Lena M writing in Atheist Republic flags up yet another clerical sex abuse scandal. 


Photo Credits: Wikimedia

The Vatican police arrested Monsignor Carlo Alberto Capella — who was one of the church's diplomats accredited to Washington — on suspicion of possessing child pornography. Monsignor Capella was recalled from the Vatican Embassy in August and at that time the police in Windsor, Canada, said they had issued an arrest warrant for him on suspicion of possessing and distributing images of child abuse on the internet. After an investigation, which led to a warrant issued by the Holy See’s chief magistrate, Capella was arrested in the Vatican. The accusation is based on articles of the law signed by Pope Francis in 2013 which are related to images of child sexual abuse.

But this is not the first time Capella was accused of child porn abuse, and the Vatican tried to protect him at first. The Holy See was notified of a possible violation of laws by a member of their diplomatic corps accredited in Washington by the State Department, and the Vatican denied the United States’ request to waive diplomatic immunity. If the Vatican accepted this request, the offender could have been charged in the United States. At that time, the Vatican refused to identify the diplomat, but there were strong indications that it was Monsignor Capella.

According to The Guardian, Capella’s case is the worst involving a diplomat since 2013 when former Archbishop Jozef Wesolowski faced charges of paying boys for sexual acts, downloading and buying pedophile material while he was the Vatican’s ambassador in the Dominican Republic. He was recalled to Rome by the Vatican, arrested and stripped of his duties after an investigation by Dominican magistrates. He died at the hospital in 2015 at the age of 67 before his trial at a Vatican court could begin.

If convicted after his trial at the Vatican, Monsignor Capella could possibly face up to 12 years in prison. But this may not be likely since, in 2011, the Vatican held a trial for a priest who was a “notorious sex abuser” decades earlier, — he was found guilty of sexual abuse — but was only forced to retire and sentenced to a lifetime of "penance and prayer". Also, this inappropriate sentence came 27 years after the first complaints about him were made.

Although the Pontiff declared zero tolerance for the abuse that occurs in churches, it looks like the Vatican is not doing enough to prevent misconduct. This case may look like a step forward, but still the question remains why the Vatican refused to waive Capella's diplomatic immunity in the USA; then they arrest him and hold him for trial. If a man is guilty he should be adequately sentenced —and "penance and prayer" is not that type of sentence. 



Follow Atheist Republic on Twitter @AtheistRepublic

A Catholic Monsignor Arrested By Vatican Police

Lena M writing in Atheist Republic flags up yet another clerical sex abuse scandal. 


Photo Credits: Wikimedia

The Vatican police arrested Monsignor Carlo Alberto Capella — who was one of the church's diplomats accredited to Washington — on suspicion of possessing child pornography. Monsignor Capella was recalled from the Vatican Embassy in August and at that time the police in Windsor, Canada, said they had issued an arrest warrant for him on suspicion of possessing and distributing images of child abuse on the internet. After an investigation, which led to a warrant issued by the Holy See’s chief magistrate, Capella was arrested in the Vatican. The accusation is based on articles of the law signed by Pope Francis in 2013 which are related to images of child sexual abuse.

But this is not the first time Capella was accused of child porn abuse, and the Vatican tried to protect him at first. The Holy See was notified of a possible violation of laws by a member of their diplomatic corps accredited in Washington by the State Department, and the Vatican denied the United States’ request to waive diplomatic immunity. If the Vatican accepted this request, the offender could have been charged in the United States. At that time, the Vatican refused to identify the diplomat, but there were strong indications that it was Monsignor Capella.

According to The Guardian, Capella’s case is the worst involving a diplomat since 2013 when former Archbishop Jozef Wesolowski faced charges of paying boys for sexual acts, downloading and buying pedophile material while he was the Vatican’s ambassador in the Dominican Republic. He was recalled to Rome by the Vatican, arrested and stripped of his duties after an investigation by Dominican magistrates. He died at the hospital in 2015 at the age of 67 before his trial at a Vatican court could begin.

If convicted after his trial at the Vatican, Monsignor Capella could possibly face up to 12 years in prison. But this may not be likely since, in 2011, the Vatican held a trial for a priest who was a “notorious sex abuser” decades earlier, — he was found guilty of sexual abuse — but was only forced to retire and sentenced to a lifetime of "penance and prayer". Also, this inappropriate sentence came 27 years after the first complaints about him were made.

Although the Pontiff declared zero tolerance for the abuse that occurs in churches, it looks like the Vatican is not doing enough to prevent misconduct. This case may look like a step forward, but still the question remains why the Vatican refused to waive Capella's diplomatic immunity in the USA; then they arrest him and hold him for trial. If a man is guilty he should be adequately sentenced —and "penance and prayer" is not that type of sentence. 



Follow Atheist Republic on Twitter @AtheistRepublic

3 comments:

  1. The whole "judicial process within the vatican is beneath contempt, "penance and prayer" fuck's sake. The problem lies in parishoners acquiescence of vatican authority, further afield there remains an almost defence of paedophiles within the exended Catholic community. I've had people like myself, atheist who was brought up catholic, "Catholic atheist" as I've heard us jokingly referred to who when discussing paedophilia within the Church say things like " it's not just the Catholic Church" as if that is somehow relevant. It seems we have amazingly managed to put child rape in sectarian terms. How do practising Catholics marry their attendance at church and messages of love with the cover up and acceptance of child rape? Just curious.

    ReplyDelete
  2. David,

    I feel it's moral authority has eroded as its immersion in the rape culture has been exposed. The notion that clerics have anything worthwhile to say on moral matters is very tenuous. I think there has to be a correlation between the upsurge in support for abortion rights and the depreciation of Church standing resulting from its endless child rape scandals. I guess for some if the church opposes something it must be worthy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anthony,
    I hope it's moral authority has eroded and this generation's common sense over religious doctrine attitude in things like abortion is refreshing, but I still think the church has too much power over people's rationale. lost count of the amount of times i've heard otherwise sound people, people who have a desire for social justice, make excuses for the most grotesque lack of justice when it comes to Catholicism. I've not commented or read the tpq as much for a long time. Disillusioned with politics, republicanism as a worthwile concept no longer is relevant, can't relate with the modern left, although i find myself agreeing more with the right their kowtowing to corporate interest and authority shows their true colours. Am a political nomad. Through absence you forget the platform youse give to many important issues. Fair play to youse

    ReplyDelete