Showing posts with label Theocratic Iran. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theocratic Iran. Show all posts
Azar Majedi ✊with a statement released by Organisation for Women’s Liberation just prior to International Women's Day earlier this month. 

It is 8th March, the International Women's Day.

On this day, we once again emphasize our commitment to eliminating sexual oppression and to continue our fight for liberation and equality. We live in an extremely dire situation, internationally and in the Middle East. In the world we live in, it is of utmost importance to emphasise our egalitarian and liberating horizon and values. It is befitting to voice our humane goals on 8th of March.

This day belongs to the socialist movement. It was the socialist movement that declared the day as the day of freedom and equality of women, and it is due to the relentless socialist struggle that 8th of March has become identified with women’s equality throughout the world. United Nations chose this day as women’s day, not out of radicalism or dedication to equality and freedom, but rather with the intention of watering it down.

Women's liberation movement in Iran was born at the same time as the Islamic regime; Islamic regime gave birth to its antithesis, its staunchest enemy, i.e. women’s liberation movement. This movement has taken deep roots in society. It has faced ups and downs over the past forty years. At one time, the national Islamic reformist movement became widely active and tried to steal the stage in order to silence the radical left tendency. The left was fighting to completely de-Islamise the laws and the state, to overthrow the Islamic regime and has been fighting for real equality. The demand and slogan "equal blood money for men and women" demanded by national-Islamic reformists was among the masterpieces of this period. Organising religious ceremonies and prayers and kissing the hands of criminal mullahs in the parliament was their activism! Shirin Ebadi was one of their heroes (a friend of the regime at the time, she received the Noble Peace Prize.) We exposed them and pushed for the deepening of radicalism in the women's liberation movement. Our role was effective.

In the next round, these national Islamic women activists went abroad. They toured Western countries and received awards, donations and funds from Western states or foundations. Their position was still the same: "Islam does not contradict women's rights," (Shirin Ebadi’s famous declaration after winning the Noble Peace Prize in 2003). It did not take long before they gradually replaced their veils with hats and then tousled their hair. (Masih Alinejad is a famous example of this.) Different stunts are used to enable them to keep up with the times! With the rise of the revolutionary movement against the Islamic regime, they changed course from timid defenders of the regime to joining the right wing opposition, the national-fascist movement defending the previous regime.

Women's liberation movement is a solid pillar of the revolutionary movement against the Islamic Republic. The world felt the existence and weight of this movement in street protests, in burning the hijab, and in breaking sexual apartheid. A striking feature of the women's liberation movement in Iran is the large and active presence of men in it.

The balance of power has changed dramatically. Women's liberation movement in Iran succeeded in the de facto overthrowing of hijab. All the regime's efforts to attack women without the hijab and the "hijab and Chastity" bill are a desperate attempt to save face. The Islamic Republic is tangled in a predicament, it has lost the war on hijab and sexual apartheid, but as these two phenomena are its flag and ideological identity, it needs to keep it alive.

On the other hand, the right-wing opposition, who are counting on US regime change to rise to power, is trying to dilute and "hijack" the women's liberation movement. The word "Woman" is being superficially glorified in this scenario. All kinds of “human rights” and Nobel Peace prizes have been bestowed upon these figures. Their model-like photos are published in Western fashion and political magazines.

In1979 Iranian revolution, US and the West brought Islamists to power in Iran, a regime change imposed on people who had risen against tyranny, inequality and poverty. This time, US and the west intend to change the regime back to the old one. National fascists are the main actors of the regime change scenario and they use the narrative of "women against Islam” in the most superficial and fake way; (Or, even more superficial, woman’s body against Islam!) The West is very “creative”; professionally making up false narratives, refurbishing and customising movements and creating leaders; just as they once made ISIS and Al-Qaeda, and then with a minor plastic surgery, exchanged their robes and turbans for Yves Saint Laurent suits and were installed into the Syrian government.

We need to be aware and vigilant. We should expose their narrative. This is a trap to abort the revolutionary movement for freedom and equality of the masses of the people, the working class and the women's liberation movement. In the current critical conditions of the region and the world, increased vigilance is needed to put a barrier against this regime-change trap in the struggle for the revolutionary overthrow of the Islamic regime. Socialist ideals, that is, freedom and equality are deep rooted in Iran. These goals must be formulated and expressed loudly. Unity and solidarity must be expanded. Revolutionary organisation must be formed. A huge and decisive battle is ahead of us.

Even if we ignore theory, history has consistently shown that freedom and equality under capitalism are impossible. Leave aside the vast majority of the world under oppression and dictatorship thanks to US imperialism, look at the western world, the cradle of democracy and prosperity. 80 years after the end of a devastating world war that led to horrific genocides in every corner of the world, to holocaust, and the US celebrated its end by dropping atomic bombs on Japan, after promising that it will "Never happen again!", celebrating human rights and democracy; fascism is rapidly on the rise to complete power.

Repression and censorship are rampant; poverty and deprivation have engulfed millions in the "prosperous" West. Western statesmen are beating the drums of war. Thousands have been killed in Palestine; the flames of war have engulfed the region. The Middle East has practically become a ruin, an open mass grave. The cleansing of a nation is proceeding in the most brutal way possible before the eyes of the world. This is capitalism. Capitalism came to power by bleeding society and has continued to exist by enslaving millions of people. This is the nature of capitalism.

Women’s liberation movement in Iran must raise the flag of socialism, the flag of real freedom and equality, not a formal or cosmetic one. If the west and their allies have not been able to implement the regime change yet is because of the existence of the socialist aspirations within Iranian society. Let us believe in our strength. Let us rely on our united and organised force. Let us not allow our demands and ideals to be diluted, hijackedor distorted.

8th March is a suitable occasion to consolidate and strengthen our movement; a movement that strives for the freedom and equality of humans from the yoke of slavery and exploitation, injustice and oppression.

Long Live Women’s Liberation!

Long live Freedom, equality and prosperity!

Organisation for Women’s Liberation

5 March 2025

Asar Majedi is a Member of Hekmatist Party leadership & Chairperson of Organisation for Women’s Liberation

8th Of March A Socialist Heritage Celebrating Freedom And Equality

Maryam Namazie ✊ of One Law for All who organised the FEMEN/One Law for All protest in London on 8 November in support of Ahoo Daryaei said:

Nude protest goes to the crux of the Woman, Life, Freedom revolution in Iran by reclaiming a battlefield for suppression into a battlefield for liberation of self and society. A reimagining of a world that is based not on ‘Man, Nation, Prosperity,’ but on Woman, Life, Freedom.

See her speech here:



Farsi Translation can be found here.

Full English Text below:

Ahoo was violently arrested for stripping at her Tehran university campus and sectioned in a psychiatric ward for being ‘mad,’ but there is nothing mad about her scream against misogyny. Women who rebel have always been labelled insane by the Islamic regime in Iran but also historically. In fact, it is the regime, its laws, Islam, religion, misogyny, patriarchy that is mad not Ahoo.

Why with nude protest though some ask? Because nudity is the antithesis of veiling. It is a subversion of the ideal woman who must be obedient, submissive, silent, and erased from the public space. The regime calls unveiled women naked. Ahoo and we will show you what naked is. The insistence by the Islamists to erase women’s bodies and voices from the public space means that nudity is an important form of resistance.

So, you want everyone to be naked as the Islamic regime says about nude protest? Maybe you don’t understand the concept of ‘My body, My choice’ or how rights work. The right to abortion, or gay rights doesn’t mean you have to have an abortion or be gay.

Women’s nudity as protest brings out deep-seated hatred and misogyny particularly when a women’s body is in her own hands outside of the socially accepted limits of being either “virgin” or “whore.”

Still, often opposition to the Islamic regime of Iran equate nudity with deviance and obscenity. This is the regime’s view of women’s bodies, hence the Woman, Life, Freedom slogan ‘You are the deviant, I am a Free Woman.’

In fact, Ahoo’s stripping is the crux of the Woman, Life, Freedom revolution, which is not just about the hijab. The hair is an extension of the body. Women’s bodies are not shameful. Shame is not between a women’s legs or within her breasts. As Gisele Pelicot said in her mass rape trial, ‘Shame must change sides.’ It is the Islamic regime of Iran, misogynists and patriarchs that should be ashamed, not Ahoo. The problem is not with women’s bodies; the problem is your deep-seated misogyny.

Nude protest makes women’s bodies visible and redefines who controls her body – not religion, culture, the patriarch, and certainly not ‘Man, Nation, Prosperity,’ a slogan raised in confrontation to ‘Woman, Life, Freedom,’ representing more of the same old man as lord and master.

Nude protest goes to the crux of the Woman, Life, Freedom revolution in Iran by reclaiming a battlefield for suppression into a battlefield for liberation of self and society. A reimagining of a world that is based not on ‘Man, Nation, Prosperity,’ but on ‘Woman, Life, Freedom.’

Maryam Namazie is a political activist, campaigner and blogger

In Support Of Ahoo Daryaei 🪶 Nude Protest Is A Battlefield For Liberation

Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain 8 November Global Day Of Action For Student Who Removed Her Clothes In Tehran

On 2 November, a female student from Tehran's Science and Research University (apparently called Ahu Daryaei) removed her clothes on campus in protest to being harassed by security forces over mandatory hijab rules. 

She was violently beaten, arrested and reportedly transferred to a psychiatric ward.

It is the Islamic regime of Iran’s control and suppression of women’s bodies, it is sharia, compulsory veiling, the hatred of women that is the madness, not women’s defiance and screams against misogyny.

When being a woman is a crime, when women’s bodies, hair, voices, sexuality are deemed blasphemous, corrupt and a source of fitnah, nudity becomes an important form of resistance.

FEMEN and One Law for All stand with #StudentOfScienceResearch and demand her immediate release.

We call on women everywhere to join an International Day of Action for the #StudentOfScienceResearch by posting photos and videos of ourselves on Friday 8 November using these hashtags:

#GirlOfScienceResearch

#دختر_علوم_تحقیقات

Alarm At New Sikh Court

For many years, One Law for All, Southall Black Sisters (SBS) and other organisations in the UK have campaigned against religious courts like the Sharia courts or Beth Dinn. We are extremely concerned to see the recent establishment of a Sikh court as well.

Religious courts actively undermine and obstruct access to justice and violate women’s and children’s rights. Rather than establishing more religious courts that represent the fundamentalist agenda, we call on the government to end the religious-Right's use of the Arbitration Act 1996 in family matters and end religious courts once and for all.

For more information on the new Sikh court, see:

The Sikh Court: Parallel Justice Systems are a Danger to Women

In peril: religious authorities are closing in on minority women’s rights!

Events

Maryam Namazie gave the keynote address at the October 19 National Secular Society Secularism 2024 conference arguing against the notion that 'East' and 'West' are fundamentally and irreconcilably different, by stressing our common humanity.

Focusing on the story of the secular 'Women, Life, Freedom' movement in Iran that followed the murder of Mahsa Jina Amini, Namazie urged secularists to act in solidarity ‘across borders and boundaries’ in defence of universal values.

Her speech on ‘confronting identity politics, a breeding ground for division and dehumanisation’ can be found in The Freethinker.

Other upcoming speaking engagements this month:

14 November 2024, Cambridge Union, ‘This House Believes Feminism is Incompatible with Religion’. See details.

29 November-1 December 2024, Reggio Emilia, Giornate della laicita festival. See details.

For more information or to donate, visit One Law for All’s website.

Day Of Action In Support Of Iranian Woman & Sikh Courts

Maryam Namazie A video is circulating of Aisan Eslami, an ‘Influencer’ who lives in the USA with millions of followers, promoting the ‘honour’-killing of an Iranian women Simin Pourmehr on social media for her saying that one could go on holiday with the money it costs to go out for one night in Dubai.


It’s a masterclass in misogyny, racism and violence against women.


He says:

‘If you were my sister, I would behead you, filthy shit… Isn’t there a man in your family to come and pull your hair, and bring you to Iran and tie you up in a room, you filth. Girl, you are my namoos (honour), my countryman, my sister. Oh you filthy, shit, dog… I was just looking at explorer, [and you say], ‘we live in Dubai and with the money of one night recreation, one can go on holiday.’ Spit on your face. You shit. At least, don’t speak Farsi, speak another language… Isn’t there a mother, father, male, cousin who can come and pull your hair and hit you in the head, you filth? Why are you going to an Arab Emirate?… We go with the photo of Reza Khan, the Shah of 50, 60, 70 years ago; our history was Kourosh the great… you’re doing exactly what the Islamic regime of Iran wants – to make everyone ‘dis-honourable’, to make everyone dishonourable. Brother, ‘Binamoosy’, lack of honour is the red line of all Iranians across the world. Are we Mexicans, El Salvadorans, where the brother has sex with the mother, the mother has sex with the sister…? In Iran if this happens, there is a homicide…. Wherever you see this video [of her saying you can go on holiday for money it costs for one night in Dubai], erase the video, this will reach the hands of a few Arabs. In another 2 days they will sit together, with the fat stomachs and they will say this is an Iranian girl. I will have a heart attack to see such scenes. Then you go to Turkey and you see Iranian girls and they ask, ‘How much does she take?’ to one’s mother and sister and it leads to murder. You made me ill, girl. And it upset me that I cursed at you, you filthy shit. If I had my hands on you, I would hit your head with this [shows something] so that your head explodes.‘

He has since ‘apologised’ saying he spouted the murder of women because he ‘got caught up in the moment’ and ‘became emotional.’

Even in his ‘apology,’ Eslami places the blame on the woman who invoked his violent rage. It’s the usual shaming of women who don’t behave ‘appropriately;’ in effect she is the whore who has no one to blame but herself for any ensuing male violence.

His bogus apology shows, at the very least, the pushback that exists as a result of the Woman, Life, Freedom revolution. It also shows, though, that it is not just the Islamic regime of Iran that is being challenged by the women’s revolution.

The misogyny and violence against women is deep, including amongst the monarchist opposition abroad to which Eslami belongs. Look at the comments in his feed defending him and vilifying her to get a small flavour of this toxic masculinity and ‘honour’ culture which removes male accountability for violence. In this world, women are to be either protected or raped/beheaded depending on how well they guard the honour of men.

This violence and threat of violence spills beyond the pages of social media.

Just one case in point. At a rally against the farce of a presidential election in Iran in London, monarchists chant ‘Maryam Namazie, hurry up and get naked’ and ‘Filthy Feminists’ in first video and ‘Ripped, Ripped Maryam, Fuck your Sister’s Cunt’ in the second video whilst calling myself and other women ‘whores.’




Threats from monarchists and the regime’s agents are full of violent misogynist language similar to that used by Eslami. See some here and here.

Eslami parades topless spouting misogyny and violence against women and is enabled by social media companies to garner millions of followers. Women’s rights defenders on the other hand are often suspended and barred for defending women’s bodily autonomy and rights.

See for example:

Instagram has been restricting my account without informing me. I only found out inadvertently.

Maryam Namazie is an Iranian-born activist and Spokesperson of the
Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain and One Law for All.

Aisan Eslami ✊ Not Your Fucking Honour

Maryam Namazie Resistance against surging executions in Iran continue.

5-February-2024

On 25 January 61 women political prisoners in Evin prison held a day-long hunger strike in condemnation of the surge in executions, including of a protestor arrested during the Woman, Life, Freedom revolution, Mohamad Ghobadlou.

On 30 January, there was a national strike in Iranian Kurdistan against the executions of Kurdish political prisoners Mohammad Faramarzi, Mohsen Mazloum, Wafa Azarbar, and Pejman Fatehi.


On 31 January, a group of prisoners on death row at Ghezel Hesar prison declared a hunger strike every Tuesday to draw attention to the urgent need to halt executions; other prisoners have joined the campaign.

Join #TuesdaysAgainstExecutions #EndExecutionsInIran. Join protests that are being organised in city centres worldwide, write a poem, sing a song, draw a picture, take a photo or video of yourself with the hashtags…

Your support and solidarity with thousands of prisoners on death row can help save lives.
#TuesdayAgainstExcecutions
#StopExecutionsInIran
#RageAgainstExecutions

Maryam Namazie is an Iranian-born activist and Spokesperson of the
Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain and One Law for All.

Tuesdays Against Executions In Iran

Maryam Namazie Abstract: The article critically examines Bahareh Hedayat’s open letter from Evin prison written in December 2022. 

9-October-2023
The letter reveals a paradigm shift with respect to the so-called reformist movement – from working within the confines of a theocratic state to calling for its complete overthrow by revolutionary means. This welcome change is a reflection of the secular and anti-clerical revolution unfolding in Iran, sparked by the murder of Mahsa Jina Amini and led by women – a revolution that is convincing many, like Hedayat, that the only solution is revolution. In fact, the whole idea behind the reformist movement was wrong from the beginning: how does one reform God’s laws that are meant to be infallible? Can the rights of women be met within a system of sex apartheid? Can the unreformable be reformed? As for the future of Iran, this is the time to dream big and recognise the vast potential of this revolution to fundamentally change the face of the country and the world by establishing – why not? – a more interventionist direct democracy, such as that being experimented in Rojava.


Bahareh Hedayat (born 1980) is an activist who has been imprisoned multiple times. In October 2022, she was re-arrested amidst the Mahsa Jina Amini revolution and jailed in Evin Prison. She has currently been moved to hospital due to deterioration of her health as a result of a hunger strike.

In December 2022, two months after the start of the Mahsa Jina Amini revolution, Hedayat penned an open letter from Evin Prison. [Political prisoners in Iran have smuggled open letters for years now, including labour activist Sepideh Qoliyan, who recently wrote: ‘The echoes of “Woman, Life, Freedom” can be heard even through the thick walls of Evin prison.’ Upon release in March 2023 after nearly 6 years in prison, Qoliyan shouted ‘Khamenei the tyrant; we will bury you.’ She was promptly rearrested and is back at Evin Prison.]

Hedayat’s letter is entitled ‘Revolution is Inevitable.’

The letter reveals a paradigm shift: from working within the confines of a theocratic state to calling for its complete overthrow by revolutionary means.

Hedayat is best known for her work in the Campaign for Equality which aimed at raising one million signatures to reform the discriminatory laws in Iran and for her support of the Green Movement of the so-called Islamic reformists. She has also been Spokesperson for the Women’s Commission of Daftareh Tahkheem Vahdat(Office to Foster Unity or Office for Strengthening Unity), a government-affiliated student group aimed at organising students ‘within the framework of the constitution and the Islamic revolution.’

This welcome change is a reflection of the women’s revolution unfolding in Iran, sparked by the murder of Mahsa Jina Amini for ‘improper veiling’ on 16 September 2022. This modern, secular, anti-clerical and even anti-religious revolution is led by a Generation Z that has no illusions towards any aspect of the Islamic state. And it is convincing many, like Hedayat, that the only solution is revolution.

In her open letter, she writes: ‘the youth of today’s Iran brought their political demands to the streets and defined them around the slogan of “woman, life, freedom” and the concept of the overthrow [of the Islamic Republic].’ She says the movement is ‘free from the shrapnel of political Islam.’ She adds, ‘In order to explain what it wants and does not want, this generation of protestors has not resorted to any concept that has a religious or even quasi-religious pedigree, and this is a great accomplishment.’

Crucially, she recognises that support for the so-called reformists has been a mistake. At the height of this movement, many of us on the Left did warn that the reformist faction from within the ruling elite was a strategy to maintain the Islamic system with empty promises of illusory reform in the face of widespread opposition from various sectors of Iranian society. After all, the so-called reformists have always been part and parcel of the system. Only men who have shown complete loyalty to the Islamic system have had any chance of entering and remaining in positions of power. They can only run in the farcical elections if approved by Ayatollah Khamenei, the Supreme Spiritual Leader, and the Council of Guardians. And the track records of these ‘reformists’ speak for themselves.

Mohammad Khatami, the ‘leading reformer,’ for example, has been a representative in the Islamic Assembly during the 1980s, Minister of Culture and Islamic Guidance responsible for censorship, and a member of the Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution, which aims to ensure that the education and culture of Iran ‘remains 100% Islamic’ as Ayatollah Khomeini has directed.

The Green movement leader, Mir Hossein Mousavi, has been a former prime minister during 1981-1989, a period known as the Bloody Decade. In August 1988 alone, in a second wave of mass executions after brief ‘trials,’ thousands who responded negatively to questions such as ‘Are you a Muslim?’, ‘Do you believe in Allah?’, ‘Is the Holy Qur’an the Word of Allah?’, ‘Do you accept the Holy Muhammad to be the Seal of the Prophets?’, ‘Do you fast during Ramadan?’, ‘Do you pray and read the Holy Qur’an?’ have been summarily executed. So why Hedayat’s misguided feelings of betrayal to hear Mir Hossein Mousavi call Ayatollah Khomeini, a ‘vigilant spirit?’

Certainly, the ‘reformists’ have been persecuted, their government-affiliated papers shut down, their candidates barred from running in the ‘elections.’ But hasn’t this regime been built on the suppression and persecution of countless generations? Isn’t it a totalitarian state without free press, speech or thought? Does persecution only matter when those working within the confines of the regime are persecuted? What about all the other bodies buried in mass graves, like in Khavaran?

The earnest use of the term reformist within this widespread repression is repulsive. Reform means real changes in the law that improves the condition of citizens. How does one reform God’s laws that are meant to be infallible? And how can a theocracy that represents God’s rule on earth be reformed? The very idea is considered blasphemous and heretical by theocrats, including so-called reformists that have not only been ‘contaminated with political Islam’ but part and parcel of Islamist rule in Iran for four decades.

The Worker-communist Mansoor Hekmat has said it well in describing a conference in Berlin in 2000 that had aimed to present the ‘reformists’ image of a different Islamic Republic ‘…full of smiles and chirping birds, where harmless mullahs with radiant faces and sheer robes frolic, hand in hand in meadows chasing butterflies, collecting stamps and learning the Internet… [in order to] conceal – behind a cardboard image of a reactionary mullah and worthless utterances about “modern Islam” – the mass executions and stonings, the unmarked graves, the unpaid workers, right-less women, hopeless youth, ruined children, suppressed beliefs and silenced voices.’ The so-called reformists tried to save their regime and failed. The Jina revolution is testament to that.

Hedayat now recognises that people’s demands cannot be met within this structure. Of course, it cannot. Any aspect of an Islamic state, however presented and packaged, is antithetical to people’s demands and desires. The ongoing protests and uprisings in Iran over the years, including in December 2017 and November 2019 have shown this very clearly. Can the rights of black people be met within a system of racial apartheid? Can the rights of women be met within a system of sex apartheid? Can the unreformable be reformed?

Interestingly, Hedayat is rightly critical of a current in the West that defends the hijab as empowering and sees criticism of the veil as ‘Islamophobia’ because of cultural relativism. But wasn’t the corresponding cultural particularism of the ‘reformists’ the exact same position, albeit for different reasons? Their argument has always been that Islam and Islamic rules are ‘people’s culture,’ therefore ‘graduate change’ is needed to ‘prevent violence’ and ensure that ‘our’ culture is respected. Cultural relativism and absolutism have been the perfect positions to maintain the status quo and the Islamic system in Iran. Yet we know that culture is not homogenous or static. A defence of Islamic culture is a defence of a totalitarian state vis-à-vis the culture of dissent and resistance. In any case, if your ‘culture’ violates rights, it must be changed, condemned, abolished. You cannot legitimise violence and rights violations by saying it is ‘my culture.’ It certainly isn’t everyone’s culture. Saying so disregards the empirical evidence of diversity and the widespread opposition to Islamic rules, which are now in public view for the world to see, thanks to the Jina revolution.

Women and girls removing and burning their hijabs as the most visible manifestation of and a key pillar of Islamist rule insists on this distinction between the regime’s culture and that of free women and men. The slogan ‘Woman, Life, Freedom,’ first raised in Rojava, has shaken this regime to its very core because a theocracy that cannot control ‘its women,’ cannot continue to exist. It is via the hijab and suppression of women that the regime suppresses all of society. Hence why this is a revolution supported by all segments of society. After decades of misogynist rule, the Jina revolution proclaims: the freedom of women in any society is truly the measure of a free society. Which is why, too, that this revolution has brought to the fore the struggle against discrimination of national and sexual minorities. [As an aside, though Hedayat doesn’t see this, the hijab and sex apartheid are very much related to the maintenance of capitalism through the relegation of women to private domestic labour and reproduction.]

Whilst commendably criticising the ‘reformist’ movement, Hedayat’s worldview continues to carry its baggage. She speaks of revolution being in nature ‘dangerous and violent,’ for example. In fact, revolution is the people’s response to forty years of unrelenting violence. Revolution is the least violent means in confronting a totalitarian state. If over 600 people have been killed in protests since September 2022, if 18-20,000 people have been arrested and tortured, if hundreds have been executed since January this year alone, if over 5,000 schoolgirls have been gassed… it is the regime’s violence they are resisting, not the other way round.

Also, another open letter from Hedayat from June this year warns against ‘unrealisable utopias,’ such as ‘council rule and radical democracy.’ As Uruguayan poet and writer Eduardo Galeano says: ‘To ensure the perpetuation of the current state of affairs in lands where every minute a child dies of disease or hunger, we have to be taught to see ourselves through the eyes of the oppressor. People are trained to accept “this” order as the “natural” order and therefore as an eternal one…’

Considering direct forms of democratic rule as utopian precisely during a period of revolutionary upheaval reveals the continued ‘reformist’ point of view that can never see beyond prescribed confines and limits. More than any other time, isn’t this the time to be audacious, dream big and recognise the vast potential of the Woman, Life, Freedom revolution to fundamentally change the face of Iran and the world by establishing a more interventionist direct democracy, such as that being experimented in Rojava, which goes beyond the current old and tired ‘democracies for all’ but really for the few?

The poverty of empathy and imagination is a major obstacle to the birth of a new society in Iran as is the threat of further interventions by Western governments, the revolution’s hijacking by right-wing opposition forces like the monarchists, and most crucially the continued suppression by the Islamic regime of Iran as its only route to survival.

The Jina revolution is showing a new way, if only its call is heeded.

This article was written and will be published in Italian for Psiche in December. It was published in English in Feminist Dissent.

Maryam Namazie is an Iranian-born activist and Spokesperson of the
Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain and One Law for All.

Iran ✊ Revolution Not Reform

Maryam Namaziespeaking in England and Germany, shared her views on the relationship between human rights in Islam.


The global fight for women’s rights and freedom takes centre stage as prominent women’s rights organisation One Law For All and the feminist liberation charity FiLiA again join forces to stand in solidarity with our Iranian sisters, and to call for an end to the Islamic regime of Iran.

The #Sing4Freedom initiative, an integral part of the ground-breaking Hair4Freedom campaign initiated in November 2022, and the subsequent Dance4Freedom campaign in April 2023, are set to inspire and mobilise women across the UK and world.

Women will gather to sing the Equality Song which has become a rallying cry for protestors in Iran. Notably, the song gained international attention in 2018 when three unveiled women’s rights advocates sang it in the Tehran metro to mark International Women’s Day.

The #Sing4Freedom protest aims to amplify the voices of those who cannot be silenced, bringing attention to the daily inhumane treatment faced by women in Iran.

Lyrics and translations of the Equality Song are available in both English and Persian, serving as a bridge that connects cultures and languages while championing the universal fight for women’s rights. This is an opportunity for the press to engage in a story of courage, resilience, and solidarity. By covering this unique protest, the press can play an essential role in encouraging the global community to stand up and support the ongoing revolution for women’s freedom.

Join us in spreading the word to commemorate one year since the murder of Mahsa Amini, and the Woman Life Freedom Revolution!

We invite the press to capture the determination of those who refuse to turn away from this revolution.

For media inquiries, interviews, and more information, please contact:

Freya Papworth, FiLiA Campaigns Spokeswoman, campaigns@filia.org.uk

About One Law For All

One Law For All is a prominent women’s rights organisation. Through dynamic campaigns and powerful initiatives, they oppose religious laws and theocracy that discriminate against and encourage violence against women and strive for women’s rights, equality and secular societies.

About FiLiA

FiLiA is a feminist liberation charity committed to amplifying the voices of women less heard, defending women’s rights globally, and building sisterhood and solidarity.

Together, we sing. Together, we stand. Together, we rise.

Social media hashtags: #Sing4Freedom #Hair4Freedom #Dance4Freedom

Comments For Use:

Maryam Namazie – Spokeswoman for One Law For All @MaryamNamazie

In Iran, women are banned from showing their hair, singing or dancing in public, hence why so many women and girls have been doing just that during the Mahsa Jina Amini revolution in Iran. They are also barred from working, studying and travelling without their male guardian’s permission. Women’s testimony is worth half that of a man’s; she gets half the inheritance men do, and women have to sit at the back of a bus and use separate entrances. It’s a system of apartheid, no different from race apartheid, but one based on sex. It’s no wonder that women and girls are leading the fight back. Their message has reverberated across the world: we don’t want an Islamic regime; we don’t want a misogynist state. In a country where the state controls all of society via its suppression and control of women, it is fitting that it is the women – and young girls – who are bringing the Islamic regime to its knees. We see it as the historical task of women everywhere to defend the Jina revolution. Our revolution.

Freya Papworth – Spokeswoman for FiLiA Charity campaigns@filia.org.uk

The past few years have seen a brutal crackdown on women’s rights around the world, with the clock ticking backwards as hard won freedoms have been removed either with the swipe of a pen or with brutality reminiscent of a dystopian novel. Women are under sustained and increasingly violent attacks and so we stand with our sisters in Iran who are fighting back, against such high odds. I am proud of our sustained protests throughout the last year which have seen hundreds of women cut their hair and dance, and I hope many more will join us on the 16th April both in person and at home on social media.

Useful Links:

FiLiA Charity

One Law For All

Maryam Namazie

Video of Hair4Freedom protest 2022

Podcast episode with Maryam and Freya

Previous Protests by One Law For All and FiLiA

Hair4Freedom

The first #4Freedom joint action, #Hair4Freedom saw women queuing up for over an hour to cut their hair, a symbol of the women led revolution, to the sound of drumming, chanting and singing. Our action was broadcast around the world on: Daily Telegraph Australia, VOA, ABC News, Cyprus Mail, Alein Farsi, Independent Persian, Kayhan London, VOA 365, Sri Lanka News, Yahoo, Reuters and others. Attempts were made to throw the gathered hair on the regime’s embassy in London. Activists were prevented from doing so because the police said ‘it would distress the embassy personnel’.

#Dance4Freedom

On April 29th 2023 women again gathered to learn and perform an Iranian dance set to the protest song Girls of the Land of the Sun. This action was in solidarity with the women’s revolution in Iran via protest dance. The dance-in was for 45 minutes, symbolic of the time it took for morality police to call an ambulance after Mahsa Jina Amini collapsed in detention.

Maryam Namazie is an Iranian-born activist and Spokesperson of the
Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain and One Law for All.

#Sing4freedom To Mark The One Year Anniversary Of The Murder Of Mahsa Jina Amini And The Start Of The Woman, Life, Freedom Revolution In Iran

Caoimhin O’Muraile ☭ This Saturday 16th September will mark the first anniversary of the death of political activist, Mahsa Amini in Iran.

Mahsa died suspiciously to say the very least while in custody of the Iranian authorities. One year on the Iranian authorities continue to repress dissent and protest, no matter how minor, and they very often arrest and victimise the families of activists. They impose very restrictive and cruel restrictions on peaceful gatherings and continue vandalising and destroying the graves of their victims. 

Mahsa Amini’s family have publicly spoken out, at great risk to themselves, about the repeated damage to her grave in this supposed religious country. Mahsa’s grave has become a central point where the families of other victims of the regime in Iran gather to find peace and solace. The religious gang who govern, or more aptly misgovern Iran have begun doubling their efforts of control particularly against women. In July, there was a return of police patrols whose role it is to force women to cover themselves up in public, a practice known as ‘compulsory veiling’ in which women and girls, whether they wish it or not, are forced to wear a full veil over their face. Women and girls who defy the authorities and therefore ‘forced veiling’ have been threatened with legal action as well as being violently assaulted by officials in Tehran and Rasht.

Many, many women whose numbers are ‘countless’ have been suspended and expelled from universities, barred from sitting their final exams, a disaster for any student in any country, and denied access to banking services and banned from public transport. Not a single official of the religious ruling body has been held to account for the murders of men, women and children by the so-called security forces during the last year of protests. Why could that be?

Civil unrest and protest in Iran against the government associated with the death while in police custody of Mahsa Amini began on 16th September 2022 and is continuing to this day. Mahsa’s offence, if that is what it was, was violating the country’s ‘mandatory hijab law’ by wearing her hijab in an improper fashion. According to eyewitnesses, she had been severely beaten by ‘Guidance Patrol officers’, claims which the authorities deny. 

As the protests spread out from Mahsa’s home town of Saqqez to other cities in Iran, the government have responded with widespread internet blackouts, nationwide restrictions on social media usage and have used teargas and gunfire against protestors. There have been countless human rights abuses against women and girls by the so-called ‘Morality Police’ along with the killings of hundreds of protestors. The aims of the protestors have increased from protesting at the severity of the law since the death of Mahsa Amini and are now aimed at the toppling of the regime in Iran. Also on the protestors' agenda is the protection of civil and political rights, including and primarily in that country, women’s rights hitherto hardly existent. The protestors also wish to remove mandatory religious requirements, such as the forced wearing of the hijab, dissolution of the so-called Morality Police and the prosecution of the murderers of Mahsa Amini. 

As of 4th April 2023 at least 537 protestors including 68 minors have been killed by the authorities. Mahsa Amini was a 22-year-old Kurdish Iranian woman beaten by the ‘Guidance Patrol’ (I assume these are a wing of the ‘Morality Police’) having a fatal head injury inflicted on her. After a Computerised Tomography (CT) scan confirmed that she ‘sustained head injuries, the head of the Guidance Patrol was allegedly suspended, a claim which was denied by the Tehran police’

The protests have not yet been as deadly as those in 2019, when more than 1,500 were killed. They have, however, been nationwide and spread across all social classes, universities, the streets and schools. They have been described as the ‘biggest challenge to the government of Iran since the Islamic Revolution of 1979.’ Women and schoolchildren have played a key role in these demonstrations, which the government dismiss as riots caused by foreign states and dissidents abroad. Even by the ridiculous standards of Iran these claims appear far-fetched to say the least.

What is happening in Iran should be condemned by every sane person on the planet and is not perhaps dissimilar as to the present situation in Afghanistan. Since the United States and the British, having made yet another fucking mess, left the country the plight of women under the ruling Taliban does not look good. Firstly, they went in to sort out the Taliban who had fought as part of the Mujahadin against the Soviet Union. They, the US, armed them, advised them only to have those same guns fired back at themselves! At this point they ran away leaving the Taliban in charge and the plight of women very, very uncertain. When the USSR left Afghanistan many women, who no longer had to wear the veil and could enter the world of work, including the professions, cried at their future prospects under these religious nutters. It appears very much the same kind of fanatical Islamic regime which is ruling in Iran.

We should not forget, here in the 26-counties, that not so many decades ago we too were de-facto ruled by a bunch of religious cranks. John Charles McQuaid was the Archbishop of Dublin between 1940 and 1972. He influenced, even dictated to governments and was chiefly responsible for the failure of the progressive Dr Noel Browne’s attempts to introduce the ‘Mother and Child’ scheme. The ‘Mother and Child scheme’ was the brainchild of Dr Noel Browne and was seen, by the church and McQuaid in particular, to be the ‘socialisation’ of health care hitherto the responsibility of the Catholic Church. The scheme was designed to give free healthcare to mothers and children up to the age of 16. The Catholic Church, the de-facto government unelected for so many years, opposed anything with an air of socialism about it and this included free at the point of need healthcare. The other major so-called Christian religion in the 26 counties, the Church of Ireland was also opposed to Browne’s scheme. 

In the six counties, initially, there were similar opposition to the introduction of the National Health Service in 1948 on similar grounds. Professors Garry O’Leary and Brendan O’Leary wrote that the Ulster Unionist Party was “famously opposed” to the introduction of the NHS. Any form of socialism/communism went against all Christian teachings, yet, my understanding was that Jesus, if he existed, was the first communist on earth! Did he not supposedly kick the capitalists out of the temple? Did this early variant of Marx preach the spreading of the wealth? ‘The meek will inherit the earth’ was another communistic statement supposedly uttered by Jesus, and let us not forget the Sermon on the Mount! 

In the 26 counties anything which went against Catholic doctrine, or McQuaid’s interpretation of such doctrine was a non-starter for any Taoiseach and none dare oppose the all-powerful Archbishop! He had de Valera eating out of his hands and the rights of women were virtually non-existent, with government approval. Many women died in the so-called ‘Magdalene Laundries’ and other Catholic run state approved sweatshops. In the six-counties between 1922 and 1972 the entirely Protestant Ulster Unionist Party governed, or more appropriately misgoverned that part of Ireland. They too had their religious fanatics, like the late Ian Paisley, and in Protestant areas of the statelet on Sunday all the swings in playparks for children were tied up so they could not be used, and the UUPs early attitudes to free healthcare has already been mentioned. Fortunately, Ireland, 26 counties and the North of Ireland have made great progress since those days of religious lunacy. The church was never the elected government in either jurisdiction on the island of Ireland but they still ruled indirectly for so many years. Unfortunately for Mahsa Amini and countless other women and protestors Iran has, if anything, gone backwards as has Afghanistan who are still living in the days of Saladin and the Holy Wars against the Crusades of the 12th century.

To mark the anniversary of Mahsa’s death there will be a rally at 1pm, the Spire on O’Connell Street, Dublin. The rally is organised by the Support Equality & Freedom for Iran (SEFI) and Irish Iranians all welcome. The campaign is supported by Amnesty International.

Caoimhin O’Muraile is Independent Socialist Republican and Marxist.

Remember Mahsa Amini ⚑ Death Of An Activist