Dr John Coulter  The bitter medicine which we Royalists have to swallow is that the Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor situation has landed the entire institution of the British Monarchy into a crisis. 

It has all become tarred with the same brush.

Those folk in society who want the United Kingdom to become a republic with a president rather than a king to be a head of state are having a field day with the debacle which has enveloped the former Prince Andrew, the younger brother of King Charles III.

Could it be a case of history repeating itself on a number of fronts? Previous monarchs called Charles have had a poor history. Charles the First was executed following the bloody English Civil War when Britain became a commonwealth.

Following the Restoration of the Monarchy a few decades later, Charles II was such a poor king, he sowed the seeds of doom in terms of English succession, and paved the way for King William III, aka King Billy, to come from Holland and restore order.

While the current King Charles III is doing his level best to wash his hands of any alleged activities or scandal caused by Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the bitter reality which the Royal Family must face, is that the entire institution of the Monarchy has become tainted by the Epstein saga.

Whilst there has been much talk in Northern Ireland of the need to reform the Stormont institutions, could this atmosphere of reforming seep across the Irish Sea to mainland Britain with a growing desire to see the Monarchy itself reformed?

The United Kingdom boasts one of the most high profile Monarchies in the world compared to the profile and position of other Royal Families across the globe.

Put bluntly, perhaps the time has come for the Royals to take urgent action and for King Charles III to break the supposed ‘curse of the Charles’ and abdicate to make way for his eldest son, Prince William, to ascend to the Throne with the latter’s wife, as Queen Catherine, alongside him?

I don’t have much time politically for former Labour PM Tony Blair, but he has to be given credit for calling William’s mother, Diana, the ‘People’s Princess’ after her tragic death in the Paris road crash in the late 1990s.

As a life-long Royalist, I have always remained a so-called ‘Diana Loyalist’, believing she was the Queen we never had.

Granted, since Diana’s tragic death, public relations gurus have burned the midnight oil to rebrand the former Mrs Camilla Parker-Bowles as a future queen.

Since the death of Queen Elizabeth II, that campaign has been in hyper-drive to ensure that the concept of ‘Queen Camilla’ becomes part of the Royal furniture at Buckingham Palace.

Whilst ardent republicans want to see an end to the Monarchy, some of us so-called ‘Diana Loyalists’ want to see ‘Queen Camilla’ replaced as soon as possible by a Queen Catherine.

The Royal brand of William and Kate has stood the test of time. They have three wonderful children, and Kate has coped admirably with her cancer challenge. They are the future of the Monarchy and the sooner they are given that opportunity to reign, the better.

I don’t wish the current King Charles III any harm, but if he is blessed with the same longevity as his late mother and grandmother, the late Queen Mother, William - like his dad Charles - could be near pension age before he is crowned in the aftermath of Charles’ death.

Put equally bluntly, William should not be waiting on dead man’s shoes before he is handed the Royal crown.

Like it or not, the alleged activities and notoriety of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have placed the Monarchy in a 1930s-style abdication scenario when the then King Edward VIII abdicated to allow him to marry his American divorcee lover Wallis Simpson.

The Royal Family simply cannot afford to hide away in their homes, palaces and castles and pretend to carry on as if nothing has happened. The Firm, as it is affectionately known, needs to take drastic action before any current Labour administration at Westminster passes legislation which reforms the Monarchy into a European-style, lowkey institution.

A King Billy saved the British Monarchy from disaster in the late 17th century. A new King Billy is urgently needed to perform the same saving manoeuvre in the latter years of this decade.  

Follow Dr John Coulter on Twitter @JohnAHCoulter
John is a Director for Belfast’s Christian radio station, Sunshine 1049 FM. 

King Billy Needed To Save The Monarchy!

Lynx By Ten To The Power Of One Thousand Nine Eight Hundred And Ninety Eight

 

A Morning Thought @ 3074

Anthony McIntyre 🎥 My daughter recommended we watch this blend of sci-fi and psychological thriller.

She had previously viewed it in the cinema and explained that it was essentially a body horror movie - not a concept I was familiar with until I watched it - that satirically eviscerates the American entertainment industry.

The elixir of youth, much like the Philosopher's Stone of Indiana Jones fame, has for aeons found itself being pursued by a posse of age averse death evaders. The elixir unlike the stone has remained beyond reach although it has not dampened the enthusiasm for the search parties eager to hold back death anxiety.

Demi Moore is Elizabeth Sparkle and puts in a sparkling performance. Acting non-sexual nude scenes at 60 showed a robust character, not in the slightest deterred by her equally naked, and equally brilliant, co-actress Margaret Qually, thirty years her junior. A long time star, age became a hindrance to Elizabeth because of the demands of her boss, Harvey (a telling choice of name). His interest in Elizabeth began to wane as her marketability began to wither. She was replaced as the face of a popular television morning aerobics show. Having lived with fame and face recognition for so much of her life, she was alarmed at the void opening up in front of her, a fame-free future, once Harvey told her that her presence on the Hollywood Walk of Fame was superfluous to requirement. 

Anxious and anguished, not quite ready to walk off the stage, with the termination notice to the fore of her mind, her drive through city streets leads to her finding herself distracted by her image being erased from a billboard. In the second it took her to glance away she lost control of her vehicle. The camera work from inside the car was done with aplomb, causing more than one wince and a gasp in the living room, as Ms Sparkle was thrown around like a rag doll. Suddenly it seemed the light might be going out in her life. 

No more Ms Sparkle was avoided by good luck, which was explained to her by the hospital doctor who fortunately gave her the all-clear before telling her that his wife loved her TV show. Not so fortunately, the male nurse examining her gave her information about The Substance that could change her life. With the sparkle having gone out of her career thanks to the avarice of Harvey, the chance to reignite the flame of fame was too much of an allure. Seemingly on the up . . . so began her descent into Hell.

The Substance is a green liquid that restores youthful vitality but it can only work via the emergence of a new person. A secular version of the biblical myth where a woman is created from a rib, the only concession to feminism lies in the figurative rib from which Sue was created belonging to Elizabeth. The profiteering suppliers of The Substance explain that there are not two people but one. If the viewer can grasp the Catholic theological Blessed Trinity idea they can get their head around Elizabeth and Sue being the same person existing in two bodies.

Success in a cutthroat world inevitably sees someone's throat cut. Failure for somebody is invariably the price of success for someone else. The younger Sue soars while the older Elizabeth sinks. Feast of fame for one, famine of fading for the other, the inevitable internal conflict is set in motion.

The script could have been written by Stephen King, not just because of the horror dimension - while the supernatural is not at work in the film, The Dark Half invites comparisons - but because of the cut throat rat race that defines US capitalism into which King sketched a window with The Running Man, under the pseudonym Richard Bachmann. Parallels may also be found in the sporting world where performance enhancing drugs have at times caused a very corrosive effect on authentic competition. The final part of the two and half hour movie has echoes of Marry Shelley's Frankenstein. A movie, not of the horror genre but which serves up horror nonetheless.

Written and directed by French filmmaker Coralie Fargeat, The Substance is a film of the Me Too era, a pushback against the Harvey ilk of this world who denigrate and destroy in their own rapacious race to the top that sends so many others spiralling to the bottom. Those who are singularly committed to the objectification of women and reduce them to mere chattel are not the heroes of this film. No heroines emerge either, just women crushed by the relentless lust of the male gaze. A sad denouement where Fargeat plants a thought in the minds of her viewers as to how such an ugly industry ever became known as the beauty industry.

Follow on Bluesky.

The Substance

Event   ★ A Hands Of Iran Protest will take place tomorrow in Dublin.

Date: 2-March-2026

Time: 1800

Venue: The Spire 


Hands Off Iran

Friendly Atheist A new analysis shows how Republicans are increasingly embracing religious extremism while abandoning constitutional principles.

The Republican Party is rapidly becoming a Christian Nationalist organization, according to a new analysis from PRRI. The polling group found that while about one-third of Americans are “adherents” or “sympathizers” of Christian Nationalism, the number jumps to 56% among Republicans.

It’s a sign that the GOP will continue ignoring the Constitution and church/state separation while doubling down on the false beliefs that we were founded as a “Christian nation” and should be governed by whatever conservative claim are Christian values. I would add that these same people have no problem ignoring the blatant rejection of those values by their own political leaders, whether we’re talking about affairs, corruption, or whatever else Ken Paxton is up to today. And that’s before we even get into how all these people are attempting to brush aside the Epstein-Trump Scandal.

The percentages of Americans who support or reject Christian Nationalism have held relatively steady for the past few years. But because it’s becoming more possible to live in your own reality bubble, we can now see precisely where the extremism is fomenting. 

Christian Nationalism Has Captured The Republican Party

Lynx By Ten To The Power Of One Thousand Nine Eight Hundred And Ninety Seven

Right Wing Watch 👀 Written by Peter Montgomery.


President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address this week was widely recognized as a marathon of lies and gaslighting—but not by his friends at Intercessors for America, who continued their relentless marketing of all things Trump with a new “prayer guide” that functions as a long press release that unquestioningly affirms the claims Trump made in his speech.

The IFA document basically lists Trump talking points—for example, “Tariffs ended other countries ripping off America”—and links them to prayers and passages from the Bible. An email to IFA’s prayer warriors promoting the new prayer guide says the State of the Union included “plenty of answered prayers.” It linked to video of the speech for anyone who missed it. The guide praises Trump’s assertions about a religious renewal, adding, “Thank You for this administration that openly honors and glorifies Your name.”

Intercessors for America runs the White House Prayer Team, which also pushes Trump administration propaganda to conservative Christian pastors and activists. IFA is closely allied with Paula White’s National Faith Advisory Board, which does the same via emails and webinars for Trump-aligned religious leaders and gatherings like last week’s Unleashed conference. 

Trump’s Prayer Warriors Promote State Of The Union Propaganda

Lynx By Ten To The Power Of One Thousand Nine Eight Hundred And Ninety Six

 

Pastords @ 33

 

A Morning Thought @ 3073

Anthony McIntyre  More Israeli violence in the Middle East, when yesterday the most Nazi-like regime in the region bombed Iran. 

Its leader, wanted by the international Criminal Court as a suspect in a war crimes investigation, is backed by the military might of another leader who a month or so ago was given to hissy fits because the Nobel Peace Prize had not been bestowed on him in recognition of the wars he has either threatened or been involved in. Yet not enough Americans consider it an imperative to change the president, content instead to change his diaper. 

Israel is considered a vital strategic partner to the US in the Middle East. Former president, Joe Biden has been consistent in his assessment first made in 1986 that “Were there not an Israel, the United States of America would have to invent an Israel to protect her interest in the region.”. His reason for opposing the sale of arms to the Saudis four decades ago was because they could not fulfil Whitehouse strategic ambitions to serve as “agents of .U.S interests in the Persian Gulf region.” He brazenly cited the “naked self-interest of the U.S.”

Biden perhaps as a child was denied by his parents the opportunity of watching the movie, Frankenstein. It would have alerted him to the dangers of creating monsters. More likely, he did watch it and found the concept of monster-making a great idea, earning for himself the moniker Genocide Joe as a result.

Either way we are left with the monstrosity that is Israel, a settler-colonial, apartheid, racist regime. From the US perspective, it is considered good realpolitik for genocidal Israel to have a nuclear bomb but not theocratic Iran. 

If the US was a force for good in the world it would have bombed Tel Aviv not Tehran. However, bombing to stop or disrupt genocide is not something the US routinely does. It refused to bomb Rwanda in 1994 to disrupt the Hutu Power genocide of the Tutsis. It bombed Laos and Cambodia in 1970 with genocidal ferocity. In 1945 it bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the same dark spirit, which again is casting a dark shadow across the world as the global community sees the hand of the doomsday clock move towards the midnight hour. 

When we consider the bellicose nature of Israel, the most warlike state on the planet, there is a logic overflowing from the observation made last year by the American columnist Ted Rall:

As a political entity, Israel is a witch. Its conduct is incompatible with 21st-century civilization. To whatever extent it ever had one, Israel no longer has a right to exist.

While averse to any suggestion that the citizens of Israel should be subjected to the type of barbarism that the Palestinians have endured, it must be asserted that no state has an automatic right to remain in existence particularly when it is in perpetual violation of international law and norms. Apart from Justin Barrett, there seems to be a general scarcity of people making the news because of their insistence that the state of Nazi Germany should have been be allowed to continue in existence. 

Given the breadth of support within Israel for genocide and crimes against humanity it seems impossible to envision de-nazifying Israeli society as a workable alternative to the dismantling of the state of Israel. In the interests of world peace, its statehood has to be rendered obsolete.

For now, skip the pretence that the US supports Israel because it is the only democratic regime in the Middle East. It is the only genocidal regime in the Middle East but that is not why the US supports it. It supports it out of its own strategic interests. For people like ourselves in the Drogheda Stands With Palestine group, until this marriage made in hell is dissolved, to cite The Conversation, 'the U.S.-Israel relationship will remain “ironclad” and Palestinians will continue to pay the price."

Follow on Bluesky.

Making Monsters