Social Items

TPQ
National Secular Society ★ Men who dress as women "revolting" and "repulsive", says chair of trustees.


The National Secular Society has reported a newly registered Christian charity to the regulator after its chair claimed "the devil will come in" if wives refuse their husbands sex.

It also broadcast a sermon implying being gay should be treated as a mental illness.

Wellspring Ministry registered under the charitable purpose 'the advancement of religion' in January. Its registered address is in Southwest London but the church itself is in Reading. Charities are legally required to act for the public benefit.

'You do not have authority over your body'

In a 2022 sermon titled 'End Time Message & Sex', chair of trustees Bienvenue Hombessa, who also goes by Ben Bienvenue, tells married women in the audience: "you do not have authority over your body". The sermon is available on the charity's YouTube channel.

Men in the audience can be heard saying "amen", but Hombessa rebukes the women for not being loud enough: "I can't hear you sisters, no I can't hear you".

He goes on: "Within the context of marriage, your body, sister – it does not belong to you."

Continue @ NSS.

Christian Charity 🪶‘Devil Will Come In’ If Wife Refuses Husband Sex

Right Wing Watch 👀Written by Peter Montgomery.


A Christian nationalist organization that is vetting potential Supreme Court nominees for their adherence to the group’s biblical worldview standard says that previous Supreme Court rulings have invited God’s punishment on the U.S., and that President Donald Trump must name the “right” people to fill any vacancies “to escape national judgment.”

AFA Action, the political arm of the American Family Association, distributed an email last Thursday and again on Tuesday warning of “fearful consequences” if Trump doesn’t use any future Supreme Court nominations to restore a national relationship with God that AFA says was broken by SCOTUS rulings upholding church-state separation.

“America desperately needs our Supreme Court Justices to turn back to God,” declares the fundraising email, which comes at a time of widespread speculation about the likelihood of one or more justices resigning this year. Highlighting the uncertainty of justices’ intentions is the fact that on the same day AFA’s email said a vacancy was likely soon, the allied Family Research Council published an article saying it is unlikely that Justice Samuel Alito or Clarence Thomas would be retiring soon.

AFA Action’s Center for Judicial Renewal is run by a long-time right-wing judicial activist Phillip Jauregui . . .

Continue @ RWW.

AFA 🪶 Trump Justices Must Turn SCOTUS 'Back to God' To Avoid Fearful Judgment

Lynx By Ten To The Power Of One Thousand Nine Hundred And Fifty Three

 

Pastords @ 41

 

A Morning Thought @ 3127

Dixie Elliot ✊I am certain that all Republicans would be in agreement with the mainstream Nationalist party Sinn Féin on the subject of Bobby Sands' statue.


However when I read the repulsive revisionism of Chris Donnelly this morning I asked myself why are these people so insistent in tarnishing the name of Bobby by dragging it into something no one in their right mind would have given their life for?

To quote Donnelly:

the political and electoral legacy of the hunger strike he led was the 'rise of Sinn Féin, the Anglo-Irish Agreement and political talks that led to the ceasefires.

I take it that the Anglo-Irish Agreement he refers to was the GFA which was in fact the 1973 Sunningdale Agreement repackaged and sold as the GFA.

As for the 'rise of Sinn Féin', who would give their lives so that Sinn Féin would one day replace the SDLP in the North and FF/FG in the South? Which is yet to happen because they've achieved nothing else other than the hope that someday the perfidious British would keep their word on agreeing to a referendum on Irish Unity. Even that couldn't be viewed as an achievement as it had also been contained in the Sunningdale Agreement of 1973.

'Political talks' has to mean the Hume/Adams talks, because if there had been talks with the British then it would have been they who did all the talking and Sinn Féin would have just listened.

Donnelly referred to Bobby as a 'personality from the conflict' (sweet fuck!). Then he claimed that 'only Martin McGuinness and Gerry Adams would be viewed by the broad Republican community as equals in terms of historical status.'

That is an insult to not just Bobby but his nine brave comrades who followed him to the death on hunger strike, the many brave young Irish men and women who died for a 32-County Socialist Republic. I wouldn't compare those two with the brave leader Brendan 'The Dark' Hughes who always led from the front.

McGuinness and Adams took a once proud movement, which Bobby loved and died for, from his Republican socialist ideals to fawning over the most repugnant aspect of British imperialism, the British Royals, attending the coronation of the British King, who still claims sovereignty over the northern six counties of our country and standing in solemn silence at British war commemorations.

Let's not also forget the numerous times they apologised for the actions of the IRA, in particular the assassination of the notorious paedophile Mountbatten.

Sinn Féin would tell us that no one has the right to speak for the dead, yet they go on and brazenly use the dead, such as Bobby Sands, to sell the betrayal of everything those brave men and women died for.

The 32-County Socialist Republic Bobby and his comrades, both inside and outside the prisons, died for is no longer spoken of by Sinn Féiners.

They now speak of this 'New Ireland', which seems to be the anglicisation of 'Éire Nua' and nothing more, as they can't say what this 'New Ireland' actually is.

Sure,  don't we know how Unionists feel about anything remotely Irish, in particular the Gaelic language . . . 

Thomas Dixie Elliot is a Derry artist and a former H Block Blanketman.
Follow Dixie Elliot on Twitter @IsMise_Dixie

Repulsive Revisionism

Geordie Morrow 🖌 with a painting from his collection of art work. 

Coloured pencils on card

⏩Geordie Morrow is a Belfast artist.

Mickey Marley’s Roundabout

Kate Rice🔖 answers thirteen questions in Booker's Dozen.

 Reading Aloud And Allowed


TPQ: What are you currently reading?

KR: I’ve just started the ‘Shardlake’ series by C. J. Sansom. Mystery novels aren’t usually my kind of thing, so it’s a pleasant little change up.

TPQ: Best and worst books you have ever read?

KR: Worst book is a hard one for me because there’s definitely been a few times in my life where I’ve purposefully read those trashy sort of self-published smut books at the joking recommendation of a friend. Joke reads aside, the worst I’ve ever read was All Fours. Can I say that? I get the message but I just sort of felt embarrassed.

Best book, too many to name. Sweetbitter by Stephanie Danler is my modern sort of guilty pleasure. The Crucible by Arthur Miller, though that’s a play. I Could Live Here Forever by Hannah Halperin, Small Things Like These by Claire Keegan - I can’t decide!

TPQ: Book most cherished as a child?

KR: For some reason I remember being really attached to this book called My Life with George by Judith Summers. It’s an autobiographical story about her dog George who she bought as a companion after losing her husband. I didn’t understand a lot of it as a child - I’d mostly just gotten it because there was a dog on the cover - but there was something within it that made me reread it a few times.

As a teenager I sort of attached myself to books like The Bell Jar and the Virgin Suicides. I felt it was very important to have books that were physical reminders - I was Girl in Pain. Very overdramatic, but great books.

TPQ: Favourite Childhood author?

KR: Jacqueline Wilson. No one was doing it like she was.

TPQ: First book to really own you?

KR: I have two - Sweetbitter by Stephanie Danler and The Vegetarian by Han Kang. I read The Vegetarian as part of my university studies and was completely enraptured by it. It’s this incredible story about a woman who refuses to eat meat after she has a nightmare, but ends up devolving into some kind of psychosis. It’s told through the perspective of three other people - two of them being men in her life, and I think it’s such a stunning piece on womanhood and the use and abuse of the body as the last element of control over oneself.


Sweetbitter follows a 22 year old young woman moving to New York City from rural Ohio. She gets a job at this really upscale restaurant where everything is fast paced and everyone is on drugs. She meets this mysterious bartender and a senior server who are completely wrapped in one another, pseudo-incestuous, and she wants desperately to be part of their little private world. It’s just this fantastic exploration of food and the senses, sex, the subtle impact of child abuse. I recommend both these books to everyone.

TPQ: Favourite male and female author?

KR: Stephanie Danler, Donna Tartt, Louise Kennedy, Megan Nolan, Sylvia Plath, Han Kang, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie - the list of female authors is endless.

Male authors I’m more hesitant towards after publicly admitting to liking Neil Gaiman pre-exposé. I like Arthur Miller’s work, George Orwell, Simon Stephens, Gabriel García Márquez.

TPQ: A preference for fact or fiction?

KR: I do tend to lean more towards fiction, but I’ve been reading quite a lot of non-fiction recently. Say Nothing by Patrick Radden Keefe, The Widow Clicquot by Tilar J. Mazzeo etc.

TPQ: Biography, autobiography or memoir that most impressed you?

KR: I read a few autobiographies when I was younger purely because I recognised the faces on the front. Miley Cyrus, Miranda Hart etc, but I wouldn’t say they stuck in my mind. I recently read a sort of memoir/biography based on the personal letters of Lord Byron, which was fascinating. Odd man.

TPQ: Any author or book you point blank refuse to read?

KR: Rowling. I read some as a child but I won’t give a second more attention to someone who disregards and vilifies an identity.

TPQ: A book to share with somebody so that they would more fully understand you?

KR: Stray by Stephanie Danler.


TPQ: Last book you gave as a present?

KR: The two favourites I mentioned earlier, both to the same friend.

TPQ: Book you would most like to see turned into a movie?

KR: That’s a hard one. There’s a few I’d like to see turned into films, but only if I’m starring in them and I get to pick who I star alongside. Anthony Boyle, call me.

TPQ: The just must - select one book you simply have to read before you close the final page on life.

KR: A book answering every question I’ve ever had in my life. Failing that, I suppose I’d like to read something I’ve actually ended up writing and publishing.

⏩Kate Rice is a peace baby.

Booker's Dozen 📚 Kate Rice

Lynx By Ten To The Power Of One Thousand Nine Hundred And Fifty Two

 

A Morning Thought @ 3126

Christopher Owens 🎵 with the 61sth in his Predominance series.

"We’re gonna die when the sun comes up. We'll drink until we drop/My blood is 100 proof...I’d rather drink than fuck”  -  Gang Green

Horns up 

New Horizons


dalek - Brilliance of a Falling Moon

Nearly 30 years on, the Newark hip-hop duo continue to put out noisy, abrasive and hard-hitting records. Obviously directing their ire at the Trump administration, ICE and the general state of America in the 21st century, dalek remind us that hip-hop is protest music. ‘Normalised Tragedy’ is the standout number here.

The album can be streamed and purchased here.

Corrosion of Conformity – Good God/Baad Man

For their first record since the death of drummer Reed Mullin and the departure of bassist Mike Dean, COC have given us an eclectic mix of punk/hardcore, southern style metal and nods to the likes of ZZ Top and Grand Funk Railroad, all delivered with a knowing wink to their fanbase. A bit odd, but it works.

Golden Oldies


Hawkwind - The Friday Rock Show Sessions

Recorded at the (then) unhip Reading Festival in 1986, this BBC recording finds Hawkwind in grand form. Although more akin to hard rock/metal then their classic space rock sound, the driving rhythms are still in place and the visceral appeal cannot be denied. Lemmy joining them for ‘Silver Machine’ is the cherry on top.



The Fall – Fall Heads Roll

After the critical success of 2003’s ‘Real New Fall LP’, Mark E. Smith and co delivered the first truly brilliant Fall album of the 21st century. The garage riffing on ‘What About Us’ and ‘Youwanner’ is inspired, ‘Blindness’ grooves like a bastard and the cover of The Move’s ‘I Can Hear the Grass Grow’ is genuinely sweet.



⏩ Christopher Owens was a reviewer for Metal Ireland and finds time to study the history and inherent contradictions of Ireland. He is currently the TPQ Friday columnist and is the author of A Vortex of Securocrats and “dethrone god”.

Predominance 62

Open Democracy ★ Written by Sian Norris and Nic Murray.

Exclusive: Experts demand answers as we reveal prison staff increasingly use force to deal with mental health

Women in English prisons are being increasingly handcuffed, restrained or subjected to “pain-inducing techniques” by staff, including while pregnant or during hospital examinations, openDemocracy can reveal.

Prison guards’ use of force against women more than doubled in three years, rising from 3,268 incidents in 2021/22 to 6,932 in 2024/25, according to data we obtained from His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) under Freedom of Information laws. The government says such measures should be used only as “a last resort”.

Instances where a woman was physically restrained, which could include her being held face down to the floor, rose by 70% over that time period, while handcuff usage rose by 264%, from 502 occasions to 1,826.

“Use of force” against pregnant women also increased, with 11 cases in 2024/25. It is not clear from the data whether this includes non-contact interventions such as positive communication, and HMPPS refused to answer questions on this, although such techniques would usually fall under “de-escalation” rather than “use of force”. 

Continue @ Open Democracy.

Restrained, Handcuffed And In Pain 🪶 Use Of Force In Women’s Prisons Doubles

Gearóid Ó Loingsigh ☭ writing in Substack on 23-April-2026..

Foto: GOL, Nariño, Colombia

A new president will take power next August 7th. It is expected that it will be Iván Cepeda, though his victory is not in the bag yet. There is still a chance the extreme right-winger De La Espriella, the lawyer for the corrupt, drug barons and paramilitaries, may win. In the case of Cepeda being the new president the deadlock in the dialogues between the insurgency of the ELN and the state may be solved. In such a situation the drugs issues will once again be spoken of.

We already know from his repeated statements on the issue that the president, Gustavo Petro knows nothing about it. Time and again he has said things that are just simply not true, a subject I have dealt with in previous articles.[1] In July 2022, the ELN made a public declaration on drug trafficking and their disassociation from the industry, reproducing a letter sent to the Global Commission on Drugs Policy.[2] This commission argues for a human rights focus and changes in the paradigm preferring regulation over prohibition and it also argues for harm reduction amongst consumers. It is made up of former presidents, including those of Colombia, such as Juan Manuel Santos (2010-2018) and Cesar Gaviria (1990-1994) whose neoliberal policies played a decisive role in the expansion of illicit crops in the country. It is also includes the former president of Brazil Fernando Henrique Cardoso (1995-2002) and former diplomats and businessmen like Richard Branson, a topic I will deal with further on.[3] At that time the ELN made various proposal on criminal policy, health and other things without any deep development of them. Recently the ELN once again made its position on drug trafficking public. As was to be expected they disassociated themselves from the issue and once again stated that it was not the position of the ELN to be involved in any of the stages of the production and commercialisation of cocaine. Thus far fine, but the document contains various statements that are problematic in terms of understanding the issue of drug trafficking. It asserts that:

Drug trafficking is one of the main economic activities that guarantees a widespread reproduction of capital, with high rates of profit and is totally controlled by the USA and its three international agencies, DEA, CIA and FBI. Furthermore, the USA has proclaimed itself to be the supreme judge to issue moral verdicts on drug trafficking that allows them to condemn, certify or absolve people or countries according to their economic, political or military interests.[4]

Without doubt illicit drugs are an important industry and play a role in the world economy, but its weight should not be exaggerated. Drug trafficking represents less than 1% of world GDP. As the UN points out in its World Drugs Report“Although the largest illegal incomes from drug trafficking are generated in destination markets, they only represent a small proportion of the national economies of relatively high-income countries.”[5] Less than 0.5% in the case of Europe, and in some cases it even contributes less than interdiction efforts or treatment.

Of course there are regions where it has greater weight. For example in Afghanistan, drug trafficking accounted for 25% of GDP in 2023(Between USD 4.6 and 5.9 billion).[6] The legal drugs market, however, is larger than that of illicit ones. If we are talking about the accumulation of wealth the pharmaceutical sector moves more money globally and the development of its products is subsidised when not wholly financed by the states and they receive a patent on the product that eliminates or substantially reduces competition depending on the pharmaceutical. In 2023, the sales of pharmaceuticals amounted to USD, 1.6 trillion compared to around USD 650 billion from illicit drugs with a profit rate of between 40% and 90% depending on the pharmaceutical.[7] It is worth pointing out that given that it is an illegal industry and clandestine the figures for the illicit drugs are calculations and there are differences between the sources cited, but in general terms they all indicate that the legal industries are many times more larger than the illegal industries.

Another industry that is very profitable and a lot more so than drug trafficking are the arms industries and military expenditure. In 1961, General Eisenhower retired from public life passing the presidency on to Kennedy. In his farewell speech he warned about the rise of what he termed the military industrial complex.[8] But he was no pacifist and he was not opposed to arming nor using weapons, but he looked on with concern at the development of that industry. Nowadays, a modern Eisenhower would have to say that we have reached the point he feared. Global military spending in 2025 was USD 2.63 trillion. Of that the USA represented USD 921 billion, China 531.4 billion, Russia 523.6 billion followed by Germany with 107.3 billion and Great Britain with 94.3 billion. The military GDP is equivalent to the GDP of all the countries of Africa combined. Extreme poverty could be ended with just over 10% of that. It is clear that the war industry is the main one and just like the pharmaceutical one it receives juicy subsidies and state contracts.

The businesspeople of the world, including drug traffickers and the banks that launder their assets take part in that industry. Not only do the capitalists of the powerful countries do so, but also almost those from nearly all countries in the world. Colombia is not an exception to that. In 2024, Petro’s government allocated USD 7.73 billion for military expenditure and USD 8.09 billion in 2025, representing about 1.9% of GDP, far from the contribution of illicit drugs. It is worth pointing out that despite the existence of the state company Indumil, Colombia buys its most expensive weapons such as planes and boats and does not manufacture them. Though Petro has begun to change that. And this brings us to the role and contribution of drug trafficking in Colombia’s GDP. According to the ELN:

In Colombia due to a policy decision of the state drug trafficking became the main economic activity (bold not in original) and being the main global exporter of cocaine it has fused the main national economic business groups with transnational capital and finances the paramilitaries to carry out the antisubversive war and state terrorism.[9]

Let’s start with the easiest part which is actually true. Yes, it is true that drugs trafficking financed paramilitarism in Colombia. It an historical fact and I would say, a current one that cannot be denied. Though it is not clear what the ELN means by the expression “a decision of state policy” and how it made drug trafficking the main economic activity in the country, nor how it fused national economic groups with international capital, other than criminal groups. The insertion of the Colombian bourgeoisie in the world economy is an historic constant, it is neither new nor recent. Of course, Cesar Gaviria’s economic aperture of 1992 accelerated and strengthened it. But to say that drug trafficking is the main economic activity of the country, makes no sense. It is an important economic activity. But the Colombian economy is more diverse than drug trafficking. The illicit drugs industry represents 4.2% of Colombian GDP. It is very important, but when we compare it to other sectors of the economy, we see that the ELN does not take into account the most basic data on the issue. Its contribution has varied over time. As Portafolio reported.

For Daniel Mejía, professor of the Andes University, the impact of this reality is that the weight of drug trafficking in the Colombian economy is more than 4%, an historic high. “ In 2008 that proportion was equivalent to 2.3% of GDP and five years later it fell to its lowest point, 1.2%.[10]

Moreover, according to the DANE (National Administrative Statistical Department), the information and communications sector contributes 4.22% of real GDP, manufacturing industries 19.03%, and commerce, transport, hotel and food sector 34%. The ELN’s analysis of the role of drug trafficking in the economy is cursory, perhaps because it is just a declaration, but it is completely wrong.

Foto: GOL, Sur de Bolívar, Colombia.

Amongst the sloganeering statements is the conspiranoic vision that the drugs industry is “totally controlled by the USA and its three main transnational agencies: DEA, CIA and FBI”. It has been more than proven the times these agencies have taken part in the drugs trade such as the Iran-Contra scandal, or the tolerance of opium when the Taliban were the USA’s friends, or the de facto acceptance of the laundering of assets and the lack of punishment for the same when the banks are caught red handed. They go no further than just fining them. The fines are significant but are a minor percentage of all the money laundered. Amongst the banks fined for money laundering are Credit Suisse USD 536 million in 2009; Barclays USD 298 million in 2010; ING USD 619 million in 2012,; Standard Chartered USD 330 million in 2012 and a further USD 1,1 billion in 2019; BNP Paribas USD 8.9 billion in 2014 and Deutsche Bank USD 258 million in 2015.[11] I do not discount the role of the industry and sectors of the US capitalist class or the state itself, but to go from that to declaring that the industry is 100% controlled by the US government is saying a lot. For example, ecstasy, or MDMA as it is technically known, is manufactured in the Netherlands and Belgium , both members of the European Union and also NATO. Does the USA control that production? Furthermore, 86% of seized precursor chemicals used in the manufacture of ecstasy were confiscated in the Netherlands, many of them stolen in Germany according to the European Union Drugs Agency.[12] Almost all the acids used in the manufacture of cocaine in Colombia come from Germany. Does the USA control that also?

One last aspect of the declaration is that “the USA has proclaimed itself as the supreme judge to issue moral verdicts on drug trafficking that allows them to condemn, certify or absolve people or countries according to their economic, political or military interests.” Without a doubt it acts in this manner, it is beyond dispute, except that it does so under the cover of international treaties from the United Nations itself, such as the Single Convention of 1961, the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971, and the Vienna Convention of 1988 i.e. it is the UN which gives the US power to take measures against drug trafficking and although the USA is the most powerful country that exercises that power and it is the largest market for many (though not all) drugs, it is not by far the only country in the world that takes steps, though it is the only one that attacks and kills in the war on drugs. Other countries take measures against individuals, companies etc. Of course the difference is that the US does it as part of its domestic and foreign policy and as a measure to bring pressure to bear on issues not related to drug trafficking, but at all times it does so under the auspices of international treaties and the UN.

The ELN proposals regarding what to do are better, though they are brief. The ELN proposes a break with the prohibitionist model and to treat the problem as a public health issue, just like many organisations around the world call for. They also argue for a non-criminal treatment for other links in the production chain and talk of crop substitution. Some organisations and social-democrat NGOs have questioned the state’s crop substitution model. The peasant did not get the wrong crop and some NGOs acknowledge this and make proposals on the issue. However, they ignore a large part of the problem: neoliberalism. One of the problems with substitution is that it seeks to locate the peasant within the global economy as a supplier of prime materials, i.e. they seek to deepen the process that bankrupted the countryside in the first place and that the country be a pantry of exotic crops for Europe and the US: the cash crops of all the Colombian governments, including Petro’s.

It would seem the ELN is not thinking along those lines as it asks to bring forward “substitution plans with products from each region” whilst Petro seeks to promote cash crops. It would be interesting for the ELN to develop this aspect of their proposal, as after more than 60 years in the mountains, it cannot settle for a brief statement. The FARC with all their arrogance went into negotiate an accord whose point four dealt with the issue of drugs. Its accord was dreadful and negotiated behind closed doors. If the ELN is serious it has to have a serious debate with data and analysis and detailed proposals and to do that they have to choose better interlocutors than that so called Global Commission. Within its ranks are criminals chosen from amongst the governors of the world and high ranking functionaries such as the deceased General Secretary of the UN, Kofi Annan i.e. those who implemented the prohibitionist regime that the ELN criticises. It is not a real commission, but rather a group of former diplomats and politicians seeking relevance in the world. Talking to them is like talking to the states. It would be more interesting to talk to organisations and bodies that have actually criticised the war on drugs. Also one of the current commissioners is the controversial billionaire Richard Branson, a man of no ethics and a privatiser of the health system in Great Britain. He is not exactly a person who argues for treating the drugs issue as a public health issue as his record is to seek to generate private profit from health problems in the world. The sum of the value of his contracts with the health system in Great Britain runs into the billions of pounds.[13]

This NGO is not a valid partner, it is a commission of capitalists that want to influence the debate on drugs in an attempt to define where the debate goes and guarantee the participation of private capital in any proposal for change. They want to ensure that any change to the prohibitionist regime is profitable. It is undignified that the ELN has a relationship with them and not other bodies that are concerned about people’s welfare and not the profits of private companies.

It is a poor proposal , but one that they are in time to make a better one that is serious, rigorous and is worth discussing. How drug trafficking is characterised is important as it influences the proposals for change, who you talk to and on what basis. The participation of civil society cannot include people like Branson nor former Colombian presidents such as Santos and Gaviria.

References

[1] For example, see Ó Loingsigh, G. (23/09/2023) Fentanyl, Coca and Drug Policy. 

[2] ELN (2022) Propuesta para una política antidrogas 

[3] See.

[4] ELN (2026) Para la superación del narcotráfico. 

[5] UN (2025) Key Findings World Drug Report 2025. UN. Vienna. p.82 

[6] Ibíd.

[7] Capital Cell (07/04/2025) Big Pharma vs. the Drug Cartels. Daniel Oliver. 

[8] See his speech at en 

[9] Capital Cell Op. Cit.

[10] Portafolio (02/06/2024) Análisis: ¿cuánto representa el narcotráfico en la economía colombiana en el 2024?. Ricardo Ávila. 

[11] Investopedia (12/10/2025) HSBC Money Laundering Scandal: A Case Study in Compliance Failures. Marc L. Ross. 

[12] EUDA (2025) Overview of MDMA production in Europe. 

[13] See.

⏩ Gearóid Ó Loingsigh is a political and human rights activist with extensive experience in Latin America.

Drugs, Peace And The Economy 🪶 A Critique Of The ELN

Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)