Jim Duffy There have been hundreds of plagues and pandemics throughout history. 

The Plague of Justinian was caused by the Bubonic plague. It ran from 541–549 and may have killed one hundred million. It killed 25–60% of European population.
 
In terms of death toll, it is akin to the Spanish Flu (1918-20), which also killed up to 100 million (albeit of a larger world population).
 
In terms of death toll, the third placed pandemic is the HIV-AIDS pandemic. It reached 45 million in 2026, but with Trump's destruction of USAID, the body critical to providing treatment in Africa, the number is likely to increase sharply again after years in decline.
 
In fourth place was the Black Death which is believed to have killed 25–50 million - again from a smaller world population. It ran from 1346–1353.
 
In fifth place is the covid pandemic, with an estimated 38 million to date. Vaccines thankfully prevented it reaching numbers akin to the Spanish Flu - something it had the potential to do. However it is by no means over, and there remains the risk of a variant appearing that current vaccines cannot control.
 
The Cocoliztli epidemic of 1545–1548 was limited to Mexico, but is thought to have killed up to 80% of the population.
 
Knowing how many died is not always easy. Sometimes a person technically died of something else, but would have survived but for being ill with the pandemic. Other times record-keeping collapses due to mass deaths so the total number who died is unknown. That is the case in some US cities in the Spanish Flu. Death certification, burial records, church records, etc all broke down as those who had kept them died or were too ill. Bodies in Philadelphia were buried in mass graves without counting numbers as there were so many rotting bodies needing burial they had not time to count the dead. Some people died in their homes, but the collapse in the collection of corpses forced families to dump the bodies of the dead in back lanes as the smell of the decaying corpse in the house was unbearable. It would disappear but they would not know had it been picked up for burial in mass graves, or simply eaten by rats, dogs and cats. So in pandemics often all that can be made are estimates. 

When research is done afterwards, it always turns out that the estimates were a considerable under-estimate. Bodies buried in the Spanish Flu in Greenland and the Artic were exhumed some years ago. They had remained undecayed in the frozen earth. When autopsies were done, it was found that many people whose deaths were originally thought to have been caused by something else had been caused by the Spanish Flu. Detailed exhumations over the decades has led to the conclusion that the original presumption that 50 million died was a considerable under-estimation, and the number was potentially one hundred million.

Overall, pandemics are a constant regular occurrence. The best way to stop its spread is use lockdowns - something learned in the 14th century. Most pandemics are spread by person-to-person. Therefore to break the transmission, lockdowns have to happen to stop people becoming in contact with someone with it. Thankfully, we can develop vaccines, and once a vaccine achieves the right number, lockdowns can be eased and ended. Lockdowns feature in plays, poems and art from the Middle Ages. A lockdown is critical in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet. It is why a vital message to Romeo cannot be passed on - the city he is in is in lockdown and the gates are locked, so no-one can enter.
 
We even know throughout history that churches and ale-houses/pubs are the most dangerous places. People remain in the same spot and get infected in churches. In pubs, alcohol dims awareness of distancing. So right back to the middle ages, both have to be shut. It is nothing new. In contrast, modern supermarkets are not dangerous. Everyone is on the move. They have air-conditioning and aisles are wide. So people may only come close to an infected person for a split second. In a church, with everyone sitting, standing and kneeling at the same spot for half an hour or more, they are likely to get the infection if they are near someone carrying the virus.
 
Pandemics are as certain as night and day. The only thing we don't know is when they will hit. One might not hit for fifty years, or it could hit next month. The usual cause is the same - some animal virus jumps species into a human, then spreads. The Spanish Flu is suspected of moving from a pig to the farm worker looking after it. He had arranged to join the army as the US was in WWI, went to the local army fort and unbeknown to him spread it to soldiers, who spread it through the army and brought it to Europe. They infected workers at the port of Brest. They infected crew on merchant ships who brought it to their own countries. And all from an apparent farm worker on a farm in Kansas nursing a sick pig.

⏩ Jim Duffy is a writer-historian.

The Plague

Jim Duffy There have been hundreds of plagues and pandemics throughout history. 

The Plague of Justinian was caused by the Bubonic plague. It ran from 541–549 and may have killed one hundred million. It killed 25–60% of European population.
 
In terms of death toll, it is akin to the Spanish Flu (1918-20), which also killed up to 100 million (albeit of a larger world population).
 
In terms of death toll, the third placed pandemic is the HIV-AIDS pandemic. It reached 45 million in 2026, but with Trump's destruction of USAID, the body critical to providing treatment in Africa, the number is likely to increase sharply again after years in decline.
 
In fourth place was the Black Death which is believed to have killed 25–50 million - again from a smaller world population. It ran from 1346–1353.
 
In fifth place is the covid pandemic, with an estimated 38 million to date. Vaccines thankfully prevented it reaching numbers akin to the Spanish Flu - something it had the potential to do. However it is by no means over, and there remains the risk of a variant appearing that current vaccines cannot control.
 
The Cocoliztli epidemic of 1545–1548 was limited to Mexico, but is thought to have killed up to 80% of the population.
 
Knowing how many died is not always easy. Sometimes a person technically died of something else, but would have survived but for being ill with the pandemic. Other times record-keeping collapses due to mass deaths so the total number who died is unknown. That is the case in some US cities in the Spanish Flu. Death certification, burial records, church records, etc all broke down as those who had kept them died or were too ill. Bodies in Philadelphia were buried in mass graves without counting numbers as there were so many rotting bodies needing burial they had not time to count the dead. Some people died in their homes, but the collapse in the collection of corpses forced families to dump the bodies of the dead in back lanes as the smell of the decaying corpse in the house was unbearable. It would disappear but they would not know had it been picked up for burial in mass graves, or simply eaten by rats, dogs and cats. So in pandemics often all that can be made are estimates. 

When research is done afterwards, it always turns out that the estimates were a considerable under-estimate. Bodies buried in the Spanish Flu in Greenland and the Artic were exhumed some years ago. They had remained undecayed in the frozen earth. When autopsies were done, it was found that many people whose deaths were originally thought to have been caused by something else had been caused by the Spanish Flu. Detailed exhumations over the decades has led to the conclusion that the original presumption that 50 million died was a considerable under-estimation, and the number was potentially one hundred million.

Overall, pandemics are a constant regular occurrence. The best way to stop its spread is use lockdowns - something learned in the 14th century. Most pandemics are spread by person-to-person. Therefore to break the transmission, lockdowns have to happen to stop people becoming in contact with someone with it. Thankfully, we can develop vaccines, and once a vaccine achieves the right number, lockdowns can be eased and ended. Lockdowns feature in plays, poems and art from the Middle Ages. A lockdown is critical in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet. It is why a vital message to Romeo cannot be passed on - the city he is in is in lockdown and the gates are locked, so no-one can enter.
 
We even know throughout history that churches and ale-houses/pubs are the most dangerous places. People remain in the same spot and get infected in churches. In pubs, alcohol dims awareness of distancing. So right back to the middle ages, both have to be shut. It is nothing new. In contrast, modern supermarkets are not dangerous. Everyone is on the move. They have air-conditioning and aisles are wide. So people may only come close to an infected person for a split second. In a church, with everyone sitting, standing and kneeling at the same spot for half an hour or more, they are likely to get the infection if they are near someone carrying the virus.
 
Pandemics are as certain as night and day. The only thing we don't know is when they will hit. One might not hit for fifty years, or it could hit next month. The usual cause is the same - some animal virus jumps species into a human, then spreads. The Spanish Flu is suspected of moving from a pig to the farm worker looking after it. He had arranged to join the army as the US was in WWI, went to the local army fort and unbeknown to him spread it to soldiers, who spread it through the army and brought it to Europe. They infected workers at the port of Brest. They infected crew on merchant ships who brought it to their own countries. And all from an apparent farm worker on a farm in Kansas nursing a sick pig.

⏩ Jim Duffy is a writer-historian.

10 comments:

  1. "However it is by no means over, and there remains the risk of a variant appearing that current vaccines cannot control."

    Unlikely. Variants exist when the original strain adapts to work around defenses and in doing so, become necessarily less virulent. The virus wants to survive. COVID will always now be with us like influenza ( which is a variant of the original 'Spanish' flu) but its lethality is massively reduced.

    And it has been known for decades that we should NEVER vaccinate during a pandemic as it creates variants. I hold my hands up and say I bought into the bullshit at the time though.

    And covid didn't jump from an animal. It was genetically tampered with and accidently released due to poor safeguarding measures from the Wuhan institute of virology. A lab that was funded by Anthony Fauci as part of the National Institute of Health to investigate "gain of function research" on....bat coronaviruses...for weapon application. Obama forbid this work from being undertaken in the US...so Fauci shifted it.

    But nobody cares anymore. Here's the latest from Ukraine/Epstein Files/Banks being corrupt wankers/China/Trump's latest outburst of capricious narcissism ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Steve - this is what I find confusin:

      And it has been known for decades that we should NEVER vaccinate during a pandemic as it creates variants.

      Because it is preceded by this:

      Unlikely. Variants exist when the original strain adapts to work around defenses and in doing so, become necessarily less virulent.

      There seems to be some irreconcilability between the two.

      Delete
    2. Herd immunity Anthony, sorry I wasn't clearer. With the original 'Spanish flu' it just ripped through the population so much so that eventually enough of the population build up natural immunity to it that it significantly curtailed it's spread. This was decades before we had a vaccination for it ( the US gave it to their Army in WW2 if memory serves, and the original pandemic was 1918) but this vax was for the original strain.

      What we did with vaxxing during covid was give extra pressure on the virus to mutate to get around the original shot, that's why we had 'escape variants', Omicron, Delta et al. Big Pharma knew this rationale and didn't care.

      What we should have done is keep everything open and isolate high risk groups like the elderly and those with co morbidities though note kids were not severely affected ( my kids were doing flipping somersaults while affected!)

      I live in Melbourne the worlds most locked down city and work in hospitals, so I totally get why we locked down ( due to projected mortality with spread compared to hospital beds) we got it wrong. Hindsight is always 20/20 though.

      Nobody down here would tolerate another lockdown though.

      Delete
    3. Stave - herd immunity was argued for by Boris and he pulled back once people realised he was only suggesting it to allow government inertia or investment in combating it.
      If another serious pandemic occurs there might be another lock down. If people start dropping dead in the streets the herd will respond by withdrawing indoors.
      Spanish flu killed so many that I doubt people will wait around until herd immunity kicks in.
      But I think your arguments are there to be made and merit a hearing. I just never buy into the conspiracy fiction that it was just a big ruse to dupe societies and citizens worldwide into police states.

      Delete
  2. I don't think it was a ruse Anthony, the release from the lab was due to slack protocol adherence not deliberately done. Then big pharma saw a huge opportunity and took it. Capitalism seldom misses an open goal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Last time I came across anything on it, the origins seemed to be a matter of conjecture with no settled view. That said I have had the time of motivation to deep dive it.
      Public health policy in modern democracies can't simply be dictated to by the needs of capitalists. The state has to take more into consideration than their greed. If the primary role of the state within a capitalist society is to ensure the reproduction of capitalism then it has to curb capitalist greed in circumstances where that greed threatens to destabilise capital. Left to the capitalists there would be no public health service or welfare state. These things work quite well for capital but capitalists would not see it that way.

      Delete
    2. Not for the first time Anthony, I agree with everything you have just written.

      On the origins, as always I encourage everyone to research for themselves. I would ask as an exercise for people to ask AI what was being researched in 2019 in that particular lab in Wuhan.

      My main irk is the sad realisation that people have attention spans of goldfish. Look at the absolute clown show that is Trump and Starmer. How the fuck do they represent anyone?

      Delete
    3. Steve - I had this discussion last night with a good friend and former prisoner. We were reflecting on the similarity between MAGA and SF - the willingness of people to swallow utter nonsense. It is not called goldfish syndrome for nothing - the ability of people to swallow the same old bull they were fed six seconds earlier.

      Delete
  3. "Public health policy in modern democracies can't simply be dictated to by the needs of capitalists."
    Many people would contest that assertion. Lobbyists from the agricultural sector, from the food processing manufacturers, as well as from the pharmaceutical sector greatly influence policy & legislation - policies, subsidies, and legislation, which serve capitalism, often at the expense of public health.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that is more a case of the needs of capital rather than the needs of capitalists. To my mind the role of the state is to forge unity among the dominant bloc for the purposes of sustaining a capital conducive environment - if what the bodies you listed propose policies that are so limited to themselves that they threaten capital then the state will opt for measures more conducive to capital.
      It makes sense given the disparate nature of capitalism and the intense competition between capitalists. The state is the bulwark of capital.
      There is nothing new in this - just a reassertion of a central theme in the Poulantzas-Miliband debate which was probably one of the most enlightening discussions within Marxism back in the day.

      Delete