tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807238897188927967.post885195281996593257..comments2024-03-29T06:51:03.388+00:00Comments on TPQ: Buyer BewareAMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00559413440743290550noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807238897188927967.post-70032484636567613482015-06-27T17:57:41.731+01:002015-06-27T17:57:41.731+01:00Eddie,
what you are really saying is that where p...Eddie,<br /><br />what you are really saying is that where people like Detective French were involved in interrogations their word about the outcome is not worth a hill of beans and this has been demonstrated in other court cases, the knowledge of which should be shared widely. <br /><br />People interested in the period should read Cruel Britannia by Ian Cobain. He claims that MI5 bugged the AMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00559413440743290550noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807238897188927967.post-77841284089686853292015-06-27T12:16:04.520+01:002015-06-27T12:16:04.520+01:00AM
The name of both detectives were mentioned thr...AM <br />The name of both detectives were mentioned throughout the mccartney/mcdermott appeal judgement and the reason for the appeal being allowed.<br /><br />Similarly in the UK many convictions have been overturned because of the activities of the infamous West midlands police detectives. Thoses detectives went on a crusade after being given blance carte in respect of the Birmingham 6 case. eddiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16025554963518660658noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807238897188927967.post-31827588574309282012015-06-27T11:59:09.695+01:002015-06-27T11:59:09.695+01:00Eddie,
his name can be mentioned. The problem wou...Eddie,<br /><br />his name can be mentioned. The problem would only lie in stating he had a conviction for it if he hadn't (and was actually found not guilty). That I fear would give him a leverage (if he is still alive). The wider point you are making is valid and needs to be made as it complements Diplock Court's point. Let's face it we are not talking about a guy that respected theAMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00559413440743290550noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807238897188927967.post-38770303732359431022015-06-27T11:42:22.093+01:002015-06-27T11:42:22.093+01:00AM,
I will check that out, now that you prick my m...AM,<br />I will check that out, now that you prick my memory, it might be the assaulted prisoner won a court case that he was assaulted and was awarded damages (as opposed to somebody being awarded damages without liabilty being admitted)and maybe the detective wasnt actually convicted. Whether he was convicted or not the import, thrust and principal of the point I was making is still nonethelesseddiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16025554963518660658noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807238897188927967.post-16809407866247681202015-06-27T11:04:24.454+01:002015-06-27T11:04:24.454+01:00Eddie,
we need a reference showing the convictio...Eddie, <br /><br />we need a reference showing the conviction for assault you refer to. Without it and if the assailant is still alive, he may well take us to court. There are citations of a prima facie case but not that we can find up to now of a convictionAMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00559413440743290550noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807238897188927967.post-9943772376562378832015-06-27T00:34:17.737+01:002015-06-27T00:34:17.737+01:00Dixie
Eddie has a point. Flash McVeigh is/was so...Dixie<br /><br />Eddie has a point. Flash McVeigh is/was some sort of 'special advocate' for coiste I gave him solid evidence on a crown prosecutor and suggested that he should find out how many other questionable cases there might be involving the same prosecutor, and then make one solid case against that prosecutor --McVeigh's response was to blow me off and tell me that coiste Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807238897188927967.post-38703686055755343812015-06-26T22:14:10.721+01:002015-06-26T22:14:10.721+01:00Dixie, if it helps, certain people didnt prove tha...Dixie, if it helps, certain people didnt prove that they were brutalised into making incriminating statements. What was proven was that those police who had interviewed them had been found guilty of assaulting another prisoner in police custody. Now the shocking thing about this is, if the names of the peelers convicted of the police custody prisoner had been made widely known then other eddiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16025554963518660658noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807238897188927967.post-72253984094954126652015-06-26T21:17:52.975+01:002015-06-26T21:17:52.975+01:00Good piece Dixie - if people don't see through...Good piece Dixie - if people don't see through it by now ...AMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00559413440743290550noreply@blogger.com