Social Items

TPQ
Micheál Choilm Mac Giolla Easbuig ★ What was Andy Burnham actually saying about the British controlled; and sometime, maybe, poll, on their version of a united Ireland?

  
It could be viewed as a 'Freudian slip' by him. But it is more likely that his 'handlers', the 'Deep state actors' like, MI5, Ml6 and others, had a hand in his choice of words. Maybe they wanted to say to Sinn Fein ' stay in your box, we hold all the cards here'.

The other question is: Were the Shinners really shocked? If yes, that would show a serious level of political naiveity and misjudgment.
 
But, l suspect that the Shinners know the craic. They cannot but know that the English ruling class and the deep state actors, will decide, when or even if, a poll on Their (an English) united Ireland will be called at all. In fact, that's written in 'black and white' in the, so called, Good Friday Agreement (GFA).

Not alone that, the British will decide the wording of such a poll. The poll will Not be an all-Ireland poll. But two separate polls, one North and one South. That is their stated plan. And ultimately, even if the poll result is in favour of their united Ireland, it will need a certain percentage majority, which will, again, be decided as appropriate or not, by the said, English ruling class.

And when all those 'hurdles are jumped through', the English rulers will then decide If or How the result in favour of their united Ireland, will be implemented. Baile Átha Cliath, America and the EU will hold a 'watching brief', favourable, to the English of course, throughout all of these political shenanigans.
 
All that said, I have no doubt that when the British 'deep state', imperialism and capitalism, decides that an all-Ireland arrangement (their united Ireland) suits their needs better, they will do just that; no matter what is said, not said or written . . .  ever. Unionist protests or not. We know that from the 1922 Free State arrangement, to this very day; but now with BaileÁthaCliath, Yankee and EU backing.
 
That's what article 3.2 of the IRA Constitution was designed to ensure; a 32 County Socialist Republic; clearly stated. But that has been abandoned, long ago by the careerist Sinn Fein leadership, in favour of going along with the Imperialist and capitalist, status quo.

The 'United Ireland' that the ruling class i Baile ÁthaCliath, the Brits, the Yanks and EU are talking about . . . a shared/agreed island et al, will be a retention of the capitalist and imperialist system we presently exist under. And Dublin, via it's NATO and EU Army preparations, is lining itself up for just such a settlement.

It will be an Ireland controlled by the minority 'powerful and wealthy ' for the benefit of that powerful and wealthy elite; and at the expense of the majority, the poor and working poor. Unaffordable homes, a two tier health service, an underfunded and expensive education system; combined with poor wages and conditions for the majority, the working class. The poor and working poor will continue to struggle to exist and not live a decent life or benefit fully from the wealth they always create. No change there.

This is where the SF project has went and it will fail. They had many opportunities in the last 60 years, to build a people powered, decentralised democratic system; and utilise Revolutionary politics, as opposed to the politics of the powerful and wealthy, at council level, Stormont, Teach Laighean and Europe.
 
I really put no value on polls, laws, promises or otherwise, that emanates from those in power or their servants. Eight hundred years + of English/British occupation, their laws and false promises, tells us all we need to know. As does the three hundred years of the life of capitalism.

Micheál Choilm Mac Giolla Easbuig 
is an independent councillor on Donegal County Council.

Burnham Burns Border Poll

Owen Jones 📹 with a video posted by Israeli Nazi Itamar Ben Givr.

Ben Gvir is Israel's National Security Minister. 

Yes It's Real

Anthony McIntyre ☠ Defence spending has come to the fore in Irish political discourse from the moment Russia's right wing authoritarian leader ordered his country's military to invade Ukraine.

Ireland's Defence Minister Helen McEntee's bobbing and weaving in recent days suggests she might be more suited to a boxing ring than a government portfolio. Direct answers are not her thing, ducking and diving considered just fine in the bamboozling exercise that serves as government communication policy.

The UK too has faced the same disquiet. Prime Minister Andy Burnham - having evicted from No 10 anti-human rights lawyer Keir Starmer - has failed to assuage his critics, some within his own ranks, of his commitment to increase defence spending to a level of 3% of the GDP by 2030.

Enter Kemi Badenoch, leader of the Tories with a proposal that his neither original nor surprising. Her plan for raising the the £10bn required is to hit the poor, and certainly not tax the rich.

According to the Daily Sceptic, Bad Enoch wants to slash:

The Conservatives say their savings will include £4 billion through housing benefit reforms, and £3.1 billion from reimposing the two-child benefit cap. They will end the £1 billion annual funding increase for the British Business Bank and save £1 billion by ending VAT exemptions for motability vehicles.

The Labour Party cast scorn on her proposals, ridiculing the previous Tory government's commitment to Defence.

These unserious plans are hardly surprising from the same Tory Party that hollowed out our Armed Forces, shrinking the British Army to its smallest size since the Napoleonic era.

Badenoch is making a pitch to the wealthy.

The first duty of every government is defence, and the Conservatives will always put our defence first.

She seems determined to defend British citizens against Russian aggression but not defend them against the aggression of the greedy rich, better known as poverty.

⏩Follow on Bluesky.


Bad Enoch

Caoimhin O’Muraile  ☭ Frank Ryan was an Irish republican and socialist who fought on the anti-Treaty side of the Irish Civil War. 

He was born into a family of nine in the townland of Bottomstown near Elton, County Limerick to parents, Verne Foster Ryan and Annie Slattery, both national School teachers in 1902. He died in Dresden Germany in 1944, and it is the Dresden connection which has prompted some revisionist and reactionary ( and some not so reactionary) historians to paint an erroneous picture of Ryan, suggesting his views may have changed. Some claim, citing his stay in Nazi Germany, that Ryan switched sides from radical socialist, Marxist, towards an ideological Nazi-style side, claims which are unfounded. 

Frank Ryan was an Irish Republican Army (IRA) Volunteer who fought in the Irish Civil War against the Irish Free State forces and later, in 1934, along with George Gilmore, Michael Price, Nora Connolly O’Brien (daughter of James Connolly) Peadar O’Donnell, and many others formed the left-wing Republican Congress. He left the mainstream IRA due to ideological differences which, in Ryan's case, meant socialism. Frank Ryan fought in the Spanish Civil War against the reactionary fascist forces of General, later Generalissimo, Francisco Franco and was heavily involved in the fighting at the Battle of Jarama in February 1937 where his friend and comrade, Kit Conway, met his death. Ryan succeeded Conway taking command of the Connolly Column, part of the XV International Brigade. 

On 31st March 1938 Frank Ryan was captured by Franco's allied Italian forces and imprisoned initially in Mora del Ebro and San Pedro de Cardena before being moved to Burgos Prison and sentenced to death. In October 1938 Ryan was visited in Burgos Prison by the Irish minister to Spain, Leopold Kerney, who secured a lawyer for him paid for by the Irish government. Despite the lawyer's - Jaimie Michel de Champourcin - best efforts the Spanish regime would not grant Ryan's release. His death sentence was commuted, after the intervention of Eamon de Valera, to 30 years imprisonment and he did secure his release by a least expected organisation and certainly unlikely wing of the German establishment.

Frank Ryan was released into the custody of the German Intelligence Service, the Abwehr under the command of Wilhelm Canaris, on 15th June 1940. At the time the Nazi/Soviet non-aggression pact was still in play so, albeit cautiously, acceptance of Abwehr hospitality was acceptable to Ryan as a socialist especially when his life depended on it. The situation was not ideal but, by comparison with the alternatives, Gestapo custody and certain torture, Canaris and the Abwehr was the best attainable. Wilhelm Canaris, unknown to Hitler and the Nazi Party, was not a follower of the dictator and was anti-Nazi, something he managed to keep secret for many years, But was eventually discovered and executed by the SS. Canaris was an old-style right-wing Conservative but no Nazi. 

Unlike the Gestapo the Abwehr was aligned with the German armed forces, the Wehrmacht, therefore the methods of the Gestapo were usually not adopted by the intelligence service. The Gestapo kept hounding the Abwehr for Ryan to be handed over but Canaris stood his ground. The Gestapo were interested in Frank Ryan's anti-fascist work and his involvement in the International Brigades in Spain and, had they been successful in securing him into their custody, Ryan would almost certainly have been tortured to death. Plus the former IRA Chief of Staff, Sean Russell, had been in meetings with the Nazis, working on the old maxim; ‘my enemy’s enemy is my friend’ which though applicable in the First World War most certainly was not in World War II. Russell died on board a U Boat of a perforated ulcer returning to Ireland. 

While Ryan was in Germany he had no passport, no legal status, and was entirely dependant on the Abwehr for accommodation. Being in the custody of the Abwehr must have seemed fortunate given the alternatives were the SS or the Gestapo, possibly both! As a guest of the intelligence service it was not perfect, far, far from it, but certainly preferable. At this point and perhaps at no other did Ryan know many of his hosts were also anti-Nazi. The head of the Abwehr, Wilhelm Canaris, even managed to smuggle a small number of Jews out of the clutches of the Third Reich but unlikely any of this would have been known to Frank Ryan, Canaris was playing a very dangerous game, one which would eventually cost him his life.

Another ruse the Abwehr played to keep Ryan out of Gestapo custody was denying any such person was in their custody. They had a ‘Frank Richards’ under arrest and this was nothing to do with the Gestapo or the SS Canaris informed his inquisitors. Had Ryan been handed over to the Gestapo they would have, after extensive torture, in all probability executed him as a communist. While in German custody at no point did Frank Ryan change or even modify his political and ideological views in any way. It was simply a battle of survival. And with the Abwehr things were a lot more favourable than the alternatives. 

The protective shield the Abwehr provided for Ryan was invaluable. Remember, the Nazis were not a normal government even by the standards of the day. The concept of the IRA coming firmly down on the Nazi side during the war may have been perceived as beneficial to Sean Russel but highly unlikely that Frank Ryan would have approved. Ryan was aboard the U Boat on which Russell died but was nothing more than a passenger. 

Those who would have us believe Frank Ryan changed his political position while in German custody are wrong. If anything his anti-fascist stance, though kept under wraps, may well have been strengthened. The narrative about Ryan dropping socialism may suit what some reactionaries wish to believe but that does not make such nonsense a fact, it was, and remains at best a myth. It is true he did ‘collaborate’ in the true sense of the word but this was a on a minimal basis as part of staying alive. ‘Collaborate’ had many different guises during the Second World War ranging from sympathetic collaboration of people like Quisling in Norway, Petain in France, to the mildest form adopted by ordinary people under occupation who just wished to stay alive. Those who adopted the latter would not cause any trouble for the Germans and hoped that would be enough to see them through. If Frank Ryan did ‘collaborate’ it was in the mildest sense and there is no evidence to suggest anything different.

Irish republican and International Brigade leader Frank Ryan died on 10th June 1944 at a hospital in Dresden, Germany, at the age of 41. The cause of death was pleurisy and pneumonia and he had been in poor health for many years. He had been living in Germany since 1940 where his remains stayed until repatriation in 1979 when the Irish government successfully repatriated his body. He was reinterred with a large republican funeral at Glasnevin Cemetery in Dublin.

Caoimhin O’Muraile is Independent Socialist Republican and Marxist.

Frank Ryan 🪶 Myth V Truth

Lynx By Ten To The Power Of Two Thousand And Eighty Two

 

A Morning Thought @ 3253

Jim Duffy ✍ The West's response is invariably timid and that timidity plays into Putin's hands. 


Autocrats see the world in zero sum ways: win vs lose, where they show determination and are winners and the West shows timidity and are losers. That is how they invariably see things. It is rigidly black and white. Issuing tough statements and shutting down a consulate is in Russia's eyes classic Western timidity. 

The West reminds me of a notorious Irish judge who is endlessly weak on criminals and literally thinks that saying "you are being bold! Now stop it!" is being tough. A robber robbed a house I lived in. The Gardaí caught him. The case went to court, but when they heard what judge they had I remember a guard sighing and saying they had wasted their time. Sure enough the judge told the criminal to "stop being so bold" and gave him a short suspended sentence. The robber already had three suspended sentences having over him, but the Gardaí said to me that they didn't know what crime that robber had to commit to actually get sent to prison. I remember the robber walking out of the court and in the hall outside laughing at the Gardaí and giving them the finger. He knew that judge would effectively let him off. He always did.
 
The West's endless handwringing "tough talk but no serious action" approach is just like the judge.

It is worth reminding people that Putin says he is at war with Europe. Every single country. Not just NATO countries. All the neutrals too - Switzerland, Austria, Cyprus, Malta and Ireland. They are all targets according his ambassadors. The Russian ambassador made it clear that Ireland is a target and "will be dealt with."
 
The West thinks in terms of a gradient up to war, with cyber-attacks, drone attacks, etc as below war level. That is not how Russia thinks. It sees cyber-attacks and drone attacks as an actual war tactic. They saw the cyber-attacks on Ireland as war attacks. Of course the Irish government while knowing definitively Russia was behind them didn't even announce the fact publicly, instead saying they didn't know and investigations "are still ongoing." They actually finished investigations years ago and know precisely where they came from (right down to the building) and who ordered them. At least this time the Germans named who was responsible. Britain did not name who had planted parcel bombs in DHL,  parcels that caught fire in a warehouse in Birmingham thankfully before they had been put on a plane.

⏩ Jim Duffy is a writer-historian.

The Timid West

Anthony McIntyre ☠ The UUP leader Jon Burrows was described last month by Tom Kelly in the following unflattering terms:

Self assurance - is meaningless without self awareness. Jon Burrows is a loquacious confident speaker but the output is a word salad of political nothingness, contradictions . . .

The inference is that as a former RUC officer Burrows has brought the force's lack of self awareness into the heart of the political arena with all the self assurance of one of Bertrand Russell's fools and fanatics who are invariably so 'certain of themselves,' while wiser counsel is often 'so full of doubts.'

However we choose to assess him he is neither foolish nor fanatical when denouncing attacks on the Ballymena war memorial in August. Twice over a three day period the memorial was vandalised. Flags were stolen and flag poles broken. 

Mr Burrows castigating the attacks as “despicable and deeply disrespectful” added that he was:
 
absolutely disgusted to learn that this memorial has been attacked and damaged for a second night over the course of this weekend. This is not simply an act of mindless vandalism. It is an attack on a place of remembrance dedicated to those who made the ultimate sacrifice during the Great War.
This memorial provides a quiet place where people can sit, rest and reflect. More importantly, it serves as a lasting reminder of the men and women who gave their all in service and sacrifice . . . To attack this memorial once was disgraceful. To return and target it for a second night shows a level of contempt for our community, for the volunteers who care for this area and, above all, for the memory of those commemorated here . . .
Whatever motivates someone to deliberately target such a place, there can be absolutely no excuse for it.

Whether Great War or Great Waste, hate crime as alleged by the PSNI or clown crime, desecration of space reserved for quiet reflection in memory of lives lost should have as much place in discursive practices as the N word. 

Critics are entitled to view the slaughter of World War 1 with the same contempt that Connolly and others did: an imperialist grab where lions were sent to their deaths by donkeys. That entitlement does not extend to desecration of memorial tributes to the dead of that war. Memorial marauding is as wrong in Ballymena as it is in Twinbrook where the Brendan Hughes mural was defiled by goondas associated with Sinn Fein. It is no different from what the IDF did in Gaza to a war cemetery, where satellite imagery showed:

extensive earthworks in the southernmost corner of the graveyard. Bomb craters can be seen around the cemetery, but in this area the destruction appears to have been more systematic.
Rows of gravestones have been removed, the topsoil has been churned up and a substantial earth berm can be seen running across the middle of the affected area. It is of a size that suggests the use of heavy equipment.

Despise the fallen and what they died for if we wish, but allow the dead to rest in peace and the living to remember them in peace. 

⏩Follow on Bluesky.

Desecration

Irish Times 📰 Written by Sinéad O'Sullivan. 

Europe has stumbled into a new growth paradigm with a reliance on the permanent threat of war

At the launch of the White Paper for European Defence – Readiness 2030, Ursula von der Leyen declared the era of Europe’s peace dividend “long gone”. Peace, apparently, was a phase that we have now outgrown.

The EU’s centre of gravity has rapidly moved from a focus on trading to armament, as outlined by von der Leyen in early 2025, and this transfer of meaning is not happening through defence memorandums but through nation state treasuries. Consider the following: the European Commission is in the midst of mobilising €800 billion defence spending by 2030; more than 15 member states have activated “escape clauses” to enable an economic breach of fiscal rules to procure weapons; €150 billion of so-called “bomb bonds” has been raised for collective borrowing; a new multilateral bank – the Defence, Security and Resilience Bank – is targeting hundreds of billions of euro, with Belgium, Greece, Romania, Latvia and Ukraine among its founders; Canada has been admitted as a non-EU member state, in a leadership role, on many of these initiatives.

Continue @ Irish Times.

The Irish Government Is Helping To Usher In A New Wartime Economy In Europe

Shaun Harkin ➤ Burnham is rightly being challenged for his hypocritical "off the table" comment regarding a referendum on ending partition.


He's no democrat or ally of working-class people on the island of Ireland or Britain. 

He says he's opposed to anything that's divisive and wants to focus on addressing issues that matter to people.

The Labour government has been nothing but divisive and incapable of addressing the needs of working-class households, here or in Britain.
Axing the Winter Fuel Payment, imposing paltry public sector workers pay increases, expelling socialists, supporting Israel's Gaza genocide, criminalising Palestine solidarity, punching down on trans people and tailing Reform on immigration have all been tremendously divisive.
 
Supporting a massive spending increase for the arms industry, as Burnham has done, is divisive and prioritises war profiteers over investing in schools, hospitals, housing and renewable energy.
Labour and Westminster's failure to challenge inequality and transform people's lives here, combined with the toxicity of the DUP and much of political unionism, is the very reason a border poll has become an urgent matter.
 
By dismissing the demand for a border poll and the aspiration of many for Irish unity, he couldn't be more divisive.
 
The way Burnham commented was a reminder of Starmer's comments giving Israel the greenlight to slaughter Palestinians.
 
Burnham supports devolution but not democracy.
 
Labour backed devolution as a means of getting devolved areas to take responsibility for implementing austerity.
 
Labour in government has done nothing to undo decades of austerity imposed by Westminster on the North of Ireland.
 
If Burnham was a democrat he would agree people in Ireland should have the opportunity, as people in Scotland had and should have again, to vote on its constitutional future.
 
Burnham has made it clear he will stand in the way of democracy.
 
He isn't a progressive. He's a willing manager of the British state, its present interests and its colonial legacy.
 
Burnham's accusation that a poll to undo partition is divisive is utter hypocrisy. The British Empire imposed division across the world. It imposed division and partition here.
 
Partition was imposed to divide the Irish working-class and to strengthen the power of elites North and South and in Britain.
 
The British ruling class opposes the fragmentation of the UK today because it will weaken its economic and military power. In an increasingly uncertain world, the British state has become more determined to block independence for Scotland and Irish unity.
 
The demand for a border poll is a legitimate democratic demand. It shouldn't be in the gift of a British prime minister or secretary of state to determine if, when or how that will ever happen.
 
The opportunity to redistribute wealth and power across Ireland is linked to ending partition. Burnham has no right to shut that door.
 
There is no guarantee that ending partition would dramatically improve working-class people's lives across the island. It depends how it is ended.
 
There are political, corporate and military forces at work to ensure in the event of a border poll that a New Ireland would pose no threat to the existing status quo.
 
When the nationalist political establishment North and South talks about the need to plan what a New Ireland will look like following a border poll, it doesn’t include a Socialist Ireland.
 
Connolly's Workers Republic envisioned the simultaneous end of British rule and capitalism. This alternative is only possible if the working-class asserts itself independently:
 
No Irish revolutionist worth his salt would refuse to lend a hand to the Social Democracy of England in the effort to uproot the social system of which the British Empire is the crown and apex, and in like manner no English Social Democrat fails to recognize clearly that the crash which would betoken the fall of the ruling classes in Ireland would sound the tocsin for the revolt of the disinherited in England.
But on whom devolves the task of achieving that downfall of the ruling classes in Ireland? On the Irish people. But who are the Irish people? Is it the dividend-hunting capitalist with the phraseology of patriotism on his lips and the spoil wrung from sweated Irish toilers ill his pockets; is it the scheming lawyer – most immoral of all classes; is it the slum landlord who denounces rackrenting in the country and practices it in the towns; is it any one of these sections who today dominate Irish politics?
Or is it not rather the Irish working class – the only secure foundation on which a free nation can be reared – the Irish working class which has borne the brunt of every political struggle, and gained by none, and which is today the only class in Ireland which has no interest to serve in perpetuating either the political or social forms of oppression – the British connection or the capitalist system?
 The Irish working class must emancipate itself, and in emancipating itself it must, perforce, free its country. 
The act of social emancipation requires the conversion of the land and instruments of production from private property into the public or common property of the entire nation. This necessitates a social system of the most absolute democracy, and in establishing that necessary social system the working class must grapple with every form of government which could interfere with the most unfettered control by the people of Ireland of all the resources of their country. - Erin's Hope

⏩Shaun Harkin is a councillor in Foyleside.

Off The Table

Lynx By Ten To The Power Of Two Thousand And Eighty One

 

Hate Theology @ 14

 

A Morning Thought @ 3252

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)