Journalists Sign Open Letter To NUJ In Support Of Mendoza

From The Skwawkbox an open letter to the NUJ in support of the gagged Kerry-Anne Mendoza, editor in chief of The Canary

Journalists have begun to sign an open letter just published by supporters of Kerry-Anne Mendoza, the Canary editor-in-chief whose invitation to deliver a lecture for Black History Month was cancelled by the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) over the heads of its Black Members Council BMC), ignoring the BMC’s democratically reaffirmed choice, after mostly white journalists at the Guardian/Observer objected.

The letter pulls no punches: 

We the undersigned have written this letter to express our frustration and outrage at the behaviour of the National Union of Journalists’ National Executive Council (NEC) towards Kerry-Anne Mendoza, co-founder of The Canary. We also write to express our solidarity with Kerry-Anne, who the NEC de-selected from giving this year’s Claudia Jones Memorial Lecture for Black History Month. That offer, given by the NUJ’s Black Members Council (BMC), was rescinded by the NEC undemocratically and wholly without merit, as a result of a sustained smear campaign championed by some staff at the Guardian/Observer.

It is abundantly clear that staff at the
Guardian/Observer, which had agreed to host the lecture before they knew who would speak, opposed Kerry-Anne giving the talk and openly sought her removal from the very beginning.

Establishmentarianism by any other name

The NEC has proven itself to be little more than a tool of middle-class liberalism, ironically subverting everything that the Black radical communist Claudia Jones stood for.

Kerry-Anne is a Black, gay, working-class woman who risked everything to co-found an independent, left-wing alternative to the mainstream corporate and establishment press. She did this with a budget of £500, which was money put in by the founders, including Kerry-Anne herself. In the greatest tradition of Claudia Jones, Kerry-Anne’s lecture will be held without the support of the NUJ’s leadership on 29 October 2018 at the Sands Films Studio in London.

The event is sold out of (free) tickets. If you would like to attend, please email to be added to the waiting list for any returns.

Manufacturing reasons to remove Kerry-Anne

The first attempt to remove Kerry-Anne as speaker, without cause, was rebuffed by the BMC – which affirmed Kerry-Anne as its choice. This led the NUJ’s NEC to try again and again, until they finally used the product of a smear campaign against Kerry-Anne as a justification to remove her.

Biased news on Nicaragua

The second attempt to attack Kerry-Anne and push her out of giving the talk followed the publication of a highly detailed and well researched investigative piece by award-winning journalist Max Blumenthal. Observer journalist Nick Cohen and BuzzFeed journalist Mark di Stefano erroneously blamed The Canary for the deportation of a US journalist from Nicaragua. The article in question exposed this journalist as being embedded with right-wing militias in Nicaragua that were openly calling for the violent overthrow of the government.

The claim that the deportation was down to
The Canary re-publishing a later version of Max’s article was repeated by the NUJ general secretary. And despite BuzzFeed retracting that baseless conclusion, no apology was ever made to Max, Kerry-Anne or The Canary.

Poor judgement by the NUJ secretary general

Here, the NUJ general secretary showed incredibly poor judgment, as she repeated claims about a situation without confirming the facts. The Canary has published a follow-up piece by Max Blumenthal, which further confirmed that The Guardian failed to inform its readers that a key source for its reporting on Nicaragua was embedded with and openly praising rebels who promote violent ‘regime change’. The NUJ has still issued no retraction, despite being made aware of these facts.

Acceptable attacks

Instead, Kerry-Anne and The Canary have been subjected to sustained attacks online and by journalists who were not fully informed about these two investigative pieces published by The Canary. 

The unacceptable face of solidarity

In solidarity with Kerry-Anne and The Canary, an already active hashtag of #boycotttheguardian started trending. Having previously failed to remove Kerry-Anne democratically via the BMC, the NEC ultimately forced another vote claiming that the ‘boycott’ violated NUJ principles.

The attacks on Kerry-Anne and
The Canary both preceded and are a cause of the solidarity ‘boycott’ call. That the NEC would then use this call for solidarity to then retroactively blackball Kerry-Anne, whose speech was due to have already gone ahead on 11 October, is beyond the pale.

Manufacturing crisis to oust-Kerry-Anne

In short, attacking and smearing Kerry-Anne and The Canary is acceptable in the eyes of the NUJ’s NEC. But Kerry-Anne’s failure to openly oppose the solidarity boycott, which she had no hand in initiating, and her choice to retweet the hashtag, is apparently a violation of the NUJ’s rules. Ironically, the NEC’s complaint is that the boycott threatened the livelihoods of NUJ members. But smear campaigns also threaten the livelihoods of The Canary’s contributing journalists, many of whom are NUJ members (Kerry-Anne included).

We call on all journalists to express their solidarity with Kerry-Anne against the anti-democratic manoeuvrings of the NUJ’s NEC; and to that end we also call upon Alex Pascall OBE to refuse to speak, in solidarity with Kerry-Anne.

In solidarity

Tickets for Ms Mendoza’s alternative Claudia Jones Memorial Lecture, which will take place next Monday evening in London, went within a few hours – including a second batch after capacity was expanded.

To sign the letter, visit the Google document here.


  1. This is a very disappointing decision by the NUJ. It should not matter to them in the slightest who the BMC invites to speak. And if it does matter, then whatever concern the NUJ has, it should not trump the right of the BMC to facilitate the unhindered flow of opinion.

  2. This is where The Canary begins to lose it The BBC is right to pose the question – the answer is more important.

    Of course it is not a refreshing break from PC - but what role has PC played in fuelling it? It is a further manifestation of a very dangerous trend. Bolsonaro conjures up memories of the name D'Aubisson. Archbishop Oscar Romero fell victim to that thug. Does the Brazilian Church have someone of the calibre of Helder Camara to stand up to this incoming regime?

    It is more important than ever that the radical current democratises itself and exposes the shortcomings of its leaders. Left to the right to do so opens up a vista that is frightening to contemplate. When the right do it they turn it into a beachhead from which they make even further gains. For democratisation to happen dissent is vital - the term dissident should be hauled back to the moment of its creation.

  3. AM

    I am afraid this sort of shock-jock reportage with statements twisted out of context to stimulate the maximum alacrity possible is the stock-in-trade of the Canary and other parts of the Corbynite media ecology such as Squakbox and Novara Media They are essentially click-bait operations which generate their income from sensationalist headlines. Their hostility to the mainstream media and to those outside the Corbynite "community of the good" has had consequences such as their No 1 target Laura Kuennsberg of the BBC requiring police protection at Labour Party conference and death threats to employees of PR firm Portland Communications for their alleged complicity in "Blairite" conspiracies undermine Dear Leader.

    But I agree with you on the unfairness of the decision by the NUJ.