“It appears that these interviews have limited probative value to the criminal investigation,” Dunn said. “We are engaged in this issue for the sake of academic research and the enterprise of oral history.”
That statement eats itself: BC is fighting to protect academic research, but explicitly signals that its only intention is to protect interviews that don't matter. Interviews with probative value to a criminal investigation? Yeah, go for it, doors to the archive are wide open. Happy to help!
http://chrisbrayblog.blogspot.com/2012/02/most-unwelcome-development.html
Chris,
ReplyDeletea case of planning to fail
I trust you noticed the title of this one - Unwelcome!!
ReplyDelete