Gearóid Ó Loingsigh ☭ writing in Socialist Democracy compares the Palestinian Authority with Vichy.

The German Nazis invaded France during the second world war, however, they did not occupy all of France, opting instead to leave a part of it in the hands of collaborationist government with its administrative centre in the city of Vichy. 

Secretary of State Antony Blinken with
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

This government under the command of Marshall Petain, a French first world war hero, collaborated closely with the Nazis, repressing the French resistance, deporting Jews to the camps and in addition freeing up German troops to fight the war by taking over the daily work of occupation. Nowadays, the term Vichy is synonymous with collaborator with an occupation, betrayal and surrender. Although the phrase originated in the context of the Nazi occupation of France, it can be applied to many conflicts following the second world war.

The Palestinian Authority government has a lot in common with Vichy. Following the Oslo Accords the PA took over the repression of the more coherent and revolutionary factions, just as Marshal Pétain had done in Vichy. It also freed up Zionist troops and police forces from the daily work of occupation and collaborates closely with the fascist regime in Tel Aviv.

Over the years this government has bent the knee time and again to the Israelis, sometimes begging the Western powers to intervene on issues such as settlements in the West Bank. At no point has it led a struggle against the Zionists. In fact, it presents itself as the reasonable representative with whom negotiations can happen and agreements reached.

Now Israel commits endless war crimes in Gaza and is carrying out a genocide in Gaza against the Palestinians. It aims to wipe Palestinians off the map, expel them from Gaza and also the West Bank, take control over sacred sites, such as the Al Aqsa Mosque, destroy it and build their own temple in its place. And what does the Vichy regime do in the face of such crimes? Little. It sticks to begging the West to put an end to the barbarity, ignoring that these same powers have always supported Israel, politically, militarily and economically.

It does have other options, but they require it declaring war on the Zionist regime and calling on the Arab masses to unite. Such a revolutionary option fills it with fear and it prefers to continue to collaborate with the fascist regime of Tel Aviv. It could also ask the reactionary Arab regimes for help. But it hasn’t placed the first demand on those governments. First, it could demand the expulsion of the Israeli ambassadors and break all diplomatic and commercial relations with the regime. But it hasn’t done so, nor will it. The Houthi rebels who have been fighting against one of the most reactionary Arab regimes for eight years, namely Saudi Arabia, have done more in a few days to strike a blow against the economy of the Zionist regime.

In a short period, the Houthis have attacked at least 12 commercial ships in the Red Sea, according to Yankee military sources. Their attacks have reduced the flow of trade through the sea and Suez Canal. Four of the five big shipping companies, Maersk, Hapag-Lloyd, CMA CGN Group & Evergreen have suspended shipments through the Red Sea(1) and the company OOCL announced that it would not accept shipments to or from Israel and cost of transport had gone up from USD $1,975 to $2,300 within a few days.(2)

Meanwhile, Vichy has done nothing. The Arab regimes have made no demands against Israel and the oil flows not only to Israel but also Great Britain and the USA. Without the Vichy regime, Israel would have had greater problems in the region. Not only should the Zionist regime fall, but also the Arab regimes and the Vichy government of Palestine. They are all, in their own way, responsible for the genocide in ´Gaza.

Notes

(1) CNN (19/12/2023) Who are the Houtis and why are they attacking ships in the Red Sea? Christian Edwards.

(2) Reuters (18/12/2023) Israel shipping costs rising as lines pull out and Red Sea attacks worsen. Jonathan Saul. 

Gearóid Ó Loingsigh is a political and human rights activist with extensive experience in Latin America.

The Role Of The Vichy Palestinian Authority

Gearóid Ó Loingsigh ☭ writing in Socialist Democracy compares the Palestinian Authority with Vichy.

The German Nazis invaded France during the second world war, however, they did not occupy all of France, opting instead to leave a part of it in the hands of collaborationist government with its administrative centre in the city of Vichy. 

Secretary of State Antony Blinken with
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

This government under the command of Marshall Petain, a French first world war hero, collaborated closely with the Nazis, repressing the French resistance, deporting Jews to the camps and in addition freeing up German troops to fight the war by taking over the daily work of occupation. Nowadays, the term Vichy is synonymous with collaborator with an occupation, betrayal and surrender. Although the phrase originated in the context of the Nazi occupation of France, it can be applied to many conflicts following the second world war.

The Palestinian Authority government has a lot in common with Vichy. Following the Oslo Accords the PA took over the repression of the more coherent and revolutionary factions, just as Marshal Pétain had done in Vichy. It also freed up Zionist troops and police forces from the daily work of occupation and collaborates closely with the fascist regime in Tel Aviv.

Over the years this government has bent the knee time and again to the Israelis, sometimes begging the Western powers to intervene on issues such as settlements in the West Bank. At no point has it led a struggle against the Zionists. In fact, it presents itself as the reasonable representative with whom negotiations can happen and agreements reached.

Now Israel commits endless war crimes in Gaza and is carrying out a genocide in Gaza against the Palestinians. It aims to wipe Palestinians off the map, expel them from Gaza and also the West Bank, take control over sacred sites, such as the Al Aqsa Mosque, destroy it and build their own temple in its place. And what does the Vichy regime do in the face of such crimes? Little. It sticks to begging the West to put an end to the barbarity, ignoring that these same powers have always supported Israel, politically, militarily and economically.

It does have other options, but they require it declaring war on the Zionist regime and calling on the Arab masses to unite. Such a revolutionary option fills it with fear and it prefers to continue to collaborate with the fascist regime of Tel Aviv. It could also ask the reactionary Arab regimes for help. But it hasn’t placed the first demand on those governments. First, it could demand the expulsion of the Israeli ambassadors and break all diplomatic and commercial relations with the regime. But it hasn’t done so, nor will it. The Houthi rebels who have been fighting against one of the most reactionary Arab regimes for eight years, namely Saudi Arabia, have done more in a few days to strike a blow against the economy of the Zionist regime.

In a short period, the Houthis have attacked at least 12 commercial ships in the Red Sea, according to Yankee military sources. Their attacks have reduced the flow of trade through the sea and Suez Canal. Four of the five big shipping companies, Maersk, Hapag-Lloyd, CMA CGN Group & Evergreen have suspended shipments through the Red Sea(1) and the company OOCL announced that it would not accept shipments to or from Israel and cost of transport had gone up from USD $1,975 to $2,300 within a few days.(2)

Meanwhile, Vichy has done nothing. The Arab regimes have made no demands against Israel and the oil flows not only to Israel but also Great Britain and the USA. Without the Vichy regime, Israel would have had greater problems in the region. Not only should the Zionist regime fall, but also the Arab regimes and the Vichy government of Palestine. They are all, in their own way, responsible for the genocide in ´Gaza.

Notes

(1) CNN (19/12/2023) Who are the Houtis and why are they attacking ships in the Red Sea? Christian Edwards.

(2) Reuters (18/12/2023) Israel shipping costs rising as lines pull out and Red Sea attacks worsen. Jonathan Saul. 

Gearóid Ó Loingsigh is a political and human rights activist with extensive experience in Latin America.

14 comments:

  1. So what is your solution to the Israel/ Palestine conflict and what is your roadmap to it? The PA is certainly corrupt and undemocratic but it is not comparable to Vichy France. For one thing it has not committed crimes approximating to the deportation of 42,000 Jews to Nazi death camps.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The term Vichy like the term Quisling denotes native nationalist and fascist movements in Europe who saw their mirror images in Nazi Germany just as contemporary far right movements see Putin as their lodestar.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Like a lot of commentators on I/P, you and brandish terms like fascism which have dubious applicability to the conflict. On the basis of my enemy's enemy is my friend you ally with the Houthis who overthrew a legitimate government and bear no little responsibility for Yemen's suffering.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You conveniently ignore the malign influence of clerical totalitarian Iran with it's perpetual war on women and serial executions of dissidents and minors and it's dangerous ally Hezbollah.

    ReplyDelete
  5. And finally as a self proclaimed Irish Republican who is so found of throwing Vichy accusations around, does the name Sean Russell mean anything to you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. How imperialist is it for a Westerner to proclaim who should be the the representatives of the Palestinian Arab people?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is a legitimate point if it is accepted that the people of Gaza have a right to elect whoever they want and that the Biden-Netanyahu Axis cannot insist on them electing only the Palestinian Authority post-genocide. Being a secularist I have a strong preference for Hamas not to be elected.

      Delete
  7. Elections in the Occupied Territories would help. I do not see you calling for them.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's all occupied territory, the whole of Palestine. It's like holding an election in the occupied 6 counties and inferring that that is representative of the will of the people of Ireland. Your continued excuses for the crimes of the occupationary forces are embarrassing Barry.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Skin, behind the Green Line lies the State of Israel constituted as legitimate by UN General Assembly. Beyond that are the Palestinian Territories which are internationally classified as Occupied Territories where elections are held but not since 2006. The "six counties" are legally part of the UK under the nationally and internationally validated GFA. The world as it is not in your anti-imperialist fantasy world.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Barry, I think you would be surprised at the amount of support for my 'anti-imperialist fantasy world '. Your world view appears more toxic by the day.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And where does the Russian invasion of Ukraine and China threats to Taiwan fit into your anti -imperialist schema, Skin?

      Delete
  11. Barry, run us through the election process that the Palestinian people engaged in to arrive at the 'legitimate' demarcation of their country.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Skin, can you through the election process that led to the pro-Nazi Mufti of Jerusalem being leader of the Palestinian Arabs. The leader who rejected the UN Partition Plan in 1947 which would have created a Palestinian Arab state and an Israel smaller than it's current boundaries.

    ReplyDelete