Showing posts with label Sinn Fein Crisis 2024. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sinn Fein Crisis 2024. Show all posts
Muiris Ó Súilleabháin ✍ It would be easy to sit back and enjoy the apparent implosion of New Sinn Fein ( NSF) with a certain amount of justifiable schadenfreude. 

The furore surrounding the provision of job references for paedophiles and sexters by the party that provided a public reference for the misunderstood family man Freddie Scappaticci, while justified, has somewhat taken the heat of the party`s abysmal performance as the lead party in the NI Executive.

The current scandals appear to have derailed the strategy and based on current opinion polls the only hope NSF have of reaching the “big chair” in the South is if they amalgamate with Fine Gael. While this might be an appealing option to Mary Lou and other members of the centre right wing of NSF, I doubt very much that FG, who have a new bounce in their step, will be wooed. Failure to secure Government in Leinster House, this time round, leaves “the border poll 2030 project” dead in the water and the entire “movement” in need of a reboot. Mary Lou will soon discover that the “movement” devours their own without remorse.

In the north, the Executive is delivering nothing but more of the same for workers and families and the only thing that has changed is that instead of blaming “Tory austerity” the Shinners are now blaming Starmer. As one particularly astute commentator noted this week it would suit NSF if the Executive was to collapse and die, but it would not suit them to be the ones to collapse the Executive.

“Events dear boy events”

When the Fist Minister of Northern Ireland was unceremoniously sent packing from Downing Street with her Casement Park begging bowl, quickly followed by her socialist economy and finance Ministers, few chose to cast a critical eye on the not unsubstantial part that New Sinn Fein (NSF) themselves played in this debacle and the many reasons why NSF moved from a position of Casement being a red line to meekly accepting the diktat of the sovereign UK Government.

NSF misread the room, in relation to the “New” Labour Government, perhaps because of the mood music being supplied by Starmer’s now redundant advisor Sue Gray, who maintains a dubious relationship with both former Finance Minister O’Mulleoir and current Economy Minister Murphy.

The UK treasury, Labour MPs and the entire GB Civil Service were aghast that anyone who was enumerate, never mind a finance minister, was arguing for an investment equivalent to the £400m Olympic stadium in London for a football pitch in Andytown, that would, at best, host a few matches and concerts per year.

The socialist Minister Archibald met with the Chancellor 2 days before the official announcement and was left in no doubt that if Casement was to be built to FIFA standards then she would have to find the money. Dr Archibald, I am told was given what GB Civil Servants described as a “reality check” and what her own staff referred to as a “much needed kick in the arse”.

The good doctor, Archibald, who has quickly gained the reputation amongst her officials as having the fiscal acumen of Liz Truss and the competence of Catriona Ruane, left the Chancellery with her tail between legs. Having been given a very clear understanding that not only would “Super Casement” not be built with UK monies, but that she would have to supplement the block grant by raising revenue through the indirect taxation of “workers and families” (© Sinn Fein).

Duly obliging her colonial masters, the socialist republican Minister who had previously increased rates, promised further “progressive” revenue raising measures, such as removing winter fuel payments from pensioners. The Socialist Minister issued a caution to her fellow Ministers, warning them of “dire consequences” if they spent more than they were allocated by her department. No doubt it was the British that made her do it.

Having dutifully moved from the Connollyesque platitudes in their manifesto to an economic position that would have embarrassed Thatcher, the movement required choreography, and the UK Government was content to oblige. The spoon full of sugar that afforded Sinn Fein a modicum of self-respect and a line that the leadership could sell to their faithful was the announcement of the inquiry into the murder of Pat Finucane.

The reasoning behind the Finucane family’s acceptance of an inquiry that was on offer to them 18 years earlier, by Peter Hain, at such a critical juncture for NSF will never be known. However, I suspect that it may have more to do with ongoing negotiations on an overarching deal on legacy, that will address the tricky but paramount issues for NSF such as John Downey and Martin McAuley.

By the time, the British Secretary of State made the public announcement of Casement on a Friday evening, the NSF position had changed from one of “Super Casement” being a red line that might endanger Stormont to “Casement will be built”.

I was minded of a quote by Khrushchev who once opined that “politicians are the same all over. They promise to build bridges, even when there are no rivers”, and reflected on the fact that Casement would have been built had it not been for the incompetence of the previous NSF Ministers, including Hargey and Ni Chuilin.

No doubt Archibald was relieved that the news cycle had moved onto the references for paedophilia story and the subsequent cover up. The outing of Wee Niall and the Mag Uidhir scandal provided ample cover for her and her party’s inability to build a football pitch, as promised. Correspondingly the NSF decision to financially punish “workers and families” at the behest of the British Government, did not receive the serious political or media scrutiny that it warranted.

An inquisitive journalist, or a competent opposition in Stormont, could have sunk HMS NSF below the waterline. O’ Toole tried his best, but he made what once may have been a fatal error: he asked straight questions and naively expected straight responses from a party well versed in deception and sleight of hand.

The real story, was hiding in plain sight: NSF as represented by Archibald and O’Neill (the two most senior Ministers in Stormont) went to the Chancellor with their begging bowl, asking for three things:

  1. The money for Super Casement
  2. A bigger block grant for NI and a review of the current funding arrangements
  3. A re-commitment to provide the EU funding to the community sector that would be lost as a result of Brexit.

The Brits being the Brits, behaved as one would expect any government to behave having just discovered a 22 billion budgetary deficit. They asked NSF to prioritise what it is was they wanted most, and as if by magic the demand for a super Casement was dropped for what had been on offer for 10 years.

The Chancellor reminded the dynamic duo that the block grant and the financial package on offer was what they had publicly signed up to only a few months earlier to support the restoration of Stormont. Perfidious Albion, who have actually been true to their word, agreed to review the current NI funding arrangements but forgot to mention to NSF, that this would also encompass a review of the “City Deals”.

NSF once again failed to read the small print of their “requests “to HM Government. HMG, having bared their teeth to NSF in the hope that they might finally understand fiscal prudence, rowed back on the city deals after the intervention of the SDLP inside Westminster. Senior Hurling indeed.

The priority for NSF was to secure the commitment to replace the EU funding which is critical for many community groups in NI. While O’Neill and Archibald were busy pleading with the UK chancellor, other prominent NSF dignitaries were lobbying the EU, the US and others imploring them to pressure the UK Treasury to live up to its pre-Brexit commitment on a replacement.

While this bizarre concern for an already burgeoning community sector, which has delivered nothing in real terms for the most disadvantaged in the north, may seem entirely altruistic of NSF, it should, of course, be viewed in the context of the “movement's” strategic priorities.

The 2006 internal NSF document somewhat optimistically titled the “Roadmap to Victory” commits NSF to:

use our membership in a strategic way on all civic and public bodies, community structures and political institutions to effect positive change.

The “Roadmap to Victory” was designed to support those who had transitioned into NSF following the army statement of 2005. It laid out in detail, the strategy, as it then was and exemplified community organisations that had been established by the “movement” as models of best practice.

This national objective was strengthened by the Cuige Uladh, who in 2006, redefined the strategic objective to: deepen our community roots (This means becoming embedded within the community as ONH was during the armed campaign).

One does not dismiss the success of the movement in embedding their membership into strategic positions in the community sector in the north particularly in Belfast. Well paid jobs, that are not scrutinised by funders, who fear “destabilising the peace process” have propelled many careers and maintained a loyalty to the movement that only a mortgage, a nice car and holiday home can engender.

In part two of this article, I will explore how the noble sentiments of “community, service and positive change” have been corrupted by the absolute need to control and dictate how billions of pounds of funding was allocated. Funding which was supposed to support working class communities emerge with dignity from a bloody conflict has been abused and misused by those who claim they will lead us to the Republic. 

Absolute Power corrupts absolutely.

⏩Muiris Ó Súilleabháin was a member of the Republican Movement until he retired in 2006 after 20 years of service. Fiche bhliain ag fás.

Absolute Power 🪶 Act Ⅰ

Anthony McIntyre ☠ Belfast City Council has agreed to remove the portrait of former mayor Niall O Donnghaile from the City Hall. 

It is not quite part of the woke fad for statue smashing and monument moving as the request came from the DUP, not known for being woketard-friendly. For the dinosaurs it is about rubbing Sinn Fein noses in the dirt of a safe space where there is no risk to the Self-Preservation Society at Stormont.

Sinn Fein seemed eager to back the DUP request in stark contrast to how it failed to back a motion in Belfast City Hall to expel the Israeli ambassador from Ireland. Michelle O'Neill:

I think it is appropriate. His behaviour was completely inappropriate so, therefore, I think that we had no issue whatsoever in backing the removal of the portrait.

A portrait of a former mayor whose inappropriate behaviour falls short of the standards required in public office, but also falls short of being a crime, is a much greater irritant to party sensibilities than an advocate for the horrendous crime of genocide.  

While 'inappropriate' can cover a wide range of activity, Niall O Donnghaile's self-condemnation would lead us to think that his inappropriateness was of such gravitas that it is legitimate to argue that he is not fit to be mayor. That hardly alters the fact that he was mayor, and the attempt to airbrush him out of the official history of Belfast City Hall has an Orwellian feel to it. 

It is difficult to be persuaded that the physical destruction or cultural obliteration of artefacts from the past in any society serves much purpose other than the present needs of the one-eyed tribe, whichever one of them happens to be in charge at any given point in time. Too much like book burning. We now live in a world where each generation can erase traces of what the last generation valued because of a mood swing in public opinion. Rather than destroy, societies can easily find ways to create. A contextual plaque placed beside the 'offending' artefact seems much more creative and explanatory than a bulldozer.

Opposing a new portrait of O Donnghaile seems reasonable, but to take a cricket bat to what went before is not cricket as the English might say. Quite a few hateful bigots have served as mayor of Belfast over the last 118 years, their portraits most likely still in place. Let the record of the council stand, warts and all, rather than mask it with a blank canvas.

The DUP is revelling in its opportunity to make Sinn Fein feel uncomfortable given that its sense of entitlement has left it feeling humiliated at being in the position where it must now kick up rather than down to land its blows on Sinn Fein. While it might feel that the rapidity with which it moved against Jeffrey Donaldson compared to a general Sinn Fein tardiness around issues of sex abuse gives it the moral high ground, in terms of mayoral malfeasance the party is not squeaky clean. Thomas Hogg, who served as DUP mayor of Antrim and Newtownabbey Council in 2014-15, was - unlike O Donnghaile - actually convicted of a sex offence against a child.

He had offered to perform a sexual act on a 15-year-old boy and asked the boy to perform a similar act.

I have no idea if the DUP put a motion before Antrim and Newtownabbey Council calling for the removal of any portraits of Hogg, but Annie McGinley wrote on Twitter that:

When I Googled "DUP request the portrait of Thomas Hogg be removed" I got absolutely no results. Instead, this came up. He was stripped of his MBE for being an actual convicted sex offender. But there was no call from the DUP to remove his portrait.

Sanitising the past record to suit present requirements is like polishing a turd. The smell remains. 

⏩Follow on Twitter @AnthonyMcIntyre.

Portraits

Anthony McIntyre ☠ I have never met Michelle O'Neill, but after suffering all the forgettable straitlaced dullards who have served as First Minister in the North it is hard not to be somewhat enamoured of her public persona. 

Earthy, no airs and graces, a rapid fire parochial accent to cut through you, somebody with real life experience - the type who didn't learn to swim in the library - and far removed from the stodgy patrician characters that are all too often to be found in the corridors of power. Not that Stormont, the British equivalent of a South African Bantustan, has any power other than formal with meaningless trappings to boot. But that is a fish to fry another day. Whatever it is they do up in Uselesstan, Michelle O'Neill brings a dash of élan rather than ennui to proceedings.

Still, she has found herself embroiled in a controversy because her party has once again been accused of what many believe it does best - cover up. Today's front page Irish News story about the text life of erstwhile Senate leader Niall Ó Donnghaile serves to keep the pot boiling beneath the lid of a party, whose leaders are averse to the insight of Harold J. Smith: more people would learn from their mistakes if they weren't so busy denying them.

When Michael McMonagle, the former Sinn Fein press official recently convicted of child sex offences and now facing a custodial sentence, asked two colleagues to provide him with a reference, they did so. These were supplied despite the party being aware he was under investigation by the PSNI in relation to issues of child protection, for which he had been cut adrift by Sinn Fein. Armed with those references McMonagle applied for and received a post with the British Heart Foundation. Whatever about Caolan McGinley's role the more senior press officer, Sean Mag Uidhir, is a man of vast experience, with an astute understanding of the contours of politics. WTF he was thinking when he put his name to the reference for now remains one of life's mysteries. He alone can explain that. Although both he and McGinley might have cause to feel hard done by in the light of the party leader's glowing reference for Niall Ó Donnghaile who too found himself walking the plank for sending inappropriate messages to a teenager. The leader's prerogative: don't do as I do - do as I say.

The same prerogative might be said to apply when it comes to Sinn Fen admonishing the Catholic Church over its handling of child abuse. Conor Murphy in a frosty BBC interview insisted that it was not the responsibility of the party to tell the British Heart Foundation about the PSNI investigation into the suspected paedophile the party had just peddled on to the Foundation. We can imagine the type of public outcry that would assail the ears of a bishop were he to claim it was not the Church hierarchy's responsibility to alert the school it had just recycled a priest to that the cleric was under police investigation for child sex offences.

Michael McMonagle cuts a lonely figure in the footage showing him entering Derry courthouse accompanied by no one, either family members or party officials. Abandoned and abhorred, his possible mental health concerns considered much less worthy than those of Niall Ó Donnghaile. Isolated as he might well be, he is definitely not invisible.

Despite this Michelle O'Neill claims not to have seen him in a room yards from her in conditions of clear visibility when he was attending an event in his new role as an employee of the BHF. Echoes of Bismarck: Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied. It cannot be proved beyond reasonable doubt that she did see him but the balance of probability points to a different conclusion. In the court of public opinion probability counts in a way that it would not in a court of law. As Patrick Murphy caustically observed: 

He was particularly skilled, because while his presence could be detected by cameras in Stormont, he was entirely invisible to the human eye.

Sinn Fein, not without some justification, claims that its opponents in the Dublin government and rivals on the opposition benches are driven less by concern for children and more by political considerations, particularly so as a general election approaches. That however cuts both ways. Whatever the motives, the necessary scrutiny that should always be in place seems to have been nowhere near as vigorous in Stormont as it was in Leinster House. For all Sinn Fein's claims about politically driven scrutinization in the Dublin parliament, the lack of such scrutiny in the Belfast parliament also seems to have been driven by politics as was lucidly explained by Patrick Murphy's description of Stormont, 'where 79 of the 90 MLAs are in a government devoted to self-preservation'.

The inference to be drawn is that Sinn Fein believes it prospers best in situations where its activities are not transparent and as such will continue striving to maintain the party as a cold house for scrutiny.

⏩Follow on Twitter @AnthonyMcIntyre.

The Invisible Man

Anthony McIntyre ☠ Sinn Fein is on the ropes.

There is a sense that one more heavy punch will see it on the canvas hoping that it can get back up before the count completes. In the run up to an election, the party is facing the type of cross examination a deeply unpopular government, rather than the opposition, is subject to. What has kept it on its feet up to this point has been one strong performance by its leader who in the Dail yesterday used skillful ringcraft followed by an uppercut that will have stung but was not forceful enough to even the score. Her critics in Leinster House remain well ahead on points and have no intention of throwing in the towel. McDonald can only hope there are no further rounds to come.

Her performance was all the more remarkable because, as has been pointed out by a friend, the scandals gripping the party took place on her watch while she was not watching for what may have been understandable reasons. She was ill, her husband was ill and her father died. The strength of character she put out there has shown why she is party leader while others are a country mile behind. This perhaps explains why she was not instructed by the party to take compassionate leave during her travails. Primus inter pares, her shoes fit no one else. Aggregated, it all augurs darkly for the party if her position as leader ever comes under threat.

I watched many of her leading colleagues face media grilling yesterday. None stepped up to the plate. On message, uninspiring, unconvincing. Usually polished performers like Matt Carty and Louise O'Brien were unusually unsteady as they gripped the safety rail of internal policies and processes while reiterating the new mantra of an abundance of caution. Martin Kenny, despite facing weak opposition in the person of Thomas Byrne, was pedestrian while Claire Kerrane was flat and robotic. Pearse Doherty, this morning, hardly improved matters, his standard forward advances held in check while he played square balls. Mary Lou McDonald was left to do what Diego Maradona found himself compelled to do so often in an Argentina shirt: carry a mediocre and mundane crew over the line. 

So, the problem remains. McDonald's combative performance was just that, performative which in terms of combat, was really no more than the firing of blanks, more heat than light. 

Many people do not believe either McDonald or her Sinn Fein colleagues, sensing a cover up of Adamsesque proportions. McDonald has to realise just how damaging to party prospects that  perception is. The weighty bones of the Adams skeletons were a deadweight on the party's fortunes, as was evident after he had vacated the scene. If the electorate thinks he has stepped back but not down, the party's credibility - which was very much on the up - risks becoming threadbare once again. 

If asked in the current climate if she persists in her inane claim to believe Adams when he denies ever having been a member of the organisation of which he was chief of staff, an affirmative answer will expose to ridicule her proclamations of truth and transparency. 

The Sinn Fein president needs to seriously confront the reasons the party culture is as it is rather than what the party claims it to be. A different type of party so unlike what went before requires a different type of leader so unlike what went before. Mary Lou cannot be Gerry Lou.

⏩Follow on Twitter @AnthonyMcIntyre.

On The Ropes