RTEWritten by Vincent Kearney and Conor Macauley. Recommended by Christy Walsh.

A major report dealing with some of the most controversial aspects of the Troubles has found no evidence of collusion on the part of the British state in the 1974 Dublin-Monaghan bombings.

Among the other issues the Kenova Final Report addressed was the role of the British Army's top agent in the IRA.

The report was commissioned by the PSNI in 2016 following a direction of NI's Public Prosecution Service.

The bombings in Dublin and Monaghan on 17 May 1974 claimed the lives of 34 people.

There had long been a suspicion that the UVF, which claimed the attack, would not have had the necessary expertise to carry out such a co-ordinated attack in two places on the same day.

"The review has not identified any evidence or intelligence which would indicate that British Security Forces colluded with the UVF to carry out the attacks in Dublin or Monaghan, nor has any evidence of state collusion been identified," the report says.

It also says it found "no specific intelligence" which, if acted upon, could have prevented the atrocity.

Continue @ RTE.

Report Finds No Evidence Of Collusion In Dublin-Monaghan Bombings

RTEWritten by Vincent Kearney and Conor Macauley. Recommended by Christy Walsh.

A major report dealing with some of the most controversial aspects of the Troubles has found no evidence of collusion on the part of the British state in the 1974 Dublin-Monaghan bombings.

Among the other issues the Kenova Final Report addressed was the role of the British Army's top agent in the IRA.

The report was commissioned by the PSNI in 2016 following a direction of NI's Public Prosecution Service.

The bombings in Dublin and Monaghan on 17 May 1974 claimed the lives of 34 people.

There had long been a suspicion that the UVF, which claimed the attack, would not have had the necessary expertise to carry out such a co-ordinated attack in two places on the same day.

"The review has not identified any evidence or intelligence which would indicate that British Security Forces colluded with the UVF to carry out the attacks in Dublin or Monaghan, nor has any evidence of state collusion been identified," the report says.

It also says it found "no specific intelligence" which, if acted upon, could have prevented the atrocity.

Continue @ RTE.

2 comments:

  1. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to rig together a smokey. Always struck me as daft saying they couldn't build one when they'd been doing it in Belfast repeatedly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Steve - they had enough former British soldiers in their ranks that could easily have put something together without that amounting to collusion.
      The obvious question is that with the degree of collusion and infiltration why would the British not be able to ascertain what was going on given the involvement of so many people even if they were not signing off on every a operation?
      Of course that could be flipped and the same question could be asked of big IRA operations given the extent of penetration.
      My own view is that the report hints strongly at something murky with its reference to intelligence gaps. That leads me to suspect destroyed intelligence.

      Delete