Mousa Abu Marzouk ✏ writing for Media Review Network.


For years we have been vilified and criminalized from afar by various Western governments, political leaders and movements and their hired agents. Hamas is this… Hamas is that … Hamas did this … Hamas did that. For decades, we have been subject to non-stop verbal attacks, lies and disinformation which has sought to recraft us from a national liberation movement and the elected representative of the people of Gaza into “terrorists” who care not for Palestine and its needs and independence, but the chase of personal fame and benefit.

Once again in the recently concluded two-day hearing brought by South Africa before the International Court of Justice, not on our behalf, but that of international law and justice, Israel spent its entire defense relying on rampant hearsay, a fabric of lies and an obvious strategy of deflection. Before responding to this symphony of distortion let us make clear certain fundamental undeniable points:

Hamas was elected by Palestinians in Gaza more than fifteen years ago in a process described by then international monitor former President Jimmy Carter as the fullest and fairest he had ever observed. All these years later we still serve in that capacity not because we have refused or prevented our Palestinian families and community from holding new elections, but because Israel has done everything in its power to ensure that full and free elections will not happen, fearing that Hamas would not only once again win in Gaza, but throughout the occupied West Bank and Jerusalem. Our candidates have been detained, essentially indefinitely, without formal charge or trial in a military system; universities have been raided and closed and students arrested whenever they dared to hold political rallies or debates let alone elections to see who would speak on their behalf; and, finally, our political leaders, activists and candidates have often been executed by Israeli military and security forces, or by so-called settlers. So please, spare us the indictment that we are a despotic movement interested in maintaining power at all costs rather than one which seeks to participate in full, fair and free elections across all of Palestine and which will abide by those results whatever they may be.

Israel’s defense against the action brought before the ICJ by South Africa, is likewise filled with convenient distortion, deflection and, at times, outright lies. Moreover, our lawyers advise that its various defenses are not valid under the Genocide Convention but simply another in the lifetime Israeli scream that it is the eternal victim, all the while victimizing millions of Palestinians. As a civil proceeding, the ICJ arguments were not a trial with live in-person witnesses’ to events they observed or participated in and who could be subject to examination and cross examination for the Judges to decide their credibility and whether to credit their narrative. Israel spent most of its defense telling the Judges and the world what Hamas did or did not do on the basis of second, at times third hand reports very much like a novel for sale. None of the sources for these accusations or so-called observations appeared in court and many were not even identified. Israel simply said this is what happened and why … trust us.

Israel used the same dodge before the ICJ in defending what it claims to have done in Gaza these past three months, using second and third hand self-serving information, anonymous sources and manipulation of fact. There is a simple way to resolve this stream of hearsay claims and manipulation — it’s called a trial. Since 2015 Hamas has accepted the jurisdiction of and cooperated with the on-going investigation by the International Criminal Court into Israel and Palestinian resistance movements, including our own. Israel has not. Since 2015 Hamas has repeatedly expressed its interest in appearing before and being judged by the ICC not on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations and screams but evidence and facts. Israel has not.

This could be resolved quickly and easily. Hamas stands ready to appear before the ICC with witnesses and live testimony and bear the burden of any judicial finding against it or its members after a full and fair trial with rules of evidence; with examination and cross examination into we have done or not over the many years of our leadership as a national liberation movement. Is Israel?

Israel has gone to great pains these past three months of its unprecedented onslaught against our people to justify their rampant violation of international law on the basis of what they say happened and by whom on October 7th. In an ever-changing stream of allegations, it accuses the Qassam Brigades, the military wing of Hamas, of a host of crimes and violations of international law. Putting aside the fact that what Israel alleges on a given Monday changes on Tuesday and what is stated with forensic or scientific certainty by Israel on Wednesday changes on Thursday there is a simple way to establish what did or did not happen on October 7th. A trial. We categorically deny the allegations lodged in the media by Israel and its supporters against us with regard to the events of that day and stand ready to defend ourselves at such a trial. Is Israel willing to proceed from rhetoric to evidence and to pursue justice in such a proceeding and to bear the consequences, whatever they may be? We are.

Ultimately in the broadest sense given Israel’s unprecedented onslaught upon our communities in Gaza and the West Bank these past three months, that is the question of our time. And while Israel has tried before the ICJ to rebut overwhelming independent first-hand evidence of the crimes it has committed most recently against our community of two plus million in Gaza, it has once again proven to be little more than coverup. Quite simply, under international law what did or did not happen on October 7th bears no legal relationship to or defense against what Israel has done to our people in the months since, as little more than not just brazen revenge, but clear violation of the Convention against Genocide.

Fact. Over these months Israel has dropped more bombs on Gaza than the allied forces on Germany during a two-year period of WWII. It’s fired some 30,000 air-to-ground munitions, 50 per cent of them unguided and launched more than 15,000 tank shells into our residences, hospitals, schools, shelters, and refugee camps.

Fact. These months of incessant Israeli attacks have killed more than 25,000 civilians with almost 13,000 children slaughtered, and another 60,000 wounded. Some 10,000 Palestinians are missing buried under the rubble of their homes and offices.

Fact. Hundreds of medical staff and teachers have been killed along with more than a hundred journalists and a like number of UN workers, all identified as such. More than 80 % of Gaza has been leveled including most hospitals, mosques and churches, schools and essential infrastructure. Like an earlier Nakba, more than 90% of our people have been forcibly dispossessed from their homes.

Fact. Half a million Gazans are starving. Denied food, water, medicine and medical support, hundreds of thousands of our people are sick with the likelihood of out-of-control infectious diseases to claim countless numbers of other civilian lives in the days to come.

More than seventy-five years ago the world watched in horror as the Nuremberg Tribunals put Nazi war criminals on trial, holding them accountable for horrific crimes they carried out against millions of defenseless Jews. From that nightmare came the Convention against Genocide under which, in relevant part, it is defined as “any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”

We ask nothing now but that the Genocide Convention used against those that committed appalling crimes against Jews a lifetime ago be applied equally here and now for other no less fiendish crimes carried out by Israel against millions of defenseless Palestinians.

Law for one is law for all.

Mousa Abu Marzouk, a senior member of Hamas is one of the original founders of Hamas, he was the first head of its political wing, imprisoned in the US for some two years because of it, and is now a leader of its international efforts.

Hamas Throws Down The Gauntlet

Mousa Abu Marzouk ✏ writing for Media Review Network.


For years we have been vilified and criminalized from afar by various Western governments, political leaders and movements and their hired agents. Hamas is this… Hamas is that … Hamas did this … Hamas did that. For decades, we have been subject to non-stop verbal attacks, lies and disinformation which has sought to recraft us from a national liberation movement and the elected representative of the people of Gaza into “terrorists” who care not for Palestine and its needs and independence, but the chase of personal fame and benefit.

Once again in the recently concluded two-day hearing brought by South Africa before the International Court of Justice, not on our behalf, but that of international law and justice, Israel spent its entire defense relying on rampant hearsay, a fabric of lies and an obvious strategy of deflection. Before responding to this symphony of distortion let us make clear certain fundamental undeniable points:

Hamas was elected by Palestinians in Gaza more than fifteen years ago in a process described by then international monitor former President Jimmy Carter as the fullest and fairest he had ever observed. All these years later we still serve in that capacity not because we have refused or prevented our Palestinian families and community from holding new elections, but because Israel has done everything in its power to ensure that full and free elections will not happen, fearing that Hamas would not only once again win in Gaza, but throughout the occupied West Bank and Jerusalem. Our candidates have been detained, essentially indefinitely, without formal charge or trial in a military system; universities have been raided and closed and students arrested whenever they dared to hold political rallies or debates let alone elections to see who would speak on their behalf; and, finally, our political leaders, activists and candidates have often been executed by Israeli military and security forces, or by so-called settlers. So please, spare us the indictment that we are a despotic movement interested in maintaining power at all costs rather than one which seeks to participate in full, fair and free elections across all of Palestine and which will abide by those results whatever they may be.

Israel’s defense against the action brought before the ICJ by South Africa, is likewise filled with convenient distortion, deflection and, at times, outright lies. Moreover, our lawyers advise that its various defenses are not valid under the Genocide Convention but simply another in the lifetime Israeli scream that it is the eternal victim, all the while victimizing millions of Palestinians. As a civil proceeding, the ICJ arguments were not a trial with live in-person witnesses’ to events they observed or participated in and who could be subject to examination and cross examination for the Judges to decide their credibility and whether to credit their narrative. Israel spent most of its defense telling the Judges and the world what Hamas did or did not do on the basis of second, at times third hand reports very much like a novel for sale. None of the sources for these accusations or so-called observations appeared in court and many were not even identified. Israel simply said this is what happened and why … trust us.

Israel used the same dodge before the ICJ in defending what it claims to have done in Gaza these past three months, using second and third hand self-serving information, anonymous sources and manipulation of fact. There is a simple way to resolve this stream of hearsay claims and manipulation — it’s called a trial. Since 2015 Hamas has accepted the jurisdiction of and cooperated with the on-going investigation by the International Criminal Court into Israel and Palestinian resistance movements, including our own. Israel has not. Since 2015 Hamas has repeatedly expressed its interest in appearing before and being judged by the ICC not on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations and screams but evidence and facts. Israel has not.

This could be resolved quickly and easily. Hamas stands ready to appear before the ICC with witnesses and live testimony and bear the burden of any judicial finding against it or its members after a full and fair trial with rules of evidence; with examination and cross examination into we have done or not over the many years of our leadership as a national liberation movement. Is Israel?

Israel has gone to great pains these past three months of its unprecedented onslaught against our people to justify their rampant violation of international law on the basis of what they say happened and by whom on October 7th. In an ever-changing stream of allegations, it accuses the Qassam Brigades, the military wing of Hamas, of a host of crimes and violations of international law. Putting aside the fact that what Israel alleges on a given Monday changes on Tuesday and what is stated with forensic or scientific certainty by Israel on Wednesday changes on Thursday there is a simple way to establish what did or did not happen on October 7th. A trial. We categorically deny the allegations lodged in the media by Israel and its supporters against us with regard to the events of that day and stand ready to defend ourselves at such a trial. Is Israel willing to proceed from rhetoric to evidence and to pursue justice in such a proceeding and to bear the consequences, whatever they may be? We are.

Ultimately in the broadest sense given Israel’s unprecedented onslaught upon our communities in Gaza and the West Bank these past three months, that is the question of our time. And while Israel has tried before the ICJ to rebut overwhelming independent first-hand evidence of the crimes it has committed most recently against our community of two plus million in Gaza, it has once again proven to be little more than coverup. Quite simply, under international law what did or did not happen on October 7th bears no legal relationship to or defense against what Israel has done to our people in the months since, as little more than not just brazen revenge, but clear violation of the Convention against Genocide.

Fact. Over these months Israel has dropped more bombs on Gaza than the allied forces on Germany during a two-year period of WWII. It’s fired some 30,000 air-to-ground munitions, 50 per cent of them unguided and launched more than 15,000 tank shells into our residences, hospitals, schools, shelters, and refugee camps.

Fact. These months of incessant Israeli attacks have killed more than 25,000 civilians with almost 13,000 children slaughtered, and another 60,000 wounded. Some 10,000 Palestinians are missing buried under the rubble of their homes and offices.

Fact. Hundreds of medical staff and teachers have been killed along with more than a hundred journalists and a like number of UN workers, all identified as such. More than 80 % of Gaza has been leveled including most hospitals, mosques and churches, schools and essential infrastructure. Like an earlier Nakba, more than 90% of our people have been forcibly dispossessed from their homes.

Fact. Half a million Gazans are starving. Denied food, water, medicine and medical support, hundreds of thousands of our people are sick with the likelihood of out-of-control infectious diseases to claim countless numbers of other civilian lives in the days to come.

More than seventy-five years ago the world watched in horror as the Nuremberg Tribunals put Nazi war criminals on trial, holding them accountable for horrific crimes they carried out against millions of defenseless Jews. From that nightmare came the Convention against Genocide under which, in relevant part, it is defined as “any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”

We ask nothing now but that the Genocide Convention used against those that committed appalling crimes against Jews a lifetime ago be applied equally here and now for other no less fiendish crimes carried out by Israel against millions of defenseless Palestinians.

Law for one is law for all.

Mousa Abu Marzouk, a senior member of Hamas is one of the original founders of Hamas, he was the first head of its political wing, imprisoned in the US for some two years because of it, and is now a leader of its international efforts.

13 comments:

  1. "The Day of Judgment will not come until Muslims fight the Jews, when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say, 'O Muslim, O servant of God, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.' Only the Gharkad tree would not do that, because it is one of the trees of the Jews."

    Your actions are no better than the Israelis. Attempting to scale a moral high ground is galling. Neither you nor them have solid ground to stand on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The sheer scale along makes a huge difference. The targeted mass murder of thousands of children puts the Israelis in a league of their own. A regime of unalloyed malevolence.
      But you are right - those who commit atrocity and war crimes have no claim to the moral high ground.

      Delete
  2. Christy Walsh comments

    Hamas threw down the gauntlet? More like they strapped a suicide belt around the Gaza Strip. Mozzarella Abu Marzouk is an Islamist terrorist no better than Israeli terrorists. Like all Hamas leaders he is safely hiding away while he and his fellow Islamists sacrifice the lives of the Gazans. He belongs in the Hague as Netanyahu's co-accused for the genocide of the Gazan Palestinians. In a survey of Gazans in June 2023, 83% of Gaza Palestinians said they believed that Hamas would never allow elections so he is lying when he says "Israel has done everything in its power to ensure that full and free elections will not happen". Islamism is opposed to democracy and freedom of thought. Israel has many unspeakable faults but they are not responsible for Islamist extremist authoritarianism. By all means condemn Israel and its extremist terrorist leaders but Hamas terrorists are no good guys in the suffering and horrors Gazans are currently enduring they share blame and responsibility with Israel.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Just like the Provisional IRA was not an 'Immaculate Conception' neither is Hamas. Just as the various IRA's saw themselves as 'Freedom Fighters' and, yet were widely rounded on as terrorists, much the same applies to Hamas.

    And just as necessary conditions must exist for any sustained conflict, so must necessary conditions emerge for a lasting peace.

    Sure, bringing about necessary conditions for peace is much more easily said than done but it will eventually happen. It may take an extremely long time. It may even include further regional war(s) but the supremacist Zionist project and all its ancillary outworking will in time be deconstructed.

    And from that perspective in the far-distant future October 7th will be understood in context and viewed differently.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that gets things in the round rather than being a caricature of a perspective that sees equivalence in size between the hyena and the mouse. October 7 pales in reddishness contrasted against Israeli blood shedding. This becomes even more apparent now that the mass rape narrative has increasingly been challenged in the West's own media and the mass beheadings seems to have died a death from fictionitis. Even the Israeli government refrained from making that accusation. Then the Hannibal Directive has compromised the allegations thrown the way of Hamas. As Palestinian writers are claiming - we need to know the truth about October 7.
      While not being one of the Hamas haters that the Western establishment likes to promote - I am anything but a supporter or sympathiser - I still think the attack on October 7 needs to be considered against the wisdom of our old friend Camus:
      "even in destruction, there's a right way and a wrong way—and there are limits."
      And
      'The role of the intellectual cannot be to excuse the violence of one side and condemn that of the other.'
      Nobody claims to be an intellectual here but the point is valid.
      Israeli is solely to blame for the genocide. Yet the question has to be asked of those who planned October 7 - what were they thinking when initiating a counter terrorist operation of such magnitude that would allow the Kapos cover to perpetrate. genocide?
      The response can't be 'move on nothing to see here.'

      Delete
    2. You rightly pose the question 'What was Hamas's thinking when they launched an operation of such magnitude'.

      My best guess is that given their continued oppression and ghettoization they decided as did Jews in Warsaw to make a stand. Without recourse to effective international justice, facing further isolation and abandonment due to the possible extension of the Abhramic Accords, to include normalisation of relationships between Israel and Saudi Arabia they chose a Connollyesque position; better to take a stand than die on one's knees.

      (Don't know if you've read Camus's 'Algerian Chronicles'? I came across an English translation online some time ago and dipped in and out. Arthur Goldhammer, a Harvard fellow and an astute blogger on contemporary French politics, is the translator. Alice Kaplan, the book's editor, provides an insightful introduction where she acknowledges Camus's positioning as a powerful voice against violence and extremism but yet also points to his failure to support full independence for Algeria as being considered way off the mark today).

      Delete
    3. Christy Walsh comments

      Henry Joy - Deliberately targeting children in their cots are acts of terrorism no matter who does it. An Afgani Islamist explained the strategy to me days after 7th October "You have to kill the babies to make them fear us." He went on to assure me he's still a good person. Abducting little kids and holding them captive in dungeons for months are acts of terrorism. Netanyahu and his extremist government fed, watered and nurtured Hamas and they should all be hauled before the Hague together for the war criminals they are. But there is no comparison between Hamas and the IRA, in fact, other than the Shankill Butchers, even Loyalists had more integrity, humanity and decency than Islamists... and that's saying a lot.

      Delete
    4. Henry Joy - that probably explains much of their thinking. But I am not sure the comparison with Connolly works - the latter did surrender rather than cause further suffering to the civilian population.
      The terrorism of Hamas is one of those situations where terrorism has been defined as the weapon of the weak against state terrorism from the skies which is the weapon of the strong. And when people are driven to rage by decades of subjugation we might criticise their actions but have no right to pretend that their choices were heavily circumscribed by the structural balance of power. It suits those Western backers of the genocide to frame Hamas as simply a manifestation of a dark religious impulse that needs destroyed because it allows them to continue to back the colonial project and ignore the facts on the ground that fuel bodies like Hamas.
      And while I think the Camus political position on Algeria was wrong, the moral clarity he brought to the conflict holds good. Did you ever read the Modern Masters biography on him by Conor Cruise O'Brien? He criticised him for his Algerian stance - a joke given what he morphed into. Although his take detracts nothing from your perspective.

      Delete
    5. Yes Christy, deliberately targeting children anywhere is abhorrent; likewise the targeting of now--combatants. It all needs to be stopped.
      Unfortunately, judicial regulation and intervention, the means of restraint that organized societies adopt to prevent such heinous acts, and the rule of law that you advocate for have shown itself ineffective.
      When the guard dogs have no teeth, what can you expect but chaos?

      Delete
    6. Maybe the comparison with Connolly is tenuous and a weak one. Let's put further exploration of that comparison on the back burner. I'd prefer to discuss the framing of ' Hamas as simply a manifestation of a dark religious impulse that needs destroyed because it allows them to continue to back the colonial project and ignore the facts on the ground that fuel bodies like Hamas.'
      Your point is well-made. And bar some frustration with Christy's Islamist references it's an aspect I hadn't given too much thought or attention to. At least not until last night when I listened to an interview by Chris Hedges with Ilan Pappé, headlined 'The Myth of Israel's Democracy'.
      In the YouTube interview, Pappé discusses in some depth and elucidates the religious/political complexity within the non-Arab population itself. What struck me most was his revelation that on his Israeli passport, his nationality is 'Jew' not Israeli. On the other hand, Israeli Arabs have their nationality listed as 'Muslim'!

      The Zionist state has done everything and will do anything within its power to misdirect attention from its ugly essence.

      (I'm tempted to get over myself and check the Cruiser out).

      Delete
    7. Henry Joy - I am not sure your Connolly point is tenuous. The comparison is that both initiated a set of actions that could have produced severe consequences for civilians. It doesn't work as well after a week of fighting when Connolly surrendered but Hamas chose not to. So I think your point was well made, but did invite expansion.

      The Zionist state has done everything and will do anything within its power to misdirect attention from its ugly essence.

      This underscores the need to avoid false equivalences. Hamas is not behind the current genocide. Israel is. That does not absolve Hamas of culpability for its actions.

      Moreover, I think it important to pause definitive judgement on October 7 because as time goes on we learn more and more that Israel perpetrated atrocities on the day. How we establish the ratio of culpability is a matter for further examination.
      Hedges and Pappe are excellent sources of information and in my view bring clarity to matters. Are you aware that Hedges is a Christian minister?

      Delete
  4. Hamas was funded by Israel in order to split the influence of the PLO that had the prominent influence amongst Palestinians at the time. The founder leader of Hamas has two sons, one was an admitted agent of Israel(he even wrote a book about it) and the other disowned Hamas when he learned of the leaders' life of luxury in Turkey whilst the people suffered on the ground.
    One would be forgiven, when considering the history(the influence of Brit spooks involved in them that is) of groups here in Ireland, for treating Hamas with a huge amount of caution because all may not what it seems. Just saying.

    ReplyDelete
  5. MickO,

    Hamas launched their attack two weeks after this article came out.

    https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/israel-saudi-arabia-finally-new-middle-east

    I would suggest this was foremost in Hamas thinking. I doubt the Israelis would have wanted this applecart upturned by conflict in Gaza, given the massive step at recognition by the Arab world this deal would have brought. But you do have a point.



    ReplyDelete