Showing posts with label Culture and Tradition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Culture and Tradition. Show all posts
Gearóid Ó Loingsigh writing in Substack on 30-September-2024.

Kemi Badenoch, the contender for the Tory Party leadership in Britain has stirred up controversy through her comments that not all cultures are equally valid. 


(30/09/2024)

She referred to women’s rights, gay rights and even hating Israel as signs of which cultures are less valid. Not surprisingly some right wing “feminists”, like the ones currently campaigning for the man who advocates sexually assaulting women in the US came out to agree with her. Key amongst them Kellie Jay Keen, who saw fit to bring up child marriage,[1] an issue Trump and every US president would know something about, given the huge numbers of child marriages in the US, where it is legal in 37 states.[2]

There are “cultures” they say where women have fewer or even no rights, gays are hounded or even killed and even where witch burnings are legal. Badenoch said

We cannot be naive and assume immigrants will automatically abandon ancestral ethnic hostilities at the border, or that all cultures are equally valid. They are not. I am struck, for example, by the number of recent immigrants to the UK who hate Israel. That sentiment has no place here. We must recognise that the world has changed.[3]

Imagine belonging to a culture that hated genocide. I am tempted to say the joke writes itself, except it is no laughing matter. Although she brought up the issue in relation to immigration, when Badenoch says some cultures are less valid, what she really means is that there are countries that the “civilised” can bomb into the stone age, there are people Western troops can rape, women who can be bombed in maternity hospitals just as Israel does. What she does not mean is that Britain will not supply weapons to regimes like Saudi Arabia, her concern for women only goes so far. In fact, she would personally sharpen the sword or knot the whip used to mete out lashes to women, if there was money in it for British companies. Between March 2015, when the Saudis began bombing Yemen, and March 2024 the Saudis received 8.2 billion in weapons sales. BAE received 25 billion in the same period and has 6,700 employees based in the country.[4] Maybe some of these people whose culture she thinks are less valid are just fleeing the British bombs dropped on them by the head chopping misogynists in Riyadh.

But what is a culture?

There is no agreed upon definition of what is a culture, but it is popularly understood to be the norms, customs, beliefs, practices, artistic production and world view of a given set of people, who are in turn not that easy to define. It is a malleable term that can be twisted and distorted to suit any agenda. But Badenoch had specific people in mind. Of course, she meant Muslims, though she pointed out she didn’t mean all Muslims, certainly not the ones buying British bombs.

But are there cultures where rape, witch burning and the persecution of gays is not only legal but socially acceptable? Well yes, but let’s look at some of the facts and the British or Western values Badenoch thinks are being undermined.

Witch burning

Well, belief in superstitious nonsense is prevalent everywhere. Most people believe an invisible man in the sky not only controls their everyday lives, but blesses the bombs as they rain down on the innocent. But that aside, what about witches?

Well, it was Germany that gave us the Malleus Maleficarum and the witch hunts that murdered thousands of women in Britain and Ireland between 1450 and 1750 and King James (yep the bible basher) was particularly obsessed with the issue. That was a long time ago, however, nowadays:

The harshest place for witches, or rather, female foreign domestic house workers the government thinks are witches, may be Saudi Arabia. An entire police unit is dedicated to fighting witchcraft crime, and religious judges often convict people with laughable evidence.[5]

It is now, what it always was, the persecution of women in the economy. But nobody in Britain burns witches nowadays, do they? Well, it depends on what you mean by a witch. The term is as malleable as culture. Acid attacks are a modern form of witch burning, where women are attacked for being women. Britain has the highest rate in the world of recorded acid attacks, with 1244 incidents in 2023,[6] not all of them against women, but a significant number were and racists have tried to paint it as an Asian problem. But police statistics tell another tale and debunked that myth as far back as 2017.

In reality, just 6% of all suspects in London over the last 15 years were Asian.

For the same period (2002-16), 'White Europeans' comprised 32% of suspects, and African Caribbeans 38% of suspects. About one in five suspects remain unknown – either because they can’t be identified, or because the victim has refused to identify them.

The number of Asian victims is 421 – around one fifth of the 2,196 total for the 15-year period. Almost half the victims (987) are White European, and one quarter (557) are African Caribbean.[7]

Some right wing “feminists” have also made similar arguments to Badenoch. They ignore all their campaigning on rape when a migrant is charged and talk about imported problems. But rape has been an historic problem in Britain and indeed around the world. “[Police ]Forces recorded 194,683 sexual offences in 2021-22, including 70,330 rapes, the highest number since records began in 2002/03.”[8] We also know now that it is part of police “culture” in Britain to rape women, particularly in Manchester. Not sure who is sharing which “British values” Badenoch and her “feminist” friends were referring to. Rape in every society is committed mostly by the partner of the woman or someone she knew. Migrants are not beating a track to Britain to rape women. Women in Britain are being raped by their husbands, boyfriends, partners and other relatives. That is a statistic that holds true around the world.

As for political rights. It is true that Britain has had three female prime ministers (well, two and a half), Thatcher, May and Truss. None of these female leaders defended women’s rights. In fact Thatcher was particularly hostile to women. She cared so little for women that she agreed to fund the Afghan Mujahideen, the forerunner of the Taliban.[9] The Tories shared the same values as these troglodytes and that is the tradition Badenoch stands in, despite the illusions and denials of right wing “feminists”. The US has yet to have its first female president, though that may change with the vote in November. Meanwhile, a host of countries that do not share Badenoch’s commitment to “British values” and the rights of women, as she would claim have had female leaders, including a number of Muslim countries, such as Indonesia, Tunisia, Mauritius, and Bangladesh has had two female leaders in the last 25 years, with both of them serving two non-consecutive terms each. One of them was recently overthrown, a fate that should have befallen Thatcher, but didn’t.

But how does Badenoch fare on women’s rights? Well, she has abstained on extending abortion to Northern Ireland, buffer zones for abortion clinics and she opposed government supports for women going through menopause. As Minister for Equality, she refused to outlaw discrimination against women going through the menopause, despite the fact that one in ten women between the ages of 45 and 55 leave the workforce due to menopause symptoms.[10] She has no commitment to women.

Cultures change over time. Before the British arrived two of the most celebrated Arab poets were gay. After the British imposition of anti-gay legislation and the promotion of conservative figures, their books were burned. They are not static and within certain cultures there are those who oppose the most reactionary elements of them, like Irish women who campaigned for contraception, abortion and divorce for decades. Badenoch is just an old-fashioned imperialist, who likes to play up her own black and migrant credentials to attack other minorities. She does not defend women and the tropes about migrants repeated by KJK put her firmly in the Tommy Robinson camp she joined after the recent race riots. It is a myth that the West is some bastion of women’s rights, when it is the West that promoted and props up the most reactionary anti-women regimes in the world. The British police have a record of rape culture both on and off duty. They represent a greater threat to women than the “less valid” cultures of Badenoch’s delirium. Badenoch is the enemy of women, as is her entire Tory Party, hangers on and Tommy Robinson’s new found “feminist” friends.

[1] See.

[2] The Guardian (09/07/2024) I was handed to a complete stranger’: the survivors fighting to end child marriage in 37 US states – and the people who want to keep it legal. Alaina Demopoulos. 

[3] The Telegraph (28/09/2024) Migrants who come to Britain must uphold its traditions, not change them. Kemi Badenoch.

[4] CAAT (27/03/2024) UK Arms to Saudi Arabia 

[5] The Atlantic (30/10/2013) When Governments Go After Witches. Ryan Jacobs. 

[6] See.

[7] BBC (17/11/2017) Everything you know about acid attacks is wrong. 

[8] BBC (21/07/2022) Rape offences at highest recorded level.

[9] Declassified UK (08/09/2021) Margaret Thatcher’s Support For Afghan Jihadists Covered Up By Uk Censors. Phil Miller.

[10] The New Stateman (02/03/2023) Kemi Badenoch refuses to outlaw menopause discrimination. 

⏩ Gearóid Ó Loingsigh is a political and human rights activist with extensive experience in Latin America.

Are All Cultures Equally Valid?

Harry Hutchinson ✒ The final report of the Commission on Flags, Identity, Culture and Tradition in Northern Ireland was published last November but it has offered nothing we didn’t already have or told us anything we didn’t already know.


The political career of Mike Nesbitt, once leader of the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP), shows the extent to which sectarianism is built into the political establishment. In 2017, he made an extraordinary announcement, claiming he would vote for the Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) instead of rival unionist candidates. He also claimed he wanted to attend Sinn Fein’s Ard Fheis (conference). Nesbitt’s aim, he said, was to create a more inclusive society in Northern Ireland and challenge the more sectarian parties that were in coalition at Stormont.

His claim caused outrage in unionism and also within his own UUP. In addition, there was no attempt from the SDLP leader to embrace Nesbitt’s offer. Within months, and after some poor election results, Nesbitt was forced to resign as UUP leader. But resigning as leader was not enough. The problem for the establishment was that Nesbitt could and probably would remain popular among some people in Northern Ireland, so it became necessary to destroy his reputation. Three months after his resignation, he was photographed lying, perhaps intoxicated, in a Belfast Hotel.

The photo was broadcast across the North, particularly by the BBC, the main propaganda output for capitalism in the UK. Later, the media again targeted Nesbitt after he apparently breached Covid restrictions. Both of these incidents were enough to destroy Nesbitt’s public image.

Report on the commission on Flags and Identity Culture and Tradition

Where did the Flags, Identity, Culture and Tradition Commission come from? In 2016 a report was commissioned by the Northern Ireland Assembly to look into areas of conflict and to make recommendations to resolve them. From the outset, the Commission was doomed to failure. Of its 15-member committee, almost half comprised of members of the various sectarian parties; two DUP, two Sinn Fein, one UUP, one SDLP and only one Alliance (the only nominally ‘non-sectarian’ party). The rest of the committee was made up by so-called independents.


At the time the commission was set up, it was challenged to recommend some meaningful changes that would address the problem of the sectarian paramilitaries that still existed. In a powerful article and video, the full extent of paramilitary activity – at that time eighteen years after the Good Friday Agreement – was spelled out (see graphic). Five years on and finally in November the Commission reported its findings. But there is no sense in which it has met the challenged made in 2016.

The commission’s report identifies a number of ‘areas of conflict’ that needed addressing, including flags, bonfires, murals, and the use of public spaces. The commission even discussed replacing the national flag and replacing it with a civic one. But after years, and costing over three quarters of a million pounds, it offers not one single recommendation to resolve any of the issues of sectarian friction or conflict that were identified. This includes, just to take one example, the vital need of integrating education, where at present only 7% of children in NI attend an integrated school.

Forced divisions in the North

Division in Northern Ireland has been maintained historically to keep sectarian and pro-capitalist parties in power. These parties legislate in the interest of the big corporations and the wealthy and do nothing to ameliorate the daily problems facing ordinary workers. The Unionist and Nationalist parties, along with their paramilitary associates, do their best to entrench divisions by all means necessary, including ethnic cleansing and attacks on migrants. The vast majority of people in the North still live in single-identity communities. Any attempts to unite people will be resisted by the sectarian parties.


As long as there is no outright conflict between Catholic and Protestant communities, there is some natural tendency for people in Northern Ireland to move, albeit slowly, in the direction of integration. Increasingly, younger people particularly identify as being ‘non-religious’ and fewer vote in elections for the two dominant sectarian capitalist parties. If there was an all-Ireland working class party that was based on the trade unions and community campaign groups, it could reinforce that tendency and provide a solid basis for uniting the people in Ireland North and South.

On the other hand, as the FICT commission report indicates – still, nearly twenty four years after the Good Friday Agreement – the potential for sectarian conflict that still exists. The paramilitary organisations still exist on both sides of the sectarian divide; the loyalist groups alone have more than ten thousand members, many of them involved in crime, harassment and intimidation in local communities.

Despite the overwhelming desire not to go back to the killings and brutality of the ‘Troubles’, Northern Ireland is still a powder-keg. The report of the commission on Flags, Identity, Culture and Tradition’ told us nothing we didn’t already know. But the complete vacuum in its recommendations is a warning, because as in nature, politics abhors a vacuum and if the labour movement doesn’t intervene in the future, there is still the possibility that sectarian paramilitaries will step in once again.

As socialists, we must explain that attempts to bring capitalist, sectarian parties together will never advance society. Uniting working people though the struggles of the trade unions and communities to address areas of concern to workers is the only means of cutting across divisions and that is the basis of building an integrated movement.

⏩Harry Hutchinson is a member of the Labour Party Northern Ireland.

Institutional Sectarianism ✑ FICT Commission Offers Nothing