Dear Sir Keir (don’t fret, I’m genuflecting as I type) you have absolutely no need to thank me for “putting my trust in you” as nothing could be further from the truth and, in fact, I cancelled my DD within 10 minutes of learning the result.
I must say that it has been an extraordinary and enlightening few years. I have now learnt that the two things you are not allowed to be in a “democratic socialist party” are democratic or socialist. War criminal or friend to Russian oligarchs and paedophile pimps, no problem.
Furthermore, I have learnt that anti-racism is not something to be lauded or promoted but something to be cynically employed by racists to destroy anti racists.
Equally, I have learnt that the bulk of the PLP are vile, self-serving, self-entitled vacuous nonentities who would shame a convention of professional fraudsters. At last, and to my great relief, I don’t have to sacrifice my own integrity by having any connection whatsoever with the likes of Tom Watson, Wes Streeting, Ian Austin (God help us all), Margaret Hodge, John Mann, Louise Ellman, Joan Ryan, Jess Phillips (giving Hazel Blears a run for her money in the most objectionable female ever to sully the Party in the unspeakable futility and vacuity stakes).
I could go on at great length but I’m sure you get the picture. The Labour Party had one chance and one chance only to save itself from the terminal death spiral it was determined to pursue. And for nothing other than the very narrow self interest of the utterly useless but pernicious degenerates who mainly populate the Labour benches, you have eschewed that chance and destroyed the hopes of the majority who you pretend to represent. The Labour Party is now an embodiment of ignominy and a rancid, noisome, rotting, corpse that needs burying, for the sake of human decency, as soon as possible.
The year 1997 is long gone and is not coming back. The world is careering towards a dystopian nightmare, the like of which has rarely if ever been seen, and what do the likes of you and your colleagues have to offer as a solution? Do you really believe that cretins of the calibre of those mentioned above (and many others beside) have the slightest idea how the coming storms can be negotiated or ameliorated? Do you really?
One of my earliest politically informative experiences, one that motivated me to be a socialist, was learning about the Holocaust. The most crucial lesson I took from that awareness was that the completely irrational nature of that horrific stain on humanity’s history meant that any of us, in the right circumstances, could similarly be victimised. And, equally importantly, any of us could be the victimisers.
The fact, for example, that in the instance of the Holocaust, Jews were the primary (but not only) victims does not for one moment mean that Jewish communities could not themselves harbour racists in their midst. And your “friends” in the BoD, the JLM and the LFoI, in their unswerving promotion and support for the definitive racism that is Zionism, seem to be determined to prove the second point.
The Holocaust wasn’t deplorable because it was Jews who were victims it was deplorable because they were human beings. It may have been the greatest crime in history but it has some stiff competition for that accolade. Or perhaps you have never troubled yourselves to look into the reality of black African slavery in the Americas. An obscenity, beyond adequate description, that lasted for hundreds of years. Try visiting the Slavery Museum in Liverpool and see how long you can last without retching with disgust. All racism is equally repugnant and wrong, both morally and factually. But to promote a hierarchy of racism is nothing more than an act of racism in itself.
For the record: Jews, scattered around the world as they are, do not have the right to self determination in Palestine, or any other country in which they are not already residing. The only people who have the right to self-determination in Palestine are the Palestinians, whether they be Jewish, Christian or Muslim. Jews from Europe, North Africa or elsewhere arriving in Palestine, and ethnically cleansing the existing population because they covet their land, are not exercising their self-determination they are exercising colonialism. It may have been unfortunate for the ethno-nationalists of the Zionist movement that they only succeeded at the same time as colonialism had become anathema, but that is tough luck.
Colonialism always was, and still is, an abhorrence, which is quite rightly now spurned as completely unacceptable. Using the argument that Jews are uniquely singled out to be denied the same right to exercise their self-determination as other people is an offensive absurdity when their “self-determination” depends upon the ethnic cleansing of the long existing population. To pretend that objections to the Zionist takeover of Palestine must solely be motivated by antisemitism is offensive in the extreme. Or, to further the analogy, which black or brown people would you deem to be acceptable targets for ethnic cleansing in order to provide for the self-determination of Gypsies, Roma or Jehovah’s Witnesses? All of whom were also targeted by the Nazis and still endure widespread discrimination and persecution.
I have to admit that the apparatchiks and core of the PLP are certainly on trend with their adoption and promotion of the black is white, up is down, war is peace narratives that are so de rigueur these days. The two of you may not have been the most prominent culprits in the obsessive and deranged campaign to destroy the most decent man in political life, for a generation at least, to endlessly accuse a lifelong campaigner against racism of embodying the most egregious racism, to attack good, Jewish, socialists for being antisemites (risible if it weren’t so serious) but I think it safe to say that your low profile on the issues was motivated more by an eye on the main chance rather than a matter of any principle.
Principle, in this context? Don’t be ridiculous. The world is in an extremely precarious state, the future will not be pretty if we continue with this current trajectory. What we definitely do not need is the likes of you two, David Miliband, Tony Blair, Peter Mandelson and all their cronies who infest the Party (in particular its machine and the bulk of the PLP) with their arrogant, self-entitled, mendacious inversion of the truth, to assume control of the political discourse at the expense of truth and social justice.
I really am perplexed as to where you think you’ll be going with this. You will never win back Scotland, “northern heartlands” – forget it. You’re obviously banking on once again being allowed to be the Tory B team while the real article regroups and refreshes for its next assault on society. In this triumphally Goebbelian era, it is actually you who are the racists, you who are utterly indifferent to the truth. Faux outrage about racism is just a tool that can be used to smear socialists into silence and oblivion.
I think you Sir, knight of the realm, forensically minded Keir (genuflecting etc) must be delighted with the hearty endorsement of George Osborne; what an accolade. He certainly believes that the preservation of the status quo is firmly secured. And who could argue with that? The Labour Party is now dead, it has ceased to be, it is bereft of life. You and your fellow travellers disgust me and it is time you PASOKed right off!. “Put my trust in you”? You certainly have a warped sense of humour, I’ll grant you that much!
⏩ Bronagh Wilson - former Labour Party Member.
When I posted this letter yesterday on my FB page I received this comment below the post.
ReplyDelete"Wish I had the words, but thankyou Bronagh for this
monumental letter. You speak for so many of us who believe that Starmer’s election has returned the Party to ‘business as usual’ Blairism."
This comment is from my Aunt who has been a member of the Labour party since she left Belfast in the 1960s to go to England to train as a nurse.
The only part of this letter which she and I disagree with is the idea that socialists should abandon the Party to this shower of warmongering neoliberals. We are many and they are few, it is not their party and we should use every means possible to take it back!
Wot, no mention of how (when DPP) he pushed for the prosecution of an irate air passenger who made a joke on Twitter about blowing up the airport he was stuck in?
ReplyDeleteMike Craig,
ReplyDeleteI think you're Aunt and Ms. Wilson are right.
The British Labor Party is intractably Tory-light.
Much like the US Democrat Party is just Coke to Republican Pepsi.
So, time to differentiate your political product line.
And start marketing a real progressive political party.
Christopher,
ReplyDeleteYes, Bronagh left out a multitude of the Knight Errant's sins, including his involvement with the Assange case. It would have taken a file rather than a letter to document these.
Eoghan,
To transform society the workers need a mass party connected to trade unions. That's what the LP was meant to be. We tried building outside it during the Blair years, that failed. Currently it is a case of two steps forward, one step back.
The only Trade Unionists I knew were bone idle while collecting fat cheques and living in very large houses # Expenses accounts
DeleteMike Craig,
DeleteI agree workers everywhere need a mass political party.
But I don't think it has to be connected to trade unions.
Because too many unions are not really pro-worker.
Any more than law firms are or Animal Farm was.
They're just pyramid payment schemes for their "leaders".
No different really than any Insurance Company.
Who are happy to be co-opted by corporate parties.
Whose upper class interests they share!
Since they don't live in mobile homes on £120 a week:
Revealed: Tony Blair worth a staggering £60m
Exclusive: Tony Blair’s fortune now stands at three times the amount he has previously claimed, at some £60 million – which includes 10 homes.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/tony-blair/11670425/Revealed-Tony-Blair-worth-a-staggering-60m.html
So, learn to forget the UK Labor Party.
It's just an elitist trick to fool the masses.
As such it's an incurable fraud.
Whose lies you have no business ever believing.
Otherwise, it'll forever just be for you and yours...
Two steps back to go two more steps back.
@ Ronan
ReplyDeleteWell this one lives in a 30 year old mobile home on £120/week. There is no doubt that too many paid trade union officials get far more than they deserve and in fact many of them deserve nothing as they are an impediment to any improvement in workers' lives. They are in a minority. Does this mean that there should be no trade unions? Do you think that capitalists who live in big houses yet do no socially useful work should be left to continue to exploit workers unhindered?
You should get a job in an Irish Ngo / Charity - 120 k a yr for the top brass, zero for those who do the donkey work.
ReplyDeleteLimitless immigration has destroyed the housing market for people on modest wages who are as badly off as unemployed people from previous generations. Unions primarily represent those in cushier sectors of the economy.
Immigration has nothing to do with either the price or availability of housing. Unions represent their members, if you want to be represented by a union, join it first.
ReplyDeleteRonan, surely you know that the housing crisis in Dublin is due to a small number of extremely rich investors buying a number of properties each, sometimes up to a hundred properties a person for speculation.
ReplyDeleteThese are often AirBNBs. In 2018 there were 30,000 empty properties in Dublin.
Let the blame fall where it should, on multi-purchases by corporations, landlords, speculators, the Airbnb industry and similar enterprises.
There needs to be a serious review of housing rights and the rules governing speculative purchases.
By blaming immigration you let the real culprits off the hook and therefore become part of the problem.
Immigration has nothing to do with the price or availability of housing. That's the most ill informed comment I have ever read. Next, you will be telling us that it doesn't drive wages down.
ReplyDelete@ Simon.
ReplyDeleteYou saved me the bother.
@ Eoghan,
ReplyDeleteJames Connolly must have gotten that one wrong then.
And please don't come back with anything to do with territory, this isn't an exclusively British problem.
Yes, of course the trade Union leaders and their bureaucratic setup are rotten, but it would be defeatist to not try to change this.
Mike Craig,
ReplyDeleteEven the radical James Connolly steered clear of reformists.
But you’re right, political co-option isn’t exclusive to Britain.
Way to guard against this I think is like Connolly did.
That is, put your political party first.
Then affiliate with like-minded trade unionists and others.