John Murphy 📢 delivered an oration at the annual Vol. Alan Ryan Commemoration on 8-September -2024.

A chairde I would like to welcome you all here today to our annual commemoration for IRA Volunteer Alan Ryan. Each year that passes brings its own fresh challenges to the struggle for which Alan paid the ultimate sacrifice.

And one of those challenges is the creeping and insidious policy of this state, and its political parties, to be selective in choosing who it is that is worthy of commemoration. The hierarchy of victims policy is now complimented with a hierarchy of patriot dead.

The path to political office is littered with sell outs and betrayals and it is clear that this now extends to the exclusion of Irishmen and Irishwomen, from whatever organisation, who gave their lives for Irish freedom.

We cannot stress how important it is to commemorate all our patriot dead. It is a powerful political statement confirming revolutionary continuity and intent. Even in the most darkest and isolated days in Irish republicanism commemorations held the line, facilitated debate and provoked ideas to move us forward. Today’s commemoration will continue in that tradition.

Throughout our history we Irish have never wavered in identifying and taking on our enemy.

We have never been a people to scapegoat or punch down in pursuit of Irish freedom and sovereignty. We understand our enemy and we know all too well the trail of destruction they have left around the world in their pursuit of colonization murder and theft.

We were the first to have experienced Britain's tactics of attempting to colonize our country and generations of Irish have watched as Britain perfected those tactics here and used them throughout the world.

It is with a heavy heart that we, this generation of Irish republicans, watch our people lose sight of who our enemy is. The new era of colonization has once again set working class people against their own kind. Those who control these colonialist and globalist policies are equally determined to divide opposition through smoke and mirror tactics to disguise themselves as the true authors of mass exploitation.

The question of immigration has commanded centre stage on the political agenda, not just in Ireland but throughout Europe and beyond. It provokes a wide and emotive range of reactions. Whether it be through fear, manipulation, ignorance, political naivete or wilful racism the scale of immigration has sparked division within our communities which in turn has polarised debate as to how this issue should be addressed.

Republicans and socialists cannot shy away from the gravity and depth of this issue. It is incumbent on us to fully acquaint ourselves with a thorough knowledge of the totality of immigration and the political and economic forces which drive it. But in equal measure, we cannot fall foul of any strawman arguments designed to deflect from the true extent of the problem. We cannot invent enemies simply to reward ourselves a mythical victory in the deeply flawed belief that republican redemption is to be found in a slogan.

The Dublin Government is clearly implementing an immigration policy which is being dictated to them from outside sources. It is not a sovereign decision. No government, however incompetent, could remotely develop a policy which it vainly struggles to even partially implement. The spectacle of tent encampments being met by metal fencing as some kneejerk solution only underscores the shambolic policy from the outset.

It is also abundantly clear that these external influences are blindly indifferent to the impact such a policy on immigration has on local communities which in turn demonstrates their clear indifference to the welfare of immigrants themselves.

Recurring reports that immigrants are now being advised to destroy any documentation they possess as a sure way of exploiting the State’s legal obligations towards them only adds to the already deep scepticism our communities hold towards the immigration process. But it also introduces the reality of people trafficking, the organised exploitation of those who once they surrender their documents are at the complete mercy of slum landlords and ruthless employers paying slave wages.

When our people see government ministers responsible for this debacle struggling to answer the most basic of questions; when they see opposition wannabes flip flopping like the opinion poll prostitutes that they are, when they are told that failed asylum applicants are responsible for deporting themselves, and the whereabouts of the thousands who don’t is unknown, their scepticism rapidly turns to cynicism.

Working class communities are seeing immigrants being placed on their doorsteps without consultation or consent by a government and opposition with no inclination of providing either in the future. There is no regard as to the ability of local services to cope with such a sudden influx, which reflects a national concern on other national services already struggling to address the needs of the status quo. That they take to the streets to protest should be first understood before it is strategically mislabelled and disgracefully misjudged.

The government and opposition would claim that no community has a veto over who lives in their area. Yet the same political class negotiated the entrenching of the Unionist veto, which excludes the vast majority of Irish people from living in a sovereign 32 County Irish Republic. True liberty is the right of every man and woman to be honest, to think and to speak without hypocrisy.

Of course there are those with nefarious agendas who will seek to exploit the anger and frustration of the people. For republicans to engage in an activity that drives all protest off the streets in the delusional belief that the far right or the fascist tendency are the main actors behind these organic protests are only serving the State and globalist agendas. If we cannot discern the baby from the bathwater, we fulfil the proverbial outcome.

In a coordinated and systematic campaign the State and its NGOs have raised the spectre of the rise of the far right as a classic deflection tactic in an attempt to avert scrutiny from their disastrous immigration policy. It has paved the way to label all those opposed to their gross mismanagement as either far right or racist as a means to deflect from any examination of the State’s subservient role in facilitating it.

Why should republicans and socialists cavort with this political posturing when the very core of what we are should be on the streets exposing it? We cannot become pawns for the pawns of EU capitalists in order to silence dissent against them.

We know who is responsible for the housing crisis. We know who is responsible for the health crisis. And we also know that the increased pressure placed on these services by a flawed immigration policy is a deliberate tool to ultimately place those services in the hands of private ownership.

In conjunction, this State's policy of neutrality is being deliberately eroded to move towards a military agenda devised by the same external influences who are driving mass economic migration. Private profiteering is behind fascist wars like that in Ukraine and so-called regime changes in other countries which feeds into the displacement of populations as billions are pumped into the coffers of the arms traders.

The displacement of peoples from these imperialist motivated wars, and imperialist economics, is as equally profitable in terms of cheap labour and the private sector supply of accommodation paid for by public funds. A naïve approach to these fascist acts will only make us complicit in the fascist acts themselves.

And let’s not delude ourselves that the planning for this mass immigration is a recent construct or a response to recent conflicts. The legal and political framework to enable it has its origins in successive EU Treaties, culminating in the Lisbon Treaty which gave it legal effect. And now that we see the dysfunctional fruit of that treaty, we have a better understanding of why they forced a second vote upon us. Republicans and socialists have always opposed the EU as a capitalist and militarist venture. Why should our opposition to its concept and practices stop now?

Vacuous terms such as diversity and inclusivity fly in the face of the abject failure of multiculturalism throughout Europe. Woke words are the bread and butter of those whose vision for Ireland is to profit from whatever Irish society looks like on the day. Ideological posturing on the reasons for this failure cannot alter this basic fact. As George Orwell stated, “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.” Speaking the truth becomes a revolutionary act.

And this is what Irish republicans and socialists must bring into the national narrative, revolutionary ideas complimented by revolutionary acts. And regardless of which issue it is, partition, neutrality, immigration, healthcare, housing or education even in a democratic socialist republic the rules of the road must apply.

Our clear definition of what Irish sovereignty actually means for our people will set us apart from those who, knowingly or unknowingly, would reduce our country and our people to a regional entity governed and exploited by capitalist interests from the EU. So before we take to the streets in protest at least let us have a grounded understanding of the issue at hand and that we fully understand who our protests must be directed against.

All revolutionary ideas and actions have consequences. We must display the courage that Alan and all our patriot dead have shown when we engage and initiate them. To do any less is the most counter revolutionary act we could commit.

Rest in peace Alan. The struggle continues.

Beir Bua!

John Murphy is a former republican prisoner from Cork. 

Alan Ryan Remembered

John Murphy 📢 delivered an oration at the annual Vol. Alan Ryan Commemoration on 8-September -2024.

A chairde I would like to welcome you all here today to our annual commemoration for IRA Volunteer Alan Ryan. Each year that passes brings its own fresh challenges to the struggle for which Alan paid the ultimate sacrifice.

And one of those challenges is the creeping and insidious policy of this state, and its political parties, to be selective in choosing who it is that is worthy of commemoration. The hierarchy of victims policy is now complimented with a hierarchy of patriot dead.

The path to political office is littered with sell outs and betrayals and it is clear that this now extends to the exclusion of Irishmen and Irishwomen, from whatever organisation, who gave their lives for Irish freedom.

We cannot stress how important it is to commemorate all our patriot dead. It is a powerful political statement confirming revolutionary continuity and intent. Even in the most darkest and isolated days in Irish republicanism commemorations held the line, facilitated debate and provoked ideas to move us forward. Today’s commemoration will continue in that tradition.

Throughout our history we Irish have never wavered in identifying and taking on our enemy.

We have never been a people to scapegoat or punch down in pursuit of Irish freedom and sovereignty. We understand our enemy and we know all too well the trail of destruction they have left around the world in their pursuit of colonization murder and theft.

We were the first to have experienced Britain's tactics of attempting to colonize our country and generations of Irish have watched as Britain perfected those tactics here and used them throughout the world.

It is with a heavy heart that we, this generation of Irish republicans, watch our people lose sight of who our enemy is. The new era of colonization has once again set working class people against their own kind. Those who control these colonialist and globalist policies are equally determined to divide opposition through smoke and mirror tactics to disguise themselves as the true authors of mass exploitation.

The question of immigration has commanded centre stage on the political agenda, not just in Ireland but throughout Europe and beyond. It provokes a wide and emotive range of reactions. Whether it be through fear, manipulation, ignorance, political naivete or wilful racism the scale of immigration has sparked division within our communities which in turn has polarised debate as to how this issue should be addressed.

Republicans and socialists cannot shy away from the gravity and depth of this issue. It is incumbent on us to fully acquaint ourselves with a thorough knowledge of the totality of immigration and the political and economic forces which drive it. But in equal measure, we cannot fall foul of any strawman arguments designed to deflect from the true extent of the problem. We cannot invent enemies simply to reward ourselves a mythical victory in the deeply flawed belief that republican redemption is to be found in a slogan.

The Dublin Government is clearly implementing an immigration policy which is being dictated to them from outside sources. It is not a sovereign decision. No government, however incompetent, could remotely develop a policy which it vainly struggles to even partially implement. The spectacle of tent encampments being met by metal fencing as some kneejerk solution only underscores the shambolic policy from the outset.

It is also abundantly clear that these external influences are blindly indifferent to the impact such a policy on immigration has on local communities which in turn demonstrates their clear indifference to the welfare of immigrants themselves.

Recurring reports that immigrants are now being advised to destroy any documentation they possess as a sure way of exploiting the State’s legal obligations towards them only adds to the already deep scepticism our communities hold towards the immigration process. But it also introduces the reality of people trafficking, the organised exploitation of those who once they surrender their documents are at the complete mercy of slum landlords and ruthless employers paying slave wages.

When our people see government ministers responsible for this debacle struggling to answer the most basic of questions; when they see opposition wannabes flip flopping like the opinion poll prostitutes that they are, when they are told that failed asylum applicants are responsible for deporting themselves, and the whereabouts of the thousands who don’t is unknown, their scepticism rapidly turns to cynicism.

Working class communities are seeing immigrants being placed on their doorsteps without consultation or consent by a government and opposition with no inclination of providing either in the future. There is no regard as to the ability of local services to cope with such a sudden influx, which reflects a national concern on other national services already struggling to address the needs of the status quo. That they take to the streets to protest should be first understood before it is strategically mislabelled and disgracefully misjudged.

The government and opposition would claim that no community has a veto over who lives in their area. Yet the same political class negotiated the entrenching of the Unionist veto, which excludes the vast majority of Irish people from living in a sovereign 32 County Irish Republic. True liberty is the right of every man and woman to be honest, to think and to speak without hypocrisy.

Of course there are those with nefarious agendas who will seek to exploit the anger and frustration of the people. For republicans to engage in an activity that drives all protest off the streets in the delusional belief that the far right or the fascist tendency are the main actors behind these organic protests are only serving the State and globalist agendas. If we cannot discern the baby from the bathwater, we fulfil the proverbial outcome.

In a coordinated and systematic campaign the State and its NGOs have raised the spectre of the rise of the far right as a classic deflection tactic in an attempt to avert scrutiny from their disastrous immigration policy. It has paved the way to label all those opposed to their gross mismanagement as either far right or racist as a means to deflect from any examination of the State’s subservient role in facilitating it.

Why should republicans and socialists cavort with this political posturing when the very core of what we are should be on the streets exposing it? We cannot become pawns for the pawns of EU capitalists in order to silence dissent against them.

We know who is responsible for the housing crisis. We know who is responsible for the health crisis. And we also know that the increased pressure placed on these services by a flawed immigration policy is a deliberate tool to ultimately place those services in the hands of private ownership.

In conjunction, this State's policy of neutrality is being deliberately eroded to move towards a military agenda devised by the same external influences who are driving mass economic migration. Private profiteering is behind fascist wars like that in Ukraine and so-called regime changes in other countries which feeds into the displacement of populations as billions are pumped into the coffers of the arms traders.

The displacement of peoples from these imperialist motivated wars, and imperialist economics, is as equally profitable in terms of cheap labour and the private sector supply of accommodation paid for by public funds. A naïve approach to these fascist acts will only make us complicit in the fascist acts themselves.

And let’s not delude ourselves that the planning for this mass immigration is a recent construct or a response to recent conflicts. The legal and political framework to enable it has its origins in successive EU Treaties, culminating in the Lisbon Treaty which gave it legal effect. And now that we see the dysfunctional fruit of that treaty, we have a better understanding of why they forced a second vote upon us. Republicans and socialists have always opposed the EU as a capitalist and militarist venture. Why should our opposition to its concept and practices stop now?

Vacuous terms such as diversity and inclusivity fly in the face of the abject failure of multiculturalism throughout Europe. Woke words are the bread and butter of those whose vision for Ireland is to profit from whatever Irish society looks like on the day. Ideological posturing on the reasons for this failure cannot alter this basic fact. As George Orwell stated, “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.” Speaking the truth becomes a revolutionary act.

And this is what Irish republicans and socialists must bring into the national narrative, revolutionary ideas complimented by revolutionary acts. And regardless of which issue it is, partition, neutrality, immigration, healthcare, housing or education even in a democratic socialist republic the rules of the road must apply.

Our clear definition of what Irish sovereignty actually means for our people will set us apart from those who, knowingly or unknowingly, would reduce our country and our people to a regional entity governed and exploited by capitalist interests from the EU. So before we take to the streets in protest at least let us have a grounded understanding of the issue at hand and that we fully understand who our protests must be directed against.

All revolutionary ideas and actions have consequences. We must display the courage that Alan and all our patriot dead have shown when we engage and initiate them. To do any less is the most counter revolutionary act we could commit.

Rest in peace Alan. The struggle continues.

Beir Bua!

John Murphy is a former republican prisoner from Cork. 

18 comments:

  1. I think this requires a response that a comment would not allow for.

    First thoughts are that is sounds like republicans putting out feelers to the far right either in a bid to cozy up to the fascists or to replace them by stealing their thunder and their positions.

    There has to be space within oppositional discourse for people to express their concerns about emigration and the EU without being labelled fascist. But when the old far right themes of recolonisation, globalisation and NGOs enter republican discourse it becomes apparent that the direction of travel is to the right not the left. The goal is not a Republic but some form of autarkic, xenophobic, exclusivist nationalism with all the reactionary bells and whistles. A friend said to me earlier that he feels the speech was a dog whistle to the far right. I can understand why.

    A republican project that fails to recognise fascism as by far a bigger danger to democracy than immigration will sooner or later find itself sharing platforms with the Irish Freedom Party.

    Partition is not going to be overcome by Perdition.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely AM!

      I just quickly skimmed over the speech and what immediately stood out was what you've just addressed in your reply.

      Im going to forward this article onto one of the people that was with Alan when he was shot and hopefully i can encourage him to write some form of a reply to be published here. Hope that's ok?

      Delete
    2. FromRedToBlack - yes, get it through whenever you can. If Sinn Fein was to deliver this eulogy at the graveside of Bobby Sands I would demand they leave or I would walk away. I would regard them to the right of Fine Gael and with no right of presence at the graveside of republican dead.

      Delete
    3. As a youngster, I joined the Republican Movement in 1972. It was a broad front, the majority sincere and decent, with misfits weeded out. The hiberno-nationalist views expressed by Mr Murphy would only have been tolerated if he were an exceptional operator in the field.

      Delete
  2. "Republicans and socialists cannot shy away from the gravity and depth of this issue. It is incumbent on us to fully acquaint ourselves with a thorough knowledge of the totality of immigration and the political and economic forces which drive it. "

    Cui Bono?

    Very interesting to read this. Clearly the mood of the locals is registering.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The difficulty there Steve is that this strain of republicanism is not remotely interested in the mood of the people other than as fuel for its own project. Physical force republicanism - which I think is the tradition this strain fits into - has always had a contempt for democracy. 'The people' are there for it - it is not there for the people.

      If you compare some of the traits of physical force republicanism you find how readily it corresponds to and complements some of the fourteen points of the Ur-fascism as articulated by Umberto Eco. I think the Eco interpretative framework for fascism is, unlike more Marxian frameworks, ahistorical (it is referred to as eternal fascism) but Marxism in the hands of Stalinoids and Trotoids can be very wooden and formulaic. Try working with the Poulantzas model of fascism (neither a Trot nor a Stalinist) as compared to Eco's - it is quite challenging.

      Delete
  3. In return for the E U & Yanks turning a blind eye to Ireland being a tax haven , we are ruled with an iron fist from Brussels & Washington . Part of the deal is allowing limitless immigration from the fourth world . The 26 counties are as independent as the 6 up North .
    Those supporting " No borders " are a curious combination of the libertarian " right " , who favour unlimited immigration as a means of screwing wages to near zero ( explains why the federal min wage in the USA is a laughable $ 7: 25 an hour ) & the woke far left brigade who live in leafy suburbs , have cushy employment & worship The Guardian / Irish Times etc .
    Funniest vids on www.youtube.com are interviews with posh protesters in England @ " refugee " support rallies who squirm when asked if they would take an asylum seeker into their home # No room @ the inn # Buckinghamshire / Dalkey / etc are full .
    The Irish language is never to be heard on Dublin streets , better chance of hearing Mongolian . Multiculturalism is working a treat across Europe ( isn't it ) ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Though but a fledgling member of the Republican Movement and still at school in 1972 I was already active. During that year as part of my studies, my Irish A Level teacher suggested that the class students participate in an essay competition running in the Irish Times entitled 'Is EEC Membership a Good Choice for Ireland' or something to that effect.
      Of the 17 class members, I was the only one to write an essay opposing the motion (And the only one to receive recognition; my paper though not prize-winning was highly commended). As a Republican, I continued to oppose EEC/EU membership, and opposed & campaigned against the GFA.

      Today, as an older and wiser man I hold different opinions.
      I would vote against 'IRExit' in the unlikely event of that ever coming about. And though not enthused about the abandonment of the 'Irish Republic' and not well-disposed to those who abandoned it, those who like myself swore to uphold it, I accept the demoncratic collective will of the people of the island.

      Delete
    2. English is the most prevalent foreign language on the streets of Dublin. The thugs attacking immigrants seem always to speak in English. I don't think I have ever heard them howl in Irish.
      Part of the deal is allowing limitless immigration from the fourth world

      This deal is certainly is worthy of discussion and as you have hardly pulled it out of your jaxie, can you let me know where we might find this deal?

      Delete
  4. It's not fascist to limit the amount of people allowed live in a country . What a lazy stereotype from the commies / socialists .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is potentially fascistic to be opposed to democracy, pluralism, egalitarianism, liberalism, or socialism. Though the EU is not nirvana, compared to most other political arrangements, it embraces or allows for the values that fascism opposes. The electorate of the 26 counties has voted to remain in the EU. They have benefited greatly economically from that union.
      For as long as they remain in the EU they are not going to be able to cherry-pick. Sure they can impose limits, limits subject to European laws and treaties.

      Delete
    2. It is wrong to label as fascist people who have a concern about immigration. The fascists are to be found hating immigrants, burning accommodation, intimidating inter alia.

      Delete
    3. Is the problem legal or illegal immigration? And if the problem is refugees aren't they supposed to take refuge in the nearest country? And I know we've had this conversation before but if the EU is so wonderful why is Calais full of people attempting to get to the UK by boat? This is also the reason why the far right is gaining traction. Brexit had a strong undercurrent of being against immigration which does not seem to have slowed whatsoever, and the political parties have done fuck all about it. Won't be long until the Far Right gain popularity and votes in the UK. Ireland will be little different.

      Delete
  5. Frankly I found the speech to be well balanced and thought out. It is reassuring to see that some in Republican circles finally have the courage to say what a lot of people in this country are thinking and talking about on a daily basis. In my view it was certainly not a ‘dog whistle’ to the Far Right. For me this reads more like an acknowledgment to the genuine fears and concerns of the working class, to highlight that reactionary racism is wrong and that the blame lies with the Free State and EU Imperialism, and yes the system is close to capacity and moderation is the way forward. I think this speech showed a degree of leadership during what is a difficult time.

    Is it not Stalinist to vehemently disregard or dismiss anyone or anything calling for moderation on immigration as Far Right or Fascist? To throw out these very dangerous terms in such a care free manner is reactionary and surely puts one in bed with the main stream narrative of the establishment, and not with the Irish Republic and working class.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I had similar thoughts to yours Anthony. This starts OK ('let's keep in mind who the real enemies are') but then devolves quite quickly and ends up being very close to dog whistling. I think there's a relationship between the size and health of an organisation and the quality of their ideas and I wonder if one in this case is an accurate reflection of the other.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joe, it is said that one of the failings of an ideologue is that the more people disagree with you the more convinced you become that you are right. You end up a tiny, marginalised cult. So, there is most likely something to what you say.

      There has been a lot of criticism of the speech both on and offline but nobody yet has said to me that it is outside the parameters of discussion. Those who I have talked to and who are vehemently opposed to the content nevertheless do not object to it being carried on TPQ.

      I think these things have to be discussed openly. The fact that the piece is being well read would indicate an interest in the subject matter. We can't tell from reading stats alone if that is because the ideas expressed are welcome or abhorred.

      Overall, I think it is a moribund republicanism trying to make itself relevant by latching onto an issue. That strain of republicanism has been outvoiced and outmaneuvered by the far right and has moved the dial to the right in a bid to catch up.

      I would be loathe to label the speaker a fascist. I have not heard it said that he has been at far right rallies or has shared platforms with the fascists. For those who go to fascist rallies or share platforms with fascists then they are in the fascist camp even though they might feel they are not full blown fascists. I have talked to some of the people who have turned up at these rallies and they don't believe they are fascists. But if you go to a Presbyterian church on Sunday and observe the protocol, there is not much point in proclaiming you are a Catholic. You might be but you are still in the Presbyterian camp.

      Delete
  7. Unfortunately those of whom should know better are quick to label anyone who genuinely opposes issues they themselves may agree with as far right bigots be it, abortion,coroniebalonie terrorism, fighting Russia, stopping big bad Assad etc etc. Both sides are permitted to disagree over Palestine but everything else the western world pushes upon us seems to be echoed by the so called 'left'. Could it be that the 'left' has been infiltrated too?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Be assured Mick that the democratic left condemns all war crimes, whether the perps are Israeli, Russian, Hamas or Assad. It opposes suppression of democracy whether in Hungary or Venezuela. It opposes suppression of women's bodily autonomy thru abortion bans and demonisation of migrants.

      Delete