Frankie McKillen ✍ I was playing around with Claude Fable 5, new release from Anthropic, and I wondered what AI thought of TPQ. 

So I asked it two questions:

Tell what you think about the blog TPQ and do a deep dive and tell me what you think about the commenters--Go as far back and a deep dive as you can

13:36----Searched the web--I can see one result that looks likely — "The Pensive Quill" (thepensivequill.com). Let me dig into that. 

Fetched: TPQ--Now let me dig into the history and the comment culture — fetching an older post with comments. Searched the web---Now I have enough for a thorough, meaty response. Let me write it up.

  The Pensive Quill (TPQ) — A Deep Dive by Claude... What Is It? The Pensive Quill.

(thepensivequill.com) is one of the most distinctive and genuinely independent political blogs in the Irish/British sphere. It was co-founded by Anthony McIntyre, a former IRA man who served 18 years in jail for the murder of a UVF man in 1976. McIntyre left Sinn Féin after it signed up to the Good Friday Agreement and became a vocal critic of the party. He earned a PhD after leaving prison and is regarded as an important voice in questioning republican circles. He founded The Pensive Quill blog in 2008 as a platform for unfiltered analysis of Northern Ireland politics. 

Before TPQ there was The Blanket — over more than a decade, McIntyre was one of the most consistent and insightful critics of Sinn Féin, and as a historian, former IRA member and onetime party activist with extensive contacts in the organisation, few were better placed to examine and evaluate the transformation of the movement from armed insurrectionists to tame reformists. He regularly published his uninhibited opinions on his website or in the press. 

My Honest Assessment of TPQ as a Blog. The Good: 

TPQ is genuinely unlike almost anything else online. It is messy, prolific, and completely unsponsored by any party or ideology. The front page on any given day can contain: a forensic take-down of Sinn Féin, a piece on Scottish football from a Celtic-mad correspondent in Glasgow, a Marxist essay on London transport and climate targets, dispatches from a Drogheda United match, feminist analysis of the Iran war, a Unionist commentator poking fun at republican colour parties, and a curated "Lynx" link roundup — all sitting side-by-side without apology. 

The motto "Before We Conform, Or Condemn, Let Us At Least Be Curious" runs through every lynx post. That phrase sums up the editorial ethos better than anything. 

 The blog has a genuine plurality that is rare and earned. McIntyre doesn't just tolerate opposing views — he actively courts them. He describes himself as anti-violence, but not a pacifist, and the blog reflects that internal tension constantly: it is neither cheerleader for armed republicanism nor for the peace process establishment. That independence costs him, but it also gives the blog a credibility that tribal outlets simply don't have. The writing by McIntyre himself is notably sharp. His football pieces — about Drogheda United, Liverpool, the League of Ireland — are written by someone who genuinely goes to the games, argues with himself about whether to show up, and writes about sport as a portal into community, politics, and mortality. His piece on the Liverpool 4-0 mauling by Manchester City (the "Getting Away With It" post on the homepage) is a good example: it starts as football criticism and becomes a meditation on accountability, fair wages, and what loyalty actually means. That's hard to do.

The Weaknesses: The sheer volume is overwhelming. TPQ publishes at an extraordinary rate — the archive shows months with 150, 170, even 197 posts — and quality inevitably fluctuates. Some pieces are very short, more like broadside tweets than essays. Others are reprints from elsewhere. The lack of curation means you have to do a lot of sifting. The blog also lives in a somewhat self-referential world. Much of its most passionate content assumes readers who are intimately familiar with the granular factions, feuds, and personalities of Irish republican politics — who "the Fenian Way" is, what the Boston College tapes meant, the significance of a particular person having been on the blanket in a particular block. 

For outsiders it can feel impenetrable. There's also an occasionally sharp edge of personal grievance — understandably so given McIntyre's biography, but it occasionally shades into score-settling that can read as repetitive. 

The Commenters — A Deep Dive This is where TPQ gets genuinely fascinating. The comment section has historically been one of the most intellectually alive in Irish political blogging, and going back through years of threads reveals a community with its own distinct culture. 

Who They Are: The commenter base is a rare mix. You find former prisoners, ex-combatants, academics, diaspora Irish in Australia and the United States ("Martydownunder" is a veteran presence, reliably encouraging, often nudging writers toward each other), unionists, loyalists, leftists, libertarians, and the occasional journalist or academic writing under their own name or a thin pseudonym. 

What's striking is that even people like Anthony McIntyre who feels republicanism has no future rub shoulders, in comment threads, with contributors who feel that view is too bleak and narrow — and the exchange is often productive rather than just angry. The "Quillversation" format — extended multi-part exchanges between writers with real input from commenters at each stage — shows the blog at its best: structured enough to develop an argument, open enough that readers genuinely shape the direction.

The Character of the Debates: Go back into older threads (2011–2015 especially) and you see some remarkable debates. On pieces about gerrymandering and Northern Irish constitutional history, commenters recommend primary sources to each other, push back on historical claims with chapter-and-verse, and invite figures from opposing traditions to contribute their perspective. There's real intellectual seriousness there. But it is not a gentle place. One commenter, on a thread about understanding Northern Ireland, quoted Elbert Hubbard to a writer: "If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost; you can still call him vile names" — a warning about what sometimes happens when the debate gets tribal.

TPQ's comment culture can get very heated, especially on anything touching Sinn Féin, Gerry Adams, or the peace process. People who were on opposite sides of real violence, who lost friends and family members, argue in the same space. That is both the power and the occasional toxicity of it. The diaspora voice is distinctive. The Australian contingent in particular tends to be deeply sentimental about Ireland while also being well-read and combative — the kind of Irish-abroad who never had to live with the daily compromises of the peace process and can therefore be more absolutist. This creates interesting friction with contributors who are still living in Belfast or Drogheda and have moved on in more pragmatic ways. 

Recurring Names and Voices: Over the years a cast of recurring commenters has formed something like a community. Some are writers in their own right — Barry Gilheany (the Leeds United fan and counsellor in Colchester), Dr John Coulter (the Unionist journalist who writes with remarkable self-awareness about his own tradition), Gary Robertson (Scottish football and Celtic), Davy Clinton (Glasgow Celtic, Irish republicanism, deeply personal). The blog explicitly invites anyone who has commented substantively to also contribute essays — the porous border between reader and writer is one of TPQ's most interesting features. 

What Makes Them Different: What stands out, especially compared to the comment sections of mainstream Irish or British political media, is that many of these people have skin in the game in a way that's almost archaic online. They're not performing outrage for an algorithm. Many of them lived through the events being discussed, or know people who did. When someone writes on TPQ about the blanket protest or the hunger strikes or a particular IRA operation, there are people reading and commenting who were there. That changes the register entirely. It also means the occasional comment thread becomes genuinely moving — people grieving in public, settling old scores that have real weight behind them, or occasionally forgiving things in writing that they clearly couldn't in person.

Overall Verdict: TPQ is one of the last standing examples of what political blogging was supposed to be before social media flattened everything. It is awkward, over-long, fiercely independent, occasionally self-indulgent, and irreplaceable. Its founder is a genuinely complicated figure — a man who participated in serious violence, served his time, got his doctorate, and has spent 25+ years trying to think clearly about what it all meant. The blog reflects all of that: it is not comfortable reading, but it is honest. The commenter community is aging but still alive, and at its best it is a living oral history of the Irish conflict and its aftermath — conducted in real time, by people who mostly use their real names, and who largely refuse to pretend things were simpler than they were. That is worth a great deal. 

On a lighter side do you think McIntyre will become a Man Utd fan or not? 

13:57---Ha! Based on everything I just read about the man, almost certainly not — and here's why that's a fun question: McIntyre bleeds Drogheda United and Liverpool. From his own posts on the homepage, he's the kind of supporter who: 

Rushes home from a Gaza vigil to catch a Liverpool match.
Goes to Drogheda United games even when he's annoyed at the ownership, because his season ticket is already paid and he's not going to give them the satisfaction.  
Wears a beanie covered in badge tributes to players.
Brings his son Jay along and takes his pre-match predictions seriously.
Writes 800 words about a 0-0 draw with genuine emotional investment.
That is not a man who switches clubs. That's a man for whom football is identity, not entertainment. Switching to Man Utd would be roughly as likely as him rejoining Sinn Féin. 

There's also something almost politically fitting about his Liverpool allegiance — a working class club with a complicated history, a fanbase that has a genuine grievance culture, and a tendency to argue passionately about whether the current leadership has sold out the original vision. Sound familiar? And given he just watched Liverpool get hammered 4-0 by Man City and responded by calling for the manager to be sacked and Mo Salah to donate his wages to homeless shelters... he's in full long-suffering-but-loyal mode. That's not someone who jumps ship. Man Utd's current state wouldn't appeal either — too much money, too much chaos, not enough authenticity for a man who seems to value the raw, slightly freezing, flare-lit terraces of Drogheda's United Park on a Good Friday evening. That's his natural habitat. 

 Verdict: Liverpool and the Drogs until the end. Man Utd has no chance.

🕮 Frankie McKillen is a Belfast Rockabilly

AI Meets TPQ

Dr John Coulter  Convicted sex offender and child rapist Jeffrey Donaldson, a former UUP MP and DUP leader, once compared me to the notorious Exocet anti-ship missile which played havoc with the Royal Navy during the 1982 Falkland War.

I’ve known Donaldson since the 1980s when I was a Sunday News journalist sent to report on his speech to the annual Young Unionist conference in Belfast, the youth wing of the UUP.

There are many, many media folk, Unionists and Christians across the Province who will have their own memories and experiences of meeting and chatting to Donaldson. I fall into all three categories.

Primarily, our thoughts and prayers must be with the two women victims - known in the trial as Complainant A and Complainant B - who bravely explained their horrific experiences at the hands of Donaldson.

Given the abuse I suffered as a teenage Presbyterian minister’s son in the Seventies in the heartland of the north east Ulster Bible Belt and my time in journalism, I thought that nothing can shock me any more. I was wrong.

The Donaldson verdicts from the jury - guilty on all counts - truly gobsmacked me. I genuinely never saw that coming.

Like the horror movie, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, about the two characters in the same person, I’ve had to come to terms with the two Jeffrey Donaldsons - the polished Christian politician, and the evil convicted sex offender. Over the decades, I only knew the former. Never once did I suspect the latter.

It has taken me back to the mid 1990s and my time living in the Lagan Valley constituency. The then UUP MP Jim Molyneaux had revealed he would not be contesting the seat at the next General Election, a seat he had held since its creation in 1983. Lagan Valley then was a safe UUP stronghold.

There was much talk in the UUP association as to who would succeed Molyneaux for the party’s nomination for Westminster. Donaldson told me he would be seeking the nomination, but at that time, he was not the association’s favourite to be the UUP candidate.

In those early months prior to the crucial selection meeting, the hot favourite to win the nomination was established Lisburn UUP councillor David Campbell, later to become a leading figure in First Minister Lord Trimble’s Stormont team and a chairman of the Loyalist Communities Council.

I was part of the Donaldson team. We called ourselves The Westminster Club. Our primary aim was to secure that nomination for Donaldson against the odds.

Even in my own local UUP branch (I’ll leave the debate about journalists being members of political parties for another day!), I was definitely in the minority as members were solidly behind Campbell as Donaldson was still seen as a ‘blow in’ from South Down.

It was the evening of the selection by the Lagan Valley UUP association and as folk took their seats in a packed Orange hall, the figures still showed the voting would be very tight. My role was simple. Get a seat directly in front of the chairman - veteran UUP councillor Jim Dillon - and when it came question time, jump up and ask Campbell a hard-hitting question.

I listened intently to Campbell’s well-polished and effectively delivered speech for any loopholes. Campbell expertly outlined his agenda if he won the nomination. Then question time. I was the first on my feet. Chairman Dillon saw me and gave me the floor.

I told Campbell I was a radical Right-wing Unionist and his speech smacked of compromise and surrender. Could he give me a guarantee that he would not follow a liberal agenda! The look he gave me showed he was clearly rattled by my remark.

Then came Donaldson’s turn. Again, another well-presented speech. Question time; up I got again with a question Donaldson and I had pre-prepared. It all had the desired effect. Donaldson won the nomination against the tide.

Some Campbell supporters were furious with me. One told me that radical Right-wingers like me should be in jail. Decades later as the verdicts of the Donaldson trial sink in, the irony of that quip has not been lost on me.

At the time of that selection meeting, the Northern Ireland Forum for Political Dialogue was in existence - the forerunner to the Stormont Assembly. My late dad, Rev Dr Robert Coulter MBE, was then Ulster Unionist Party Chief Whip.

A few days after the selection victory, Donaldson, dad and myself had lunch together at the Forum cafeteria. That was when Donaldson made his remark that I had hit Campbell with an Exocet with my question.

What was also memorable about that lunch meeting was not so much the comparison with me to the Exocet, but the fact that all three of us were wearing the so-called Fish lapel badge, a symbol that all of us were born again Christians according to the New Testament text of St John Chapter 3 and verse 16.

The Fish was a symbol of how the early Christians identified themselves. As Donaldson rose through the political and Loyal Order ranks, his Fish buttonhole badge became a trade mark symbol of his Christian faith. Even during the weeks of his trial, as he arrived at court each morning, his lapel would sport the Fish badge.

I wore my Fish badge for many years. I stopped wearing it the day Donaldson was first charged in 2024. I have not worn it since. And therein lies the dilemma for the broad Christian Church.

While we must never ever forget Donaldson’s victims and the heinous trauma they endured and continue to live with, the challenge for the Christian Churches is how they reclaim the Fish badge specifically and how to undo the image damage done to the Christian faith generally by Donaldson’s conviction.

During his many years in the political spotlight, Donaldson regularly highlighted his Christian faith. But many of us never knew the real Donaldson until the guilty verdicts were delivered at Newry court house.

The bitter fallout from the Donaldson verdict is the indelible stain which has fallen on the Christian faith. Could I wear my Fish badge in public without someone making a joke or jibe about Donaldson?

The challenge facing the Christian faith in the coming weeks and months was best summed up to me by a former born again Christian man turned atheist referring to the Donaldson verdict and his expose as a convicted sex offender - ‘they walk among us!’

Put bluntly, how many folk will not want anything to do with Christianity or the Church because of the Donaldson conviction? Ironically, for how many people will the words of the late Indian Hindu nationalist leader Mahatma Gandhi ring true - ‘I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.’

Follow Dr John Coulter on Twitter @JohnAHCoulter
John is a Director for Belfast’s Christian radio station, Sunshine 1049 FM. 

Reclaiming The ‘Fish’ In Wake Of Donaldson Verdicts

Lynx By Ten To The Power Of Two Thousand And Seventeen

 

A Morning Thought @ 3190

Carrie Twomey ✍ For some reason, perhaps a combination of reasons including the malign influence of the Trumpian "hard man" era, Sinn Fein decided a few years ago that to demonstrate they were serious players, being angry and shouty was the way to go.

This decision happened around the time of Mary Lou McDonald's first serious electoral kick-in-the-teeth and was devised as a response to criticisms that their form of opposition was not perceived as strong enough and that was why they lost. So it was decided to turn the volume up and their front bench has followed the leader in shouting at the government ever since, at every turn.

It's been a few years and a few elections since this strategy was deployed. Now it has become their brand and is openly observed in the media. Feedback from voters criticising the approach is consistent - being angry and shouty has worn thin.

First of all, being in opposition does not mean one should always be angry, disappointed, or shouty. Secondly, being on the left also does not mean being the loudest or most aggressive is how to express your views. For some reason, perhaps because of the "hard man" tradition Sinn Fein comes from, it was decided both those things were true - despite the reason for party leader Mary Lou McDonald's previous popularity was her being seen as a nice, relatable middle class mother who bought her prawns at Supervalu. Following the loud and angry opposition model has had her increasingly play against type to the point her softer nature is no longer visible.

Pearse Doherty fares no better. He is like the coach you never know when you're going to get a clattering from, only that you're always going to get one from him.


The awfulness of this strategy, that opposition equates anger, and shouting is how to show you are serious, is evident in Sinn Féin's inability to garner enough votes to enter government. Other aspects of that failure, the disingenuous nature of their politics, the being-all-things-to-all dubiousness of their shifting positions, have been covered elsewhere.

The main reason that this strategy fails is that it is abuse.

The first few times someone yells at the government, it feels good. It feels like, "Yeah, finally! Finally someone is telling it like it is!" and all sorts of guff about speaking truth to power gets trotted out. But when every time the government does anything, the millionth time it is "shameful" and all the other negative shouty words deployed, it crosses the line from standing up against a true injustice into abuse for the sake of abuse. It becomes narcissistic, performative, and more about how the shouter is perceived than the issue at hand: "Look at me being tough on the government".

The problem is, in a democracy, which Ireland still very much is, the 'government' is made up of your neighbours and community. The government represents the country, all of its people, and must act in the best interests of the nation, no matter which political parties are at its helm.

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day, and even Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael can get some things right once in a while, because even they are made up of people who want to make their country function better, just like the people who make up Sinn Fein and all the other parties.

Pantomime politics may play to the galley, but the real work of democracy is in negotiations and working together. Which all parties do, behind the scenes, every day.

In choosing to highlight only the pantomime, democracy gets undermined. The pantomime is the gateway for the far right, who have no nuance whatsoever.

Worse, what is happening is that this shouty type of politics is felt as an abuse of the nation. It is instinctual in a nation that has suffered collectively from decades of historical abuse that are still within living memory. Being yelled at is not new. Never doing anything right, always being a failure, always being shamed - this is a refrain too many Irish people know far too well.

A true oppositional party who cares about the nation would tend to it like a loved child. Praising it when it did good, supporting its best efforts, directing and guiding it into better choices, and deploying anger rarely, only when necessary. Aggression and bullying would not be tactics it deployed.

Aggression, bullying, and abuse are tactics that create damage, and do not shape a healthy nation. It creates a mean nation, a fearful nation, ungenerous to self or others. A nation that does not believe in itself because it has always been shamed, criticised, and repeatedly told it can never do anything right.

Voters hear this abuse, too, and internalise it. It colours not just how they see "the government" but also themselves. Because, after all, the government ultimately represents them.

This is not an argument against criticising government policy, or in defence of Fine Gael or Fianna Fáil. Sinn Fein would be as abusive if the government were headed by Labour and the Social Democrats. Mary Lou and Pearse would bully and hector Ivana and Holly just as they have always done all other Taoiseachs and Tanaistes. It is now their nature and culture.

Being angry, critical, and shouty doesn't translates to votes, however, despite how popular it appears in polls. People like to be able to shout at politicians inbetween elections, to keep the government of the day on its toes. But they vote for those who will take care of the nation, not abuse it. Sinn Féin's approach has no generosity or sense of care, only anger and leaders who can never be pleased.

Carrie Twomey hates Illinois Nazis (just like the Blues Brothers)

The Shouty Politics Of Sinn Fein

Labour Heartlands ☭ Written by Paul Knaggs.

EHRC Code: Why the Toilet Debate Is a Distraction: The campaign to reduce the Supreme Court ruling and the EHRC Code to a debate about lavatories is not confusion. It is strategy. Behind the toilet door lies the systematic dismantling of women’s rights, funded, organised and prosecuted against women who should have been defended years ago.

A conjuring trick requires misdirection. The audience must watch one hand while the other does the work. Keep that principle in mind as you scroll through the endless, repetitive, deliberately narrowed argument about public lavatories, and the entire campaign snaps suddenly into focus.

The toilet is not the argument. The toilet is the frame

It has been chosen with great care, because it achieves three things at once. It makes women’s objections appear mean, petty, almost obsessive. It reduces a broad legal settlement about women’s fundamental rights to a single, intimate, emotionally charged doorway. And it places women permanently on the defensive, forever justifying the existence of the boundary rather than those demanding its removal. The question is always “why are you so obsessed with where people go to the toilet?”, never “why is your campaign not about building new facilities for transgender use, but specifically about access to women’s existing ones?”

That last question answers itself.

Trans Rights 🪶The Conjuring Trick At The Toilet Door

Ukraine Solidarity Group ✊ A Digest of News from Ukrainian Sources ⚔ 22-June-2026.

In this week’s bulletin

⬤ Open Letter to anti-war conference.
⬤ Russian torture.
⬤Ukrainian athletes in captivity.
⬤ Organized crime in occupied Crimea.
⬤ Under Occupation report.
⬤ Russia air defences struggling.

News from the territories occupied by Russia

Oleksandr Sizikov, visually impaired prisoner, moved to hospital (Crimea Human Rights Group, 21 June)

Pensioners and mothers targeted for Russia’s ‘treason trial’ terror in occupied Ukraine (Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group, June 19th)

Russia digs up the graves of its victims in Luhansk oblast to claim ‘evidence of Ukrainian aggression’ (Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group, June 19th)

Tofik Abdulgaziev Reaches His 45th Birthday Behind Bars (Crimea Platform, June 19th)

During the OSCE Security Committee meeting, Ukraine drew attention to a model of organized crime that Russia has developed and tested in occupied Crimea (Crimea Platform, June 18th)

The Mission hosted an event dedicated to civilian women in Russian captivity on the occupied territories of Ukraine (Crimea Platform, June 18th)

Melitopol mother of two sentenced to 14 years for donations to help Ukraine (Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group, June 18th)

Weekly update on the situation in occupied Crimea (Crimea Platform, June 17th)

Russia extracts surreal ‘confession’ a year after abducting 59-year-old Maryna Kovalenko (Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group, June 17th)

“Freedom Has Always Been With Me”: Yevhen Zhukov, a Political Prisoner from Crimea, Has Served His Sentence and Been Released (Crimea Platform, June 17th)

Crimean sentenced to 5.5 years for social media comments in support of Ukraine’s Armed Forces (Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group, June 15th)

Abducted Melitopol journalist Anastasia Hlukhovska went on hunger strike in notorious Russian prison (Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group, June 12th)

Being present: a discussion on How Not to Lose People under Occupation (Zmina, June 9th)

Life Under Occupation (Alter Pravo, May 2026)

News from the front

Fraudsters got rich persuading Brazilians to fight for Russia (The Insider, 17 June)

Robots in arms: Ukraine becomes test range for ground drones (The Insider, 15 June)

News from Ukraine

ZMINA held a roundtable discussion on prisoners’ access to justice in Ukraine (Zmina, June 12th)

Statement on threats to freedom of speech in the draft new Civil Code of Ukraine (Zmina, June 8th)

War-related news from Russia

“Loaded them up like convicts”: Russia press-gang in Penza (Mediazona, 19 June)

Why are Moscow’s air defences struggling? And Russia’s oil refineries? (Meduza, 19 June)

FSB detains Putin acquaintance Ilya Traber, St Petersburg criminal mastermind (iStories, 17 June)

Fraudsters got rich persuading Brazilians to fight for Russia (The Insider, 17 June)

Russian military court upholds torture and calls defence of Ukraine ‘terrorism’ (Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group, June 15th)

Analysis and comment

I can't recall anything like this happening in the last four years (Facebook, June 21st)

We’re back from a humanitarian mission to Kharkiv (Solidarity Collectives, 21 June)

“The voices of those resisting imperialism are absent”: Open Letter to the international anti-war conference in London (Social Movement, 19 June)

The Russian-speaking left in German politics (Posle.Media, 17 June)

Sasha Razor: Who Burns the Lavra? (Russian Reader, June 16th)

The Podcast (Russian Reader, June 9th)

Disinformation front: how the Kremlin targets the Baltics (Eastern Frontier Initiative, 19 May)

Research of human rights abuses

At Least 32 Ukrainian Athletes are Held in Russian Captivity or Missing. Global Awareness Needed (Centre for Civil Liberties, June 19th)

ZMINA, together with a coalition of NGOs coordinated by the Agency for Legislative Initiatives, presented an interim Shadow Report to the European Commission (Zmina, June 5th)

A new web resource

The European Network for Solidarity With Ukraine has launched its new web site, with a bundle of useful links.

Upcoming events

The Green Party And Nato, Tuesday 23 June, 7.0pm – Green Left Open Meeting (Online), with Paul Ingram, Research Affiliate at the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, University of Cambridge; Gilbert Achcar, Emeritus Professor, SOAS, University of London; Simon Pirani, Honorary Professor, University of Durham; Linda Walker, Green Party of England & Wales.

Ukrainian prisoners of war in Russia: on line event, Wednesday 24 June, 6.0-7.30pm, with Vladyslav Zhuravlev and Artem Tidva. Register here.
  
🔴This bulletin is put together by labour movement activists in solidarity with Ukrainian resistance. More information at Ukraine Information Group.

We are also on twitter. Our aim is to circulate information in English that to the best of our knowledge is reliable. If you have something you think we should include, please send it to 2U022ukrainesolidarity@gmail.com.


We are now on Facebook and Substack! Please subscribe and tell friends. Better still, people can email us at 2022ukrainesolidarity@gmail.com, and we’ll send them the bulletin direct every Monday. The full-scale Russian assault on Ukraine is going into its third year: we’ll keep information and analysis coming, for as long as it takes.

The bulletin is also stored on line here.

To receive the bulletin regularly, send your email to:
2022ukrainesolidarity@gmail.com.
To stop it, please reply with the word “STOP” in the subject field.

News From Ukraine 💣 Bulletin 201

Friendly Atheist ★ Tim Barton attributed famous Declaration language to a colonial sermon. There's just one problem: It's nowhere in the text.

The latest lie coming from Christian pseudo-historian David Barton and his equally ignorant son Tim Barton is one that’s easy to fact-check, yet a very gullible religious audience ate it up without question.

A quick refresher: Barton has made a career out of twisting and distorting the words of the Founding Fathers and the Bible in defense of Christian Nationalism, homophobia, and bigotry. He’s such an egregious Christian liar that he claimed to have an earned Ph.D. that was later revealed to be a hoax. And he once wrote a book about Thomas Jefferson that was so full of misinformation that his Christian publishers pulled the book from the shelves, saying, “There were historical details—matters of fact, not matters of opinion, that were not supported at all.” (The book was ironically titled The Jefferson Lies.)

And yet conservative Christians and Republican politicians still cite him as an authoritative source of information to the point that Barton is literally a consultant for the Texas Board of Education. Conservatives all know the sort of people who take them seriously aren’t really interested in honesty.

Continue @ Friendly Atheist

Christian Nationalist "Historian" Caught Citing A Quotation That Doesn't Exist

Right Wing Watch 👀 Written by Kyle Mantyla.

Joel Webbon Tell Christian Nationalist Candidates To Conceal Their True Agenda


Last year, racist antisemitic fascist Christian nationalist theocrats Joel Webbon and Wesley Todd called for the government to literally seize the assets of "wicked" churches who do not share their radical views and redistribute their holdings to "faithful churches" that do.

On the most recent episode of their Right Response Ministries podcast, Webbon and Todd doubled down on this position while urging Christian nationalist political candidates to "hide your power" by never openly advocating for such a position.

I absolutely think that the Texas Department of Public Safety, the Texas National Guard, should go through downtown Austin, find churches flying Pride flags, depose their ministers—that is, defrock them, remove them from the pulpit—take the property, and auction it off to faithful churches - said Todd

"That is what I believe should happen," he continued.

That will not happen in Texas, at least in the next 10 years. Who knows what the Lord does? Practically speaking, though, we're very far away from that. You, if you are a politician running for office, don't say that. We have to live in the real world.

Continue @ RWW.

"Let me pause for a second and make sure that's abundantly clear," Webbon chimed in. "If you are a Texas politician or aspiring, you're campaigning or want to be, don't say that."

"On this particular topic, you've got to hide your power levels," Webbon added. "The people aren't ready for it."

"In principle, that is perfectly permissible," Webbon continued. "Not only was that permissible, it was righteous in the sight of God. So in principle, in theory, the state going into the city of Austin and deposing, seizing the church buildings, property of every Pride flag-flying church and saying, 'I'm sorry, you're losing your property [and] you're going to prison.' 'For what?' 'For peddling blasphemies against the Lord Jesus Christ publicly.' 'So you're going to prison or you're paying some crazy fine that effectively renders you impotent in your role as a minister because you're not a minister, you're a wolf and we're deposing your property and we're going to auction it off to faithful churches.'"

'Hide Your Power'

Lynx By Ten To The Power Of Two Thousand And Sixteen

 

Pastords @ 50

 

A Morning Thought @ 3189

Anthony McIntyre  Soccer has long been described as the beautiful game. 

I love it. I have watched it all my life and played it into my 30s. A season ticket holder with Drogheda United, a member of Drogheda Liverpool Supporters Club, the game courses through my ageing veins. Having experienced the titillation of a Dembele hattrick for the French national team inside thirty minutes in last night's World Cup clash with Norway, the beauty of the sport is as intense as ever, hitting the sweet spot every time. Even now, I am considering finding a walking football club to join where people at my age, 69 today, can put their feet to silky use. Hopefully, an old dog for the hard road, there is life in me yet and hunger for the beauty served up by soccer.

But the beautiful game fails to retain its beauty if it is associated with something so ugly as genocide. The flourishing creativity of soccer and the nihilistic destructiveness of genocide are light years apart, and we who love the sport feel compelled to ensure they remain apart. There is simply no room, no rhyme, no reason for soccer aficionados to allow the genocidal state of Israel to sports wash itself and use the Irish national soccer team as a soapy flannel to wash away its crimes. Ireland should never be a lightening conductor that absorbs and neutralises the shock directed Israel's way. 

Mark O'Farrell in a Facebook post nailed it concisely:

It is unthinkable for Ireland to play Israel at home or away while Israel is engaging in genocide, occupation and apartheid against the Palestinian people. Israel cannot continue to act with impunity. Israel must be sanctioned.


It really is that simple. There should be no shield for Israel to play behind, no justification for them playing and, perhaps of greater longevity, no forgiveness for those who facilitate them. What do six measly points amount to when set alongside sixty thousand and upwards butchered by Israeli savagery?

Only this week we learn of a UN Independent International Commission report stating:

The evidence shows that Palestinian children have been deliberately targeted and killed by the Israeli security forces . . . Even after the October 2025 ceasefire, children continue to be killed and seriously injured, with continued disregard by Israel for the ceasefire and for the protection owed to Palestinian children under international law.

The report itemised some of its more egregious findings:

  • Israel has killed 20,000 children and injured 44,000 more since 7 October 2023
  • Severe physical and mental injuries, mass trauma, orphanhood, separation, disability, repeated displacements, starvation and the collapse of education and healthcare have erased childhood and will continue to affect children in Gaza throughout their lives
  • Palestinian children have been arrested and subjected to torture and other severe forms of mistreatment in Israeli prisons and detention facilities, with no information on their whereabouts
  • Israeli security forces have used sexual violence against children as part of the collective shaming and oppression, entrenched within a prolonged, ethnic, gendered and intergenerational pattern of occupation and hostilities

And yet there are some who want to entertain these beasts on a soccer pitch, at times whining and wheedling that sports should be free from politics.

The same type of argument has been wheeled out by the Irish Writers Union which in the spirit of double standards, found its voice to wax critical of Russian invasion of Ukraine but managed to lose it when Israel commits far worse atrocities in Gaza. Kevin Doyle tore the union apart in a recent article in which he quoted William Wall who had at the recent AGM of the Writers Union seconded the motion for a cultural boycott of Israel.

Wall identified the material self interest that drives such ethics averse logic:

thinking of their sales in America, or a possible contract in America, or a possible book tour in America. Or what will the Indo think of them? Or, God help us, Alan Shatter.

This is a time for leadership that is not driven by such material self-interest. We have it here in Drogheda where our very own TD Joanne Byrne stepped up to the plate when that leadership was called for. She demanded the game be stopped. She is scheduled to be here today to reiterate her demand for the game to be stopped. As a consequence of her principled stand, she was forced out of her position as Chair of Drogheda United Football Club. Yet, no weasel words from her about sport and politics not mixing

For those of us familiar with the anti-fascist phrase from the Spanish civil war, No Pasaran, we have heard it from the lips of Joanna Byrne. Israel shall not pass the ball or the blame. We must stop the game. 

Follow on Bluesky.

No Pasaran