Caoimhin O’Muraile ☭ Throughout the last century many people have asked this question and nobody has yet given a definitive answer. Who Shot Michael Collins?

There have been many anecdotes bordering on myths as to who the culprit(s) was/were and still nothing definitive. I do not claim to have the answer but it may be worthy of a quick examination of the events leading up to August 22nd 1922 at Beal na Blath in County Cork where the 31-year-old met his death. That, and the fact he was shot in the head are perhaps the only definite answers surrounding the death of the Free State Army’s Commander in Chief. This has not, however, stopped people speculating as to who the culprit(s) may have been. Perhaps the most popular bar room theory is that de Valera ordered his killing. He had held much antagonism toward Collins since his return from the USA in December 1920. Did he hold enough contempt for Collins to order his execution? Was he in a position to make such an order? After all, Liam Lynch was the Commander of the anti-treaty IRA, not de Valera whose military standing was mediocre and that is being kind. Many volunteers on the anti-treaty side saw de Valera as an inconvenience, someone who got in the way when he tried to manipulate or partake in military matters, he was a politician not a soldier. This was the reason he was manipulative enough to avoid going to The Treaty talks in 1921 - he sent Collins instead.

When the imperfect treaty was brought back by the Irish delegation in December 1921 it was to cause a stir in the Dail - and that is an understatement - between those who accepted, albeit reluctantly, and those who opposed it, led by de Valera. This ultimately led to civil war in Ireland, which was as bloody as anything that had gone on previously, including the War of Independence. However, before the Civil War kicked off, Michael Collins was allegedly and clandestinely supplying the northern divisions of the IRA with weapons to continue the conflict. He did this very cleverly by striking a deal with the anti-treaty IRA, taking their weapons to supply the northern units, replacing them with Free State Army guns. This way if the weapons were to be captured by the British they could not be traced back to Collins or the Free State, they belonged to the anti-treaty forces. This arrangement stopped of course when the Civil War broke out on 28th June 1922. Collins also reportedly had plans if the Civil War could be got over quickly, to reunite the IRA and march on the six counties. Would such an invasion have succeeded? Who knows, it’s all hypothetical now! The question is, had the British got wind of Collins antics? Had Lloyd George, Churchill and Birkenhead found out via their own spy and infiltration network what the signatory to the treaty was up to? Did they, therefore arrange for the shooting of Michael Collins? Enter Lionel Curtis.

Lionel Curtis was a behind the scenes man and second secretary to the British delegation during the treaty talks. He was the unseen figure behind the scenes and advised Lloyd George and Winston Churchill. One such piece of advice Curtis gave the Prime Minister was to advise him to inform Michael Collins his electoral pact with de Valera was “in breach of the treaty”, which it certainly was not. This was Curtis manipulating a situation for whatever ends. Irrespective of the rights and wrongs of what Lionel Curtis was advising it had the desired outcome, Collins repudiated the treaty on Lloyd Georges say so! He was clever and manipulative, and is on record as saying, after Collins was shot, “Collins premature death probably saved the treaty”. Why would a Civil Servant come to such a conclusion? After all Civil Servants are not known for passing such statements of likelihood on the deaths of other countries leaders, so why did Curtis show more than a passing interest in the death of Michael Collins? Did Curtis, after discussions with the Welsh Wizard (Lloyd George), arrange the shooting himself at the Prime Ministers bequest? He was certainly able and had the influence to arrange such an action! Again, we will never know, it does seem strange that a senior Civil Servant would make such a suggestive remark on “Collins premature death”. One thing is for sure, Lionel Curtis was not a man to be underestimated!

Something else which gives rise to a possible cover up about the killing of Michael Collins is; why have successive 26 county Governments ruled out any inquiry into the events of 22nd August 1922 at Beal na Blath? The most recent to oppose an inquiry into Collin’s death and circumstances surrounding it being An Taoiseach, Micheal Martin. This may be down to the fact that he is the leader of the party most associated with the anti-Treaty side, the ones many think responsible for Collin’s death, Fianna Fail (then in 1922 still part of Sinn Fein). But what then of Fine Gael? They are the successors to Cumann na Gaedheal, the party which Collins was a member of and the pro-Treaty political voice which formed the first Free State Government or Executive Council, despite Collins' alleged independent activities. Why have they, when in government, not ordered an inquiry? It would have been thought that it would be in Fine Gael's interests to show Fianna Fail up in a historical bad light! Or, could it be, more sinisterly, the fact that such an inquiry would show Britain’s hand in the killing? With Anglo Irish relations not brilliant at the moment perhaps the last thing the Irish Government want is to implicate former British politicians and civil servants in the plot to kill Michael Collins - it may prove embarrassing!

Let us move on, or go back, to the 22nd August 1922. What exactly could have happened? Collins was shot in the head, that is certain and beyond question. What is not certain is by whom? One suspect is a volunteer of the anti-treaty side, Denis “Sony” O’Neill. O’Neill had been active fighting for Britain, as were most of the National Volunteers, in the First World War. The National Volunteers were so named to differentiate them from the Irish Volunteers who refused to fight for the crown in Europe and staged the Easter Rising 1916, along with the Irish Citizen Army. He was an excellent shot that is known, but he carried an injury to his right shoulder collected on the battlefields of Europe. The time of the shooting was dawn and visibility very poor. The shot, if this theory is correct which I doubt, came from a distance of around 150 metres away (450 feet). Not only would O’Neill have been a very good shot, he would need to have been a marksman second to none and very, very lucky to hit with such accuracy in poor visibility at that distance and carrying an injured shoulder, not forgetting the wind and elevation of the projectile factor. Remember there were no telescopic sights in those days and the recoil from the rifle was severe. Could a man with an injured shoulder, one of the tenderest parts of the body, in such poor light, long distance, and given the affect the recoil would have had on his shoulder, really have carried out the shooting? There has to be a serious question mark over this theory. Yet it is a theory and without naming O’Neill in their discourse which many believe, and have believed over the last century that the shot came from anti-Treaty forces in the hills around Beal na Blath. Many agree the tale about de Valera giving the order but is there any evidence? It is almost 100 years ago since Collins was shot and eye witnesses are now long dead in most cases, more recently dead in others.

There are other theories apart from the O’Neill scenario, and one is that he was shot by somebody in his own entourage. One theory is Major General Emmet Dalton, who was close to Collins and was in the same vehicle may have done the deed. Dalton was a staunch treaty supporter and was the man charged with opening fire on the Four Courts using British artillery loaned by General McCready, the Four Courts being the anti-treaty HQ which kick started the Civil War. Had Dalton, or perhaps more to the point McCready, caught on to what Collins was up to arming the northern units of the IRA? Could the British General have made it a condition of loaning the artillery to Dalton, that he, Dalton, ensured that Collins would die? Dalton was a former British Army officer, and a National Volunteer in the First World War, he was a Captain. A major contradiction here is that Emmet Dalton was also a member of Collins elite band in Dublin, the “Squad”. He was a member of the party assigned to free Kevin Barry, before the plan was aborted, and had been with Collins for years. He participated in the killing of a number of British Intelligence Officers, known collectively as “the ”Cairo Gang,” on 21st November 1920. Nevertheless, is it possible he and Lloyd George along possibly with McCready were in this together, both wishing to stop what Michael Collins was doing in the North to save the treaty, with the ever-arcane Lionel Curtis the planner and execution organiser? Again, this is mere speculation and we could go on and on searching for culprits. It is almost certain now that Michael Collins was going to break The Treaty at a convenient moment. He justified this by reciting the Treaty of Limerick back in 1691 (which ended the Williamite war in Ireland) and the English betrayal and breaking of the said treaty. This, Collins claimed, “justified” him doing the same to this treaty.

There is yet another twist in this tale, one which is not wildly known. Michael Collins had signed a pact with James Craig, the Prime Minister of “Northern Ireland”. Part of this pact, article 6 starts with the line; “IRA activities to cease in the six-counties.” If this was the case then why was Collins, if indeed he was, arming the northern IRA units? The pact between these two belligerents contained eleven points, including abolishing the ill-fated Border Commission and the two of them, Collins and Craig, setting the border themselves. Would this then suggest Collins was accepting some form of partition? Another point contained in the Collins/Craig pact was around policing. It was agreed that recruitment into the Police, RUC, should be equally representative of both Catholics and Protestants. This was an attempt to quell the sectarian violence that had erupted in the six-counties since the treaty was signed. Recruitment to the police should be, according to the terms of the pact, representative of both communities (ring any bells?) particularly in Belfast. In mixed areas the police were to be composed half Catholics and half of Protestants. An advisory committee, composed of Catholics, to be set up to assist in the selection of Catholic recruits into the police specials in Catholic areas.

The pact was signed by Michael Collins and Kevin O’Higgins on behalf of the Provisional Government of the Irish Free State, James Craig, Lord Londonderry and E.M. Archdale on behalf of the “Northern Ireland” Government and was countersigned by Winston S. Churchill and Sir Laming Worthington-Evans on behalf of the British Government, noticeable to see no Lloyd George present (something not like him, he normally took a hands-on approach). The pact was signed on 30th March 1922. Unfortunately, Collins was killed and the pact never came into being. If it had, who knows? Where would the border have been? Was Churchill acting officially? The Border Commission Craig and Collins were trying to get rid of, was part of The Treaty so abolishing it would have been technically a breach of The Treaty! Or was it alright for the British Government to breach the terms of the treaty when it suited?

What was Michael Collins hoping to gain from this pact with the most unlikely of bedfellows? Did Collins intend, as he had decided over the treaty, to break the pact? If this was the case and even with a unified and better equipped IRA Michael Collins was preparing to take on the British Army regulars, the Black and Tans, which no doubt Churchill having been double crossed would certainly have reintroduced, the Auxiliaries and now, having stabbed Craig in the back, the Ulster Volunteer Force. This might have been, if indeed it was the case, too much even for a reunited and well-equipped IRA. Had Craig and Churchill, possibly via Curtis, have caught on? Could Craig have been involved somewhere along the line with the execution of Michael Collins? This is all supposition but as there is no definitive answer to who shot Michael Collins and the 26-county government reluctant to hold an inquiry, all these possibilities hold water. All the circumstances outlined above are historically accurate to my knowledge. 

The mystery of who shot Michael Collins is not one for the least enquiring of minds, and certainly not confined to the one theory held by many that de Valera was responsible, which is one possibility along with many others. There are many combinations of suspects, all feasible, but no hammer blow evidence to categorically point the finger at any! Theory one, Denis “Sony” O’Neill, the anti-treaty combatant with an injured shoulder, in poor visibility with heavy recoil from the rifle and at a distance of 150 metres does not add up to me in the real world of shooting relevant to the time. The numerous conspiracy theories including Lloyd George, Lionel Curtis and assassin unknown, Emmet Dalton being one suspect, but only a suspect, is another theory. The combination of Winston Churchill, Sir laming Worthington-Evans and Possibly James Craig is another. Could either of the latter two conspiracy theories involve General Neville McCready who loaned Free State Army Major General Emmet Dalton the artillery to bomb the Four Courts have had involvement?

There is perhaps one other candidate in the riddle who had Mick Collins shot and that is Brigadier-General Ormonde de l’ Epee Winter who was known simply as “O”. Winter replaced General Tudor at Dublin Castle in 1920 becoming responsible for intelligence operations in Ireland during the War of Independence. He was described by Mark Grant-Sturgis as; “O” is a marvel, he looks like a wicked little white snake, he is clever as paint, probably entirely non-moral” all of these things he was history tells us, and unscrupulous to the point of evil. He was Michael Collins nemesis and, unlike Collins, cared nothing for collateral damage, ie civilian deaths in his pursuit of quarry. He used many of Collins' methods in reverse, like using agents obtained by local police and through the agency of “local centres”. Collins used agents obtained by “local police” but sympathetic to the IRA and its aims. He used, as did Collins, captured documents and infiltrators, in much the same way as Michael Collins used Ned Broy, one of his number one spies and infiltrators working for British Intelligence along with David Neligan in Dublin Castle. In 1920 Winter took charge of the 90 strong Dublin District Intelligence Service known as the “Cairo Gang,” many of whom Collins had assassinated on Bloody Sunday 1920. Had Winter caught on to what Michael Collins was up to after The Treaty was signed, supplying the IRA in the north? Or did he just want revenge on the man who eradicated his unit? This being the case could Ormonde Winter have, through collusion or otherwise, had a hand in the shooting of Michael Collins? All speculation, but all possibilities. We could go on indefinitely pointing the finger of guilt at numerous persons but for me these are all strong possibilities, but only that.

These are only theories and not intended to be definitive conclusions, but it does seem strange the 26-county government, various, are most unwilling to open an enquiry as to who really did shoot one of the founders of the Irish Free State and Commander in Chief of the “National Army” on August 22nd 1922 at Beal na Blath in County Cork. It is my contention we will never know for certain who committed the deed, but no doubt speculation will continue indefinitely!

Caoimhin O’Muraile is Independent 
Socialist Republican and Marxist

Who Shot Michael Collins?

Caoimhin O’Muraile ☭ Throughout the last century many people have asked this question and nobody has yet given a definitive answer. Who Shot Michael Collins?

There have been many anecdotes bordering on myths as to who the culprit(s) was/were and still nothing definitive. I do not claim to have the answer but it may be worthy of a quick examination of the events leading up to August 22nd 1922 at Beal na Blath in County Cork where the 31-year-old met his death. That, and the fact he was shot in the head are perhaps the only definite answers surrounding the death of the Free State Army’s Commander in Chief. This has not, however, stopped people speculating as to who the culprit(s) may have been. Perhaps the most popular bar room theory is that de Valera ordered his killing. He had held much antagonism toward Collins since his return from the USA in December 1920. Did he hold enough contempt for Collins to order his execution? Was he in a position to make such an order? After all, Liam Lynch was the Commander of the anti-treaty IRA, not de Valera whose military standing was mediocre and that is being kind. Many volunteers on the anti-treaty side saw de Valera as an inconvenience, someone who got in the way when he tried to manipulate or partake in military matters, he was a politician not a soldier. This was the reason he was manipulative enough to avoid going to The Treaty talks in 1921 - he sent Collins instead.

When the imperfect treaty was brought back by the Irish delegation in December 1921 it was to cause a stir in the Dail - and that is an understatement - between those who accepted, albeit reluctantly, and those who opposed it, led by de Valera. This ultimately led to civil war in Ireland, which was as bloody as anything that had gone on previously, including the War of Independence. However, before the Civil War kicked off, Michael Collins was allegedly and clandestinely supplying the northern divisions of the IRA with weapons to continue the conflict. He did this very cleverly by striking a deal with the anti-treaty IRA, taking their weapons to supply the northern units, replacing them with Free State Army guns. This way if the weapons were to be captured by the British they could not be traced back to Collins or the Free State, they belonged to the anti-treaty forces. This arrangement stopped of course when the Civil War broke out on 28th June 1922. Collins also reportedly had plans if the Civil War could be got over quickly, to reunite the IRA and march on the six counties. Would such an invasion have succeeded? Who knows, it’s all hypothetical now! The question is, had the British got wind of Collins antics? Had Lloyd George, Churchill and Birkenhead found out via their own spy and infiltration network what the signatory to the treaty was up to? Did they, therefore arrange for the shooting of Michael Collins? Enter Lionel Curtis.

Lionel Curtis was a behind the scenes man and second secretary to the British delegation during the treaty talks. He was the unseen figure behind the scenes and advised Lloyd George and Winston Churchill. One such piece of advice Curtis gave the Prime Minister was to advise him to inform Michael Collins his electoral pact with de Valera was “in breach of the treaty”, which it certainly was not. This was Curtis manipulating a situation for whatever ends. Irrespective of the rights and wrongs of what Lionel Curtis was advising it had the desired outcome, Collins repudiated the treaty on Lloyd Georges say so! He was clever and manipulative, and is on record as saying, after Collins was shot, “Collins premature death probably saved the treaty”. Why would a Civil Servant come to such a conclusion? After all Civil Servants are not known for passing such statements of likelihood on the deaths of other countries leaders, so why did Curtis show more than a passing interest in the death of Michael Collins? Did Curtis, after discussions with the Welsh Wizard (Lloyd George), arrange the shooting himself at the Prime Ministers bequest? He was certainly able and had the influence to arrange such an action! Again, we will never know, it does seem strange that a senior Civil Servant would make such a suggestive remark on “Collins premature death”. One thing is for sure, Lionel Curtis was not a man to be underestimated!

Something else which gives rise to a possible cover up about the killing of Michael Collins is; why have successive 26 county Governments ruled out any inquiry into the events of 22nd August 1922 at Beal na Blath? The most recent to oppose an inquiry into Collin’s death and circumstances surrounding it being An Taoiseach, Micheal Martin. This may be down to the fact that he is the leader of the party most associated with the anti-Treaty side, the ones many think responsible for Collin’s death, Fianna Fail (then in 1922 still part of Sinn Fein). But what then of Fine Gael? They are the successors to Cumann na Gaedheal, the party which Collins was a member of and the pro-Treaty political voice which formed the first Free State Government or Executive Council, despite Collins' alleged independent activities. Why have they, when in government, not ordered an inquiry? It would have been thought that it would be in Fine Gael's interests to show Fianna Fail up in a historical bad light! Or, could it be, more sinisterly, the fact that such an inquiry would show Britain’s hand in the killing? With Anglo Irish relations not brilliant at the moment perhaps the last thing the Irish Government want is to implicate former British politicians and civil servants in the plot to kill Michael Collins - it may prove embarrassing!

Let us move on, or go back, to the 22nd August 1922. What exactly could have happened? Collins was shot in the head, that is certain and beyond question. What is not certain is by whom? One suspect is a volunteer of the anti-treaty side, Denis “Sony” O’Neill. O’Neill had been active fighting for Britain, as were most of the National Volunteers, in the First World War. The National Volunteers were so named to differentiate them from the Irish Volunteers who refused to fight for the crown in Europe and staged the Easter Rising 1916, along with the Irish Citizen Army. He was an excellent shot that is known, but he carried an injury to his right shoulder collected on the battlefields of Europe. The time of the shooting was dawn and visibility very poor. The shot, if this theory is correct which I doubt, came from a distance of around 150 metres away (450 feet). Not only would O’Neill have been a very good shot, he would need to have been a marksman second to none and very, very lucky to hit with such accuracy in poor visibility at that distance and carrying an injured shoulder, not forgetting the wind and elevation of the projectile factor. Remember there were no telescopic sights in those days and the recoil from the rifle was severe. Could a man with an injured shoulder, one of the tenderest parts of the body, in such poor light, long distance, and given the affect the recoil would have had on his shoulder, really have carried out the shooting? There has to be a serious question mark over this theory. Yet it is a theory and without naming O’Neill in their discourse which many believe, and have believed over the last century that the shot came from anti-Treaty forces in the hills around Beal na Blath. Many agree the tale about de Valera giving the order but is there any evidence? It is almost 100 years ago since Collins was shot and eye witnesses are now long dead in most cases, more recently dead in others.

There are other theories apart from the O’Neill scenario, and one is that he was shot by somebody in his own entourage. One theory is Major General Emmet Dalton, who was close to Collins and was in the same vehicle may have done the deed. Dalton was a staunch treaty supporter and was the man charged with opening fire on the Four Courts using British artillery loaned by General McCready, the Four Courts being the anti-treaty HQ which kick started the Civil War. Had Dalton, or perhaps more to the point McCready, caught on to what Collins was up to arming the northern units of the IRA? Could the British General have made it a condition of loaning the artillery to Dalton, that he, Dalton, ensured that Collins would die? Dalton was a former British Army officer, and a National Volunteer in the First World War, he was a Captain. A major contradiction here is that Emmet Dalton was also a member of Collins elite band in Dublin, the “Squad”. He was a member of the party assigned to free Kevin Barry, before the plan was aborted, and had been with Collins for years. He participated in the killing of a number of British Intelligence Officers, known collectively as “the ”Cairo Gang,” on 21st November 1920. Nevertheless, is it possible he and Lloyd George along possibly with McCready were in this together, both wishing to stop what Michael Collins was doing in the North to save the treaty, with the ever-arcane Lionel Curtis the planner and execution organiser? Again, this is mere speculation and we could go on and on searching for culprits. It is almost certain now that Michael Collins was going to break The Treaty at a convenient moment. He justified this by reciting the Treaty of Limerick back in 1691 (which ended the Williamite war in Ireland) and the English betrayal and breaking of the said treaty. This, Collins claimed, “justified” him doing the same to this treaty.

There is yet another twist in this tale, one which is not wildly known. Michael Collins had signed a pact with James Craig, the Prime Minister of “Northern Ireland”. Part of this pact, article 6 starts with the line; “IRA activities to cease in the six-counties.” If this was the case then why was Collins, if indeed he was, arming the northern IRA units? The pact between these two belligerents contained eleven points, including abolishing the ill-fated Border Commission and the two of them, Collins and Craig, setting the border themselves. Would this then suggest Collins was accepting some form of partition? Another point contained in the Collins/Craig pact was around policing. It was agreed that recruitment into the Police, RUC, should be equally representative of both Catholics and Protestants. This was an attempt to quell the sectarian violence that had erupted in the six-counties since the treaty was signed. Recruitment to the police should be, according to the terms of the pact, representative of both communities (ring any bells?) particularly in Belfast. In mixed areas the police were to be composed half Catholics and half of Protestants. An advisory committee, composed of Catholics, to be set up to assist in the selection of Catholic recruits into the police specials in Catholic areas.

The pact was signed by Michael Collins and Kevin O’Higgins on behalf of the Provisional Government of the Irish Free State, James Craig, Lord Londonderry and E.M. Archdale on behalf of the “Northern Ireland” Government and was countersigned by Winston S. Churchill and Sir Laming Worthington-Evans on behalf of the British Government, noticeable to see no Lloyd George present (something not like him, he normally took a hands-on approach). The pact was signed on 30th March 1922. Unfortunately, Collins was killed and the pact never came into being. If it had, who knows? Where would the border have been? Was Churchill acting officially? The Border Commission Craig and Collins were trying to get rid of, was part of The Treaty so abolishing it would have been technically a breach of The Treaty! Or was it alright for the British Government to breach the terms of the treaty when it suited?

What was Michael Collins hoping to gain from this pact with the most unlikely of bedfellows? Did Collins intend, as he had decided over the treaty, to break the pact? If this was the case and even with a unified and better equipped IRA Michael Collins was preparing to take on the British Army regulars, the Black and Tans, which no doubt Churchill having been double crossed would certainly have reintroduced, the Auxiliaries and now, having stabbed Craig in the back, the Ulster Volunteer Force. This might have been, if indeed it was the case, too much even for a reunited and well-equipped IRA. Had Craig and Churchill, possibly via Curtis, have caught on? Could Craig have been involved somewhere along the line with the execution of Michael Collins? This is all supposition but as there is no definitive answer to who shot Michael Collins and the 26-county government reluctant to hold an inquiry, all these possibilities hold water. All the circumstances outlined above are historically accurate to my knowledge. 

The mystery of who shot Michael Collins is not one for the least enquiring of minds, and certainly not confined to the one theory held by many that de Valera was responsible, which is one possibility along with many others. There are many combinations of suspects, all feasible, but no hammer blow evidence to categorically point the finger at any! Theory one, Denis “Sony” O’Neill, the anti-treaty combatant with an injured shoulder, in poor visibility with heavy recoil from the rifle and at a distance of 150 metres does not add up to me in the real world of shooting relevant to the time. The numerous conspiracy theories including Lloyd George, Lionel Curtis and assassin unknown, Emmet Dalton being one suspect, but only a suspect, is another theory. The combination of Winston Churchill, Sir laming Worthington-Evans and Possibly James Craig is another. Could either of the latter two conspiracy theories involve General Neville McCready who loaned Free State Army Major General Emmet Dalton the artillery to bomb the Four Courts have had involvement?

There is perhaps one other candidate in the riddle who had Mick Collins shot and that is Brigadier-General Ormonde de l’ Epee Winter who was known simply as “O”. Winter replaced General Tudor at Dublin Castle in 1920 becoming responsible for intelligence operations in Ireland during the War of Independence. He was described by Mark Grant-Sturgis as; “O” is a marvel, he looks like a wicked little white snake, he is clever as paint, probably entirely non-moral” all of these things he was history tells us, and unscrupulous to the point of evil. He was Michael Collins nemesis and, unlike Collins, cared nothing for collateral damage, ie civilian deaths in his pursuit of quarry. He used many of Collins' methods in reverse, like using agents obtained by local police and through the agency of “local centres”. Collins used agents obtained by “local police” but sympathetic to the IRA and its aims. He used, as did Collins, captured documents and infiltrators, in much the same way as Michael Collins used Ned Broy, one of his number one spies and infiltrators working for British Intelligence along with David Neligan in Dublin Castle. In 1920 Winter took charge of the 90 strong Dublin District Intelligence Service known as the “Cairo Gang,” many of whom Collins had assassinated on Bloody Sunday 1920. Had Winter caught on to what Michael Collins was up to after The Treaty was signed, supplying the IRA in the north? Or did he just want revenge on the man who eradicated his unit? This being the case could Ormonde Winter have, through collusion or otherwise, had a hand in the shooting of Michael Collins? All speculation, but all possibilities. We could go on indefinitely pointing the finger of guilt at numerous persons but for me these are all strong possibilities, but only that.

These are only theories and not intended to be definitive conclusions, but it does seem strange the 26-county government, various, are most unwilling to open an enquiry as to who really did shoot one of the founders of the Irish Free State and Commander in Chief of the “National Army” on August 22nd 1922 at Beal na Blath in County Cork. It is my contention we will never know for certain who committed the deed, but no doubt speculation will continue indefinitely!

Caoimhin O’Muraile is Independent 
Socialist Republican and Marxist

7 comments:

  1. The original Irish 20th century conspiracy theory topic. It's akin to who killed JFK but much like the great hunger not spoken of much in Ireland rather the adoption of a historically porous narrative like the famine. I do think there was more contribution in Collins on the question of Irish independence, I don't believe he'd have rest easy on the treaty as his legacy and I do think there is a strong possibility that it wasn't a sniper in the hills that killed him. What could put this to bed? An exhumation seems really disrespectful to a huge figure in Irish history despite his end as upholder of partition and a place as dominion under the crown. If he'd have died during the tan war he'd have been a hero and possibly assumed forever to be a hardliner but compromise is the black art of the British and you either believe in principle or you dont, that's been repeated since of course.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That is very true Patrick, and it would be disrespectful to exhume the remains and I was not suggesting it. What mystifies me is the pact with Craig, the pair of them to decide where the borer would be, with Churchill present! Very sinister, and I firmly believe Curtis had more to do with his death which is why perhaps little is mentioned of him.

    Caoimhin O'Muraile

    ReplyDelete
  3. Or he could just have driven down the wrong road and found himself in the path of a bullet, like what happened with many others during this period. War is war, Collins was an enemy general in hostile territory, and sometimes the simplest solution really is the right one.

    If British intelligence was half as good as the theories make it out to be, the IRA would have been beat by December 1920 and Lloyd George not needing to sign the Treaty in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Would such an invasion have succeeded?"

    Unlikely given the original Ulster Volunteer Force had 100k in it's ranks, were well armed and supported by field hospitals and supply chains, not even counting British forces. It would have been a bloodbath regardless.

    ReplyDelete
  5. There by hangs the question? A better equiped IRA would have been in a position to give the regulars a run for their money, possibly securing a victory given Britain was winding down her armed forces, eighteen years later it almost cost them. Whether, even better equiped, the IRA could have defeated the British and the UVF, by British I include the Tans, is questionable. You are correct it would have been a bloodbath on both sides. The outcome may well have rested on British war weariness and public opinion.

    Another alternative is, had Collins lived, his deal with Craig coming into play. All out war could have been averted, as Craig, disagree with him I may, was not an idiot. If Collins and many others main gripe was the oath, then with that gone a 26 county republic, or even a 28 county republic may have sufficed for the time being. Demographics may have taken care of the rest in later years.

    Caoimhin O'Muraile

    ReplyDelete
  6. @ Caoimhin O'Muraile

    Fantastic article, thank you.

    @ Stevie R

    "Would such an invasion have succeeded?"

    Unlikely given the original Ulster Volunteer Force had 100k in it's ranks, were well armed and supported by field hospitals and supply chains, not even counting British forces. It would have been a bloodbath regardless."

    This is a fascinating question. My thoughts are that you are probably correct, but that the Free State would have engaged in a much less conventional war than the post WW1 UVF would have been adept at fighting.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It may well have depended largely on the British public, who cared little for Ireland let alone fighting another war to keep it. Demand may have forced, given the so called Great War had just ended, regular troops be withdrawn.
    Yes, the UVF at the time were large and, as the 36th Ulster Rifles had fought in WW1. So too had the National Volunteers equally. A unified IRA would have matched the UVF, certainly numerically, and huge losses on both sides, to say nothing of civillians, would have been huge.

    British public opinion may have forced the government possibly to relinquish Ireland, which would have taken the wind out of the UVFs sails. No monarch to fight for! And with their second option, Kaiser Willhelm out of the way options would have been limited.

    However, its all if's but's and maybe's we will never know. Just like the Collins Craig pact, would that have worked? I think that could have been the most likely outcome, that most unlikely of pacts.

    Caoimhin O'Muraile

    ReplyDelete