Dr John Coulter ✍ Farming remains one of Ulster’s key industries, but there is the real danger the tractor road blocking strategy could badly misfire and public opinion turns against the wider agricultural community.

Given the cash crisis which many farmers face, mainstream and social media has been crammed with photos and footage of massive traffic tailbacks at various commuter junctions across Northern Ireland.

In some quarters, it has become known as the so-called ‘Sunningdale Strategy’, named after the use of farm vehicles to block roads during the 1974 Ulster Workers’ Council strike which collapsed the Sunningdale power-sharing Executive.

However, the British Government learned its lessons from that traffic debacle and has contingency plans in place for future events. In 1977, the then leader of the DUP, the late Rev Ian Paisley, attempted another 1974-style loyalist strike, but it collapsed mainly because the security forces were well prepared for any disruptive tactics.

But the real danger for the current farming community is that the general public will abandon support for those farmers. The organisers of the tractor protests should remember the consequences of the March 1986 Day of Action in Northern Ireland against the Anglo-Irish Agreement.

Again, farm machinery was used to block many roads and junctions across the Province that day. But as the day wore on, frustration boiled over and in some areas, there were ugly scenes of confrontation between the security forces and loyalists.

While the signing of November 1985 Dublin diktat mobilised a substantial section of the pro-Union community against the Anglo-Irish Agreement and the Ulster Says No rally at Belfast City Hall saw some 250,000 people on the street, middle class Unionist support for the campaign began to quickly evaporate once the road blocking of 1986 turned to violence and confrontation.

Farmers who take part in these current road blocking protests or the use of slow-moving convoys say they are at their wits end financially and have no other option but to resort to the tactics which have been deployed successfully in the Irish Republic, prompting the Dail to bring in a series of measures to assist the Southern agricultural community.

However, Northern Ireland is already in a cost of living crisis and coupled with the Iran war, prices are starting to rocket. Northern Ireland politicians have been voicing their demands that Westminster must intervene to assist Ulster’s beleaguered farming community. But is Downing Street really going to listen and act simply because routes to Belfast International and Belfast City airports have been blocked?

Could Westminster adopt the same attitude as it was perceived to adopt during the era of the Troubles? As long as its happening in Northern Ireland and not happening in mainland Britain, then it becomes an Ulster problem and we in Westminster need only pay lip service to the situation.

Who is being hurt the most by the current tractor blockades and slow-moving convoys? As in 1986, all is takes is for tempers to flare, harsh words to be exchanged, and the farming lobbyists will lose the support of the general public if the tractor protests descend into violence.

What makes the farming community think they will succeed with these types of protests when the British Government has already plans in place to deal with groups such as Just Stop Oil and Palestinian Action?

Put bluntly, policing authorities are now well versed at handling and controlling so-called campaigns of civil disobedience. And the authorities can also throw the full weight of the courts against potential protesters.

In the Eighties, when Unionists were advised to withhold payment of certain bills as part of the Ulster Says No campaign, many folk ended up in court.

Taken today, could a number of the farming protest group end up in court as a result of the tractor road blocking campaign? Could that affect their chances of successfully gaining individual future funding?

In practical terms, how much fuel will be used up taking part in these tractor protests given that the rocketing costs of fuel prices is at the heart of the matter? Does this mean the tractor protests will eventually become self-defeating?

If the tractor road blocking does not work, would some in the farming community take even more extreme measures by withholding products from the shops and supermarkets sparking a food shortage crisis on top of a cost of living crisis? Then again, the argument can be made - that is only hurting our own people!

The trick of the trade will be to get Westminster to vote on a package of measures which will radically help the Northern Ireland farming community. That means lobbying specifically the MPs in mainland Britain who will vote on such a package.

Perhaps if the broad UK farming community feels that a civil disobedience campaign using tractors is the best tactic, then they should park their tractors and slurry spreaders outside the homes and constituency offices of those MPs?

A Labour MP, even one very loyal to PM Sir Keir Starmer, will not take much notice of traffic delays and massive tailbacks on the Sydenham bypass in Belfast. But if a dozen massive tractors are parked outside the entrance to their home or constituency office, they’ll be on the phone almost immediately telling the PM - ‘we need urgent legislation!’

The point in terms of strategy which the current farming lobby needs to learn - hurting our own people risks losing public support; you need to take your protest right to the very doors of the folk who can influence the Government. That’s genuine pro-active civil disobedience using your heads.
 
Follow Dr John Coulter on Twitter @JohnAHCoulter
John is a Director for Belfast’s Christian radio station, Sunshine 1049 FM. 

Sunningdale Strategy Could Backfire Badly On Farmers

Ten links to a diverse range of opinion that might be of interest to TPQ readers. They are selected not to invite agreement but curiosity. Readers can submit links to pieces they find thought provoking.


Lynx By Ten To The Power Of One Thousand Nine Hundred And Forty Seven

 

A Morning Thought @ 3122

Anthony McIntyre  Last week I opted not to make the vigil. 


An event in Dublin's Academy Plaza made the choice for me. The Independent Writers Union which I recently joined was holding its AGM. A motion had been proposed by the writer Kevin Doyle that:

This AGM agrees that the Irish Writers Union will pledge its support to the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI). PACBI advocates for a boycott of Israeli academic and cultural institutions for their deep and persistent complicity in Israel’s denial of Palestinian rights stipulated in international law.

PACBI is an initiative that got off the ground in 2024. Its aim is:

to contribute to the struggle for Palestinian freedom, justice, and equality. It advocates for a boycott of Israeli academic and cultural institutions for their deep and persistent complicity in Israel’s denial of Palestinian rights stipulated in international law.

That alone seemed an authentic reason to miss the vigil. Even though it seemed to me that Irish writers would be fairly much in line with the prevalent abhorrence throughout Irish society of Israeli genocide to such an extent that the motion passing would be a mere formality, I still felt it worthwhile to attend and give my support to it. 

By the time Kevin Doyle had finished his pitch to the conference I felt to myself that will surely clinch it. When Sally Rooney addressed the conference I was convinced I could have got up and left simply because what she said was so potent, so intellectually persuasive, so limiting in the space it allowed for an alternative approach to sound remotely plausible, that there was no need for me to remain in terms of my vote making a difference. The cerebral quality of the combined appeal by Sally Rooney and Kevin Doyle was an effective double tap strike down of any suggestion that there might be a way for a writerly institution to avoid doing the right thing. I didn't leave but stayed only to learn that the institutional instinct is more self preservationist than it is a commitment to the values it professes to uphold. 

As the debate proceeded, for some incomprehensible reason a tweet by Alan Shatter, the former Fine Gael Minister for Justice, was read out. Shatter tweeted that:

On Saturday the intellectually challenged Irish Writers Union will become the first such body in Europe to join the cultural boycott of Israel. This self perceived group of intellectuals will be shamefully reviving in Ireland Nazi Nuremberg Laws to a state with 14 Nobel Laureates.

Why a statement from a pompous snob who is not a member of the union should have been read out was never explained. Did a conference of writers really need to hear that a trenchant cheerleader for the Nazi-like state of Israel was opposed to a cultural boycott? I can think of lots of people who for different reasons might oppose the boycott and are worthy of being listened to. In fact, on the day we heard a few. But they were members of the union and had every right to be heard by conference.

At that point I sensed a mood change in the room. It wasn't uproarious by any stretch of the imagination but it wasn't imperceptible either. It seemed to set the tone for the discussion which was replete with a lot of what ifs? and yes buts - the type of discursive deflating whose primary aim was described many years ago by the poet of bureaucracy James Boren: to strangle ideas, smother imitative, and suffocate any potential for doing anything effective. The unifying theme was a bogus one - those artists and writers who did not support genocide or who were not silent on it would be targeted by the boycott. Fact checks that pointed out the demonstrable falsity of such a position, with specific reference to the very focused policy of PACBI, were ignored in favour of writerly fictions.

In the end, the proposal fell by the most narrow of margins despite an emotive appeal by Fiona O'Rourke to the union not to abandon Palestinians to their fate.

The vast majority, if not all of the speakers who opposed the motion, expressed their abhorrence of Israeli genocide and the unbearable suffering of Palestinians. They were very forthright. One would be loathe to accuse any of them of lacking moral courage. Yet each contributed in their own way to allowing a union of writers to project itself, again to borrow from James Boren, as a pencil with a rubber at either end. In other words, institutionally ineffectual on matters that matter, or worse.

As we departed the scene of the crime at the Academy Plaza, our abiding memory was that the biggest influence of the day was that of Alan Shatter, who caused the blood to draw from the face of the union as readily as it did the humanitarian ink from its pen.

Follow on Bluesky.

The Plaza Of Broken Dreams

Geordie Morrow ðŸ–Œ with a painting from his collection of art work. 

Coloured Pencils On Card

⏩Geordie Morrow is a Belfast artist.

Winter Morning

Davy Clinton  I am beginning to think I am in an alternative universe. 

I don’t watch a lot of live TV but am glued to YouTube. I watch everything from fishing videos to great fights from the past….currently going through Hagler bouts….what a class act he was. 

Of course if ever I were allowed into Alaska… I won’t be… I could build you a log cabin with a corrugated metal roof and a wood burning stove. And if the Canadians did their own thing and didn’t follow their southern neighbours they could let me in to paddle my own canoe through the Yukon. That probably won’t happen either.
 
But recently I have noticed so many of the YouTube contributors have been having problems with getting lost. All I hear is … I was able to find myself ….or…I need to find myself. Like WTF is all that about. ? Is that the latest buzz words? - like “the reality is…” or  “going forward”.
 
If they want to find themselves then have a look in the mirror …. yep …. that's you right there. I have no need to find myself because I know exactly where I am . . .  and I do look in that mirror every day too. I think I was only ever lost once . . . many years ago in the wilds of Donegal. Myself and two friends were given bad directions . . .  no Sat Nav back then . . .  on our way camping, a different sort of camping than normal but some of you will understand. For an hour we went up lanes and down roads wide enough for a cart. Totally lost, and no mobile phones either then. We knew that where we were to be was four miles outside a particular village but we couldn’t find it either. Then we saw a man cutting turf and we asked him for directions to the village. We started to explain we were lost. As calm as you like he looked us up and down, shook his head, and said you must be the three northerners down for the camping. Gave us exact instructions and we weren’t two miles away.
 
Did we say after that we had found ourselves or found anything else? Would any of had ever used that phrase….? Methinks not. Methinks also that those “finding themselves” are in the main a bunch of pretentious middle class twats.

Davy Clinton is a life long Glasgow Celtic supporter. 

Lost & Found

Friendly Atheist Influential pastors and right-wing figures are openly arguing women shouldn’t vote.

Roughly 80% of white evangelical voters have supported Donald Trump in the previous three presidential elections, and a significant percentage of those voters were white evangelical women. But there’s a movement afoot within those circles to prevent women from voting at all because their husbands should represent their entire family.

A recent New York Times article explores a small but growing movement of ultra-conservative Christians who fantasize about repealing the 19th Amendment and putting head scarves on women (while ironically railing against the dangers of “Sharia Law”).

One of the weak men leading this movement is TheoBro Dale Partridge, who runs King’s Way Reformed Church in Prescott, Arizona, where women are taught to be submissive to their husbands and men are told to… be more manly, I guess. And everyone plays their role perfectly:

[Marybelle East’s] head scarf is a physical reminder of biblical patriarchy, the kind of marriage the church preaches. “It keeps me from running my mouth,” she said.

To her and the other women, patriarchy also means ceding their political voices to their husbands. They believe America would be better off if women could not vote . . . 

Continue @ Friendly Atheist

These Christian Men Want Women Barefoot, Pregnant . . . And Off The Voter Rolls

Right Wing Watch 👀Written by Peter Montgomery.


Religious-right leaders have been spent decades trying to get more Christians engaged in politics. So are they excited about a Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate who is a Christian and a seminarian who speaks fluently about how his faith informs his politics? Hell no.

From the moment that Texas state legislator and former public school teacher James Talarico won the March 3 Democratic primary—and even before—right-wing Christian nationalists have been attacking Talarico. It’s not hard to understand why. Talarico is an effective speaker who is comfortable talking about his faith while promoting LGBTQ equality and reproductive choice and challenging his Republican colleagues. When Talarico appeared on Joe Rogan’s podcast last summer, the host who endorsed Trump in 2024 encouraged him to run for president.

Polls show that Talarico is currently running neck-and-neck with either of the two Republicans who are battling each other in a runoff that will be held in May. That means he is drawing support from millions of Christian Democrats and Independents.

That is unacceptable to Christian-right leaders who have tried to make supporting Donald Trump and voting for Republicans an article of faith. 

Continue @ RWW.

Right-Wing Christian Nationalists Fear Christian James Talarico, So They Attack His Faith

Lynx By Ten To The Power Of One Thousand Nine Hundred And Forty Six

 

Pastords @ 40

 

A Morning Thought @ 3121

Donal O'Driscoll ✍ Now that the dust has settled on the fuel protests, we can look at it with perhaps more semblance of calm and reason than was possible during the week. 

However, the question of whether or not I supported the protests, as if it were a binary choice, remains problematic for me to answer without doing a deep dive into the nuances. So I will attempt to do that now.

One of the easier questions to answer is if I support the original stated aims of tackling fuel costs and the cost of living Crisis that it has created. I don't drive so petrol and diesel doesn't affect me, but I did recently have to top up our oil, paying almost double what I normally pay. Even if I hadn't, supporting people taking a stand on such fundamental issues is a no brainer.

Indeed, after initial confusion about the scale of this and the effects on the public, disruption became less of a concern. Effective mass protests do cause disruption and after the first day I think planning around things became easier.

Here is where things become murkier. The issue of organisation and leadership. It was clear from day one that this protest was a bit 'higgledy piggledy' to say the least. The lack of direct involvement from the IRHA and farmers' organisations meant it was hard to see where the buck stopped. The idea of protests being organised through WhatsApp and social media does leave me feeling a bit uneasy.

Then more and more information emerged about the so called leaders of this. Christopher Duffy, was already known to me through social media as an appalling bigot who used his social media to spread lies and hatred against Muslims and migrants. A horrible excuse of a human being that I couldn't even begin to get on board with, even before I heard of his deplorable post saying he didn't care if the IDF raped Greta Thunberg. There is so much shit on Geoghegan, it's a case of take your pick, but again, a notorious spreader of anti-immigrant propaganda. 

John Dallon's drink driving offences again make him an unsuitable spokesperson for Hauliers, but as someone with alcohol issues myself, I don't know enough about the man to know if maybe there were addiction issues he'd since overcome. He's certainly the least objectionable of the three, but that is a low bar.

Again, leadership issues don't mean you can't support the broad movement, but it was clear there was very little attempt to disassociate from the loathsome Duffy in particular. In fact many people insist still that this swamp dweller is some sort of hero. Indeed, even many of the so called 'ordinary people' interviewed, kept bringing up stuff like 'looking after our own'. I don't think I need to explain what this is usually code for. In fairness, I don't think the disgusting attacks on the Muslim Sisters of Eire can be blamed directly on the protests. The plastic patriots may well have attacked them anyway, the protests merely gave them more reason to be in town.

Now we come to the really disappointing thing for me as a socialist, the whitewashing by some on the left of the very real issues with the leaders of this. I don't have a problem with individual parties like SF or PBP supporting the protests, as I say, I get the central issues and they weren't the main gaslighters. But some of the 'left wing' influencers online who were so quick to paint this as some sort of 'glorious revolution' that they instantly shot down any mention of the involvement of people like Duffy, left a sour taste in my mouth.

So when you ask me 'did you support the protesters?', the honest answer is, it depends. I was certainly sympathetic to the aims and acknowledge most protesters were voicing genuine grievances. Nonetheless, there was a dodgy element, especially at leadership level, which made it very hard for me as a socialist, to get fully behind them.

Donal O'Driscoll is political activist from West Cork.

It Depends

The Journal 📰 Independent Senator Eileen Flynn has almost become accustomed to being the target of online abuse in Ireland, and abroad, but she said that comments about her made on X in the past week have been the worst yet.

“I’ve never experienced hate like it,” she told The Journal, after a video of remarks she made in the Seanad about the recent fuel protests went viral in certain circles online on Wednesday.

In the Seanad contribution, Flynn had said she would not attend any protests where the Irish flag was being flown because it has become a symbol exploited by members of the far right, who sought to hijack the fuel protests last week.

She told The Journal the Irish far right and other online agitators “punch down” on minority communities.

“They don’t stand for the Ireland we fought for 100 years ago and we’re still fighting for today,” Flynn said.

“I will not stand by when our flag is being used to promote hatred, division and anti-migrant remarks. For me, the flag means peace, unity and justice and equality.”

Flynn made history when she became the first woman from the Traveller community to sit in the upper house.

Continue @ The Journal.

Senator Eileen Flynn Says She Has Faced Worst Online Abuse And Hate Yet In Past Week