Gearóid Ó Loingsigh ☭ writing in Substack on 11-June-2025.


The race riots in Ballymena have shocked some, but are not one bit surprising, not only because we have already had racial disturbances in the north of Ireland with loyalist paramilitaries kicking in people’s doors and moving them out, but because on the one hand Ballymena is a sectarian cesspit and on the other hand the riots fit right in with the logic of the Good Friday Agreement (GFA)

The GFA brought an end to the IRA’s armed campaign, its partial dissolution and disarming (no one believes that a rump muscle squad was not left standing). It also saw Sinn Féin sign up to an agreement which divided the population along sectarian lines. The text does not say Catholic or Protestant, but uses the euphemism of nationalist or unionist. As an agreement that claimed to bring an end to sectarian tensions, it could hardly say it was going to divvy up political power and the public purse along sectarian lines, but that is what it did. As everyone knows, votes in the make-believe parliament of Stormont only count if the representatives are declared to be Catholics or Protestants. There must be an overall majority and a majority within each community i.e. there must be sectarian agreement.

The public purse is shared out on the basis of a sectarian headcount as are public services. The result of course is that public housing is also shared out on a sectarian basis and when the administration slips up and allocates a house to a Catholic in what is considered a Protestant area, then the masked thugs of unionism, the loyalists of the UDA and UVF are on hand to forcibly move people out. Most housing estates are 90% Protestant (in the broad sense) or Catholic. This is not an accident it is policy.

…the position of the DUP and SF whilst in office, since 2007, has not seriously got to grips with any of this; their agreed policy positions as first expressed in the Programme for Cohesion, Sharing and Integration and then in what remains the leading policy document Together: Building a United Community, have been framed within the consociational political logic that accepts the existence of the sectarian divide, and believes that it is best addressed through seeking to maintain the ‘Unionist’ and ‘Nationalist’ communities in a state of equilibrium whilst upholding a spirit of mutual accommodation, co-existence and tolerance. Amongst much else, this has meant that ideas around mixed housing or integrated education have been held back in favour of promoting a limited number of shared neighbourhood projects, shared spaces plans and shared post-primary education sites.[1]

All this happens because the GFA says there are two communities, two cultures and that they shall be respected and maintained as such and all decisions must have the approval of the “leaders” of both communities, lest those communities influence be diluted. Of course, by leaders they not only mean elected politicians but the thugs and boot boys from the UDA and UVF. In May, less than two weeks before the Ballymena riots there were attacks in north Belfast in an attempt to “cleanse” the Clanmill estate of Catholics.[2] It is not past history.

Once you accept the nonsense of sectarian communities and people living in areas according to their religion, it is not much of a push to demand that they also be separated on the basis of other classifications such as nationalities, non-Christian religions and cultures. The unionists in Ballymena know this very well. They have a particularly nasty history of sectarianism. Many will have forgotten the disgusting spectacle of Harryville Catholic Church, where loyalists organised pickets to prevent Catholics going to mass. Harryville was a 98% Protestant neighbourhood, but had a Catholic church in it. The sectarian pickets led by DUP stalwarts saw up to 1000 people and up to 22 Loyalist Marching Bands on occasions turning up to prevent Catholics going to mass, hurling insults and abuse at them. Harryville was Protestant and no Catholics should be there was the logic. The pickets began in September 1996 and went on up till May 1998. The Catholic Church at the centre of the sectarian assault has since closed. It is no accident that this cesspool is also at the centre of racial tensions now.

The god-fearing bible thumping thugs of Ballymena claim to be motivated by sexual assaults allegedly carried out by two migrants. You may think their concern for women’s safety is touching, but you would have to ignore the record of loyalist paramilitaries on women’s rights and also that the head of the DUP, Jeffrey Donaldson, the party most of Ballymena votes for, was accused of sexually abusing, over a long period, two women without so much as a rock from the hellfire and brimstone gang. Emma Little-Pengelly, the Deputy First Minister got her seat at Stormont as Donaldson’s replacement following his decision not to take his seat there but to continue as an MP at the British parliament in London. There is no explanation for it, other than naked racism from the naked sectarians.

If you believe in and accept the logic of the GFA that there are two communities in the North and that they shall be separated forever on that basis, and that no other basis, such as social-class is to be countenanced then you are following the same logic as the Ballymena thugs. Sectarianism and racism go hand in hand, they are not distinct. and a system that shares out position, power and privilege on the basis of religion will eventually get around to doing it on the basis of race. The KKK wasn’t just anti-black it was also a sectarian organisation that detested Catholics and Jews. Loyalists share a similar political perspective and just like the official backing for Jim Crow in the southern United States, sectarianism is official in the North.

Sectarianism is not just a question of ‘religious bigotry, the promotion of one’s religion or religious background at the expense of the alternative’; it is a system. In truth, sectarianism is best interpreted as constituting an intersecting self-perpetuating matrix of social closure around land, housing, education and employment, based on the categorical markers of Protestant and Catholic that result in inequality and social injustice. This is a system centred on an interlinked and mutually reinforcing pattern of exclusion, one that results in cumulative advantage for Protestant people and disadvantage for Catholic people. It is, to be clear, a dehumanising system. And the key point to be made is that Protestant people and Catholic people still confront unequal life chances as a result of how the positional structure of society has been and continues to be overdetermined by the systemic pattern of categorical exclusion.[3]

Protestantism and Catholicism are religious fantasies, they are no basis for anything. Catholic and Protestant workers have a common interest, that of their class. They are working class and have a class enemy. That common interest extends to migrants; they are also workers. Migrants have common class interests with Protestant and Catholic workers and a common enemy. The GFA explicitly discounts this common cause and ruling out unity with migrants is the logical conclusion. Those who condemn the racist riots and intimidation in Ballymena, but support the logic of the GFA must deal with their massive and glaring contradiction: they already support division in society.

Migrants represent a challenge to the sectarianism of the North and the underlying logic of the peace process. If there are only two communities that must be kept apart, then new communities must also be separated. It is at such moments that the reactionary nature of the GFA can be seen. Opposition to racism means opposition to the sectarian set up and the GFA. Let’s not pretend that the racism in Ballymena is something distinct from the sectarianism, it is not. They are flip sides of the same coin and they are fomented by the same system and institutional set up i.e. the Good Friday Agreement and all its inherent sectarian and reactionary elements.

Working class unity means Catholic and Protestant workers side by side with migrant workers. The GFA means each should stick to their ghettoes.

References

[1] Taylor, R. (2024) Systemic sectarianism in Northern Ireland. Race & Class. Vol 66, Issue 4 pp 55-70.

[2] BBC (28/05/2025) NI leaders condemn sectarian attacks on homes. 

[3] Taylor, R. (2024) op.cit.

Gearóid Ó Loingsigh is a political and human rights activist with extensive experience in Latin America.

Ballymena Race Riots 🪶 The Good Friday Agreement In Action

Gearóid Ó Loingsigh ☭ writing in Substack on 11-June-2025.


The race riots in Ballymena have shocked some, but are not one bit surprising, not only because we have already had racial disturbances in the north of Ireland with loyalist paramilitaries kicking in people’s doors and moving them out, but because on the one hand Ballymena is a sectarian cesspit and on the other hand the riots fit right in with the logic of the Good Friday Agreement (GFA)

The GFA brought an end to the IRA’s armed campaign, its partial dissolution and disarming (no one believes that a rump muscle squad was not left standing). It also saw Sinn Féin sign up to an agreement which divided the population along sectarian lines. The text does not say Catholic or Protestant, but uses the euphemism of nationalist or unionist. As an agreement that claimed to bring an end to sectarian tensions, it could hardly say it was going to divvy up political power and the public purse along sectarian lines, but that is what it did. As everyone knows, votes in the make-believe parliament of Stormont only count if the representatives are declared to be Catholics or Protestants. There must be an overall majority and a majority within each community i.e. there must be sectarian agreement.

The public purse is shared out on the basis of a sectarian headcount as are public services. The result of course is that public housing is also shared out on a sectarian basis and when the administration slips up and allocates a house to a Catholic in what is considered a Protestant area, then the masked thugs of unionism, the loyalists of the UDA and UVF are on hand to forcibly move people out. Most housing estates are 90% Protestant (in the broad sense) or Catholic. This is not an accident it is policy.

…the position of the DUP and SF whilst in office, since 2007, has not seriously got to grips with any of this; their agreed policy positions as first expressed in the Programme for Cohesion, Sharing and Integration and then in what remains the leading policy document Together: Building a United Community, have been framed within the consociational political logic that accepts the existence of the sectarian divide, and believes that it is best addressed through seeking to maintain the ‘Unionist’ and ‘Nationalist’ communities in a state of equilibrium whilst upholding a spirit of mutual accommodation, co-existence and tolerance. Amongst much else, this has meant that ideas around mixed housing or integrated education have been held back in favour of promoting a limited number of shared neighbourhood projects, shared spaces plans and shared post-primary education sites.[1]

All this happens because the GFA says there are two communities, two cultures and that they shall be respected and maintained as such and all decisions must have the approval of the “leaders” of both communities, lest those communities influence be diluted. Of course, by leaders they not only mean elected politicians but the thugs and boot boys from the UDA and UVF. In May, less than two weeks before the Ballymena riots there were attacks in north Belfast in an attempt to “cleanse” the Clanmill estate of Catholics.[2] It is not past history.

Once you accept the nonsense of sectarian communities and people living in areas according to their religion, it is not much of a push to demand that they also be separated on the basis of other classifications such as nationalities, non-Christian religions and cultures. The unionists in Ballymena know this very well. They have a particularly nasty history of sectarianism. Many will have forgotten the disgusting spectacle of Harryville Catholic Church, where loyalists organised pickets to prevent Catholics going to mass. Harryville was a 98% Protestant neighbourhood, but had a Catholic church in it. The sectarian pickets led by DUP stalwarts saw up to 1000 people and up to 22 Loyalist Marching Bands on occasions turning up to prevent Catholics going to mass, hurling insults and abuse at them. Harryville was Protestant and no Catholics should be there was the logic. The pickets began in September 1996 and went on up till May 1998. The Catholic Church at the centre of the sectarian assault has since closed. It is no accident that this cesspool is also at the centre of racial tensions now.

The god-fearing bible thumping thugs of Ballymena claim to be motivated by sexual assaults allegedly carried out by two migrants. You may think their concern for women’s safety is touching, but you would have to ignore the record of loyalist paramilitaries on women’s rights and also that the head of the DUP, Jeffrey Donaldson, the party most of Ballymena votes for, was accused of sexually abusing, over a long period, two women without so much as a rock from the hellfire and brimstone gang. Emma Little-Pengelly, the Deputy First Minister got her seat at Stormont as Donaldson’s replacement following his decision not to take his seat there but to continue as an MP at the British parliament in London. There is no explanation for it, other than naked racism from the naked sectarians.

If you believe in and accept the logic of the GFA that there are two communities in the North and that they shall be separated forever on that basis, and that no other basis, such as social-class is to be countenanced then you are following the same logic as the Ballymena thugs. Sectarianism and racism go hand in hand, they are not distinct. and a system that shares out position, power and privilege on the basis of religion will eventually get around to doing it on the basis of race. The KKK wasn’t just anti-black it was also a sectarian organisation that detested Catholics and Jews. Loyalists share a similar political perspective and just like the official backing for Jim Crow in the southern United States, sectarianism is official in the North.

Sectarianism is not just a question of ‘religious bigotry, the promotion of one’s religion or religious background at the expense of the alternative’; it is a system. In truth, sectarianism is best interpreted as constituting an intersecting self-perpetuating matrix of social closure around land, housing, education and employment, based on the categorical markers of Protestant and Catholic that result in inequality and social injustice. This is a system centred on an interlinked and mutually reinforcing pattern of exclusion, one that results in cumulative advantage for Protestant people and disadvantage for Catholic people. It is, to be clear, a dehumanising system. And the key point to be made is that Protestant people and Catholic people still confront unequal life chances as a result of how the positional structure of society has been and continues to be overdetermined by the systemic pattern of categorical exclusion.[3]

Protestantism and Catholicism are religious fantasies, they are no basis for anything. Catholic and Protestant workers have a common interest, that of their class. They are working class and have a class enemy. That common interest extends to migrants; they are also workers. Migrants have common class interests with Protestant and Catholic workers and a common enemy. The GFA explicitly discounts this common cause and ruling out unity with migrants is the logical conclusion. Those who condemn the racist riots and intimidation in Ballymena, but support the logic of the GFA must deal with their massive and glaring contradiction: they already support division in society.

Migrants represent a challenge to the sectarianism of the North and the underlying logic of the peace process. If there are only two communities that must be kept apart, then new communities must also be separated. It is at such moments that the reactionary nature of the GFA can be seen. Opposition to racism means opposition to the sectarian set up and the GFA. Let’s not pretend that the racism in Ballymena is something distinct from the sectarianism, it is not. They are flip sides of the same coin and they are fomented by the same system and institutional set up i.e. the Good Friday Agreement and all its inherent sectarian and reactionary elements.

Working class unity means Catholic and Protestant workers side by side with migrant workers. The GFA means each should stick to their ghettoes.

References

[1] Taylor, R. (2024) Systemic sectarianism in Northern Ireland. Race & Class. Vol 66, Issue 4 pp 55-70.

[2] BBC (28/05/2025) NI leaders condemn sectarian attacks on homes. 

[3] Taylor, R. (2024) op.cit.

Gearóid Ó Loingsigh is a political and human rights activist with extensive experience in Latin America.

13 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And if we don't orientate ourselves towards "the cathederal upon the hill" where then?
    (If you were to stop and think about it you might delete the last post as you've done previously when your limited thinking has been exposed. Deleted posts with no consequences despite editorial guidance that there might be.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My reply was directed to 'chungus', that someone else commented as I replied distorts the record.
      It's an imperfect world.

      Delete
    2. The record should not be distorted.

      Are you making a specific proposal?

      Delete
    3. A specific proposal?
      I'd have to reflect upon that. However, removal of the delete comment option, has merit. I have on one or two occasions made use of it, particularly with alcohol driven late night comments.
      If the option to delete were removed perhaps people could be more reflective, more reflective and less reactionary?
      Part of the challenge with modern media is that its too free. If as a pensioner I'm ever to get ink injected into my skin it'll be to reflect my universal formula E + R = O
      That said, I'm not big into shaming people but protecting them from the consequences of their behaviour doesn't serve them well either.
      My own operating system is a two strikes policy. As my ould fella, bless him, counselled "Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me".

      Delete
    4. HJ - the delete comment option is not specific to TPQ but is a property of Blogger. We can do nothing about it.
      If somebody removes a comment that no one else has replied to, we are okay with that. As you say, the glass and comment combination do not always work well.
      In this particular case we are happy to leave things as they are.


      Delete
  3. Maybe someone on the editorial team could remind us on the policy re posters who delete posts?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Henry Joy - has a post been deleted? It will normally show something saying this comment has been deleted by the author. There is nothing here that I can see.

      Delete
    2. HJ - This is the policy:

      Nor will TPQ allow access to commenters who habitually withdraw their comments. When that happens the replies to the withdrawn comment are automatically deleted by Blogger. If your comment is not for the duration, don't post it. If you have made a typo in your initial comment or wish to make some other amendment, you can withdraw your comment and immediately repost the amended version on the condition that no one has responded to it.

      When I went to the all comments section of the blog, I noticed that the commenter using the moniker Chungus has deleted a comment from the Natsis post.

      It is not habitual on the part of the commenter and, as importantly, no one has replied to the comment so withdrawing it has had no impact on somebody else's comment.

      In that situation no action is required as no blog protocols have been breached.

      Appreciate you flagging it up, nonetheless.

      Delete
    3. He did post and then delete on the 'Natsis' article.. Remind me, and the readership in general, on editorial policy on this type of behaviour. I'm of a mind that the record ought stand. Such a policy prevents people shouting their mouth off.
      Say what you mean and mean what you say. If one says that they'll be at the crossroads, be at the crossroads or take the consequences!

      Delete
    4. HJ - there is a breach as on further scanning the page, someone else had replied.

      It is not habitual and I am working on the assumption that the commenter balked at appearing on that page. Can't fault them for that.

      If it becomes habitual, the blog policy will kick in.

      Delete
    5. HJ - you are right but I had sussed it prior to seeing your comment where you pointed it out.
      Agreed - the record ought to stand but if it is deleted by the author Blogger does not provide a facility whereby it can be retrieved by ourselves.
      As a one off we take the view that there was no malice in the withdrawal and the commenter might not have been aware of TPQ policy and merely availed of the option to withdraw which is provided by Blogger.

      Delete
  4. I don't feel that those who support the GFA necessarily support division in society. They can claim with some justification that they are supporting structures that manage the division in the least harmful way.
    We can safely assume that those more concerned with careers than a political worldview will board the gravy train whatever its hue but it is very possible to support the GFA without being responsible for the Ballymena riots or the logic that drives them. With or without the GFA the Ballymena race riots would have occurred.
    Class has failed lamentably to unite the working class in the North. The Left has failed equally lamentably to persuade people of the primacy of class over community. I would wager a bet that while racism is rampant in parts of the North the Left will be squabbling over toilets and pronouns.
    Since Laclau and Mouffe identified a problem for the Left around class as far back as 1985, the Left has failed to convincingly address it, assuming a fundamentalist stance reeking of class reductionism. Yes, the economy is key but trying to read politics from it like a car numberplate I find a futile exercise.

    ReplyDelete