Showing posts with label Her Loyal Voice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Her Loyal Voice. Show all posts
From Her Loyal Voice an interview with Shirley McMichael


Introduction by Ellen.

There isn’t a day that goes by that I don’t think of my Dad. Since starting Her Loyal Voice it seems to have amplified. My Dad and I didn’t always see eye to eye. He would have said white, I would have said black. You see I was angry. I was angry that most of his life he dedicated to not just protecting us but protecting the whole community. That meant there were times when other things had to be put first.

It wasn’t until he died that I realised the full extent of what he did for me, his family and his community. During my journey from starting Her Loyal Voice I have come in to contact with some amazing people. One such person is Shirley McMichael. Not only has Shirley been extremely supportive of what I’m doing, she has kindly shared her stories with me. By doing this she has also given me a connection back to my Dad. I find it hard to explain how much Shirley has helped me connect with my Dad and how much she has helped me on my journey. I am forever grateful to her for this and for taking the time to be part of Her Loyal Voice. I hope you enjoy this interview.

Shirley McMichael

HLV: Shirley, tell me a little bit about John, what was he like?

SM: When I think back to my time with John, I first and foremost think of his sons, Saul and Gary and how much he loved them. He would be so proud of the men they have become. He was very much a family man and loved things like family get-togethers and days out with friends. Although, family will remember how he got the loan of a mini bus on a couple of occasions and drove us half way around the countryside only to end up back at home to have our BBQ there! You never knew where you would end up once you got in the car with him.

He had very few really close friends that he could relax with. A good night in was plenty of good food, a few drinks and a board game and a movie (or two)!

John and I were both married before and unfortunately we only had 7 years together. No one will ever replace him and I still miss him everyday, but smile when I think of how he changed my life for the better. It means so much to myself and John’s family that people still remember him fondly. I know that if he had lived he would have been a major figure in Northern Ireland politics.

Shirley & John

HLV: What is your background Shirley?

SM: I am 67 years old and I grew up in a row of Mill houses called Canal Street in Lisburn. I was no better off than my Catholic neighbours; we had a family of five in a two bedroom small terrace house, no hot water, no central heating, and an outside toilet, etc. It was a happy childhood. We went about our business with no bitterness or hate for anyone. I was British and never thought any more about it, that was just who I was.

However, when I was 17, the ‘Troubles’ began and I found that there were some who blamed me and others of my community for every British action throughout history, rewritten or otherwise. I was told that I didn’t belong in this land of my ancestors and I was supposed to have guilt for the occupation of my land, for inequality, for the famine and deeds further afield!

We experienced the fear and murder inflicted on our communities and to protect our areas, Grandfathers, Fathers and Sons joined together to walk around their streets to protect their families. As the Troubles progressed it was understandable that the Loyalist paramilitaries came into being and they were welcomed by the community.

However, as a young woman, I was always interested in politics but it was difficult to be taken seriously. I and my boyfriend at the time joined the Vanguard Party in the early 70’s and I vividly remember the first meeting in Lisburn. I was very excited as both Ian Paisley and James Molyneaux were coming to speak. As we arrived my boyfriend was called over and given a seat while I was directed into the kitchen to help make the tea. I will be honest - the cake was nearly thrown at them! I did get a little of my own back though as I set out all the cakes and didn’t slice them or supply any cutlery!!

Eventually, through the support of George Morrison who was a local Councillor and the Lisburn Vanguard Chairperson, I became one of the Press Officers but I think I told it too much the way it was and I was not the diplomatic soul I am today! I think I raised his blood pressure on one or two occasions! Bless him, he was always so patient and took time to nurture us “young’uns”.

I started my working life as a Lab Assistant, first of all in Barbour Threads, Hilden and then Gallagher's. However, after John’s death, I changed my focus to Community Engagement and spent many happy years with Lisburn Safer Neighbourhoods and then the Policing Board. This brought me into contact with so many people and I am glad to say, I am still in touch with many of them.

Now, in my Crone years, I can look back and acknowledge the hurt and loss that has been inflicted by both sides during our “Troubles”. I was a member of the Northern Ireland Victim’s Forum and had the privilege to share stories with others who had been injured or bereaved. It gave me a unique insight into people’s lives from all sectors of this community. We shed tears together and came out the other side with a better understanding and the knowledge that we weren’t so different!

However, it was very upsetting that my membership of the Forum received so much negative publicity and because of the upset to my family I had no alternative other than to resign. What was most upsetting is that it was so called ‘Unionists’ that gave me all the grief. A couple actually turned their back on me at the first meeting. Unfortunately, it was hard for some to believe that this ‘Terror Boss’s Widow’ (as I was called) may have had something to add to the debate through my 30 years in community engagement in Northern Ireland communities and the UK.

Political Big House Unionism has never embraced their working class ex-combatants, unlike Sinn Fein ….who not only embrace their ex-combatants but raise them up to the highest echelons of their party!

There is a class system within unionism with this false mantle of respectability. Thankfully it’s not as bad these days but I most certainly have felt it on many occasions. The families of ex-combatants are labelled and are considered through a social justice lens. I was looking at some research about the stigma surrounding the families of ex-prisoners and there are some interesting findings.

An emerging body of research in the UK and the US has sought to uncover the collateral consequences of imprisonment for prisoners’ families. It has found that these consequences are serious and predominantly negative and include financial difficulties, social stigma and emotional hardships. Prisoners’ families are seen as somehow tainted by their association with the prisoner (who is seen as evil and monstrous). Existing research (see Condry 2007) also indicates that prisoners’ families are ‘othered’ in that they are seen as tainted by their relationship with the prisoner and thus somehow separate from the law abiding community. If social justice is about the elimination of domination and oppression, then this is certainly a group whose needs ought to be recognised and engaged with.
John McMichael

Unfortunately, I tried to organise a support group for Loyalist Victim’s families when I was on the Victim’s Forum and sent a draft proposal to quite a few people but I had no interest. We badly need organisations like ‘Relatives for Justice’ who work in Republican/Nationalist areas. When I had problems in the Victim’s Forum they were the first organisation to offer me help.

I’m sure there were difficult times being around during the “Troubles”, can you talk about your experience of that time, the raids and how you coped with your children and how you kept the household going?

In those days police raids were common enough. They always came just after 6:00 am. I live in a small cul-de-sac and you could hear the police land rover from a good distance away. Around the same time the milkman would be doing his deliveries and sounded the same as the police.

On this one occasion I remember lying in bed wishing with all my heart that I wouldn’t hear the sound of the police radio as that signalled the start of banging on the door and heavy boots running up the side of the house. They afforded you no dignity and came into your bedroom. One time, our son was only about 10 months old and his cot was in the corner of the bedroom, a policeman came in and pointed his sub-machine gun at me in the bed while they dragged John out. Saul started to cry and he had a cold and I can still see his wee face all flushed and trying to pull himself up by the side of the cot with his arms outstretched to me. I just looked at the police officer and got out of bed and pushed his sub-machine gun to the side and lifted Saul out of the cot. No one was going to stop me! To be honest, as I looked into the young policeman’s eyes, I could tell he had no stomach to be pointing a gun at us.

Of course being a Brigadier in the UDA brought big security issues. You were always on your guard and the weeks before John’s murder we regularly stayed overnight with a friend or with John’s Mum and Dad.

In the nights we stayed at home, we had wonderful people who came and stayed overnight to protect us. Saul loved to see them and bonded with the wonderful Jim Guiney who many will remember was murdered at his business in Dunmurry. Jim used to play with Saul and told him his name was ‘Rambo’ and gave him a cap which he loved ... however, to a young child the best pronunciation he could manage was ‘Wambo’!!

Jim was married to my cousin Joanne and it was heart breaking when another good man was gone. I remember at his funeral giving his son the precious ‘Wambo hat’.

HLV: How did you feel about John being a UDA brigadier?

SM: John was already a Brigadier when I met him and he wasn’t what I expected at all. He was intelligent, kind, courteous and a total softie! The amount of times he put a little job someone’s way if he knew they were having financial difficulties. Which was very good from my point of view as John, to be honest, never finished a household task that he started … wallpapering, flat-packing, etc.

However, I have never met someone with such determination and a love for his community. He was keen to get people interested in their history and enhance their knowledge and sense of belonging. He helped me reignite my passion for ancient history and folklore and I dearly thank him for that.

At this point he was really honing his thoughts on the ‘Common Sense’ document and along with others spent many hours consulting with UDA members and further afield. I went with him on a few occasions when he spoke to Church, Business and Community Representatives. I am glad to see, especially in recent years that so many of our community people are engaging widely. At the moment, with the Corona Virus Lockdown, they have really stepped up to the mark and are giving wonderful support to their communities.

John was passionate to have proper politics in Northern Ireland. He was not a fan of Direct Rule. He felt that to have Westminster politicians appointed by a Westminster Government to administer the social and economic lives of the Northern Ireland electorate was not acceptable. No doffing the cap to London!

Anytime when John and I were out shopping, we were always stopped and people said how glad they were to see him on TV and as one wee woman said@

Jeezus, big lad! Great to see a Loyalist on TV that we can be proud of! You are always well turned out with lovely pressed shirts and a tie!

As she left, I got a nod of approval for the pressed shirts! Lol

However, instead of embracing this good press, I found to my dismay that jealously reared its ugly head and then John came in one day and said that the police had been to see him. They said that there were threats from the ‘Loyalist’ side. I just broke down and cried, saying, No…No, why? …..a few days later he was dead…

I wonder how I got through that time as we had also lost a baby girl who was born sleeping a few months before John. Thank goodness for my family and friends.  

Shirley McMichael

HLV: Shirley, would you like to share your personal thoughts on the situation in Northern Ireland?

SM: Like many, I would wish to see a united Unionist Party. It has been tried with some success before. I previously mentioned the Vanguard Party and in 1974, a coalition of political parties was formed and known as the United Ulster Unionist Council (UUUC). It was organised by Harry West and constituted a formal electoral pact between his Ulster Unionist Party, the Democratic Unionist Party and the Vanguard Unionist Progressive Party.

The UUUC first tested its political credentials in the 1974 general election and the party captured 11 out of 12 Northern Irish seats (7 UUP, 3 VUPP, 1 DUP). This worked for a while until Bill Craig suggested working in a potential coalition government with the nationalist SDLP. When it became clear that Craig’s ideas were not in keeping with those of his partners, Vanguard split from the UUUC. The UUUC thereafter consisted of the UUP, DUP and UUUP.

Unionism has to move forward if it is to succeed. I personally do not vote for the DUP as I disagree with their stance on woman’s rights and equal marriage. Also, as a Pagan I do not feel welcome. Unionism needs to embrace the diversity of people in Northern Ireland who support the union, no matter what their faith or sexual orientation. I have friends who are Catholic who are unionist. We need to have a limited number of well thought out Aims and Objectives that everyone who supports the union can sign up to and take that to an election.

As a unionist, it is clear that there is not a lot of interest from Westminster for the working class PUL community and we have to stop kidding ourselves that we matter! For example, no politician from Northern Ireland will ever be in the Cabinet as the main political parties do not stand for election here. We also still aren’t sure how Brexit will affect us in the long run. However, I do acknowledge the specific groups and individuals in the rest of the UK who have always been, and still are, supportive of our situation and we thank them dearly.

Westminster is too London-centric; London is a global financial power with property prices to match. Its top ten boroughs alone are worth more, in real estate terms, than all the property of Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, added together! The divide between London and the rest of the UK continues to grow. Is it really the right location to host the Mother Parliament? (My thoughts on that for another day! Lol!)

Anyhow, just some personal thoughts, as like many I am concerned for the future of my homeland. We need to get out of this cycle. Imagine how wonderful it would be for a peaceful, shared and respectful future for coming generations.

Just to end …. a memory of a holiday in the USA that I had posted on Facebook at the time the flag over the City Hall came down. This was brought back to mind by the pride I felt flying my flag on VE day recently and seeing the respectful commemoration in my neighbourhood and other locations.

When I saw the footage of the union flag being taken down after over a century of flying over the City Hall……I felt a great sadness! I believe in equality and that we should be on a level footing with others, although, as a working class unionist – I definitely have not had it any better than others in this province.

I am proud to be British and part of these islands. We are a unique people in Northern Ireland with a wonderful history. I have embraced my “Irishness” as it is part of me. I can relate to the old folklore of Cuchulainn and Fionn mac Cumhail who without a doubt built the Giant’s Causeway! However, it is a hurtful truth in Northern Ireland that when you say the phrase “I am proud to be British” that you can be labelled a “bigot”.

I remember when I was in the USA visiting friends in Baltimore. One of the days we went to Fort McHenry which is famous for being the first place in the USA to fly their flag. We went in to watch the information film about the battle that took place and at the end of the presentation the screen was lifted to show the outside panorama with the “Stars and Stripes” flying from the Fort which could be seen all around the Baltimore Bay. It was amazing to see the pride and emotion displayed by All, the diverse audience … both black and white, young and old: I was in tears ... partly because of the moment but also because I know that it could never happen here.”

Bright Blessings Everyone! X

Keep up with Her Loyal Voice.

In Conversation With Shirley McMichael

Her Loyal Voice has come about because in my quest to learn more about my identity I have found an uneven narrative. The voices of women are often missing or forgotten, and more than that the voices of women from the Loyalist and Unionist community are often silent.

It is precisely by listening to and giving voice to Loyalist and Unionist women that we can begin to appreciate their remarkable stories. 

Let their stories be told! 

⬳ Ellen 

I had the absolute pleasure of sitting down with Julie-Anne Corr-Johnston. It was one of the richest, thought-provoking chats I have had in some time. We laughed and we cried. I hope you enjoy our conversation.

Julie-Anne Corr Johnston is a former Belfast City Councillor and fledgling political analyst. Her election in 2014 broke new ground, not just for the Oldpark constituency – where she became the first female Unionist to represent the area in Local Government – but also for Political Unionism, having been its first openly lesbian designate. Her time in public office had been synonymous with progress and pragmatism however her hard work and impressive portfolio of local successes were not enough to secure her tenure in the 2019 election. Despite the loss of her seat, Julie-Anne has continued to work to improve the quality of life for those most vulnerable in our communities and is currently working with young people who have disabilities and/or ill mental health ⬳ Ellen 

In Conversation With Julie-Anne Corr-Johnston

HLV: What do you class yourself as Protestant, Unionist, Loyalist?

JACC: Where do I begin? First I don’t like the idea of being placed in a box. Labels are for filing and in this place we tick boxes to mark what separates us. And secondly I find it rather bizarre that Unionism is lumped in with Protestantism and Loyalism in the PUL acronym but not in CNR [Catholic, Nationalist, Republican]. It implies they are inextricably linked and excludes the very real possibility that there exists a Catholic Unionist or Protestant Nationalist. Shock, horror, they do. The truth is it has no religious ideology. To be a Unionist is to recognise the benefits of our union with Great Britain above any suggested alternatives, enjoy them and want to maintain them.

By definition I am a Unionist. But more than that I am a Loyalist which is arguably a subset of Unionism but for me there is a distinction. I am unequivocally loyal to preserving that Union and at the risk of sounding like the late Reverend Ian Paisley, I am also loyal to the political ideology that was outlined in the Ulster Solemn League and Covenant. Minus the violence of course. I’m of the pro-peace/anti-violence variety.

And yes I was stamped at birth as a Protestant and I was brought up in a household that practiced its faith but as I grew older my views were – and in particular my sexual orientation was – at odds with the religious teachings. That being said I do enjoy the customs and cultural traditions associated with my heritage. I have many fond memories of lining the Lisburn Road with my family waving on my Granda, uncles, cousins and neighbours who filled the ranks of the lodges and bands. As silly as it may sound it was two days of the year – the 11th and 12th – that I could escape the feeling of not belonging, of being different – those everyday challenges that many LGBT people experience growing up in the church. Now of course, that I am out and experience the unconditional love that so many don’t, the tradition starts over with my own wee family.

HLV: Would you say the term Loyalist is considered a dirty word?

JACC: If you pop the word into your search engine it’ll return images of masked gunmen and armed police pushing back protestors or news articles with headlines linking Loyalism to crime and chaos. It’s sad really. Knuckle draggers, bigots and fleggers are common descriptions on social media too. It’s almost as if our determination to make this place better, when contributing to the Good Friday Agreement, has been forgotten. Once part of the solution now more frequently referenced as a problem. But we aren’t – a problem – we are a community with problems. If only our detractors would take the time to scratch beneath the surface rather than form preconceived opinions based on a excerpt off the internet.

HLV: Are you confident in your identity? 

JACC: My national and political identity? Yes! Absolutely. Have I confidence in those charged with representing that identity? No! They have made a mess of Brexit and more locally they have neglected to deliver on the material well-being and equal citizenship our forefathers pledged in the Covenant. Our representatives are so blinded by the ‘cultural war’ as it’s been described that they fail to recognise the greatest threat to our Union is not Irish Republicanism and it’s demands but rather socioeconomic deprivation.

Julie-Anne Corr-Johnston  

HLV: You were involved in the flag protests. What would have been the outcome you would have wanted?

JACC: I’d prefer it hadn’t happened at all. I grew up pretty sheltered from Northern Ireland’s complex circumstances. Don’t get me wrong, I had Bebo and the world at my fingertips as a teenager but the flag dispute was my first real encounter of our deep-seated division. I felt then, as I do now, that the manoeuvre is typical of the political immaturity in this place – too often cementing a divided society rather than promoting tolerance for a diverse one.

HLV: You decided to join the Progressive Unionist Party, can you describe your time at the party and your first party meeting?

JACC: When my application to join was accepted I had expected that the politicking would go over my head and that I would perhaps take a feet on the streets type of role. Distributing leaflets at election time for example or helping with voter registrations. That kind of thing. Never in a million years would I have foreseen that I would, a short time later, be a candidate in that forthcoming election never mind subsequently elected to public office.

If memory serves me, I was too busy drinking in my surroundings and those sat opposite me to appreciate the discussion at my first meeting. It was only after my second or third meeting that two things came to light: that I had joined a diverse group of like-minded people from all walks of life – from low pay, zero hours health care workers through to successful business people – in a social justice movement and secondly that I had a lot more to contribute than I originally thought. You see you don’t need a degree in political science or practice to be a politician you just need lived experience, an opinion and a voice like a fog horn.

My time with the PUP was well spent, don’t get me wrong, I’m sure political activists that have been or are members of political parties would agree that it’s a lot like your every day family, it’s not always rosy and there are fall outs, heated exchanges and subject disputes particularly when you are as passionate as we were. I had more than my fair share but largely my experience was positive and I’ll treasure the privilege I had of representing the area I grew up in.

HLV: When you were asked to join the PUP did you consider that they were formed out of the UVF?

JACC: Of course I did, particularly with having been so sheltered. To have listened to my family and friends you would have thought I was coming home with a balaclava and a red hand of Ulster tattoo. However, with a practicing GP as it’s deputy leader and a whole host of socially progressive policies, a woman’s right to chose for example, the book didn’t fit the description on the cover. So I scratched beneath the surface. 

Julie-Anne Corr-Johnston


HLV: In terms of the media and the public’s view would you say it’s the case that Sinn Fein is more accepted than the PUP? 

JACC: Sinn Fein are the second largest party in Northern Ireland with something like one hundred and thirty elected representatives whereas the PUP have only three. The statistics speak for themselves.

There are any amount of reasons why that might be and I don’t profess to know them all but I did find that the media were relatively unfair when covering the party on the rare occasion it had a platform. For example in 2014, when the deputy presiding officer had just declared my shock election, I left the count to be greeted by a waiting press. “Julie-Anne from flag protestor to Belfast City Council, what brought you to the PUP, the political wing of the UVF?”. A fair question, deserving of an answer no doubt but given that I just broke new ground (being the first lesbian Unionist elected) it was apparent that I was to be profiled as a conflict politician rather than evidence of an emerging change in political Unionism. And more than that – something to contribute to making this place a better one to live in. I’ve countless other examples that give weight to that. It has been my experience, particularly in pre-election debates, that most other parties have ample opportunity to set out their stall, their manifesto, whereas PUP is bounced into answering the same old questions about its roots.

HLV: Why do you think there are so few women entering politics still?

JACC: This is a question that keeps popping up but I think things need to be viewed in context. I don’t believe it’s a case that women aren’t interested or that they feel inferior.

I can already hear the grunts of disagreement from those who have perhaps researched the topic and hold different views but understand that the women I speak to and engage with everyday are strong, confident and politically vocal. And for those women I believe it’s a logistical issue, particularly for those that have small children. Most political parties hold their branch meetings in the evening which is ideal for those working 9-5 but for the woman that has kids to put down to bed, uniforms to iron and lunches to make, it can be a challenge crossing the door. Being a political activist can be quite demanding. It’s more than just turning up to a meeting to express an opinion or cast a vote – more often than not you leave with extra responsibilities that require you to put your shoulder to the wheel, advocate for those that need advocacy and promote the brand so to speak.

In my own experience it was a financial challenge being a public rep. You’re paid £14,200 as a councillor. It’s not a full time wage but three out of five years it was my full time job. How can I say this without causing upset? Residents in the leafy suburbs, well they’re not going to be on to their politicians every day needing Housing Executive repairs or whatever. So you are not going to have the same level of constituency work are you? I simply couldn’t hold down two jobs and manage the casework I was receiving. And even then, with it being my full time (round the clock) job, I was working for somewhere in the region of £4 an hour net. I’m not complaining mind, I loved my job and I do miss it, but unless you have corporate sponsors or assembly expenses – as some of the larger parties do – to have paid support sharing the workload then you find yourself racing the clock day and daily to be a wife, mother, daughter and so on. The sacrifices you make are significant and I have no doubt in my mind that’s a contributing factor for many women when considering whether to put themselves forward or not. Especially for those women who are members of political parties and have first hand knowledge of all it entails.

HLV: What do you see as the major concerns in Loyalist and Unionist communities at the moment?

JACC: How long have we got? This may take a while but I will try to keep it brief. In no particular order there’s Brexit and the Irish Sea Border, Political Unionism’s decline and the new agreement reached to get Stormont up and running again.

The anxiety felt by the uncertainty of Brexit isn’t unique to Unionism but it is exacerbated by Boris Johnson’s shock ‘betrayal’ as it’s being dubbed. Johnson was a vocal opponent of Theresa May’s withdrawal agreement which had garnered him support within grassroots Unionism when it came to replacing her as the Prime Minister. Ironically May’s agreement would have only been temporary whereas Johnson’s is permanent. His actions are thought to have undermined the constitutional integrity of the United Kingdom and of course that doesn’t sit well within Unionism.

On political Unionism’s decline – at the last council election Unionism lost a total of 32 elected representatives. Not to each other, as so often had been the case, but rather to parties that are not defined by the constitutional question. Parties that designate as other. The middle ground. Now it’s far from circling the drain but they do say that once is chance, twice a coincidence but three times a pattern. And there is an emerging pattern. The U.K General Election marked the third consecutive election that Unionism has lost its majority. And it is likely that in the event of another election anytime soon the parties would face more of the same.

Which I guess brings me on to the recent political settlement – New Decade – New Approach. The anger within grassroots Unionism is palpable. Many feel that their political leaders gave in to Sinn Féin’s demands to save their own skin in light of those recent voting patterns.

HLV: Do you think Sinn Fein did get what they wanted?

JACC: The deal is socioeconomically ambitious, a wet dream for Unionists that measure the strength of the Union by the social well-being and economic wealth of its citizens – but it is otherwise ambiguous – which of course has been the subject of heated debate across social media. Did DUP capitulate or did SF adulterate?

Owing to that ambiguity these questions are likely to remain unanswered until the what’s in the deal come in to practice.

HLV:  If we have a society that is free from poverty, that is prospering, that is well educated – then in your view the union is secure – is that what you are saying?

Why risk a good thing for a new thing? That’s the question people should be asking themselves in the event of a border poll rather than what have I got to lose? The latter may, one day, just tip those scales.

Julie-Anne Corr-Johnston

HLV: What is your view on how the Executive and power-sharing is working?

JACC: This is a bone of contention for me. What we have is neither power-sharing or workable. It’s the splitting of power. A chuckle brothers complex.

Let’s be honest. The institutions envisaged back in 1998 were a compromise, agreed at a time when an honourable outcome and stability were desperately needed. However, those structures were not designed to last forever. They were specific to their context and, just like the devolution of justice or an extension of fiscal responsibility, the institutions grow and change as the political landscape does. We desperately need reform.

I’m not buttoned up the back, I know that a voluntary coalition, in light of our complex tapestry, would likely be as dysfunctional and myopic, as such I won’t advocate for it. But I do think there is a workable solution to be found in adopting the system of government employed by our local councils. A tried and tested system of governance that despite the occasional controversy has weathered each political storm without the threat of collapse. A system were those elected to it not only share power but responsibility too.

HLV: I wanted to ask you about the responses from some Alliance Party Councillor’s during the bonfire season in 2019. From looking at social media and news coverage, it appeared that the Loyalist and Unionist community felt hurt. What are your thoughts on what happened?

JACC: Many within my community believe there is a concerted campaign against traditional Protestant customs and culture. And some statements and remarks that were made at the time coupled with the councils course of action gives weight to that.

We don’t help ourselves mind. Just like the Orange Order and Twaddell and Woodvale Residents Association, who actually burn a traditional bonfire on Belfast City Council property – the use of an asset for both public and private events requires permission. It’s my understanding that in this instance that permission wasn’t sought. That in itself is a problem that needs addressing if we are to avoid the same thing from happening this year.

What’s interesting however is that the hurt and anger expressed at the time didn’t translate in the most recent election. In fact the Alliance surge is predominately in what has often been regarded as largely Unionist areas.

HLV: Do you think the DUP and Sinn Fein have delivered for their communities?

JACC: Having spent seven years supporting people under their government, their leadership, their legacy, I can’t say that they have. I don’t want to go in to the detail about the sights that I have seen or the experiences of those who sought my help. There are people behind them with very real suffering that don’t need to read or hear their stories retold. It’s theirs to tell. But no, no I can’t say that they have.

And look, in the interests of being fair and measured – I’m certain that if we were to canvas opinion locally that we’d find a handful of people that would speak highly of a particular politician be they a Councillor, MLA or MP from either party. Because they’ve helped them with an issue personally or perhaps know them in a personal capacity – let’s not forget that most of them live in or come from the communities they represent.

Corporately however, I’d say public confidence in either party is increasingly diminishing. Multiple deprivation statistics, which evidence unmet need in the areas the big two parties dominate show that. And a dander down the likes of the Shankill Road or Falls Road would give weight to that.

HLV: What does the Sinn Fein electoral success in Ireland mean for Unionists and the Union?

JACC: Very little to be honest. Sinn Fein will have the tall task of righting the socioeconomic injustices in the South and growing the economy to the point it becomes an appealing alternative to a Northern Ireland within the United Kingdom. More than that mind they also have the added challenge of convincing their electorate that by bringing the Northern Ireland population into their fold, with say its 11’000+ homeless persons in tow, that they won’t end up back where they started – reversing the change they had voted for in this election.

That being said, whilst a United Ireland isn’t as close as some pundits would have you believe, a border poll may well be closer. Unionists shouldn’t become complacent and as I said before it’s imperative that the question people ask themselves in that event is why risk a good thing for a new thing? Rather than what have I got to lose?

HLV: Where do you see the Loyalist and Unionist community in 10 years’ time?

JACC: I want to believe it will be in a better place. That people will experience and enjoy the material well-being and equal citizenship outlined in the Covenant but unless there is a significant shift from the politics of fear and division to that of hope and ambition then I fear it will be subject to more of the same.

⏩ Her Loyal Voice is the passion project of Ellen who is a researcher and blogger. She wants to provide a platform for the voices of Loyalist women who she feels have been kept from sharing their stories and their views.

In Conversation With Julie-Anne Corr-Johnston