Jim Duffy An interesting report from Channel 4 News. 

It isn't anything new to those of us aware of what is happening, but something that, as the Taoiseach admits, the Irish are "blissfully unaware of" as they live in their neutrality fantasy that "sure we're grand!" He made the point that the Irish really live in their deluded bubble.
 
Part of that bubble is of course due to geography. Ireland perpetually is unaware of things outside its inward-looking society. After World War II, international leaders were flabbergasted at how much Ireland lived in its own bubble. International leaders would meet Irish leaders and find them off in their own reality. The world was worried about the prospect of a nuclear war with the Soviet Union, and the risk of mass starvation, yet when they'd meet the Irish Minister for External Affairs he would want to talk about nothing but partition, the Irish border, the treaty, and being good Catholics showing loyalty to the Pope.
 
That was demonstrated when the Atlantic Treaty was signed creating NATO. Ireland wanted to join NATO, a point Minister for External Affairs Sean MacBride made clear in the Dáil and Seanad in February 1949. But all MacBride and the First Inter-Party Government wanted to talk about in order to join NATO was . . . partition!!! Seriously! The government, a bit like some in Ireland today, thought other countries were desperate to get Ireland to join NATO - and so all they had to do is get other members joining NATO to gang up on Britain and force it to withdraw from Northern Ireland and so end partition as a quid pro quo to get Ireland into NATO.
 
In fact, then as now, other countries weren't fixated on getting Ireland into NATO, and they couldn't give a damn about some 'silly squabble' over partition in Ireland. They had far bigger issues on their plate, like the status of Berlin, millions of refugees, the risk of war, the fact that many countries were bankrupt, to worry about the "dreary steeples of Fermanagh and Tyrone emerging once again", to use Churchill's famous phrase from 1922 once again.
 
It didn't help that Ireland's reputation had been catastrophically damaged by de Valera's crass condolences on Hitler's death.
 
The very idea that NATO members were going to gang up against Britain on behalf of Ireland was deluded in the extreme, but typical of how out-of-touch the Irish were. The war to the Irish was just 'the Emergency', where the main problems were no petrol and rationing food. To the other countries planning to join NATO, the war involved Nazi armies, Blitzkrieg, the bombing of cities, concentration camps and gas chambers, with millions dead. The Irish were entirely on a different wavelength to everyone else and living in a different reality.

Ireland's plot to use NATO membership to force British withdraw from the North failed abysmally.
Ireland's tendency to live in its own bubble has long been an issue. It remains an issue alive today in Ireland's neutrality delusions. Real neutrality is expensive, involves a large armed forces, and usually involves conscription (Sixty-six percent of remaining neutrals in Europe have conscription. Only one-third of NATO members do). It involves having a significant size of navy and air force. Irish neutrality however involves little defence spending, a two-ship navy, an air force with no means to intercept anything, and a tiny military incapable of fulfilling the elementary duties of a military due to chronic lack of defence spending. Whenever a problem arose, we play the 'beal bocht', even though richer than many NATO members, and look to get NATO to protect us for free with taxpayers in other countries paying our bills.
 
The reality is that continental Europe knows full well that it is being targeted by Putin's Russia, that efforts are being made to destabilise their states, that fundamental infrastructure is being targeted, that a full cyber war is being waged against them. The closer a country is to Russia, the more brutally they are being targeted and the more worried their citizens are.
 
Some countries in Southern Europe are less nervous than those in Central and Eastern Europe. However none is as much in its bubble of denial as Ireland. Part of that was due to World War II. Lots of neutrals naively thought the Second Hague Convention's declaration that "The territory of neutral Powers is inviolable" - even though that was broken by Germany in 1914 in invading Luxembourg and Belgium. World War II shattered them of that illusion - as neutrals Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway and Finland were invaded. It showed that the 'guarantee' in Hague II Title V Article I is worthless. If a country wants to attack a neutral it will. Hague is nothing more than an unenforceable gentlemen's agreement. That was why Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Norway abandoned neutrality after World War II and joined NATO. Finland and Sweden have since joined.
 
Ireland may well have been one of those neutrals Hitler planned to invade, though historians are uncertain if Operation Green, invading Ireland, was a real plan or a dummy one. If it had been invaded, that would have woken the Irish pretty quickly to the uselessness of Hague II's protection. The fact that it wasn't allows devotees of neutrality to cling to the delusion that it is protected by Hague II - despite Hague II not having protected any single country in its one hundred and fifteen years in force.
The extent to which the Irish remain "blissfully unaware" of how dangerous the situation is can be seen in the fact that Ireland has no full-time stand alone Defence Minister, has barely functioning defence, a laughably low defence budget, and the fact that neither RTÉ nor Virgin Media even bothers to have a Defence Correspondent.
 
The delusion was summed up by a typically crass intervention by Michael D Higgins where he lashed out at Estonia for taking defence seriously by increasing its defence spending as if it were acting aggressively. Typically he ignored that Russia has explicitly threatened it, that Russia spends 7.5% of GDP on defence, had been massing soldiers at its borders and had tried to provocatively steal part of its waters in breach of international waters. Then again, Higgins like many on the left is oblivious to the behaviour of Russia while always being in a rush to cast the first stone against democracies.
He is being replaced by an even more clueless nutter on the issue - a hard left woman who equates limited German rearmament in 2025, that it has to do to repair decades of underfunding, with the extreme and illegal aggressive rearmament of Hitler in the 1930s.
 
The Irish have no idea that not alone is Europe in a highly dangerous state, but it is in particular danger. 97% of the most vital data cables that Europe depend on are in Irish waters and the Irish waters are where they are most vulnerable. All Putin would have to do to throw Europe into chaos, including shutting its banks, emptying its ATMs, stopping its cards from working, etc would be to attack those cables in Irish waters.
 
Ireland is rated as one of the top three targets for Putin in any war: the Suwalki Gap; Gotland; cables in Ireland's waters.
 
Add to that Ireland is exceptionally vulnerable because it is dependent of underwater connectors to literally keep the lights on. Cut those interconnectors, and Ireland would lose 50% of its electricity generation capacity. If that happened, the government's own analysis makes it clear it would take six months minimum to fix the interconnectors. In the meantime there would be national electricity rationing. Major industrial users would be cut off indefinitely to give priority to homes, hospitals, schools, etc.
 
No other country is as vulnerable as Ireland is heavily reliant on electricity generation using gas but in an act of monumental stupidity has no gas storage facility. Add to that the Corrib gas supply is almost gone and for ideological reasons no other gas fields were opened.
 
A core aim of Russia is to destabilise the EU - which is why targeting vital data cables is central to his tactics. Destabilise states by things like throwing the electricity supply into chaos and again you make world headlines. Ireland, an isolated island with no gas storage and a demand that almost matches supply, and dependency on a limited number of interconnectors and just a two-ship navy to protect them, is a perfect target. Everyone else in Europe knows it.
 
Maybe it will take the lights going out to wake up their Irish from their blissful ignorance and realise just how dangerous the situation is internationally right now, and how its chronically underfunded defence is plain reckless and stupid.
 
It may be Ireland's Rotterdam moment. One prominent Dutch politician from Rotterdam was a pacifist who was convinced in World War II that the Netherlands was safe thanks to the Second Hague Convention. He was adamant. Then on 10th May 1940 the Nazis attacked the Netherlands, Hague or no Hague. On the 14th May, Rotterdam was bombed severely by the Nazis. Only then did he finally realise what Luxembourg and Belgium learned in 1914 - that Hague as protection is worthless. He wrote "I believed we were protected. I was wrong." His city, and his family, were destroyed in the invasion. He later went on to campaign for the Netherlands to join the new NATO being created, saying his country must never make the same mistake again.

⏩ Jim Duffy is a writer-historian.

Rotterdam Moment

Peadar O’Donnell Socialist Republican Forum ☭ In this video, speakers from Social Rights Ireland and members of the Peadar O'Donnell Socialist Republican Forum discuss how states use criminalisation as a means of enforcing the ruling class's policies.



State Use Of Criminalisation Policies

Caoimhin O’Muraile  ☭ On 3rd January 2026 Unites States President, Donald Trump, Commander in Chief of the US armed forces, ordered the illegal bombing of the South American country Venezuela. 

US forces then proceeded to, at the point of a gun, kidnap the oil rich county’s president, Nicolas Maduro, taking him back to the US for a show trial. This illegal act by Trump did not force the same protests and outrages from Western leaders as Russian President, Vladimir Putins, invasion of his neighbour Ukraine. In fact what Trump has done has semi-legitimised the Russian invasion of Ukraine because Putin can now reasonably claim; just as you dictate what goes on in your backyard, so do we in ours! 

Ever since the Monroe Doctrine of 1823 the USA has considered Central and Southern America within their sphere of influence but this is the first time they have kidnapped a country’s leader. By the same token since the fall of the Soviet Union Russia can equally claim Ukraine to be within its orbit and therefore the same rule of influence must apply. Whether this assumption is right or wrong is not the topic here but Trump's actions in Venezuela have given Putin the rationale he needs to justify his invasion and demands of Ukraine. If anything Putin may have had more justification than Trump for his actions against his neighbour which is a matter of conjecture. 

Donald Trump, a man not known for his honesty, claimed, with absolutely no evidence, the Venezuelan leader was involved in the drugs trade and therefore his arrest was legitimate. Trump also claimed the former trade union leader and head of the Venezuelan Socialist Party is/was not the legitimate leader of the country and therefore he had to be removed. Madura’s political ideology is an antithesis to Trump and for this reason, among others, he has been illegally and forcibly removed from office and taken to a US kangaroo court. We only have Trump's less than reliable word for this allegation what in all likelihood could be a false claim. The real reason for this violation of Venezuela is because the country is rich in oil. Western sycophant leaders like Britain’s Keir Starmer are lining up to find words which can justify Trump's actions so they do not have to take action, sanctions for example, if they dare, against the US tyrant.

Donald Trump has made no secret of the fact he wants to annex his neighbour Canada to the north and most of the Americas to the south of the US. In this - what could be described as a bastardisation of the Monroe Doctrine - has Trump laid the first brick in his plans to occupy the whole of the Americas? If this turns out to be the case - and the early signs are not good - what will the reactions of larger South American countries like Argentina and Brazil be? Canadian Prime Minister, Mark Carney, has already told Trump Canada will not become the “51st state of the USA” earlier in 2025 when Trump was sabre rattling about such an eventuality. Now Trump is threatening Greenland, part of the Kingdom of Denmark, with military invasion, claiming it is important to US ‘national security’ for Greenland to be governed by the USA. Once again this is make-believe stuff of comics. What the US Brigand really means is the ‘country is wealthy in minerals we want’. US security is presently guaranteed as they already have military bases in Greenland. Denmark and therefore Greenland are members of NATO and such an invasion by the USA, the leading NATO member without whom the alliance is virtually toothless, would no doubt split and possibly end the Atlantic Alliance. Article five of NATO’s constitution states, “if one member is attacked all other members come to help.” The six-million-dollar question is: will article five apply if the US invade Greenland? Just as Venezuelan sovereignty has, for the time being, gone so too would that of Greenland, and by virtue of that the sovereignty of Denmark would be eroded. On 6th January in a statement:

the leaders of France, Germany, the UK, Spain, Denmark, and Greenland said Greenland belongs to its people. It is for Denmark and Greenland and only them to decide on politics concerning Greenland. (Irish Daily Mirror 7th January). 

Trump has already indicated he does not care what Europe think: it shall be him who decides the future of Greenland! This is very similar to Adolf Hitler's attitude towards Britain and France after he had taken the Sudetenland - an area of Czechoslovakia - with the blessing of Britain, France, and Italy: and proceeded without care to take the whole country. Is Trump another Hitler?

Many Western leaders have claimed, wrongly in my opinion, that Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine is only the start of his take over in Eastern Europe. I do not believe this to have been the case. But the actions of Trump and his threats to other sovereign nation states certainly may give Putin ideas in such a direction! With the Russian invasion of Ukraine and ongoing war British Prime Minister Starmer and his like-minded European leaders like French President, Emmanuel Macron, have gathered what they call the “coalition of the willing” to provide if necessary “boots on the ground” to guarantee Ukraine’s security once the conflict with Russia comes to an end. They have spent billions and billions in aid to Ukraine and have supplied much military hardware. 

The question now is to Starmer and his supposed “coalition”: will you provide the same arms and money to Venezuela to fight the US as you have to Ukraine to fight Russia? It is exactly the same principle of violation which Trump has done to that of Putin or do such rules only apply to Russia? Starmer has refused to call Trumps actions illegal in ‘international law’ probably because he knows to do so would stir the wrath of the US tyrant! Even the far-right leader of Reform UK, Nigel Farage, a friend of Trump, has said the US actions are “probably in breach of international law”. Starmer is a sycophant to Trump who must be laughing his balls off at the British leader. In fact all the Western European heads at their dithering over what to say or do about his actions and future threats. Just as the world stood still when Hitler invaded the Rhineland in 1936, then Austria in 1938, Czechoslovakia in 1939 and finally Poland again in 1939. Are they going to do the same again with Trump?

Donald Trump is, according to him, going to run Venezuela allowing “US oil companies” to administer the oil industry in the country. This again will be an act of theft no different in principle to housebreaking just on a far larger scale. Once again, such an act will be in breach of international law which in reality does not exist. If Trump does this and takes over the administration of Venezuela as a corporate business in effect he will have made his first move towards open fascism. Corporatism is an integral part of fascist governance (something the electorate in Britain should consider before voting for Reform UK as Farage wants to run the country as a business) and is a dangerous slide back into the darkest years of global history. Another major question is perhaps: will the US dictator invade any other country which disagrees with his far-right ideology, including Britain? The US already have around 10,000 fully active troops based in Britian so all they would have to do is take over British Army barracks while more US forces arrive!

In an act of piracy on 7th January 2026, the US boarded and seized the Russian flagged tanker, Marinera, in the Atlantic about 400 miles off the coast of Ireland. This act by the United States Corsair is once again an illegal action as piracy is a crime and has been for centuries. The US aircraft had to fly over Twenty-Six County airspace to carry out this deed. The question to be asked is did they have the permission of the administration in Leinster House for this incursion? When Twenty-Six County Minister for Foreign affairs, Helen McEntee, was asked this question she fudged and avoided answering. We can probably take that as a no, they did not have permission. In which case the sovereignty and neutrality of another small country had been violated by the United States. 

Another prudent question is: how will Putin react to this Russian flagged tanker being seized by the USA? Remember Vladimir Putin has the largest nuclear arsenal of any single country on earth! In a statement Britain’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) stated “the UK helped the US in seizing the tanker”. If this assistance was voluntary then the so-called UK are complicit in breaking the fabled international law. What we should be asking is; did the “UK help” the US or, roughly translated, were they ordered to do so by the leading NATO country? Did Trump get on to Starmer and tell him this is what is going to happen and you will help us? Maybe being bullied by the US is part of Britain's “special relationship” with the United States!

With Donald Trump now doing whatever the fuck he likes where will it end? The European sycophants are doing their level best to justify the US dictator’s actions in typical grovelling fashion. Will Trump invade Greenland signalling a crisis within NATO? Or to avoid such a crisis and dilemma will the other alliance countries find a way of dumping Greenland and, in effect, Denmark possibly claiming NATOs article five only applies to actions by countries not in the alliance? 

The outcome of these US actions will end in tears for somebody with Venezuela and President Madura being the first victims. Columbia are now voicing concerns about their future, fearing a possible US invasion! The rest of the world might sit back and tell themselves in a couple of years Trump will have gone, voted out! Well, do not bank on that because this tyrant is not above, as did Hitler in Nazi Germany, cancelling elections in the USA under the guise of protecting their national security. Do not be surprised and will the world still sit idly by? Probably. They have never moved against the USA in the past why should this be any different?
 
Caoimhin O’Muraile is Independent Socialist Republican and Marxist.

Donald Trump 🪶Thief, Kidnapper, Corsair!

Lynx By Ten To The Power Of One Thousand Nine Eight Hundred And Fifty One

 

A Morning Thought @ 3028

Anthony McIntyre  Writing in the Irish News on 12-January-2026.

Just into the New Year Denis Bradley, writing in this paper, raised a matter which has defied resolution throughout many old years. 

Truth, despite acquiring a word association with reconciliation, is a concept which in the North has long been used for something entirely different - recrimination: our truth about you, but not your truth about us. 

Denis Bradley, alert to this, in suggesting that compassion should place limitations on clarity, invites his readers to reconsider the value of truth recovery in its most expansive form. His main concern is, briefly, that to come clean to the extent that informers be identified, will have a destructive affect on the families of those who are 'outed.'

One authentic, but not sufficient, reason for wishing to have informers publicly identified is curiosity. The titillation to be derived from the layers of deceit being pulled away from the spook world, causing spinners and spoofers to seek out new shadows, should not be understated either. Many aficionados of horror find rich pickings by flicking the mind's channel to one of the following stations: Internal Security Unit, Force Research Unit, MI5, Special Branch. John Ware's upcoming book on the moral quagmire inhabited by Freddie Scappaticci, Brian Nelson, and a range of state agencies is likely to be replete with the genre of nightmare that prevented Edgar Allan Poe getting a good night's sleep. Yet there is no compelling reason to insist that curiosity should trump compassion. Pursuing informers at this point is often driven by the same type of mindset that presses for prosecution of former combatants, As the former IRA prisoner Tommy McKearney once put it: why continue to take prisoners when the war is over?

While not intrinsically objectionable there is no uncomplicated way to erect the humane 'Bradley barrier.' Would the family of John Bingham be allowed to know the identities of those who killed him but not that of the informer who was also part of the same IRA operation? Perhaps the most that can be done is to erect the safety rail of compassion rather than a barrier in the hope that a society chooses wisely and opts not to go down a path that leads to even more destruction. 

One thing the Kenova Report demonstrated starkly is that there are families who have already been destroyed by the informer label. They lost loved ones, and forever walk the earth bearing the mark of Cain for a sin not their own, or a sin perhaps not even committed. Compassion should not be confronted with the harsh command of verboten at the family homes of those whose loved ones were executed on the orders of the IRA Army Council after it was fed information procured and processed by Freddie Scappaticci, and green lighted by his agent handlers in the British security matrix.  

The involvement of a British agent in the construction of cases against people accused of informing, leading to their execution, is as corrupting as police malfeasance in the Birmingham Six 'appalling vista.'  

Even within its own narrow ethical bandwidth, the deaths of all those executed by the IRA on the watch of Freddie Scappaticci amount to a gross miscarriage of justice, the cases contaminated beyond all reasonable doubt.  Each of the dead should be posthumously pardoned by the only body capable of doing so, Sinn Fein. The party still has within its ranks a former element of the Army Council, the institution which signed off on the Scappaticci executions. It alone carries the authority within the communities where the deceased once lived to remove the stain. Seeking to evade the obligation to exonerate by recourse to the mantra of the IRA has gone away, is as shallow as the secret graves the IRA interred some of its victims in. 

If Sinn Fein can lay wreaths at monuments for British war dead, it can just as surely lay wreaths at the graves of Vincent Robinson, Anthony McKiernan, Charlie McIlmurray and the many others the IRA and British state, in a macabre joint enterprise, forced to sail into nothingness under the 'tout' flag. The same military whose fallen Sinn Fein now honour on Remembrance Sunday stands accused by the party of being responsible for the killings procured and counselled by Freddie Scappaticci. To whatever extent the British state was responsible - and it is hugely culpable - showing compassion to the families of its victims is hardly a breach of any principle. Hubris should not stand in the way of an action that would be one of humility, not humiliation.

Follow on Twitter @AnthonyMcIntyre.

Truth, Recrimination And The Value Of A Little Compassion

Duleek 1916-1981 Monument Committee   is organising a tenth anniversary commemoration for Volunteer Tommy Gallagher.

Assembly Point: Hunger Strike Monument, Duleek.

Date: 22 February 2026.

Time: 1500.

Speaker: Francie Mackey



Tommy Gallagher Commemoration

Seamus Kearney 🎤 After his release from internment which officially ended on 5th December 1975, Freddie Scappaticci returned to the family home at Farnham Street in the Ormeau Road area of South Belfast. 

By the end of 1976 he had returned to the Provisional IRA, operating as a Belfast Brigade Intelligence Officer, but had also resumed work in the building trade, working alongside members of the Official IRA from the Markets area in a tax scam involving the misuse of 715 tax exemption certificates.

In 1977 he was arrested by the RUC fraud squad and threatened with prosecution and the real possibility of going back to prison over the tax scam, which seemingly terrified him. Significantly, others were compromised in a similar vein by the British security services after they had been released from the cages of Long Kesh, so Scappaticci was certainly not on his own.
 
After agreeing to work as a spy for the RUC, providing them with low level intelligence on the IRA, Scappaticci became uncomfortable as he believed the RUC to be a sectarian force, so simply walked into the heavily fortified British army barracks in Royal Avenue, Belfast, the former Grand Central Hotel, and offered his services to them instead. 

His first army contact was Sergeant Peter Jones from the Devonshire and Dorset Regiment, on a four month tour of duty in Ireland from January to May 1977. After their assessment of Scappaticci the army decided to 'poach' him from the RUC and groom him into becoming a member of their Special Reconnaissance Unit (SRU), part of 39th Brigade of the British Army. For his part Scappaticci loved the attention and gradually seen himself as a British military officer in an elite group, convincing himself and being convinced by his handlers, that the IRA was a blight on the Nationalist population of the North and had to be defeated. The fact that his blood monies would reach around 80,000 pounds per year, directed into a bank account in Gibraltar, also played a role in his conversion to work for the other side. 

Fundamentally, Scappaticci did not possess a moral compass but had a dissociative identity disorder (DID), which allowed him to switch sides in the war for his own self interest and material gain. Again, it must be stated that he was not unique in this regard, as other IRA Volunteers did the same, including people close to him, self preservation taking precedence over ideological loyalty.

When the Provisional IRA commenced the total overhaul and restructuring of its units in 1977, cell structure, the ' Green Book' and a new 'Internal Security Unit' ( ISU) were included in the overhaul. Once the British army became aware of this, they set their sights on infiltration of the Internal Security Unit, as it was like' honey to a bee'.

The British army pushed for their man, Scappaticci, to enter the ISU, while at the same time the RUC 's Special Branch were using their best endeavours to get their agents into the same unit. As it turned out both security agencies succeeded when the IRA' s Internal Security Unit was eventually activated in the Autumn of 1978. Ironically, the head of the ISU, a former member of the British army's Special Boat Service ( SBS), had already been a Special Branch agent for years previous. Scappaticci became his second-in-command. As for the others, most from D company, Lower Falls, Belfast, they were compromised IRA Volunteers with a few exceptions.
 
The Internal Security Unit, whose remit was to root out informers, brief new recruits, investigate botched IRA military operations etc was heavily infiltrated from its inception. Furthermore and disgracefully, there was no rotation of personnel which meant prolonged and sustained damage could be inflicted on the IRA, blunting its overall capacity to win the war against the British. The Provisional IRA would not be defeated in the field, but a policy of containment ensured that a military victory was unachievable.


Seamus Kearney is a former Blanketman and author of  
No Greater Love - The Memoirs of Seamus Kearney.

Stakeknife 🕵 The Rise And Fall 🕵 Act Ⅰ

Lynx By Ten To The Power Of One Thousand Nine Eight Hundred And Fifty

 

A Morning Thought @ 3027

Gary Robertson ⚽The Who in their classic “Won’t get fooled again” from 1971 sang “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss” a feeling of Déjà vu, the promise of something new yet somehow predictably the same.

And so it is currently at Celtic Park. Sure the 33 days of disaster that was Wilfred Nancy are over and again riding in to save Celtics’ season is club legend and all round good guy Martin O’Neill. Yet despite the new found confidence in the team - a crushing defeat of Dundee Utd, a team we had succumbed to only days before showed the players are good enough, O’Neill's tactical work and on the pitch, perhaps green shoots of recovery. 


But as always (to borrow another musical metaphor) every rose has its thorn and the thorn is Celtics’ board and their inability to see beyond their bank balances. The team needs investment however, a new striker for one is a must but at time of writing the board continue to drag their feet. Hibs' Kieran Bowie is certainly catching the eye of other clubs and we could do much worse, in my opinion, than look to bring him in. But as always there’s a price to pay and whether Dermott is willing to prize open the biscuit tin remains to be seen. 

Speaking of Bowie, Hibernians themselves fought out a draw with the vastly improved Motherwell. Under Jens Berthel Askou, the Steelmen are playing very attractive football and are a threat to anyone. No longer does any team expect to turn up at Fir Park and leave with three points. How long they can keep their man is a question only he and they can answer. Will be be swayed with a job in England? For the good of Scottish football I hope not but sadly the lure of big money “down south” is a difficult one to resist. For now purely from a neutral standpoint, let’s enjoy his brand of football and how he has this team playing. Motherwell are a joy to watch.

Sticking in the central belt, Livingston (a team I have a soft spot for) look doomed already to be playing in the championship next season. Four points adrift of second bottom Kilmarnock, who themselves are four points away from tenth placed St Mirren, it’s already looking like it’s going to be a long difficult season for David Martindale's men. 

At the other end of the table however Hearts continue to fly high, leading the chase from the usual suspects. Sure their match with Dundee was marred by some questionable refereeing, They showed such true character when down to ten men, after the dismissal of their keeper just before half time, that they hung on to claim three points, helped greatly by a wonder save by current Scotland number one Craig Gordon who at 43 is playing as well as he’s ever done. 


Rangers kept up the chase with a 2-0 victory over luckless Aberdeen who are winless since December 14th. A big club, the fans deserve better and should be challenging for honours season after season rather than languishing in mid table. 

Back to the bottom six, and Falkirk inflicted a damaging defeat on Kilmarnock, beating them 2-0 at Rugby Park. Like Livingston I fear for their future in the SPL. New faces in the manager and assistant managers seats, Neil McCann and Billy Dodds appear to have their work cut out but who knows with the transfer window wide open perhaps they can strengthen the team and drag themselves away from relegation fears. Rangers themselves seem to have adopted the Danny Rohl style well and are now looking more like the team we expect to see at Ibrox. Without doubt certainly in the mix for the title and playing some very watchable football. Could the young German lead “the bears” to title glory? The fans seem to think so. A demolition of Celtic in the latest Glasgow Derby and a comfortable win over the dismal Dons. Things are looking rosy down Govan way.

 
Meanwhile those of us of a “green persuasion” wait with bated breath scouring news sites, fan pages and Celtic minded podcasts in the hope signings will be made. Will we find that 20+ goal a season striker? Will we be able to find a player who spends more time on the pitch than the injury table? All will be revealed in time. Just don’t get your hopes up Celtic fans. They say it’s the hope that kills you, if that’s true we’ve all died a thousand deaths.

Til next time . . . 

🐼 Gary Robertson is the TPQ Scottish football correspondent.

After 33 Days, They Rose Again

Barry Gilheany ✍ It was the most audaciously illegal act ever in US foreign policy. 

In the dead of the night on 3rd January 2026, US forces captured or kidnapped (depending on one’s point of view) President Nicholas Maduro of Venezuela and his wife from their residence in Caracas and flew them to New York - where, in the theatre of performative power and humiliation that we have witnessed in human traffic in the opposite direction namely the deportation of supposedly illegal Latino immigrants and falsely branded criminals to El Salvador’s notorious supermax - to face charges of narcotics supply to the US. 

The overthrow of uncompliant governments in Latin America at the instigation of US agencies is, of course, hardly a rare event in a region where America has always presumed the right to do as it likes to uphold its strategic interests. But this was no half-baked attempt to overthrow a regime using native proxies like the Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961; no coup with a ready mean moustachioed military dictator like Pinochet; no long drawn out insurgency such as the Contra guerrilla campaign against the Sandinista regime in Nicaragua in the 1980s; no transformative blueprint for the reordering of an entire region by democratisation and free markets such as the Project for a New American Century which provided the intellectual ballast for the invasion of Iraq in 2003. No, it was the decapitation of the figure head while the regime continues its repression of the Venezuela population. In an inversion of the language of anti-war movements of the West, “it was all about oil” as Trump made abundantly clear while it was most certainly not about “democracy” which was the message delivered by Trump’s disavowal of any role in any future dispensation for Maria Corina Machado, the leading light of the democratic opposition and winner of the Noble Laureate which Trump so craves while he indicates his desire to cut a deal with the technocratic Vice President, Delcy Rodriguez to ensure US control of Venezuelan oil reserves. No colour revolutions on Trump’s watch.

And there will be no colour revolutions, televised or otherwise, because despite the apparent ideological chasm between Trump and the Chavismo regime that Maduro represented, both belong to the loose but interconnected conglomerate of authoritarian leaders that Anne Applebaum describes as Autocracy Inc. Unlike military regimes and ideological alliances from the past and contemporary hybrid or “illiberal” democracies like Hungary, Turkey or India, this group operates not like a bloc but rather like an agglomeration of companies, cemented not by ideology but instead by a ruthless, single-minded determination to keep their personal privilege and wealth.[1]

Applebaum lists the strongmen leaders of the following countries (at the time of writing): Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Angola, Myanmar, Cuba, Syria, Zimbabwe, Mali, Belarus, Sudan, Azerbaijan and maybe three dozen others who share a determination to deprive their citizens of any real influence or public voice, to repel any attempts at transparency or accountability, and to strike out at anyone, at home or abroad, who has the courage to challenge them. The leaders of Autocracy Inc also share a brutally pragmatic approach to wealth. They often maintain opulent residences and structure much of their collaboration as for-profit ventures. Their bonds with one another, and with their friends in the democratic world, are moulded not through ideals but through deals – deals designed to ameliorate the effects of sanctions, to exchange surveillance technology, to help one another get rich.[2] Although the name of the country that he leads is not listed in the above rogues gallery of autocracies, the modus operandi of their mutual collaboration also belong to the toolkit of President Donald Trump. His transactional view of the world, of personal and international relations and his brazen and signal approach towards self-enrichment puts the United States into that club.

Not a few of those autocracies on that list were initially birthed through popular revolutionary or national liberation struggles such as Cuba, Nicaragua, Angola and, most pertinently for this article, Venezuela. For as much as the events of January 3, 2026, are so emblematic of raw American power, they can also be seen as the long-term culmination of a revolution betrayed.

President Hugo Chavez arrived in office in 1998 after a strident campaign for change in the Republic of Venezuela which had been established forty years earlier. Formerly a wealthy, stable democracy, Venezuela had, as is the typical developmental pattern in many oil states, become nepotistic and corrupt with bribery of politicians and kickbacks being given to their friends. With the fall in oil prices in the 1990s, the resultant anger created the conditions for the revolutionary ferment that brought Chavez, a lieutenant-colonel in the Venezuelan army who had led an abortive coup d’etat in 1992, to power in a democratic election in 1998 on a promise to create a more honest Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. A year later, the new Venezuelan president held a meeting with an old comrade in struggle Jesus Urdenta, his chief of internal police. Urdenta brought to Chavez evidence of corrupt practices in the new, supposedly revolutionary government. He informed him that several top officials in the new government were padding invoices for government contracts, including the printing contract for Chavez’s new constitution. Urdenta urged Chavez to bring an end to such behaviour. After an initial silence, Chavez asked for Urdenta’s resignation and Venuezela’s Supreme Court quashed any investigation into corruption.[3]

So, Chavez made a choice, one which would prove in the long term to be fatal for the legitimacy of the revolution and the Bolivarian Republic. Had he sided with his old comrade and established an expectation of probity in the public sector, then it would have provided a solid ethical and democratic foundations for the undoubtedly popular social programmes that he did institute. But, in an attempt to keep himself in power in perpetuity, he made the calculation that corrupt officials would prove more malleable than clean ones and he was proved right to the long-term detriment of his revolution and his country.[4]

For in the years that followed, cronies of Chavez would support the president’s drive to eliminate any mode of accountability and transparency, both because doing so maintained their stay in power and protected them from scrutiny. Like other budding autocrats like Putin, Orban and Erdogan, Chavez gradually but steadily denuded democratic institutions in Venezuela of autonomy – the press, the courts, the civil service, various regulators, and ombudspersons – even while proclaiming his belief in democracy. His supporters went along with that too and, over time, the state began to act like a criminal enterprise.[5]

And what a gravy train grew for the officials who partook in the skimming off of the Bolivarian Republic’s resources. During the fourteen years Chavez held power, Venezuela took in nearly $800 billion in oil-export revenues, much of which did indeed finance the state welfare programmes which made Chavez such a poster boy for Western leftists like Jeremy Corbyn, erstwhile leader of the British Labour Party. But hundreds of billions of dollars from PDVSA, the state oil company, as well as other Venezuelan state companies, ended up in bank accounts around the world. In 2017. Investigators found that PDVSA officials had been hiding millions of stolen dollars at the Portuguese bank, Banco Espirito Santo. A 2021 investigation revealed that Swiss banks were hiding $10 billion on behalf of officials at Venezuelan state banks, electrical utilities, and other entities. In that same year, journalists uncovered a $2 billion Venezuelan oil company that had been processed through banks in the principality of Andorra.[6]

But graft pervaded the totality of Chavismo society with one of its most important agents being the industry of currency exchange manipulation, created by the state’s byzantine system of multiple currency prices. The beneficiaries of this “democratisation of kleptocracy” included students who gamed the allowance for cheap dollars meant for overseas studies either to profit from the artificial exchange rates abroad or by paying unscrupulous schools to produce paperwork suggesting that they had studied abroad which meant that cheap dollars could be swapped on the black market for many more Venezuelan bolivars than it had cost to buy them, creating for the student “a nice little earner” of a few thousands of dollars in profit. But there were far greater and more egregious players in on this scamocracy who exploited their connections to work out how to claim tens or hundreds of millions of dollars to import spare parts, medical supplies, telecoms equipment, chemicals, computers. If Venezuela needed to import anything, then someone would be generating the false paper trails and making discreet payoffs, just to unlock access to cheap currency. [7]

Behind the allure and bluster of Chavismo propaganda lay an economy and society so weakened by corruption and gross incompetence that it was peculiarly exposed to the effects of turbulence, internally and externally. The cash behemoth that was the oil industry was the first to suffer the shocks that undid the Bolivarian revolution. In 2002-3, Chavez detonated chaos in the industry by sacking 19,000 oil workers for going on strike and replaced experts with regime loyalists. Later, the decline of commodity prices and the imposition of sanctions on the PDVSA by the first Trump administration accelerated the collapse. Almost simultaneously, Venezuela began to experience critical scarcities of everything due to the currency exchange scams. Billions (or maybe tens of billions) of state funds had disappeared into the proverbial black hole, the country’s foreign currency had been siphoned into private offshore accounts, hyperinflation accelerated, and imported goods disappeared.[8]

People without dollars faced hunger and malnutrition if not outright starvation. The Catholic Charity Caritas estimated in 2019 that 78 percent of Venezuelans ate less than they used to, and 41 percent went whole days without eating. Doctors in Venezuelan hospitals faced pressure not to list malnutrition as either a cause of illness or death.[9] Even the most basic commodities disappeared from shelves including, most excruciatingly embarrassing (if such emotions could be held by such uber-kleptocrats) toilet paper.

The death knell for the Bolivarian revolution turned kleptocracy with a faux left tinge should have been sounded by the death of Chavez in 2013 and his replacement by the uncharismatic party functionary Nicholas Maduro. Venezuelans knew the truth of the hollowed-out revolution and the regime it brought to power; corruption seeped from its pores. The accession of Maduro to power ushered in a series of popular, Arab Spring demonstrations across the country and it seemed that the days of the regime were well and truly numbered. However, as Anne Applebaum describes, this was the moment that the regime called in favours from Autocracy Inc.

As well as the common ur garden means of revenue raising by rogue regimes such as drug trafficking, illegal mining, kidnapping, extortion and gasoline smuggling, the Maduro regime was able to find friends and trading partners among other sanctioned states and companies happy to engage in corruption. Russian companies such as Rosneft, Gazprom, Lukoil and TNK-BP (a joint Russian-British venture, at their own behest or at the request of the state, filled the gaps left by departing European, North American and South American firms frightened by the instability and risk, to put money into Venezuelan oil, agriculture and even manufacturing. In addition to subsidised grain exports replacing those previously from Canada and the US and gasoline (the only gasoline available in Venezuela), Moscow supplied Caracas with some $4 billion of arms and armaments, including 100,000 Kalashnikovs, 24 fighter jets, and 50 helicopters to be used in the recurring bouts of repression that characterised the Maduro regime. Complementing such lethal cargo, China has sold surveillance technology, crowd-control equipment, and riot gear to the Maduro government, along with water cannons, tear-gas guns and enormous moveable walls that could block people from joining crowds – all tools that helped prevent the opposition from winning power. China had also been a generous benefactor in the way in which it replaced international institutions wary of lending to Venezuela by providing $30 billion in loans before it cottoned onto the reality that these loans would never be paid back and that an incredibly expensive, Chinese-backed high-speed railway meant to cross Venezuela’s lightly populated southern plains would never be completed due to Venezuelan contractors absconding with the money.[10]

A shared anti-American worldview links Cuba and Venezuela and in return for subsidised Venezuelan oil, Cuba provided soldiers, police officers, security and intelligence experts as sell as sports coaches, doctors, and nurses. A shared feeling of ‘disrespect’ from the democratic world lies behind the personal links between Maduro and President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey. Venezuela exports gold to Turkey and receives food in exchange. But the biggest Autocracy Inc relationship that Venezuela has cultivated and developed is with Iran. They relate to each other on the basis of shared anti-American grievance and interest in clandestine petroleum sales. Iranians bought Venezuelan gold and sent food and gasoline in return. Iranians are believed to be advising Venezuela on repressive tactic against dissidents. They helped Venezuela build a drone factory with mixed success and have helped with the repair of Venezuelan oil refineries. In return, the Venezuelans may have helped launder money for the Iranian proxy militia and are believed to have provided passports for Hezbollah and Iranian officials as well.[11]

By tapping into this axis of convenience/corruption/illiberalism (add any suitable adjective) conceptualised by Applebaum as Autocracy Inc, the Maduro regime was able to shamelessly steal elections, bloodily suppress street protests and imprison thousands of political opponents and presumably continue to feather the nests of its entourage of placemen and apparatchiks. 

The ending of Maduro’s term in office by a much more powerful kleptocrat and authoritarian populist who, like Maduro’s predecessor, can speak to his constituency in familiar language, will most likely change nothing on the ground. In many ways, it was an easy win for Trump as his European allies, especially the UK, feels hamstrung in its response due to their perceived need to keep him on board in the defence of Ukraine. Despite all his bluster, it is almost impossible to see him repeating his “success” with, for example, the despotism of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

References

[1] Anne Applebaum (2024), Autocracy Inc. The Dictators Who Want to Run The World. London: Allen Lane p.2

[2] Ibid, p.3

[3] Ibid, pp.43-44

[4] Ibid, pp.44-45

[5] Ibid, p.45

[6] Ibid, pp.45-46

[7] Ibid, pp.46-47

[8] Ibid, pp.48-49
 
[9] Ibid, p.49

[10] Ibid, pp.50-51

[11] Ibid, pp.51-53

Barry Gilheany is a freelance writer, qualified counsellor and aspirant artist resident in Colchester where he took his PhD at the University of Essex. He is also a lifelong Leeds United supporter.

The Day That Changed Everything Yet Nothing 🪶 Trump Captures Maduro But Business As Usual In Venezuela With Regime Unchanged

Lynx By Ten To The Power Of One Thousand Nine Eight Hundred And Forty Nine