Fibber Magee

Well, well, well, Bishop John Magee. Truly you are one of the most glorious examples of supreme idiocy in human history. As proven by you actually thinking you might fool all in the end, including God – Sinead O’Connor

John Magee is the type of bullshitting reprobate any gang would like to have on its books. Probably explains why he joined one and went places within it. Devious and dishonest he can be relied upon to place the interests of the illicit fraternity above and beyond that of its victims. There is, it seems, honour among fiends.

An ambitious character, Magee was described by former Vatican official, Don Diego Lorenzi, as something of a yes-man, always eager to get the bishop’s hat and perform as a toady to do so. An inveterate liar he was even caught out spoofing about the discovery of the body of Pope John Paul 1 in 1978, only days into his papacy. Initially having told the world it was he who he found the body, he later conceded it was discovered by a nun but fell back on the lame excuse that ‘I did find the body of His Holiness. I just didn't find it first.’ Something that every loser could claim in a race; they were really first, just that somebody else crossed the line before them. At least it removed facing the difficult question of what a nun had being doing in the papal bedroom at such an unbecoming hour.

The Irish Independent homing in on the theme of dishonesty added that while ‘it is impossible to know how seriously he took the authority of the elected government of this State … he had no compunction about lying to one of its ministers.’ It now causes us to reflect on Magee’s meeting with Bobby Sands as the IRA prisoner lay dying on hunger strike. What lies we may wonder did he tell Bobby.

He lied to the HSE by telling it that all cases of abuse were being reported to the Garda. It is now clear that two thirds of these cases were in fact not reported to the Garda and none at all to the HSE. Archbishop Dermot Clifford condemned Magee's "outright lie" as "indefensible." The Irish Catholic Church fits over him as snugly as a glove given that it too, according to Vatican backer Breda O’Brien, ‘needs to stop hiding and come out and tell the truth.’ All of which lends weight to the charge of Sinead O’Connor that ‘as Catholics … we can plainly see our church has been hijacked by liars.’

The only papal secretary to have served with three popes he is the central figure in the Cloyne scandal. It is his Vatican history that has, in the words of one journalist, ‘brought the child abuse scandal to a new level internationally.’ The 341 page report by the Commission of Investigation into the Catholic Diocese of Cloyne was damning of him. It stated that he ‘was the head of the diocese and cannot avoid his responsibility by blaming subordinates whom he wholly failed to supervise.’

Conspiring with superiors in Rome he cooked the books by putting together an accurate report for the Vatican on clerical abuse in Cloyne while falsifying the report he kept as diocesan records. Cartel Vatican and its canon law, he knew would do nothing about the matter, but Irish authorities and civil law he presumed would have acted. He cannot plead a mistake; he knew exactly what he was doing. The Gardai have already recommended that Magee be charged with withholding information that would have been of material assistance. The DPP declined to proceed.

Amazingly the excuses and pandering still continue to flow: The Irish Times columnist Breda O’Brien insisted that ‘John Magee is not a monster.’ If true the word monster no longer has a meaning. If O’Brien makes such a claim on the basis that he is too banal an old codger to be capable of generating monstrosities the counter readily comes from Hanna Arendt’s ‘the banality of evil.’ Bluntly put, Magee did not give one toss for the children of Cloyne. He could not care in the slightest if priests raped kids six ways to Sunday so long as they did not wear condoms while doing it. God works in mysterious ways.

16 comments:

  1. Anthony

    One can just imagine Magee's peremptory response to your pertinent blogg. I am sure something reminiscent of the reply to the young narrator in Ring Lardner's novel The Young Immigrants who asked her father tenderly whether he was lost on the journey to their new home. “‘Shut up’, he explained.”

    Tiarna

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tiarna,

    he would only be following his cardinal Shut Them Up Sean

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yeah Anthony and all because they lost their way --from the Pope down.
    T.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Is it fair to ask if the Church is just one big vile international pedophile ring? Yes they may operate hospitals, clinics and orphanages but it sure seems like they do more harm than good. Sad that many decent naive Catholics this past Sunday gave them more of their hard earned money. Where it ends up going is anyone's guess.

    ReplyDelete
  5. lolz Anthony u r icing them! Fibber Magee title cracked me up. Maybe i am getting delirious with relief/delight the bastards are being exposed and confronted right left and centre. Nowhere left for them to hide and their old skool rhetoric has finally failed 'em. Yay...

    ReplyDelete
  6. A song all about Fibber Magee lolol I have long loved this song and now it be coming true!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIQ3UpORjHE

    ReplyDelete
  7. Any article starting out with a quotation from the notorious lunatic priestess Sinead O'Connor cannot be taken seriously.

    ReplyDelete
  8. While I would not go as far as John McGirr and call her a lunatic, I find it somewhat irritating that a notorious gobshite like Sinead O'Connor gets to pontificate in Sunday newspapers every time a new report about clerical sexual abuse is released. It is just like Bono and Africa (though he is far more annoying). Since when did rock stars become experts on anything other than writing songs and snorting cocaine?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Alfie,

    it is always hilarious to watch one religious devotee call another a nutter. But that's religion!

    'I find it somewhat irritating that a notorious gobshite like Sinead O'Connor gets to pontificate in Sunday newspapers every time a new report about clerical sexual abuse is released.'

    I think it takes it out of the realm of the 'experts.' I would much prefer your non expert view on Africa in the papers than Kevin Myers' expert opinion and analysis.

    And if she is a priestess or white witch that would allow her as much right as any priest. One's voodoo is as germane, or not, as the next

    I found her take much less irritating and more credible than David Quinn's. I am more a fan of her music than her political opinions however.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anthony,

    "It is always hilarious to watch one religious devotee call another a nutter. But that's religion!"

    The same thought occurred to me. I do consider some of John's beliefs a bit nutty, but I don't think he is a nutter.

    "I think it takes it out of the realm of the 'experts.'"

    I take your point, but I detected the same smugness in Sinead O'Connor's piece as I did in the pro-Vatican pieces from the other side. Perhaps that was just because Sinead was writing in the Sindo!

    "I would much prefer your non expert view on Africa in the papers than Kevin Myers' expert opinion and analysis."

    Thanks for the compliment, but switching me with Myers would just be replacing one gobshite with another! Seriously though, is Myers really an expert on anything? (I concede that he writes beautifully.)

    "I found her take much less irritating and more credible than David Quinn's. I am more a fan of her music than her political opinions however."

    I'm not a big fan of David Quinn's at all. Nevertheless, he at least attempted to make an argument; O'Connor merely gloated and ranted.

    ReplyDelete
  11. @ John McGirr The so called lunatic was one of the most bravest woman to take on the Vatican in public mode using her fame/singer status... It earnt her worldwide disdain... Whilst definitely Sinead has left of centre leanings and can come across as off the air - she is a brave, upfront woman.

    Whilst she ID's publicly as a survior of non clergy abuse she has consistently used her fame to give voice to & highlight clergy abuse atrocities/coverups in a climate of denial.
    EVER cross your mind - what the hell were you doing?? What the hell were millions of Catholics doing? Nought is the answer. Sat on your pontificating drowning in religiosity arses and put them blinkers on...

    Sinead is bi-polar and on meds - disclosed some years ago to media. Attributes this significantly serious mental health disorder to the years of childhood abuse (she is correct that abuse stuffs the brain up - proven scientifically) So before dissing her voice know that for an Irish woman she stood alone and shouted the truth.

    I have respect for her but find her at times hopelessly tangled up in spiritual experimental stuff. She finds comfort in Rastafari beliefs. Love her music/voice mind. So less judgement and more appreciation for what she HAS done may well be the go. PS John you have your religosity trip ahappening in here at times in a big way too... Live and let live I note u said nought re Fibber Magee that poxy little weasel.

    ReplyDelete
  12. maryhedgehog

    John doesn't see any RC heirarchy problems, he's too focused on crying statues, gable walls and tree stumps.

    ReplyDelete
  13. ‘Is it fair to ask if the Church is just one big vile international paedophile ring?’

    In a multi dimensional ensemble that is one of its dimensions. Its staff rape globally, the cover up is global, there has long been a policy of trafficking paedophiles across international frontiers where they would continue with their abuse; there has also been a global policy of not cooperating with civil law. Professor Tom Doyle who is Dominican with a doctorate in canon law has referred to it as ‘a critical problem that plagues many countries.’ So the Church is culpable and if the cap fits it can wear it. This is why the case is being made to charge the German with crimes against humanity. He has command and control responsibility for his men and has not taken the actions required to protect people from their crimes. This is why there is growing view of the Vatican as an enabler of child rape. It does not mean it willed it or approved it but that its behaviour, monitoring and accountability procedures were such that they enabled rape to take place.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Larry,

    'John doesn't see any RC heirarchy problems, he's too focused on crying statues, gable walls and tree stumps.'

    Of course I see the problems, but as with the Republican movement I don't think the failings of the hierarchy negate the Catholic Church anymore than Adams and McGuineess' treachery negate Republicanism.

    A fairly basic distinction which seems beyond the grasp of the bandwagon of Catholic haters.

    Sain?MaryHegehog,

    'So less judgement and more appreciation for what she HAS done may well be the go. ....... Live and let live I note u said nought re Fibber Magee that poxy little weasel.'

    So I should not judge Sinead but I should judge Magee?

    For the record I do not now and have not for more than thirty years had anything to do with the modern Catholic hierarchy. The bulk of the abuse has occurred since the Second Vatican Council when 90% of Catholic belief and practice was thrown out.

    Those abusing do not represent the Catholic religion, but rather the rejection of the Catholic religion. To this extent they are non-Catholics.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Alfie,

    Anthony,

    ‘I do consider some of John's beliefs a bit nutty, but I don't think he is a nutter.’

    Quite. I am sure he is every bit as sane as Sinead O’Connor.

    ‘I'm not a big fan of David Quinn's at all. Nevertheless, he at least attempted to make an argument; O'Connor merely gloated and ranted.’

    I think it was Sinead O’Connor who made the argument – for a new church if the leadership of the current one does not move out. Quinn’s argument was little other than a rearguard action aimed at muddying the waters and giving the Vatican time. Then the veiled threat at the end of it.

    SMH,

    So you liked the title! It was a last minute flash! You must drive them to despair with your take on it all. I am sure you have noticed that they take it particularly bad when a woman scorns them. The MEN of god cannot be ridiculed by a lowly woman! They are not even worthy of the priesthood – which any self respecting woman should be glad to know.

    ReplyDelete
  16. SMH,

    There is no doubt Sinead took them on in challenging circumstances. But she is a woman and that is certain to have enraged them even more in the men’s club. I have long wondered why god discriminates against women. The answer I come up with is that men rather than women made god. If you compare her courage to Bishop Magee’s there is a chasm that the blind alone cannot see.

    ‘She finds comfort in Rastafari beliefs.’

    Up to her what gets her through the night. Some find comfort in believing in transubstantiation. As long as none of them practice their beliefs on the rest of us.

    ReplyDelete