A Morning Thought @ 2530

 

50 comments:

  1. Are there any takers? Here's a 50p Paddy Power Special: Le Pen wins the appeal and wins the 2027 election in France....

    People laughed and balked at the thought of The Donald winning in 2016 and 2024....

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good night Marine and Good Riddance

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good to see the French courts showing the moral courage that the US courts lacked in dealing with Le Pen's fellow felon.

    ReplyDelete
  4. No mention of why the Right is getting votes Barry?

    ReplyDelete
  5. What matters to all democrats are that Trump and Le Pen are proven crooks. I guess there will be similar revelations about Reform UK. Slap it up them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And yet the people will vote for them Barry.

      Delete
  6. That is their choice and they have to own the consequences.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The left cannot fight fascist fascism if it continues to back liberal fascism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And was the French court's verdict in finding Le Pen guilty of embezzlement on such a scale, "liberal fascism"?

      Delete
    2. But you would imagine arming genocide is

      Delete
    3. Indeed. Those on the so called left refuse to acknowledge that their fanatical views have led to the growth of the so called right. Be it their intolerance to widespread abortion, religion, men marrying women, anti vaxxers etc etc has pushed folk into the arms of those they claim to oppose allthewhile claiming they are the righteous ones who believe in the ballot box democracy and ironically not batting an eyelid that their side is readily denying folk their chance to stand in these 'fair and democratic' elections and in some cases applauding it. If big bad trump had blocked his opponents from standing in elections these same righteous ones would rightfully condemn trump for being a dictator etc. Talk about hypocrisy. Hence why lots of folk have had enough of those righteous ones I.e they are full of manure and fakery.
      The righteous ones need to own the monsters they create.

      Delete
    4. Mick - maybe that is just worded awkwardly but I know nobody on the left or right who opposes men marrying women.

      Delete
    5. Christine lagarde embezzled hundreds of millions and was punished with a job running the ECB! I guess it depends who is in front of a judge whether one experiences the full rigors of a 'just and fair' society.

      Delete
  8. AM beautifully, and succinctly, punctures Barry's stupidity on this matter.

    In regards to Mick's comment, I would suspect that he's referring to the elevation of 2SLGBTQIA++ and the denigration of traditional marriage as oppressive, enforcing generational trauma and meaningless.

    https://www.aei.org/op-eds/what-liberals-dont-understand-about-men-and-marriage/



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All the rest of that acronym make a mockery of LGB people.

      Delete
    2. WTF is 2SLGBTQIA++ ? If we can't remember our own passwords, how are we supposed to remember that?
      Rainbow community is a more useful and convenient description rather than this Star Wars coding.
      I am not aware of anybody that opposes marriage between men and women? I think the intolerance comes from those that oppose same sex marriage.
      I don't care who people marry or love providing there is mutual consent.

      Delete
    3. It's the result of people who were really starved of attention growing up, came of age in the time of social media and never being told "No, that's ridiculous". I just saw a clip of one of these cretins dressed as a dog (furry?) and taking part in a 'dog show' like crufts. If that's not just some weird sexual kink I don't know what the fuck is. Either that or some serious mental illness. Rainbow my arse, the LGB community put a lot of work in for equal rights and these shitgibbons make fools out of them and their good work.

      Delete
    4. Indeed Christopher. My comment about marriage was me being ironic.

      Delete
    5. Steve - do you not find the Rainbow a convenient shortcut? Compared to the barcode I think it much better. At times I work to work to overcome the temptation to consider that the 'shitgibbons' as you term them are agent provocateurs, purposefully inserted into the rainbow (I am not using the barcode) community to draw down ridicule on it. Look at how easily Matt Walsh gets away with ridiculing and mocking when he does his What Is A Woman? gig. The responses to him are so unpersuasive they would make you cringe. Walsh uses a tactic that Theo Van Gogh very crudely employed. He would get the most venomous and hateful Islamists he could find and then engage in televised debate with them, addressing them as goatfucker and the like. They would respond frothing at the mouth and threatening murder. He would emerge the winner. I believe the left can overcome Matt Walsh but the Woke can't. This is why I would share Gearoid O Loinsigh's forcefulness in asserting that Left is not Woke. Susan Nieman has a great book on this very thing.

      Delete
    6. Mick - so despite the religious-like nonsense that the evangelical woke come up with the intolerance seems not to be towards men marrying women but is directed against same sex marriage.

      Delete
    7. I haven't watched Matt Walsh as I refuse to give him money, but from the clips I have seen I will give him his due in that he points out that those who claim to be transwomen or 'allies' can't even coherently define what that term means; ergo their position is utter shite. It's a social contagion that will die out as society jerks to the Right due to the woke crap.

      The term rainbow I don't have a problem with but I thought it in was meant to be representative of LGB peoples across the globe, not some bastardization whereby nonsense is also included. I wonder what the people from Stonewall would make of all this way back in their day.

      Delete
    8. Steve - I watched him but like yourself would not pay a cent to do so. It is like watching what evangelicals or racists say for themselves rather than have it filtered by the Department of Approved Thought. What amazed me was the ease with which he swept them aside. Much like the way Michael McDowell dealt with Gerry Adams in the televised discussion on economic policy in 2007, there was a huge gap in presentational ability and logic. Like you, the inability to coherently answer the question of what is a woman, left me exasperated.

      Delete
    9. So, I changed my name and 'gender-identification' to Henrietta, ye all changed likewise, Christopher to Christine, Mick to Michelle, Steve to Stephanie, and Anthony to Antonia. Then we could all have a great girls' night out!

      Ffs! Mad or what, Ted?

      Delete
    10. Henrietta - if it makes you happy and is not harming anybody else you should be free to be whatever you want.
      What you should not be free to do is enforce upon others that they too believe that you are what you state you are.
      Nor should you demand that everybody abandons science so that you can be comfortable in your belief about what you are. Like the religious type, you should be free to hold your opinions, but not to coerce others into holding them.
      We probably sing from the same hymn sheet on all of that.

      Delete
    11. Yes, we're pretty much on the same page.
      The point I was attempting to make was that just because we called ourselves girls doesn't make us women.
      The liberal/wokes' mish-mashing of fundamental & biological identifications has caused dangerous confusion for many in society.

      Delete
    12. HJ - your point was pretty clear. It might earn you the wails from the Screaming Society/SS but such is the risk of discussion and debate when it comes up against those opposed to anything they don't approve.

      Delete
  9. Replies
    1. Consider what she has done against Keir Starmer's support for war crimes. Who is the serious criminal here?

      Delete
  10. Anthony, you don't have to go that far. All anyone has to do is read up on how Christine Lagarde was treated for the same 'crime'....

    Personally the 'French deep state' were shit scared of Marine LePen winning in 2027.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Frankie, the French courts also found former Presidents Chirac and Sarkozy and former Prime Minister Francois Fillon, all solid establishment figures, guilty of corruption. The proper workings of the checks and balances of democracy in the form of an independent judiciary. As for your mythical Deep State, it is ethnic minorities, refugees and Muslims that would have most to fear from the victory of this rancid family line.

      Delete
  11. Anthony,

    WTF is 2SLGBTQIA++ ? I


    A vegan branch of the eugenics program controlled by technocrats funded by Zionist banking cartels allows big pharma to drug vulnerable kids and adults for their sick ends.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Frankie that sounds as convoluted as the barcode!!

      Delete
    2. Though convoluted it may be, there's also fundamental truth in what Frankie says: Health providers to include doctors, nurses, researchers, therapists, and pharma companies- have drugged, butchered, mutilated, and sacrificed minors on the high altar of excessive liberal tolerance.
      And it's not beyond the bounds of possibility that some of these participants are Zionist leaning. That said, I do think Frankie over attributes capitalist and profit motives as exclusive to Zionists. Exploitative greed is well-distributed and as old as Methuselah.

      Delete
    3. HJ - I don't dispute that there may be a fundamental truth in there but I am too lazy to start working it out. Once doctors murdered their patients in Rwanda, teachers killed their pupils, clergy killed their flock, that should have dispelled any lingering automatic deference to the expertise hierarchies. That said, we have more reason to have confidence in these bureaucracies than not to otherwise we would pray rather than go to the doctor. How many of us outside the Christian Science movement are daft enough to choose that?

      Delete
    4. Be cautious around health providers, too. Take time to do your research. Don't swallow any opinion whole.

      The Israel Lobby has blood on its hands, likewise, Big Pharma in cahoots with Agriculture too. Public Health advice, particularly in the West, has been manipulated to unwittingly serve profit rather than the health needs of citizens. Think here of how Ancel Keys manipulated his data, conveniently leaving out stats from France & Switzerland, to promote his hypothesis on the adverse effects of fat consumption, and also of the sugar industry, which, along with the High Fructose Corn producers, led to Public Health authorities promoting a 'food pyramid' deleterious to most, if not all consumers. The food pyramid erroneously promotes carbs over proteins and fats. The result is increased insulin resistance, which leads to metabolic disorder and obesity, which in turn come with a myriad of health challenges.

      Delete
    5. It is useful to be cautious without being paranoid. Can you think of a better person to provide health care than health professionals?
      If you or I are ill they are who we go to. We don't go to Christian scientists. We have a confidence in them but not an absolute faith. Confidence is based on evidential experience whereas faith is based on no evidence.

      Delete
  12. Frankie, I don't expect you to evidence that piece of crap because there is none except in the sick, twisted, conspiratorial and antisemitic minds of the far right disinformation merchants that you place do much stock by

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anthony...

    Frankie that sounds as convoluted as the barcode!!

    I'm glad you never asked me "Frankie are you stoned again"....

    ReplyDelete
  14. Henry,

    Frankie over attributes capitalist and profit motives as exclusive to Zionists.

    But the Zionist's (not all are Jews and not all Jews are Zionist) control the money flow----in fact if you read up on how money is made, you'll discover they (Zionist bastards) make it up as they go along....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (not all Zionists are Jews and not all Jews are Zionist)

      Can you clarify, Frankie? Mustn't have been in school the day that was covered,

      Delete
    2. It is one of the oldest antisemitic tropes that Jews control the world's money supply. Frankie's substitution of Zionists got Jews died not deceive any student of Antisemitism especially as he is unable to evidence his claims

      Delete
    3. HJ - Look at the Christian Zionists in the US. A big non Jewish Zionist lobby.
      Then look at all those Jews including some religious who oppose Zionism, many of them protesting on behalf of Palestinians.

      Delete
    4. Thanks, that's clearer now.

      Delete
  15. Anthony

    Frankie - I'll join you for that!

    I will spark up a Bob Marley for the TPQ...

    ReplyDelete
  16. Barry,

    You asked me to supply evidence----give the TPQ time to reproduce a piece from 2009 that I have yet to forward (I am busy fixing 'dead links') and then talk...

    Do yourself a massive favour and stop questioning my thoughts---I will reproduce an article that is complete with peer reviewed papers and names academia droll over.....

    ReplyDelete
  17. I am going to throw this into the mix---similar to Stevie, I have my own French connection..

    My oldest wee girl who is Jewish and born in France actually voted for Le Pen the first time Macron got elected---second time, she voted for no one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. most of us who have engaged with you over the years know that your daughter and her mum are Jewish and don't take allegations of antisemitism against you seriously.

      Delete