"The life of Joseph was as valuable as any other life.
The right to truth in this case is as fundamental as the right to truth in other cases such as the late Pat Finucane and our loved one Francisco Notaratonio.
We demand justice for all of them.
Does Sinn Fein really think that we would differentiate between our lost loved ones and demand the truth only about Francisco and not about Joseph?
So much for parity of esteem and equality."

All grieving families ‘have the right to truth’
Irish News, Andersonstown News,
9 November 2000
Statement from the Family of Joseph O Connor


On Sunday I learned that Danny Morrison had acknowledged that the ‘IRA did Claudy. Among the awful things my Movement did.’ He was hardly making any earth shattering revelation. Society already knew who did Claudy just as it has always known. Sean McStiofain’s inquiry into the 1972 bombing of the County Derry village which exonerated the IRA of responsibility was a whitewash on a par with Widgery. The Derry Brigade’s statement a few years back that it was not responsible, while most likely true, did not say what most others suspected: that the brigade did not have to be responsible in order for the IRA as a corporate body to be culpable. Some other brigade most likely wreaked the devastation.

Morrison is also said, admirably enough, to have assigned culpability to the IRA for the Whitecross massacre of 1976. Not so admirably he claims that apart from these things, society knows what the IRA did but does not know not all that the British were responsible for. If, as he implies, our knowledge of what the IRA did comes courtesy of the IRA letting us know, then we do not know that it killed Joanne Mathers in 1981, Joe O’Connor in 2000, or was behind the Direct Action Against Drugs spate of killings in the 1990s. These are pulled from memory. There are others.

While hardly on its own, clearly, there is much that the IRA has yet to come clean about.

Why Morrison is making such acknowledgements now seems to me to be linked to the publication of his friend Anne Cadwallader’s book, Lethal Allies: British Collusion in Ireland. As Richard Haass sets about addressing or fudging the past, Cadwallader’s work looks certain to throw a much needed spanner into the works that constitute the woefully incomplete narrative of both the British state and political unionism. It would seriously undermine endorsement of Cadwallader’s seemingly devastating critique of the British state (I have yet to read it) were people like Morrison to continue clinging to denials of IRA involvement in events like Claudy or Whitecross. It would make a mockery of any claim to be serious about backing her call for impartial truth recovery.

Anne Cadwalladers’s work would seem a valuable addition to public understanding, coming as it does at a pivotal juncture. As those once involved in the republican armed campaign are being painted into a corner, increasingly carrying the can for a turbulent past, the type of knowledge Lethal Allies purports to bring to the fore seriously ruptures the dominant discourse. It thrusts a STOP sign squarely in front of a consciously skewed stampede, and the author's call for truth as a process (even though processes may be better) rather than as a weapon for partisan advancement is commendable.

But her ability to discern the truth was not always as strong a feature of her investigative work. In the wake of the killing of Real IRA member Joe O’Connor Anne Cadwallader wrote a fairly substantial newspaper piece which all but exonerated the organisation that killed him, the IRA in West Belfast. She might not have had the time to do the necessary research in the period between O’Connor’s death and the deadline she was working to but I did feel at the time that her conclusion was too hastily arrived at. Ultimately her writing on the topic facilitated the passage of a false narrative that the IRA was not responsible for killing O’Connor and that those who accused it of involvement, including the dead man’s family, were mischievously making false allegations.

In yesterday’s Irish Independent Anne Cadwallader wrote a piece in which she argued that those families who paid the ultimate price and were lied to deserve the truth. Joe O’Connor’s loved ones are one family that was lied to by the IRA, which denied all involvement in his killing. Anne Cadwallader was probably lied to as well as part of the planned cover up. 13 years on the family of Joe O’Connor deserve the same degree of truth that the families covered by Lethal Allies are entitled to. Anything less is what HL Mencken suggested: rumble and bumble, flap and doodle, balder and dash.


If you believe that the Provisional IRA are not responsible, you should be eager for an inquiry to establish who is killing republicans in Ballymurphy, and to prevent further violence between republicans.
My family has suffered greatly for our republican beliefs. As you know, my father was murdered by loyalist paramilitaries, directed by British intelligence to shield a high level mole within the Provisional IRA with a code-name of “Steak Knife”.
Since my son’s murder, my grieving family and those who have spoken for justice have been threatened.
An independent community inquiry could establish the truth, halt the prospects of further violence between republicans and affirm the right of all republicans to their political beliefs.
I urge you to endorse the call for an independent community human rights inquiry into the murder of my son Joseph O Connor.
Sincerely,
Margaret O’Connor

Families Who Were Lied to

"The life of Joseph was as valuable as any other life.
The right to truth in this case is as fundamental as the right to truth in other cases such as the late Pat Finucane and our loved one Francisco Notaratonio.
We demand justice for all of them.
Does Sinn Fein really think that we would differentiate between our lost loved ones and demand the truth only about Francisco and not about Joseph?
So much for parity of esteem and equality."

All grieving families ‘have the right to truth’
Irish News, Andersonstown News,
9 November 2000
Statement from the Family of Joseph O Connor


On Sunday I learned that Danny Morrison had acknowledged that the ‘IRA did Claudy. Among the awful things my Movement did.’ He was hardly making any earth shattering revelation. Society already knew who did Claudy just as it has always known. Sean McStiofain’s inquiry into the 1972 bombing of the County Derry village which exonerated the IRA of responsibility was a whitewash on a par with Widgery. The Derry Brigade’s statement a few years back that it was not responsible, while most likely true, did not say what most others suspected: that the brigade did not have to be responsible in order for the IRA as a corporate body to be culpable. Some other brigade most likely wreaked the devastation.

Morrison is also said, admirably enough, to have assigned culpability to the IRA for the Whitecross massacre of 1976. Not so admirably he claims that apart from these things, society knows what the IRA did but does not know not all that the British were responsible for. If, as he implies, our knowledge of what the IRA did comes courtesy of the IRA letting us know, then we do not know that it killed Joanne Mathers in 1981, Joe O’Connor in 2000, or was behind the Direct Action Against Drugs spate of killings in the 1990s. These are pulled from memory. There are others.

While hardly on its own, clearly, there is much that the IRA has yet to come clean about.

Why Morrison is making such acknowledgements now seems to me to be linked to the publication of his friend Anne Cadwallader’s book, Lethal Allies: British Collusion in Ireland. As Richard Haass sets about addressing or fudging the past, Cadwallader’s work looks certain to throw a much needed spanner into the works that constitute the woefully incomplete narrative of both the British state and political unionism. It would seriously undermine endorsement of Cadwallader’s seemingly devastating critique of the British state (I have yet to read it) were people like Morrison to continue clinging to denials of IRA involvement in events like Claudy or Whitecross. It would make a mockery of any claim to be serious about backing her call for impartial truth recovery.

Anne Cadwalladers’s work would seem a valuable addition to public understanding, coming as it does at a pivotal juncture. As those once involved in the republican armed campaign are being painted into a corner, increasingly carrying the can for a turbulent past, the type of knowledge Lethal Allies purports to bring to the fore seriously ruptures the dominant discourse. It thrusts a STOP sign squarely in front of a consciously skewed stampede, and the author's call for truth as a process (even though processes may be better) rather than as a weapon for partisan advancement is commendable.

But her ability to discern the truth was not always as strong a feature of her investigative work. In the wake of the killing of Real IRA member Joe O’Connor Anne Cadwallader wrote a fairly substantial newspaper piece which all but exonerated the organisation that killed him, the IRA in West Belfast. She might not have had the time to do the necessary research in the period between O’Connor’s death and the deadline she was working to but I did feel at the time that her conclusion was too hastily arrived at. Ultimately her writing on the topic facilitated the passage of a false narrative that the IRA was not responsible for killing O’Connor and that those who accused it of involvement, including the dead man’s family, were mischievously making false allegations.

In yesterday’s Irish Independent Anne Cadwallader wrote a piece in which she argued that those families who paid the ultimate price and were lied to deserve the truth. Joe O’Connor’s loved ones are one family that was lied to by the IRA, which denied all involvement in his killing. Anne Cadwallader was probably lied to as well as part of the planned cover up. 13 years on the family of Joe O’Connor deserve the same degree of truth that the families covered by Lethal Allies are entitled to. Anything less is what HL Mencken suggested: rumble and bumble, flap and doodle, balder and dash.


If you believe that the Provisional IRA are not responsible, you should be eager for an inquiry to establish who is killing republicans in Ballymurphy, and to prevent further violence between republicans.
My family has suffered greatly for our republican beliefs. As you know, my father was murdered by loyalist paramilitaries, directed by British intelligence to shield a high level mole within the Provisional IRA with a code-name of “Steak Knife”.
Since my son’s murder, my grieving family and those who have spoken for justice have been threatened.
An independent community inquiry could establish the truth, halt the prospects of further violence between republicans and affirm the right of all republicans to their political beliefs.
I urge you to endorse the call for an independent community human rights inquiry into the murder of my son Joseph O Connor.
Sincerely,
Margaret O’Connor

16 comments:

  1. I commend your article Anthony which encourages speaking truth to power.

    It's convenient and advantageous for those who hold power to enter into a pact of forgetting. This 'pact of forgetting' is achieved through deceit, delusion and denial of truth. Often resulting in yet more confusion, frustration and further hurt for the less powerful parties. (Usually those most directly impacted by the original events now distorted or denied).

    .“Blessed are the forgetful, for they get the better even of their blunders.”
    ― Friedrich Nietzsche

    ReplyDelete
  2. While SF elected rep Mickey McIvor has already admitted the culpability of the Provisionals in Jo-Jo's killing it would be more fitting if it was acknowledged by someone as senior as Morrisson. Another family that deserve a truth recovery process of the top of my head is that of Frank Hegarty given the allegations that surround this now notorious killing

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good post Anthony I to recall the bold Annes articles in the Vatican Times,she was a forerunner to the latterday Morris,the clamour for some form of truth process here is like old brit motorbikes all noise and no performance, will the brits ever admit to collusion in the murder of its citizens, or those innocent victims in the Irish republic such as the Dublin and Monaghan bombings,or their real role in the Omagh bombing, their dalliance with loyalist murderers such as Robin Jackson or Billy Wright, the bloody Sunday and Ballmurphy massacres, the list goes on and on then we would have to hear the truth about how the republican movement was infiltrated to the highest level and how agents within the prm were allowed to murder at will, it seems to me that the truth about this place is like Iris Robinsons love life we,ll never know the half of it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Henry Joy,

    thanks.

    Marty,

    it would be churlish of me to have a go at her over the fact that she was lied to so many years ago. She has done great work here in exposing the Brits. Few enough are doing it.

    While I had a dog in the fight and took a lot of flak over my perspective then, I just think the record on Joe's killing should be put straight. The family experience should be - to quote a formidable Mark Thompson from UTV last evening - authenticated. My experience is immaterial to what should be done.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anthony I agree Anne Cadwalladers book Lethal Allies seems from all accounts to be a well researched and presented piece of work, that goes without question, it shines another light into our grubby little conflict,and dots the i,s and crosses a lot of t,s,will it open a floodgate of calls demanding the truth from all participants possibly but as we know people like Gerry Itwasntme will never admit the truth about their role in what we call the Troubles,while the Irish government is quite willing to continue to fund the orange order but deny funding to those seeking the truth about the murder of the loved ones in the Dublin and Monaghan bombings then that should tell us we are pissing into the wind, but it is something that needs to be done and good on those who plug away at it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sean-

    When or where did Mickey admit the
    culpability of the Provisionals-
    Perhaps you could share that moment with the rest of us-

    ReplyDelete
  7. Danny Morrison sure can spin the tales. He has probably convinced himself they are true. No wonder Gerry had him as his right hand man.

    ReplyDelete
  8. That article she wrote.Six of them were at the shop or buying newspapers.Wonder they wernt all at the toilet.I know you couldnt put fxxk all past the ruc but ile not be buying her book after reading that.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The book that Anne Cadwallader is nothing new about what was commonly known as the murder triangle, a man called Joe Tiernan a freelance journalist wrote a book named The Dublin and Monaghan Bombings and the Murder Triangle in 2004, he was rubbished by all in power,so it will be interesting to compare both books

    ReplyDelete
  10. Would it be feasible to say that Danny the cowboy has played a part in inputting information to this book.

    Reading that piece made me think of Morrison's wording, as if a Brit was writing it.

    As for Jo Jo, PIRA disgraced themselves that day, so many for one Murder, and because Jo Jo went and kicked two doors in, and those who lived at those premises had Guns, and were seen at the scene ,and were , are , Very well known.
    I bet if you stuck a gun into the side of there heads, they would shit there kegs, That's a fact.
    I would not even contemplate looking at a review of this book, let alone buy it, well written by SF and disinformation to keep the shinners and pira the GOODIES, or I should have typed , "The GOONIES"

    Jo Jo got a great send of. R.I.P.

    ReplyDelete
  11. michaelhenry:

    in response to your question to Sean Bres.

    The killing of Joe O' Connor

    ReplyDelete
  12. Mackers the killing of Joe O'Connor must, like the killing of anyone, be condemned. Unfortunately many people seem to base their moral stance on the side of the fence that they have an affiliation for. Many republicans failed to speak out against other killings that the PIRA/INLA etc were responsible for because they favoured that particular side. In essence they are selective in their condemnation. It's well known that some take the opportunity of others misfortune to exercise political point scoring. How many PIRA activists condemned the killing of sticks in the 70's or IRSP men the INLA/IPLO feuding? War is a very dirty game with equal bullies on all sides. We know Joe O'Connor was killed; what we don't know is why he was killed. With who did he engage and in what aggressive way that would seal his death warrant. I cannot condone this man's killing but as has previously be acknowledged - war is a dirty game and I would suggest most of its players are aware of this. If the truth is to come out let it all come out.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Itsjustmacker,

    She wouldn't need that input. It is the state sources she drew on that makes this work so potentially explosive. But she is free to take input from whoever she chooses. Not to buy the book or to refuse to read it would in my mistake be a mistake. I have not read it but from what I can make of it she has done a good job, one sorely needed.

    Emmet,

    this is to repeat much of what has been debated previously on this blog. I think the truth being demanded by the O'Connor family is an admission by the IRA that it killed him. In respect of most other killings that type of admission is in the public domain.

    Boyne Rover,

    never read Joe's book but I suggest the difference might lie in the sources drawn on.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anthony:

    My point is , she is writing about something which has been in the public domain, we all know the truth as to the murders of the State forces. I don't know the woman personally so I won't say anything bad against her , because I can't.

    Its the cowboy I'm thinking of, saying to her, "Don't Write This , Don't write that" , he is a slime ball and would make sure he had his little piece somewhere within that book.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Itsjustmacker,

    she probably no more listens to him than anybody else does these days.

    ReplyDelete