 |
| Liam Duffy 10-Sep-2020 |
Reporting of this detail caused a stir on social media, and some headlines were changed as a result.
The concern was that reporting on Abedi praying would lead to ordinary Muslim prayer being seen as a “predictor” or “indicator” of terrorism, and therefore increased suspicion and profiling of Muslims.
So is it relevant that Salman Abedi was praying? The obvious answer is — as someone about to kill themselves and others in exchange for eternal reward — yes, because every action Abedi took in the lead-up to his attack is relevant.
Prayer alone, of course, would predict no such thing and be no reason for suspicion. But security professionals are trained to be alert to behavioural patterns that are outside the norms of a given situation. A young male loitering unaccompanied by a busy music venue for over an hour with an oversized backpack amid a heightened jihadist terror threat would have been well outside typical crowd behaviour at the time, even without praying.
Continue reading @ UnHerd.
I cannot get over why Abedi was not challenged in the Manchester Arena with his backpack by security in the minutes leading up to him detonating the bomb. It should be de rigeur in any venue with large congregations of people. Apparently, security staff were barely out of their teens and paid below minimum wage.
ReplyDeleteAs regards Abedi praying; of course it is relevant as he was known to the security services and his erratic behaviour should already have attracted attention and the appropriate preventative actionb.