Gearóid Ó Loingsigh ☭ writing in Substack on 11-June-2025.


The race riots in Ballymena have shocked some, but are not one bit surprising, not only because we have already had racial disturbances in the north of Ireland with loyalist paramilitaries kicking in people’s doors and moving them out, but because on the one hand Ballymena is a sectarian cesspit and on the other hand the riots fit right in with the logic of the Good Friday Agreement (GFA)

The GFA brought an end to the IRA’s armed campaign, its partial dissolution and disarming (no one believes that a rump muscle squad was not left standing). It also saw Sinn Féin sign up to an agreement which divided the population along sectarian lines. The text does not say Catholic or Protestant, but uses the euphemism of nationalist or unionist. As an agreement that claimed to bring an end to sectarian tensions, it could hardly say it was going to divvy up political power and the public purse along sectarian lines, but that is what it did. As everyone knows, votes in the make-believe parliament of Stormont only count if the representatives are declared to be Catholics or Protestants. There must be an overall majority and a majority within each community i.e. there must be sectarian agreement.

The public purse is shared out on the basis of a sectarian headcount as are public services. The result of course is that public housing is also shared out on a sectarian basis and when the administration slips up and allocates a house to a Catholic in what is considered a Protestant area, then the masked thugs of unionism, the loyalists of the UDA and UVF are on hand to forcibly move people out. Most housing estates are 90% Protestant (in the broad sense) or Catholic. This is not an accident it is policy.

…the position of the DUP and SF whilst in office, since 2007, has not seriously got to grips with any of this; their agreed policy positions as first expressed in the Programme for Cohesion, Sharing and Integration and then in what remains the leading policy document Together: Building a United Community, have been framed within the consociational political logic that accepts the existence of the sectarian divide, and believes that it is best addressed through seeking to maintain the ‘Unionist’ and ‘Nationalist’ communities in a state of equilibrium whilst upholding a spirit of mutual accommodation, co-existence and tolerance. Amongst much else, this has meant that ideas around mixed housing or integrated education have been held back in favour of promoting a limited number of shared neighbourhood projects, shared spaces plans and shared post-primary education sites.[1]

All this happens because the GFA says there are two communities, two cultures and that they shall be respected and maintained as such and all decisions must have the approval of the “leaders” of both communities, lest those communities influence be diluted. Of course, by leaders they not only mean elected politicians but the thugs and boot boys from the UDA and UVF. In May, less than two weeks before the Ballymena riots there were attacks in north Belfast in an attempt to “cleanse” the Clanmill estate of Catholics.[2] It is not past history.

Once you accept the nonsense of sectarian communities and people living in areas according to their religion, it is not much of a push to demand that they also be separated on the basis of other classifications such as nationalities, non-Christian religions and cultures. The unionists in Ballymena know this very well. They have a particularly nasty history of sectarianism. Many will have forgotten the disgusting spectacle of Harryville Catholic Church, where loyalists organised pickets to prevent Catholics going to mass. Harryville was a 98% Protestant neighbourhood, but had a Catholic church in it. The sectarian pickets led by DUP stalwarts saw up to 1000 people and up to 22 Loyalist Marching Bands on occasions turning up to prevent Catholics going to mass, hurling insults and abuse at them. Harryville was Protestant and no Catholics should be there was the logic. The pickets began in September 1996 and went on up till May 1998. The Catholic Church at the centre of the sectarian assault has since closed. It is no accident that this cesspool is also at the centre of racial tensions now.

The god-fearing bible thumping thugs of Ballymena claim to be motivated by sexual assaults allegedly carried out by two migrants. You may think their concern for women’s safety is touching, but you would have to ignore the record of loyalist paramilitaries on women’s rights and also that the head of the DUP, Jeffrey Donaldson, the party most of Ballymena votes for, was accused of sexually abusing, over a long period, two women without so much as a rock from the hellfire and brimstone gang. Emma Little-Pengelly, the Deputy First Minister got her seat at Stormont as Donaldson’s replacement following his decision not to take his seat there but to continue as an MP at the British parliament in London. There is no explanation for it, other than naked racism from the naked sectarians.

If you believe in and accept the logic of the GFA that there are two communities in the North and that they shall be separated forever on that basis, and that no other basis, such as social-class is to be countenanced then you are following the same logic as the Ballymena thugs. Sectarianism and racism go hand in hand, they are not distinct. and a system that shares out position, power and privilege on the basis of religion will eventually get around to doing it on the basis of race. The KKK wasn’t just anti-black it was also a sectarian organisation that detested Catholics and Jews. Loyalists share a similar political perspective and just like the official backing for Jim Crow in the southern United States, sectarianism is official in the North.

Sectarianism is not just a question of ‘religious bigotry, the promotion of one’s religion or religious background at the expense of the alternative’; it is a system. In truth, sectarianism is best interpreted as constituting an intersecting self-perpetuating matrix of social closure around land, housing, education and employment, based on the categorical markers of Protestant and Catholic that result in inequality and social injustice. This is a system centred on an interlinked and mutually reinforcing pattern of exclusion, one that results in cumulative advantage for Protestant people and disadvantage for Catholic people. It is, to be clear, a dehumanising system. And the key point to be made is that Protestant people and Catholic people still confront unequal life chances as a result of how the positional structure of society has been and continues to be overdetermined by the systemic pattern of categorical exclusion.[3]

Protestantism and Catholicism are religious fantasies, they are no basis for anything. Catholic and Protestant workers have a common interest, that of their class. They are working class and have a class enemy. That common interest extends to migrants; they are also workers. Migrants have common class interests with Protestant and Catholic workers and a common enemy. The GFA explicitly discounts this common cause and ruling out unity with migrants is the logical conclusion. Those who condemn the racist riots and intimidation in Ballymena, but support the logic of the GFA must deal with their massive and glaring contradiction: they already support division in society.

Migrants represent a challenge to the sectarianism of the North and the underlying logic of the peace process. If there are only two communities that must be kept apart, then new communities must also be separated. It is at such moments that the reactionary nature of the GFA can be seen. Opposition to racism means opposition to the sectarian set up and the GFA. Let’s not pretend that the racism in Ballymena is something distinct from the sectarianism, it is not. They are flip sides of the same coin and they are fomented by the same system and institutional set up i.e. the Good Friday Agreement and all its inherent sectarian and reactionary elements.

Working class unity means Catholic and Protestant workers side by side with migrant workers. The GFA means each should stick to their ghettoes.

References

[1] Taylor, R. (2024) Systemic sectarianism in Northern Ireland. Race & Class. Vol 66, Issue 4 pp 55-70.

[2] BBC (28/05/2025) NI leaders condemn sectarian attacks on homes. 

[3] Taylor, R. (2024) op.cit.

Gearóid Ó Loingsigh is a political and human rights activist with extensive experience in Latin America.

Ballymena Race Riots 🪶 The Good Friday Agreement In Action

Gearóid Ó Loingsigh ☭ writing in Substack on 11-June-2025.


The race riots in Ballymena have shocked some, but are not one bit surprising, not only because we have already had racial disturbances in the north of Ireland with loyalist paramilitaries kicking in people’s doors and moving them out, but because on the one hand Ballymena is a sectarian cesspit and on the other hand the riots fit right in with the logic of the Good Friday Agreement (GFA)

The GFA brought an end to the IRA’s armed campaign, its partial dissolution and disarming (no one believes that a rump muscle squad was not left standing). It also saw Sinn Féin sign up to an agreement which divided the population along sectarian lines. The text does not say Catholic or Protestant, but uses the euphemism of nationalist or unionist. As an agreement that claimed to bring an end to sectarian tensions, it could hardly say it was going to divvy up political power and the public purse along sectarian lines, but that is what it did. As everyone knows, votes in the make-believe parliament of Stormont only count if the representatives are declared to be Catholics or Protestants. There must be an overall majority and a majority within each community i.e. there must be sectarian agreement.

The public purse is shared out on the basis of a sectarian headcount as are public services. The result of course is that public housing is also shared out on a sectarian basis and when the administration slips up and allocates a house to a Catholic in what is considered a Protestant area, then the masked thugs of unionism, the loyalists of the UDA and UVF are on hand to forcibly move people out. Most housing estates are 90% Protestant (in the broad sense) or Catholic. This is not an accident it is policy.

…the position of the DUP and SF whilst in office, since 2007, has not seriously got to grips with any of this; their agreed policy positions as first expressed in the Programme for Cohesion, Sharing and Integration and then in what remains the leading policy document Together: Building a United Community, have been framed within the consociational political logic that accepts the existence of the sectarian divide, and believes that it is best addressed through seeking to maintain the ‘Unionist’ and ‘Nationalist’ communities in a state of equilibrium whilst upholding a spirit of mutual accommodation, co-existence and tolerance. Amongst much else, this has meant that ideas around mixed housing or integrated education have been held back in favour of promoting a limited number of shared neighbourhood projects, shared spaces plans and shared post-primary education sites.[1]

All this happens because the GFA says there are two communities, two cultures and that they shall be respected and maintained as such and all decisions must have the approval of the “leaders” of both communities, lest those communities influence be diluted. Of course, by leaders they not only mean elected politicians but the thugs and boot boys from the UDA and UVF. In May, less than two weeks before the Ballymena riots there were attacks in north Belfast in an attempt to “cleanse” the Clanmill estate of Catholics.[2] It is not past history.

Once you accept the nonsense of sectarian communities and people living in areas according to their religion, it is not much of a push to demand that they also be separated on the basis of other classifications such as nationalities, non-Christian religions and cultures. The unionists in Ballymena know this very well. They have a particularly nasty history of sectarianism. Many will have forgotten the disgusting spectacle of Harryville Catholic Church, where loyalists organised pickets to prevent Catholics going to mass. Harryville was a 98% Protestant neighbourhood, but had a Catholic church in it. The sectarian pickets led by DUP stalwarts saw up to 1000 people and up to 22 Loyalist Marching Bands on occasions turning up to prevent Catholics going to mass, hurling insults and abuse at them. Harryville was Protestant and no Catholics should be there was the logic. The pickets began in September 1996 and went on up till May 1998. The Catholic Church at the centre of the sectarian assault has since closed. It is no accident that this cesspool is also at the centre of racial tensions now.

The god-fearing bible thumping thugs of Ballymena claim to be motivated by sexual assaults allegedly carried out by two migrants. You may think their concern for women’s safety is touching, but you would have to ignore the record of loyalist paramilitaries on women’s rights and also that the head of the DUP, Jeffrey Donaldson, the party most of Ballymena votes for, was accused of sexually abusing, over a long period, two women without so much as a rock from the hellfire and brimstone gang. Emma Little-Pengelly, the Deputy First Minister got her seat at Stormont as Donaldson’s replacement following his decision not to take his seat there but to continue as an MP at the British parliament in London. There is no explanation for it, other than naked racism from the naked sectarians.

If you believe in and accept the logic of the GFA that there are two communities in the North and that they shall be separated forever on that basis, and that no other basis, such as social-class is to be countenanced then you are following the same logic as the Ballymena thugs. Sectarianism and racism go hand in hand, they are not distinct. and a system that shares out position, power and privilege on the basis of religion will eventually get around to doing it on the basis of race. The KKK wasn’t just anti-black it was also a sectarian organisation that detested Catholics and Jews. Loyalists share a similar political perspective and just like the official backing for Jim Crow in the southern United States, sectarianism is official in the North.

Sectarianism is not just a question of ‘religious bigotry, the promotion of one’s religion or religious background at the expense of the alternative’; it is a system. In truth, sectarianism is best interpreted as constituting an intersecting self-perpetuating matrix of social closure around land, housing, education and employment, based on the categorical markers of Protestant and Catholic that result in inequality and social injustice. This is a system centred on an interlinked and mutually reinforcing pattern of exclusion, one that results in cumulative advantage for Protestant people and disadvantage for Catholic people. It is, to be clear, a dehumanising system. And the key point to be made is that Protestant people and Catholic people still confront unequal life chances as a result of how the positional structure of society has been and continues to be overdetermined by the systemic pattern of categorical exclusion.[3]

Protestantism and Catholicism are religious fantasies, they are no basis for anything. Catholic and Protestant workers have a common interest, that of their class. They are working class and have a class enemy. That common interest extends to migrants; they are also workers. Migrants have common class interests with Protestant and Catholic workers and a common enemy. The GFA explicitly discounts this common cause and ruling out unity with migrants is the logical conclusion. Those who condemn the racist riots and intimidation in Ballymena, but support the logic of the GFA must deal with their massive and glaring contradiction: they already support division in society.

Migrants represent a challenge to the sectarianism of the North and the underlying logic of the peace process. If there are only two communities that must be kept apart, then new communities must also be separated. It is at such moments that the reactionary nature of the GFA can be seen. Opposition to racism means opposition to the sectarian set up and the GFA. Let’s not pretend that the racism in Ballymena is something distinct from the sectarianism, it is not. They are flip sides of the same coin and they are fomented by the same system and institutional set up i.e. the Good Friday Agreement and all its inherent sectarian and reactionary elements.

Working class unity means Catholic and Protestant workers side by side with migrant workers. The GFA means each should stick to their ghettoes.

References

[1] Taylor, R. (2024) Systemic sectarianism in Northern Ireland. Race & Class. Vol 66, Issue 4 pp 55-70.

[2] BBC (28/05/2025) NI leaders condemn sectarian attacks on homes. 

[3] Taylor, R. (2024) op.cit.

Gearóid Ó Loingsigh is a political and human rights activist with extensive experience in Latin America.

28 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And if we don't orientate ourselves towards "the cathederal upon the hill" where then?
    (If you were to stop and think about it you might delete the last post as you've done previously when your limited thinking has been exposed. Deleted posts with no consequences despite editorial guidance that there might be.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My reply was directed to 'chungus', that someone else commented as I replied distorts the record.
      It's an imperfect world.

      Delete
    2. The record should not be distorted.

      Are you making a specific proposal?

      Delete
    3. A specific proposal?
      I'd have to reflect upon that. However, removal of the delete comment option, has merit. I have on one or two occasions made use of it, particularly with alcohol driven late night comments.
      If the option to delete were removed perhaps people could be more reflective, more reflective and less reactionary?
      Part of the challenge with modern media is that its too free. If as a pensioner I'm ever to get ink injected into my skin it'll be to reflect my universal formula E + R = O
      That said, I'm not big into shaming people but protecting them from the consequences of their behaviour doesn't serve them well either.
      My own operating system is a two strikes policy. As my ould fella, bless him, counselled "Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me".

      Delete
    4. HJ - the delete comment option is not specific to TPQ but is a property of Blogger. We can do nothing about it.
      If somebody removes a comment that no one else has replied to, we are okay with that. As you say, the glass and comment combination do not always work well.
      In this particular case we are happy to leave things as they are.


      Delete
  3. Maybe someone on the editorial team could remind us on the policy re posters who delete posts?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Henry Joy - has a post been deleted? It will normally show something saying this comment has been deleted by the author. There is nothing here that I can see.

      Delete
    2. HJ - This is the policy:

      Nor will TPQ allow access to commenters who habitually withdraw their comments. When that happens the replies to the withdrawn comment are automatically deleted by Blogger. If your comment is not for the duration, don't post it. If you have made a typo in your initial comment or wish to make some other amendment, you can withdraw your comment and immediately repost the amended version on the condition that no one has responded to it.

      When I went to the all comments section of the blog, I noticed that the commenter using the moniker Chungus has deleted a comment from the Natsis post.

      It is not habitual on the part of the commenter and, as importantly, no one has replied to the comment so withdrawing it has had no impact on somebody else's comment.

      In that situation no action is required as no blog protocols have been breached.

      Appreciate you flagging it up, nonetheless.

      Delete
    3. He did post and then delete on the 'Natsis' article.. Remind me, and the readership in general, on editorial policy on this type of behaviour. I'm of a mind that the record ought stand. Such a policy prevents people shouting their mouth off.
      Say what you mean and mean what you say. If one says that they'll be at the crossroads, be at the crossroads or take the consequences!

      Delete
    4. HJ - there is a breach as on further scanning the page, someone else had replied.

      It is not habitual and I am working on the assumption that the commenter balked at appearing on that page. Can't fault them for that.

      If it becomes habitual, the blog policy will kick in.

      Delete
    5. HJ - you are right but I had sussed it prior to seeing your comment where you pointed it out.
      Agreed - the record ought to stand but if it is deleted by the author Blogger does not provide a facility whereby it can be retrieved by ourselves.
      As a one off we take the view that there was no malice in the withdrawal and the commenter might not have been aware of TPQ policy and merely availed of the option to withdraw which is provided by Blogger.

      Delete
  4. I don't feel that those who support the GFA necessarily support division in society. They can claim with some justification that they are supporting structures that manage the division in the least harmful way.
    We can safely assume that those more concerned with careers than a political worldview will board the gravy train whatever its hue but it is very possible to support the GFA without being responsible for the Ballymena riots or the logic that drives them. With or without the GFA the Ballymena race riots would have occurred.
    Class has failed lamentably to unite the working class in the North. The Left has failed equally lamentably to persuade people of the primacy of class over community. I would wager a bet that while racism is rampant in parts of the North the Left will be squabbling over toilets and pronouns.
    Since Laclau and Mouffe identified a problem for the Left around class as far back as 1985, the Left has failed to convincingly address it, assuming a fundamentalist stance reeking of class reductionism. Yes, the economy is key but trying to read politics from it like a car numberplate I find a futile exercise.

    ReplyDelete
  5. As the author of the piece. I should point out that the racism on display would have existed without the GFA, but the GFA institutionalised it. There are those who for whatever mistaken reason supported the GFA but stand aghast at what is happening. But the idea that there are entrenched communities and the most reactionary elements, particularly of the unionists are the legitimate reps of that community and forever more. If a migrant was elected on a migrant platform their votes wouldn't count at Stormont. There are those who support the GFA who are horrified at the racism, but that is their contradiction, which is what the article intends to provoke discussion on. How can you accept sectarian devision and oppose racial division? You can't is the answer.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The GFA institutionalised a pre-existing sectarianism. It reproduces sectarian divisions which were going to be reproduced in any event. The Left had failed to make class identity more appealing that community identity.
    It doesn't follow that the GFA institutionalised racism unless we call sectarianism racism. I think then we make the mistake of mixing up the concepts.
    Despite the institutionalism of sectarianism the racist violence is not coming from the nationalist camp but the unionist one.
    That racist hatred was not spawned by the GFA. The preexisting sectarianism once again erupted with a new type to hate.
    You can accept sectarian division as a structural reality in the North without approving it, while at the same time rejecting racism.
    I just don't subscribe to the reductionist view that racism is reducible to the GFA.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Much of the analysis I have read in the last week in relation to the racist rioting has been lazy, sectarian and partitionist. With the exception of Brian Smyth of the Green party all others appear to have retreated into sectarian trenches that were fashioned by the GFA and buttressed the NI Institutions. The GFA 2 tribes argument does not explain away the rise of the far right in the 26 counties. The "only unionists are racist" take, is as sectarian as it is partitionist given the racist riots in the Capital only a year ago and the racism that still exists across the entire North ( speak to an Irish Traveller if you need any confirmation of this?. The racism in the North that accompanies sectarianism is a by product of the failure to address the realities that accompany all "post violence" societies. The announcement of a further £100m for "communities in transition" this week should be the headline.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think it has been claimed that only the unionists are racist. Living in Leinster, it is all too evident that racism is very much a xenophobic nationalist project in this part of the country.
      While there are traces of racism in the nationalist camp in the North as evidenced by attacks on shopkeepers in West Belfast, there seems nothing comparable to the extensive racist attacks that are occurring in unionist communities.
      I don't think racism in the North can be explained as a 'by product of the failure to address the realities that accompany all "post violence" societies' any more than it can explain the rise of the far right elsewhere.
      Loyalism has always had a strong core of hatred, and given its allegiances to states like Israel and Trump's USA, it is not too difficult to imagine the drift from sectarian hatred to racist hatred.

      Delete
    2. Loyalism, and Unionism to a somewhat slightly lesser extent, remains supremacist. Scratch sectarianism or scratch racism and we'll find supremacism. What we have we hold, a limited consciousness

      Delete
  8. We will agree to disagree on this one. "traces of racism in the Nationalist Camp" would not reflect either my personal or professional life experiences. CNR community may be more subtle (sometimes) in how they express their racism, but they are as racist as the PUL communities. PUL and CNR communities in the north have a "strong core of hatred" that is openly displayed by the "othering" that both engage in. The fact that this is not acknowledged shows how the north has failed in its "post violence" recovery. From the second world war to the Balkans recovery funds were targeted at "re-education" programmes with a focus on children and young people. The desired outcomes were " rights based" tolerant societies where critical thinking and challenge were the foundations. In the north every penny was thrown at and continues to be thrown at "peace projects" that perpetuate division. The Berlin Wall fell 5 years before our ceasefire, the Bosnian conflict a year after- compare and contrast their progress with ours.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreeing to disagree is always healthy.

      I can see no evidence that the Nationalist community in the North is as racist as the unionist community. I am sure racism exists within it just as there are anti-racists amongst loyalism, but if the nationalist racism was as bad as that within unionism we would expect a manifestation of it in the type of violence we have witnessed on the streets of Ballymena or expulsions from nationalist communities of immigrants. This is Harryville/Holy Cross redux.
      As for Berlin, there is serious racism there to the point that they try to silence opposition to the genocide in Gaza. There is a huge rise in the racist far right across Germany. I am not sure it is the success story you might think.
      I don't doubt the validity of your own experience in both your professional and personal life but I don't think our understanding is advanced by generalising from personal experience.

      I think an article from you on racism within the nationalist community would be a worthwhile exercise - but no pressure.

      Delete
  9. Racism manifests in multiple ways Mackers and it is seldom that it manifests itself in the violence that we have witnessed across Ireland in the last few years. It isn't normally the violence that drives people from their homes but the "othering" that comes from living in an insular community. Racism can be conscious and sub conscious and I would suggest that tackling the subconscious racism is as important as tackling the overt form. The German Governments position on Gaza should not be used as an indicator on how well they tackled their issues post conflict nor about how welcoming they are to minority ethnic communities.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Racism does manifest itself in numerous ways. Yet it is difficult to cite subtlety without showing it. The most virulent racism manifests itself in the way that is has in the North in recent days. We can't claim there is an equivalence between burning people out, widespread rioting, expulsions and whatever latent racism you think exists within the nationalist community. There are degrees existing along a spectrum. The German government is a racist government that backed genocidal policies and suppressed opposition to such policies at home. It is the only country I can think of from the top of my head which has supported two genocides. It armed the genocidaires. It allowed a huge flow of immigration which it tried to reverse from about 2023 on. German society is much more racist today than it was fifteen years ago. There is a racist response to immigration in Germany just as there is in the North.

      Delete
  10. What absolute shite. The riots were kicked off because for some time now the romanians in Ballymena have been running various prostitution rings from many rental properties provided by unscrupulous landlords to the detriment of the whole area. Locals have told me that there are 'no go areas' due to the high number of antisocial incidents with regard to this particular group and that was something that never occurred in the town before. The people got sick of it and this attempted rape by two teenagers from this group was the last straw.

    As for tarring my entire community with a racist slur would you mind explaining to us why the other groups from overseas like the Filipinos who work, pay their National Insurance and who are all round lovely people are not similarly targeted? Or those from Peru? These lovely people integrate into the community well and enjoy living there and are most welcome.

    Don't denigrate an entire people then give me some socialist shite because your helping nobody.

    You're spouting the shinner line that it's all the Protestants fault those big bad people when the Dublin is utterly sick of them too. Where the fuck do you think this shower of shite came from? They went into Dublin because of the EU access then promptly travelled north due to , get this, no fucking border!

    No wonder I hear more and more Irish accents in Australia, and I hope to hear many more because we integrate into the local community and don't turn it into a monoethnic den. Fuck multiculturalism. Multi ethnic is laudable., but again, fuck those who spout shite without getting basic facts right.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Steve - the riots were kicked off because the racists kicked them off.

      Same as the Holy Cross hate mob or the Harryville hate mob.

      No riots when Jeffrey Donaldson was charged with a similar type of offence to the two teens in Ballymena.

      As for prostitution, the biggest clients were most likely the loudest moralisers - the bible bashers.

      It seems Ballymena was ok with the no-go concept when it tried to turn Harryville into a no go area for Catholic worshippers.

      Is there any media reports of these no go areas? I talked to a relative a lot of years ago who told me about no go areas in Bradford, but this is the first I have heard it mentioned about Ballymena.

      I don't doubt the issues you raised have caused concern for people on the ground. Society should not be allowed to pretend that there are not subcultures where certain types of activities flourish. But there is nothing specific to Romanians about this. I have a certain bias - which I do not believe is blurring my vision - in that out of all the foreign nationalities that I have encountered here, I have more friends among the Romanians. Look at the criminality that the loyalist paramilitaries are up to their neck in, with which prostitution rackets are mild by comparison. And the same paramilitaries are behind much of what is going on in Ballymena and elsewhere. Nobody coming out to evict or burn out the loyalist gangsters behind criminality.

      There is anger in communities but the race riots are the work of racists. Ballymena bigots did not discriminate between ethnic groups - they attacked the homes and property of Filipinos in their racist onslaught.

      I don't see author of the piece accusing the entire unionist community of being racist. In fact he seems, as does Muiris, to suggest equivalence between the communities. Yet, the big hate events have come from within unionism - Drumcree, Holy Cross, Harryvile and now the race riots. Those that burned the Quinn children to death were motivated by hatred not culture or community concerns. This is an elephant that cannot be imagined out of the room.

      You bring more to the table when you reflect on unionism/loyalism rather than seek to reflect it. And I don't mean that you harbour the slightest racist sentiment - I am familiar with you long enough to know you don't.

      Nor does the author spout the supposed Shinner line that it is all the fault of the Protestants - the Shinners did not like what he had to say about the GFA and had a go at him for it elsewhere. I saw no denigration of an entire community. In fact while it was not your intention, the same argument could be tossed your direction - denigration of the entire Romanian community in Ballymena. But we know how to do nuance and can see that was not your intention.

      In Dublin there was race rioting as well - the author is very familiar with Dublin and knows that. But he is writing about two different dynamics, focusing on the GFA (wrongly in my view). It was not Dublin people 'utterly sick' of immigrants that caused the race riots - it was hatred. Hard for a looter to complain about the criminality of hard working immigrants.

      Perhaps you could write a piece on Ballymena in particular or the impact in general of multiculturalism. I think contributions from both you and Muiris would be worthwhile.

      John Coulter has a very reflective and sober piece on it to feature in his column later.

      But, no pressure.

      Delete
  11. This place, the north, is a racist shithole from top to bottom and across all communities. The level of racial illiteracy on display over the last week does not inspire me with confidence that we can even start to try and get things right. I would love to write a well measured thoughtful piece on what is happening but I can not move beyond the urge to lash out and kick some one in the balls...

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yes, It was a big clumsy of me to state the GFA institutionalised racism. What it did was institutionalise sectarianism and the idea of separate communities along sectarian lines and your place in society being institutionally supported along religious lines. The migrants are a new community and it is the logical consequence that they would be seen as separate etc. As a community they have no power or influence and the GFA is all about which community is top dog in the institutions and migrants don't count. That is what I meant. As for the allegations about prostitution rings, were I to take that at face value I would have to wonder whether the UDA and UVF feel their prostitution rings are being damaged. though these are typical tropes to justify racism and I do not take them at face value.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What would be wrong about wondering if the uda and the uvf feel their prostitution rings are being dammaged?

      Does it conceed some ground to the charge of organised criminality taking place?

      The adversarial tradition frowns on any ground being ceeded but the curious tend to see it as better form.

      Delete
  13. Gearoid, I don't agree that it was clumsy of you to state that the GFA institutionalised racism. It did as an unintended consequence of its inability/ unwillingness to tackle sectarianism. If you look at the cycle of oppression model a blind man on a galloping horse could have predicted the rise in racism in the north. That is not a two tribes argument but a statement of fact- we had a post violence society that failed to address the systemic oppression that existed. This does not explain away the rise of the far right across Ireland but in one part of the island there is a political system that embeds and thrives upon the division and "internalised dominance" that exists ACROSS the North

    ReplyDelete