Social Items

TPQ
Simon Smyth 🎥 That was an excruciatingly hard film to watch.


I've seen many films on Gaza and rate many of them very highly but only NAZA, American Doctor, 2026 and another film by Irish filmmakers Garry Keane and Andrew McConnell called Gaza from 2019 would I consider vital to watch. Vital to understanding the Genocide and the world today or what I imagine that is.

The people in charge of calculating the NAZA. The collateral damage calculation that could go from 10 or 20 civilians to 500 civilians for each targeted suspected Hamas combatant.

Although they didn't really target suspected combatants, they targeted buildings in which they believed the suspect was living.

Policy included bombing houses with people who stayed after warning leaflets were dropped. Nothing to do with Hamas, no suspects involved, carried out purely to create a demilitarised zone.

Maybe 25% of residents were killed under this policy in entire neighbourhoods: the infirm, the old, those who were afraid to leave in case they were targeted as they fled. Hundreds in one attack. Wiped from history. "Good luck to them!" one of the Israeli forces who was interviewed said.

With regards to the attacks against buildings housing suspects, the Israeli team would listen through mobile phones beforehand to decide if the target was home and afterwards listened to the screams. They could tap into all the sensory functions of the phone.

There was witness accounts of snipers killing those Gazans who were starving and who were trying to get food. The attackers would watch drone footage of dogs eating the dead.

At the end I just wanted the film to end. Anything to leave the carnage. To go home to my warm house. Away from clear vivid bloody depictions of the genocide and away from the perpetrators who were both against what they did and also those still in favour of what they'd done. The repugnance of it all. People who openly admitted to personally killing thousands. Away from those who compared themselves to Nazis and who explained they knew the mindset of those who carried out the Holocaust. The fear and the palpable feeling of death these whistleblowers provoked went to my core.

It's a difficult watch. People in the audience were cursing audibly with shock throughout. Silence otherwise. At the end the crowd sat as the credits rolled, people too numb to budge.

⏩ Simon Smyth is an avid reader and collector of books.

NAZA

Lynx By Ten To The Power Of Two Thousand One Hundred And Fifty Two

 

Religious Derangement Syndrome @ 24

 

A Morning Thought @ 3323

John Crawley 🔖will see his novel launched in Dublin next week.


A Shadow Of Liberty: A Story Of Irish Resistance


Venue: Peadar Brownes Pub
Lower Clanbrassil Street, Dublin. 

Date: 21-November-2026

Time: 1900-2100

Guest Speaker: Dr Tim Horgan



Book Launch 📚 John Crawley

Anthony McIntyre ⚽On the way to Tallaght Stadium I had little confidence that come the final whistle of their play-off against UCD, Drogheda United would still be in the top flight of Irish soccer.


Their descent throughout the season had been steady, their position in the Premiership looking precarious with one poor result after another.

Jay was back with us, so on the road to Dublin we got around to predictions. He felt Drogheda would win. Paddy agreed, expressing the view that the difference in quality between the two divisions was such that UCD would be unable to bridge the gap. I had a different take, forecasting a win after extra time on penalties for the Students. They had a good season compared to Drogheda and had nothing to lose. Drogheda had everything to lose and everything to play for, but in the end failed to play and deserved to lose. 

There was no satisfaction in being proven right at the end of the match. Nothing to brag or banter about. Grumbles and groans was as much as I could muster. UCD so outplayed Drogheda that neither extra time nor penalties were needed. So down go the Drogs.

The pre-match pint in a hotel close to the stadium, brimming with fans of both clubs, was the sweet spot of the day. The outcome of the game left a bitter taste in the mouth, unfortunately not the type caused by Nottingham ale. 

The Students were two smart for the Claret and Blue and were deserving of their win, something acknowledged by Drogs boss Kevin Doherty in his post match interview: 'That was our fault today. We went out there today and didn't deserve to win the game.' Drogheda looked too passive at the start, playing the ball back and forth without venturing too far ahead of the backline. A strategy-deficient game of passing but not progressing, there was a cat and mouse feel to it. 

Slowly the Drogs began to dominate and when they scored through a Mark Doyle header it seemed that safety was secured. Maybe even as convincing a win as was achieved in the same ground against Bray Wanderers two years ago. It was a false dawn. Whereas it was the fans who should have relaxed, the players decided it was a privilege the goal had bestowed on them. The predictable happened. The Drogs reverted to being the Drogs and sat back. It was the turning point in the game at which the Drogs failed to turn, and in the end got turned over.

UCD who beat Bray in the playoff semi-final didn't come to Tallaght just to make up the numbers. When the numbers mattered they put a higher tally in the net than Drogheda did. The Students were out to show that the top of Division One was not just as good as the bottom of the Premiership but better. Both sides contributed to demonstrating the veracity of that.

UCD played with verve and confidence. Since their departure from the Premiership they have learned how to play out from the back, made all the easier by the Drogs not quite knowing how to press successfully. Some of the Students' long cross field passing was exquisite, switching play, taking out opposition players and carving space all in the same move.

Both their goals were quality. First, a direct free quick around ten minutes before the break from the cultured boot of Ciarán Behan pulled them level, and in the second half a move that began when Drogheda gave away possession ended with a priceless man of the match Louis Dignam curled winner which guaranteed them premiership soccer for the first time in three years.


After that the Drogs huffed and puffed, desperate to take the game to extra time but they could not blow down the stout UCD defence. Ryan Brennan replaced Thomas Oluwa. What a strange decision. With nothing already up front Kevin Doherty decided to multiply zero by two. There would only ever be one outcome. Brennan appearing in the Drogheda colours for the last time should have been inserted into the side within the first fifteen minutes of the second half, where he could have stamped his authority on a midfield, adding experience and grit. The opportunity was missed and with it a badly needed change in structure that might just have altered the outcome of the clash.
 
Kevin Doherty's post match assertion that his side was not absolutely awful all year will fall on deaf ears. It was absolutely awful enough of the time not to merit staying up. In what looked like a justifiable swipe at the owners he pointedly observed that the sides that finished above Drogheda had 'thrown a hell of a lot more at it than we have. And at some stage, it was going to come back to bite us.” There is something in that when it is considered that the teams with the least amount of financial clout behind them both went down. Trivela's Scrooge economics has ensured a miserable Christmas for the Claret and Blue.

On the way home I suggested to Paddy that at my age I want to watch good soccer rather than persevere with the dross that is served up almost fortnightly at Sullivan and Lambe. We could forego our season tickets for 2027 and just pay as we go to the big Dublin games. He was for considering that but by the following morning on the way to the FAI Cup final at the Aviva we had found our colours again. I even wore a Drogs hoodie and undershirt on the day. So come 2027 we will be there, and hoping Scrooge Trivela isn't. They could always try their luck at Maccabi Tel Aviv.

⏩Follow on Bluesky.

Drogs ⚽ UCD ⚽ Dead Loss

Caoimhin O’Muraile ☭ On Tuesday 3rd November the US electorate delivered their verdict on the Trump Presidency. 

They unceremoniously kicked his party, the Republicans, out of Congressional control, handing it to the Democrats. Trump in typical idiotic fashion immediately and ridiculously claimed; ‘if I had been on the ballot paper’ the republicans would have won. Such a crass statement only an imbecile like him could come out with. 

Having spent weeks telling voters to ‘imagine’ his ‘name to be on the ballot’ when the electorate followed his order, and voted accordingly, the result was less than savoury for Trump and the Republican Party. Trump will now serve out the rest of his Presidency as a ‘lame duck president’ his powers, outside presidential decrees, greatly reduced. In January the newly elected congressmen and women will, unless Trump changes the rules declaring these mid-terms null and void, be sworn into the House of Representatives by the Speaker, and the Senate by the Vice President. A Democrat controlled Congress with a Republican President may well cause more political gridlock than is usual in an already griddled US political system.

Barely three days after the Democrats landslide victory taking 54 Senate seats, +7, and 254, +42, in the House of Representatives giving them control of the Congress the ‘markets’ were getting ‘shaky’. The money grabbing shareholders in Artificial Intelligence (AI) companies began getting ‘jittery’ as trillions were wiped off the value of shares due to panic selling by many. Sweeping Democratic election victories created investor ‘fears of a political backlash’ against AI which could include data centre moratoriums and possible stricter regulations on AI. The panic which wiped $2.5 trillion off the US stock market spread to Europe and Asia causing global concern within capitalism. These panics resulted in a ‘massive, widespread sale of shares’ including company investments as opposed to one single person or a group of individuals selling off individual block shares. 

All this fuss within the capitalist system of corrupt economics because the Democrat controlled Congress might want to introduce some minor regulations to AI. At the moment President Donald Trump is not a believer in regulating Artificial Intelligence.  He believes AI should be allowed to run free irrespective of the consequences. The Democrats modest regulations if they indeed do impose them will hardly threaten global capitalism, they may just make AI a little safer. At the moment AI is at a perilous stage of development with even some large companies voicing concern that the technology may become ‘outside human control’. And one large firm, Anthropic, called for a ‘break on the speed of frontier AI development’ saying; ‘We Must Pace the Frontier’. With this Democratic victory the entire industry faces mounting pressure to ‘slow down’ for a period certainly until safety can be reviewed.

This is not intended to be an anti-AI piece because the technology carefully monitored under common ownership and control can, and indeed should, benefit the whole of human kind. An end to droughts using AI for long term forecasts is perhaps not beyond the bounds of possibilities and advancements in health care are possibly endless. The only proviso is the AI must remain under human control and never be allowed to break away from such. For example, the advancements in health care and diagnosis must be under the control of healthcare professionals, consultants, doctors, and never be allowed to run loose on its own. This is not possible under capitalism because the present owners of AI have one interest and one interest only, profit! This overrides all other considerations including safety within AI, and any form of regulations is an antithesis to these parasites. They could not care a fuck for the future of humankind or the planet we live on: let the androids and robots take over, and if they grow out of control, well, as long as the profits roll in who cares! 

This is the flippant attitude of many capitalist investors and individuals including President Trump, himself a substantial shareholder in AI, towards the industry simply because it is the nature of the capitalist beast. Artificial Intelligence should become a great help to all who live on earth and not be the huge fertile money cow of the tiny minority. 

As it stands it is the latter, not the former, which prevails with the private ownership and shareholders of AI calling the shots. Will they, can they, prevent the Democratic controlled Congress imposing these, from their position, inconvenient and possibly very costly regulations? Try to imagine AI as a Lion. A lion in a zoo is safe enough in a cage and supervised by a Zoo Keeper with rules and regulations such as Do Not Enter the Cage. Now, let us take away the Zoo Keeper, the regulations, and the bars and that Lion becomes a very dangerous animal just as unregulated AI would or will become. The Zoo suddenly employs a new Manager, the Democrats, who wants safer regulations for the animals. These regulations may cost the Zoo’s shareholders profits, a profit reduction not a profit wipe-out. And for the sake of authenticity they want the Lions running almost free among the customers at the Menagerie unregulated. People attend Zoo’s to view animals in safety and, leaving aside the cruelty question, can only do so if the establishment is fully regulated.

As global stock markets fell many shareholders began selling at a rapid pace fearing these regulations once Trump and his henchmen are no longer in control of congress. Unregulated AI is a dangerous beast and could trigger a number of catastrophic incidents, nuclear war and annihilation being the obvious one as robots take control of various countries' securities. This is not the only disastrous possibility. In health care androids not under the control of a group of consultants could make unthinkable errors. It would only take one malfunction and nobody around to detect it and thousands of lives could be lost. Artificial Intelligence should be nurtured, cultured to be of benefit to all of us from sub-Saharan Africa to the Inuit of the Arctic Region irrespective of ability to pay. Under the present system that will not happen and we will see countries like the USA, the UK, and EU countries, in that order, steam ahead while other less fortunate lands will, as usual, be left behind.

The mini collapse of the stock markets due to people voting for the Democrats was how it was indirectly framed as world news. Other more important issues were occurring but everybody, rich and poor, were supposed to be horrified at the stock market crash. So a bunch of fat cats have lost some lose change, it happens in the betting shop every day, and because of this ‘tragedy’ we are all supposed to stop breathing? 

When people voted for the Democrats, they did so, no doubt in the majority of cases unwittingly, not only against Trump and his suicidal, even by capitalist standards, policies but also in favour of some kind of regulation on AI helping to make the world a modicum safer. Such an election in the eyes of global capitalism is criminal and no doubt, if they could, they would revoke the election results keeping the opponent of AI regulations Trump gang in control. They might not have to worry too much because January is a couple of months away and Trump might do this deed for them, don’t bet your house against!
  
Caoimhin O’Muraile is Independent Socialist Republican and Marxist.

Democrats Win Mid-Terms And Control Of Congress 🪶 But . . .

Lynx By Ten To The Power Of Two Thousand One Hundred And Fifty One

 

A Morning Thought @ 3322

Jim Duffy ✍I see there has been a widespread backlash at Simon Harris's idiotic attack on the long term unemployed at the Fine Gael Árd Fheis. 

Harris has had long term fixation on the unemployed. He had it when I knew him. Yet he never has a clue what he is talking about.
 
Many people down as long-term unemployed are on the wrong payment. They should be on disability due to long-term illness that makes them unable to work. However the disability bureaucracy is such that they keep being refused disability for idiotic technicalities. Eventually they just give up trying to get it, despite their doctor, social worker and everyone else knowing that they should be on it. 

One in-law of mine due to ill health should unambiguously be on disability. He instead went round and round and round in circles, constantly getting ludicrous rejections. Social workers know a standard one - people keep being told they did not send in some document they unambiguously did send. So they send it in again, and again they get told they did not send it in. My theory is that the bureaucrats do that in the knowledge that many applicants are demoralised and depressed, and so will give up.
 
Others on long term unemployment are on it because they lost their job at an age where nobody now will employ them. Others get completely demoralised and suffer severe depression.
 
Simon knows nothing about the system. He has got the smug theories of a person with no experience on the topic. If he could get his way he would cut the payments. Luckily, Fine Gael has been in government with Labour, now Fianna Fáil, and unlike Fine Gael, they are not going to slash payments no matter how much Simon wants to.
 
If Simon ever had to survive on social welfare he would die of shock. It is nothing like he thinks.

⏩ Jim Duffy is a writer-historian.

Not A Clue

Anthony McIntyre ⚽ I still don't know what to think of the current Liverpool side with Andoni Iraola at the helm. 

In terms of both energy and structure it is an improvement on the baton passed to the incoming coach from the unsteady hand of Arne Slot, but it would have been uproarious had it been worse. Slot's hopes and dreams were little more than writing on the sand of a beach, washed away in the first incoming wave.

The last two games I watched, the team failed to hit the high note and were out of tune on so many occasions. Against Fenerbahce it was Slot mark 2. Hard to watch. In the previous game against Arsenal, while denied an obvious penalty which the Premier League authorities have since acknowledged, they simply failed to create a serious goalscoring opportunity. There is a caveat but it offers little in the way of mitigation. The ineptitude of VAR officials has in large part led to me now being in agreement with Caoimhin O’Muraile on VAR. Although Ryan Gravenberch should never have been sent off in an earlier game against Manchester Cheaty courtesy of another VAR howler, which changed the direction of travel of the game and arguably the outcome, this is not a Liverpool thing. 

VAR is destroying soccer. It should be scrapped or radically overhauled to the point where it no longer strips the beautiful game of its most beautiful and beneficial characteristic - entertainment value. That aside, it is not a matter of Isak not being up to it. He is on fire but is not being found by those whose primary purpose on the pitch is to create chances. Such was their ineffectiveness that one sports journalist observed that David Raya 'could have had a cigar in and read the papers for most of the second half.' While Wirtz is improving gradually and Barcola is still adjusting to life in the Premiership, the un-fun fact is that against the Gunners Liverpool showed they had absolutely no guns. For the first time since the 2003-04 season, across 442 league games at Anfield, Liverpool failed to place a shot on target.

I missed most of Sunday's game away to Crystal Palace, catching the first thirty minutes in a Dublin bar as we crawled our way pub by pub to the FAI Cup final. What I did see gave little cause for optimism. Palace aren't exactly high fliers in the English premiership just now but they were allowed to sniff out the Liverpool goal all too easily. Allison, despite some dodgy performances of his own in the other two defeats, kept the scores level. Liverpool emerged 1-3 winners so while the front line has delivered on that occasion, serious questions remain about the backline, which conceded from three set pieces. That is abysmal defending. Even Jeremy Jacquet, so reliable throughout this current campaign, had a seriously off day. 

Virgil Van Dijk commented after the Fenerbahce game that the way the backline performs is not sustainable. But he was making the same sort of claims from early on in Slot's last season to little avail. If the captain understands the problem he shows no aptitude for fixing it. 

Liverpool under Iraola have shown with two home defeats to the big Manchester and London sides that they are still some way off competing with the elites. The Spaniard needs to raise the game much higher than the Dutchman was capable of. 

⏩Follow on Bluesky.

Smoking Cigars And Reading Papers

Louth For Ever ★ writing in Medium on 9-November-2026.

A Century After the First Dáil, Five Countries Just Found the Thing That Comes After the Gun in Ireland

Photo by Parker Johnson on Unsplash


1905 and the Second Step

Return first to 1905, since the structure established then has still not fully played out. In December 1918, Arthur Griffith’s movement secured 73 of the 105 Irish seats at Westminster, declined to occupy them, and then gathered the First Dáil in Dublin on 21st January 1919, the very day it proclaimed a Declaration of Independence that the British government never acknowledged. Thanks to Commandant General Dan Breen, of the Third Tipperary Brigade I.R.A., and comrades, the War of Independence is dated from that same afternoon. The order of events matters more than the mere occurrence: a democratic mandate, pursued and achieved, was answered by refusal, and that was then followed by armed rebellion. The violence did not replace the mandate; it arose because the mandate was denied.

That second step, which another generation of this movement could still have taken whether or not anyone today wishes it had, is now closed off. The Good Friday Agreement, now twenty eight years old as of this past April, resolved that issue both inside republicanism and beyond it. Armed insurrection in service of a political mandate is no longer a viable option, and no serious person claims otherwise. So an uncompromising question remains, one the Agreement itself does not settle: once a mandate is rejected, overlooked, or simply outvoted, and the old second step is no longer available, what remains, in fact.

This essay examines where that question has already been answered this autumn, by people who were not deliberately measuring themselves against any Irish precedent at all.

The Continent

Begin with the phenomenon that already had a label before outsiders supplied one. In the latter half of October, a loosely linked wave of mobilisations that the French press started calling the October 17th Movement spread through five countries, each driven by its own grievance and none waiting for permission from the others.

In France, the French Interior Ministry’s own statistics recorded 410,000 people on the streets nationwide on 24th October, including 110,000 in Paris. Running alongside that was a separate, longer running lycée student movement that had started in September and, by its end, had pulled in trade unions and the yellow vests: more than 2,700 arrests, over a thousand court appearances, and 217 people sentenced through fast-track trials, according to the country’s own justice minister. In Italy, “No Meloni Day” produced protests in Milan, Rome, Turin, Naples, Bologna and Florence, blending opposition to rearmament spending with more ordinary economic anger; on the twenty fourth, Italian police recorded nine arrests and 371 brief detentions across eight cities, while five hundred extra soldiers were sent to Milan alone. Spain divided into two distinct currents: disorder in Barcelona, and, separately, pensioners in Madrid marching to defend public pensions. In Albania, a demonstration that began with students in Tirana developed into an explicit call for the prime minister to resign over corruption and the neglect of schools. In Portugal, the Lisbon protests focused specifically on housing and targeted a government that was loosening rent increase limits and making it easier to evict tenants who fall behind.

Five countries, five different immediate causes, one common reality: none of this was abstract. Every one of these mobilisations confronted a named government over a concrete grievance, and the participants were prepared to be arrested for it.

The Honest Complication

The essay would be neater if the pattern applied everywhere, but it does not, and that should be said directly instead of being edited away.

On 31st October, a movement calling itself Gen Z regelt, Gen Z Takes Charge, staged demonstrations in thirty four German cities against compulsory military service and in favour of investment in education, with a spokesperson in Berlin, Lina Friedrich, describing it as a choice between “peace and freedom” on one side and “war and coercion” on the other. The organisers said they expected 182,000 people nationwide. Yet official police totals in Frankfurt, Munich and Berlin combined came to about 18,000, barely more than half of even the lower estimate the organisers’ own website had settled on by the day itself. Germany’s national school student body, the BSK, publicly separated itself from the initiative, questioning whether it was truly youth-led, and instead planned its own protest day for November 20th. The federal interior ministry stated that both far-left extremist groups and organisations tied to foreign extremist movements were trying to use it to mobilise support. Barricades were ignited in Hamburg. In Berlin, businesses along Kurfürstendamm boarded their windows beforehand. Hesse’s interior minister invoked France directly as the example not to repeat.

None of that occurred in Brazil or Serbia. Nor did it occur in the October 17th countries, where turnout generally met or surpassed organisers’ expectations and the movements’ own supposed constituencies did not publicly repudiate them. Measured against a governing coalition in Berlin already in open crisis, and a far-right party simultaneously leading national polls, the honest conclusion about Germany this autumn is not that the method failed there. Rather, the method and the far right are both active at once, unresolved, and that is a genuinely different picture from the rest of this essay. That difference should be kept in view instead of being flattened into a pattern it nearly, but not quite, confirms.

The Largest Single Case

Then came 3rd November, and the United States.

Democrats regained both chambers of Congress in one of the most one sided midterm outcomes in modern American history, only the fifth time since the Second World War that either party has taken both the House and the Senate in the same midterm election. The Senate shifted by seven seats. The House reached 218 confirmed Democratic seats, setting up Hakeem Jeffries to become Speaker, and the first Black Speaker if the chamber chooses him. Early exit polling placed Donald Trump’s approval rating at 38%, the lowest ever recorded for a sitting president at a midterm.

The largest share of what determined the outcome was conventional rather than revolutionary, and it is better to be candid about that than to invent a more dramatic story than the one that actually unfolded. Keisha Lance Bottoms became the country’s first Black woman governor, and also Georgia’s first Democratic governor since 2003. Chris Pappas became the first openly gay man elected to the United States Senate, winning in New Hampshire. Jon Ossoff was re-elected in Georgia. Roy Cooper captured a Senate seat in North Carolina. James Talarico won a Senate seat in Texas, the state’s first Democratic Senate victory since 1988, on the same night Democrats took control of the Texas state House for the first time in more than twenty years. According to the New York Times’ own analysis, Democratic candidates exceeded Kamala Harris’s 2024 results in Kansas; in South Carolina, counties that had backed Trump shifted left by an average of about twenty one points. In Florida, three House districts drawn specifically to benefit Republicans still went Democratic.

That is the main picture: an exhausted governing party, rejected. Yet within it there is a sharper thread. A number of democratic socialist candidates won House contests across New York, Pennsylvania and New Jersey, including the first Gen Z woman elected under that banner. And in California’s 34th District, a democratic socialist challenger, Angela Gonzales-Torres, defeated a sitting Democratic incumbent burdened by misconduct allegations. That outcome is not the same as the others in this essay. It is not a base defeating the other party. It is a base refusing to extend its own side’s compromise any further, and acting on that refusal rather than merely grumbling and voting the same way anyway.

What’s Actually Left

Go back to the beginning. The old second step, the one Griffith’s movement ultimately reached for after a mandate was refused, was closed off by the Agreement that is now twenty eight years old. What has taken its place, and has been demonstrated this autumn at every scale from a dispute over a march on one street to the floor of the United States Congress, is something plainer and more demanding than either violence or patience: open opposition, sustained and directed at a named target, carried by people willing to be arrested, to lose a seat, or to be disowned by the very constituency they claim to represent, rather than diluted into something easier to tolerate.

It does not always succeed. Germany is the evidence that it does not always succeed, included in this essay precisely so the rest cannot be mistaken for a law of nature. But where it has succeeded this autumn, in São Paulo, in Belgrade, on five European streets with five separate grievances, and across an entire American Congress, the shared element was never tactical cleverness. It was the refusal to soften the position into something more comfortable for the people holding it.

What any country does with that is a separate matter. This essay’s point is only that the question is real, and that answers to it, several of them, already exist in public, dated, and available for verification.

⏩Louth For Ever writes on Irish politics and constitutional change. Follow for analysis of Ireland’s democratic future as it’s constructed by those actually engaged in the work.

The Only Weapon That’s Left 🪶 What Refusal Looks Like Without A Gun

Ten links to a diverse range of opinion that might be of interest to TPQ readers. They are selected not to invite agreement but curiosity. Readers can submit links to pieces they find thought provoking.


Before We Conform, Or Condemn, Let Us At Least Be Curious


♜One recognizes one's course by discovering the paths that stray from it - Albert Camus♞ 

Lynx By Ten To The Power Of Two Thousand One Hundred And Fifty

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)