Showing posts with label Sweden. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sweden. Show all posts
Azar Majedi ✊ On Tuesday 4th of January 10 people were killed and several others injured in a mass shooting at an adult education centre in the city of Örebro, Sweden. 

A significant number of students are immigrants who attend the school to learn Swedish or various professions. The police quickly ruled out what they described as “ideological” motive.

“Officers said he had no links to gangs and is thought to have acted “without any ideological motive.”

“They also do not believe the attack was motivated by terrorists.”*

Some reports stated that he suffered from mental disorder. The official and broadcast narrative is that he was a loner with mental health issues, as it’s usually the case with white non-Moslem mass shooters! This is at best ignoring and at worst a deliberate covering up of the real motive behind such a murderous attack.

Firstly, there is a video of the attacker chanting: “Leave Europe!” This slogan is enough to call the motive at least racist. Furthermore, you don’t have to be a psychiatrist to understand that anyone who takes a gun and shoots into a crowd, regardless of their proclaimed motivation, must suffer from a mental illness or disorder. The mental illness explanation is a deliberate sidetrack from the real issue. Why would this “psychopath” attack a group of refugees and immigrants from the Middle East who are associated with Islam? The deep-rooted racism and hatred of refugees, Muslims, Arabs, blacks, and Africans is the narrative that has dominated the brain of this psychopath and has been promoted in the society by the ruling class.

Creating division, hatred and hostility in society is a classic and well-known method of the bourgeoisie. In times of crisis, this method becomes more widespread and intense. And this is the situation we are now facing in the world and in the West. The rapid growth of fascism in the West is astonishing. Right-wing and even officially fascist parties are coming to power in Europe. Repression and censorship are rampant. Poverty and deprivation have spread enormously. Governments openly and brazenly speak of the forced migration of hundreds of thousands of refugees to the slave camps they have erected in Africa. The pretence of "humanitarianism" and respect for democracy has been completely abandoned.

It is in these circumstances that we are witnessing the rise of violent attacks on groups of people. This painful and frightening event raises two questions once again: 

  1. the root of the growth of such events
  2. why are the police, the government and the media treating these crimes differently?

The rise of fascism, the deepening of hatred and hostility

Whenever racist and right-wing propaganda rises, so do blind, hate-based crimes and racist incitement against refugees and immigrants, especially from the Middle East, Africa and Muslim background. It has spread rapidly throughout Europe, including Sweden. In recent years, Swedish society has shifted sharply to the right. It joined NATO last year and is considered one of the active forces inciting NATO's war with Russia. The government is currently in the hands of a right-wing-fascist coalition.

Such attacks and crimes happen in a negative and hateful environment. With the aid of media and by creating fear and hatred in society, creating artificial confrontations between different sectors based on race, religion and nationality the ruling class resort to spreading false narratives. Provocative and hostile propaganda against refugees and immigrants and against Muslims has been growing in Sweden and Europe for years. Demonization of Muslim people, especially Muslim men, Africans and Arabs has reached disgusting dimensions.

One way to counter this atmosphere is to question and expose this propaganda. For example, during the racist-fascist riots in England, we witnessed widespread demonstrations against racism and in support of refugees. The project of forcibly sending refugees to Rwanda was initiated and pursued by Britain. However, numerous attempts by the government to implement it were unsuccessful due to large demonstrations and pickets. Now Germany has decided to benefit from the facilities for the detention of refugees in Rwanda. Sensitivity and awareness of this issue are of great importance. One way to counter the rise of fascism is through exposing their lies and objectives and by organising protests and actions. Active defence of human rights of refugees must become an important issue in our struggle against fascism, censorship and the state’s suppressive measures. The Western world now treats refugees like slaves. This is a disgrace to humanity. Fascism is investing in this. It must be reversed.

Muslim and non-Muslim attacker

Whenever the aggressor is Muslim or of Muslim descent, it is immediately and without any investigation labelled a terrorist operation and a terrorist attacker. This is what the police say, what the media reports, and what the people describe. If the attacker is black, or the attack happens inside the ghettos where most refugees live, the crime will be describe as “gang” crime. If he is non-Muslim and white, they call it a crime committed by a loaner who suffers from mental disorder. There is no need to go into great detail. Let's just look at a few recent events.

In the latest case (in Sweden) the police declared that the attack was individual and not related to terrorism or gangs. How did the police, who declared that they are still investigating and do not know the reasons and motives, come to such a decisive conclusion so quickly that they have eliminated terrorism and gangs and called the motive purely personal? Let us recall that in recent months there have been two individual attacks on groups of people in Germany. In the first case, a young man from Afghanistan was identified as the perpetrator of the incident. Immediately, everyone from the media to the authorities, including the Iranian left, called this person a terrorist and the operation a terrorist one. No one has yet conducted any investigation into the motives of this person and his connection to an Islamic terrorist group. The cry of Islamic terrorism was unabashedly raised and a call for a war against Islamic terrorism and against Muslims was issued.

A few months later, a similar action was carried out in Germany, this time by an immigrant from Saudi Arabia. The cry of terrorism was not raised, but silenced. Why? This person was a well-known Ex-Muslim and, by his own admission, hated Muslims. In a short time, terrorism was renamed "psychosis" and pages were written about his mental problems and that he was not a true Ex- Muslim.

Every year, there are a few hundred mass-shootings in America. (Last year there were 488 cases.) Hundreds of people are killed. They are usually categorised as “Psychosis", "trauma" and “PTSD” related crimes, and soon forgotten by the media and government officials.

If trauma and PTSD are supposed to be the root and reason for so many crimes committed by "white people," which is very likely to be the case, why is a similar action not considered "psychosis" or trauma by an Afghan, Iraqi, Syrian, Libyan, Palestinian, and Sudanese whose entire lives have been imbued with the deepest and the most painful traumas due to the bombs and crimes of the United States, Israel, and NATO? Targeted racism, creating prejudice, and open discrimination against certain people are the answers to this question.

Categorising criminal offenses in this manner is highly discriminatory and biased. When the police, officials or media categorise an attacker who is Muslim as a terrorist, they deprive the offender of any possibility of impartial justice. They issue a verdict before trial by branding the attacker as a terrorist. Moreover, this method intensifies and provokes racist and blind violence by creating a false fear against a section of the population.

The dominant narrative of Islam has blinded the eyes to such an extent that any logic, fairness, impartiality and indiscriminate justice, have been set aside. The word Islam and Muslim immediately sounds the alarm of terrorism in the traumatised brains of anti-Islamists. Over the past thirty years, American imperialism in its war of destruction against Middle East, calling it “The New World Order” has created and promoted a false narrative: “the clash of civilisations”, The West against Islam. By doing so, it has demonised millions of people simply because they believe in a certain religion or belong to a society in which that religion is dominant. Over the past thirty years, a dark and demonic image of these people has been transmitted to the world. It is true that Islamic terrorist groups have committed brutal crimes, but these groups are created by America, Israel and the West. Al-Qaeda, ISIS and Hamas all three emerged from the CIA, Mossad and MI6. The Islamic Republic was imposed on the Iranian people's revolution through a regime change by the West. Just as the former leader of ISIS-Al-Qaeda has now become the President of Syria with a change of decor.

We must try to expose and reject the dominant false and provocative narratives. We are in a dangerous situation. Each of these events, large and small, is a warning of a dark and bleak future; these alarms must be taken seriously. The effort to build a solid barrier against fascism and right-wing reaction that is attacking society from all sides must become a priority for leftist and communist forces, as well as progressive and freedom-loving movements.

Reference

*BBC

Asar Majedi is a Member of Hekmatist Party leadership & Chairperson of Organisation for Women’s Liberation

Terrorism Or Mental Disorder? Manipulating The Narratives 🪶 Mass Shooting in Sweden

Jan Guillon ✒ with a piece that featured in two Swedish newspapers. Recommended by Eva Sennesvik.

Sweden signed a defence deal. It looks like Sweden has been at war with the US and lost, writes Jan Guillon in this note that was printed in Aftonbladet 25th of February -23 and printed in Norwegian translation in Klassekampen 9th of March - 23.

It looks like Sweden has been at war with the US and lost. At least when you read the latest defence deal between our (Swedish) government and the US government. It introduces American sovereignty in Sweden.

This is of course not the image conveyed in media. From Rapports (Swedish news) coverage I only remember images of a tiny, happy Swedish defence minister and a huge, grumpy American defence minister signing the secret deal, as if it was an ordinary routine deal. It is not. It is unique in our history and has unfathomable consequences. It’s about complete submission.

Right at the beginning of the deal it states that the US shall have “unlimited access to and use of predetermined bases and areas”.

Exactly. What are these predetermined bases and areas? They are listed on page 37. It involves All Swedish air-bases, and all military installations, 17 in total. In practice this means that the US will have unlimited control of all of the Swedish defence system, unhindered, power.

On undefined defence installations certain areas will be closed off as “only US military access”, where US jurisdiction will apply. But not only that. “On request” the US will have rights to use private lands, property, roads, ports and airports.

The States are also at liberty to “develop areas and facilities” for storage and defence equipment. There are no limitations for weaponry, not even nuclear arms (article 14), The parties “may consult on the aforementioned to the extent it is deemed necessary.”

Over a great number of pages the rights and benefits American soldiers based in Sweden shall have. American personnel, their families and civilian employees will be exempt from normal passport and visa demands. American military ID will be used in their place. Swedish Security police shall not control or put surveillance on American personnel. All cars owned by American personnel will have untraceable Swedish numberplates. All American personnel is exempt from paying tax, including taxation on purchases, even through customs bringing purchases in or out of Sweden, including unlimited sums of currency. American airplanes shall have unlimited access to Swedish airspace, just like all American ships will have unlimited access to Swedish territorial waters.

American airplanes nor ships can be inspected by Swedish authorities and so on in a very long list of decisions.

Sweden will forgo all criminal jurisdiction (article 12) when it comes to American personnel, their families and civilian employees. But in a slight contradiction it says: "if a member of the American forces or a family member is prosecuted by Swedish police, the jurisdiction is in the hands of Swedish courts.”

It sounds reasonable. But; “cannot be prosecuted in absentia” (12:4) , and if the trial lasts longer than a year it is void. As Swedish police cannot enter American suspects on their base, the American soldiers can in effect, together with the Swedish head of State, enjoy full immunity against prosecutions.

Civil law claims can not be directed at American personnel (article 15), and the list goes on to tiny issues like exemptions from paying TV- licence, but having to pay for bridge/ferry fees. And finally the not so surprising decision that Swedish trade union rules/rights are deemed null and void on American bases. (page 36)

The American contract makers – there are no traces of Swedish ones – seem to have thought about everything. But they do have experience from all the countries they have occupied earlier. Maybe they just took the capitulation agreement from, for example, Iraq down from a shelf and adjusted it a little.

Even the right to have their own tax-free zones for recreation, shopping, entertainment, hamburger bars and tax free alcohol has been examined.

The Swedish government may have put Swedish defence systems in the hands of Trump.

This Swedish submission to a superpower isn’t completely unique. But one has to go back to the second have of the 1700’s to find anything similar. Back then it was Russia who controlled Swedish foreign policies for a while.

This new submission is however voluntary and has nothing to do with NATO. The contract is strictly between Sweden and the US. Come Autumn we might see that the Kristofferson (Swedish PM) - government may have put Sweden’s defence in president Donald Trump's hands, even if he pulls the US out of NATO.

This is a scandal like no other. It is absolutely mind boggling how this could happen in secret, without it being discussed by the political opposition in the Foreign affairs Committee. Because that’s the way it must have happened. The other parties can’t have agreed with this and kept their mouths shut? And what were the government thinking? Are the “nationalists” in Swedish Democrats also prepared to sell Sweden’s sovereignty and shut up about it too? Who really wants to make Sweden Russia’s prime target in Europe in case of war? There are about 126 questions to ask in this the greatest political scandal in my lifetime. I generously leave that job to my younger journalist colleagues. Go!

A Note On American Military Bases In Sweden

Science Magazine ✒ Schools in Sweden emphasized keeping hands clean, but neither students nor teachers wore masks. Keeping schools open without masks or quarantines doubled Swedish teachers’ Covid-19 risk.

Gretchen Vogel

A careful analysis of health data from Sweden suggests keeping schools open with only minimal precautions in the spring roughly doubled teachers’ risk of being diagnosed with the pandemic coronavirus. Their partners faced a 29% higher risk of becoming infected than partners of teachers who shifted to teaching online. Parents of children in school were 17% more likely to be diagnosed with Covid-19 than those whose children were in remote learning. 

Whether the harms of school closures outweigh the risks of virus transmission in classrooms and hallways has been the subject of intense debate around the world. Outbreaks have demonstrated that the virus can spread via schools to the wider community at least occasionally, and some data suggest teachers have higher than average risk of infection. However, it has been difficult to separate school-based transmission from other confounding factors, especially because schools have tended to open or close in concert with other restrictions lifting or tightening.

Continue reading @ Science Magazine.

Swedish Schools ➖ Masks, Quarantines & Risk

Aron Flam ➨ police seized thousands of copies of my book This is a Swedish Tiger.

 
At 9.15 on the morning of 11 June 2020, armed police wearing bulletproof vests raided my offices south of Stockholm and confiscated 1.5 tons of the third edition of my book, This is a Swedish Tiger.

Personally, I was in the bathroom at home doing what most normal people do late summer mornings in June. The staff of the offices I rent as a warehouse informed me of the bust via text message. Why the police showed up with bulletproof vests and visibly armed is beyond me. Maybe they were expecting fierce resistance or they just wanted to intimidate me? Both of which would probably have happened had I not been in the bathroom at home, defecating.

I’m not saying I would have mounted violent resistance but, slightly neurotic as I am, I would probably have defended myself and my books with a barrage of critical questions along the lines of, ‘Please officer, is this really necessary?’, or ‘Will you keep them in a dry place?’ – questions from which I seriously doubt their bulletproof vests and pistols would have protected them.

Continue reading @ Spiked Online.

The Swedish Authorities Want To Ban My Book

From UnHerd ➤ the Swedish expert who thinks lockdowns are the wrong way to go in combatting Covid-19. 
By Freddy Sayers




That was one of the more extraordinary interviews we have done here at UnHerd.


Professor Johan Giesecke, one of the world’s most senior epidemiologists, advisor to the Swedish Government (he hired Anders Tegnell who is currently directing Swedish strategy), the first Chief Scientist of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, and an advisor to the director general of the WHO, lays out with typically Swedish bluntness why he thinks:

Continue reading @ UnHerd.

Swedish Expert ➤ Why Lockdowns Are The Wrong Policy

From Slate ➤ a Swedish citizen returns home and is appalled at the anti-Covid-19 measures in place. 

By Erik Augustin Palm 


Swedish exceptionalism is a concept that Sweden has marketed well, in everything from the arts to pop culture, tech, and science. To be sure, there have been many talented Swedes deserving of international recognition: August Strindberg, Ingmar Bergman, ABBA, Robyn, Ludwig Göransson, the founders of Spotify and Skype, and—of course—Alfred Nobel, just to name a few. Sweden’s generous social welfare system, meanwhile, is often held up by envious American progressives as a model to emulate.

With its response to the COVID-19 pandemic, though, Sweden’s upright image has been tarnished. Over the past few weeks, the world has watched as Sweden’s public health agency has largely ignored international scientific consensus on the most efficient and lifesaving response to COVID-19: social distancing.

Sweden is the only nation in the group of more economically developed countries taking an almost entirely laissez-faire approach to the pandemic. As a native Swede who has been based in the United States for the past 10 years and recently made a temporary return to my home country, I have found it difficult to experience Sweden’s uniquely incautious yet self-assured response, even if it hasn’t been entirely unpredictable. Sweden’s problematic approach has many layers.

Continue reading @ Slate.

I Just Came Home To Sweden ➤ I’m Horrified By The Coronavirus Response Here

From UnHerd ➤how Sweden is responding to the Covid-19. 
By Freddie Sayers.

My Swedish passport has always felt a bit like a secret weapon. As a half-Swede who grew up in England, I have wielded it on countless occasions to get out of scrapes and escape judgement. As a national brand, it is almost beyond reproach — you flash your passport and sail through customs in countries from Israel to Sudan, greeted by special smiles of welcome like a visiting dignitary. Survey after survey confirms the same thing: everybody loves the Swedes.

Politically, the Swedes have long served as pin-ups for both the Left and Right. Bernie Sanders makes constant reference to Sweden as a model for his brand of ‘democratic socialism’, while David Cameron used to regularly seek inspiration from his Swedish counterparts on ideas as diverse as free schools, the Big Society and doing away with inheritance tax. More recently, the Right has invoked Swedish concerns about mass immigration as proof that it’s not only baddies who worry about that issue. Whatever your politics, if the Swedes are doing it, it must be OK.

Suddenly, in its response to the Coronavirus, the behaviour of my mother country is not meeting with the usual chorus of approval. By taking a radically different approach, have the Swedes finally lost their famed good sense… or should the rest of the world once again be looking to their example?

Continue reading @ UnHerd.

All Eyes On The Swedish Coronavirus Experiment

From the New York Times a piece on how the Swedes are tackling Covd19.

By Christina Anderson and Henrik Pryser Libell

Stockholm — When the coronavirus swept into the Scandinavian countries, Norway and Denmark scrambled to place extensive restrictions on their borders to stem the outbreak. Sweden, their neighbor, took a decidedly different path.

While Denmark and Norway closed their borders, restaurants and ski slopes and told all students to stay home this month, Sweden shut only its high schools and colleges, kept its preschools, grade schools, pubs, restaurants and borders open — and put no limits on the slopes. 

At a news conference this month, Prime Minister Stefan Lofven of Sweden announced the closing of high schools and universities, but not of the country’s preschools and grade schools.

In fact, Sweden has stayed open for business while other nations beyond Scandinavia have attacked the outbreak with various measures ambitious in scope and reach. Sweden’s approach has raised questions about whether it’s gambling with a disease, Covid-19, that has no cure or vaccine, or if its tactic will be seen as a savvy strategy to fight a scourge that has laid waste to millions of jobs and prompted global lockdowns unprecedented in peacetime …

… A recent headline in the Danish newspaper Politiken, encapsulates the question ricocheting around Europe, “Doesn’t Sweden take the corona crisis seriously?”

Continue reading @ the New York Times.

In The Coronavirus Fight In Scandinavia, Sweden Stands Apart